
‘It's a death sentence': US health insurance system is failing, say doctors
American doctors are accusing US health insurance giants of causing deadly delays to vital medical procedures and care – and putting profits ahead of their patients' health.
Firms including United Healthcare have denied basic scans, and taken months to reconsider, according to physicians who spoke to the Guardian.
'There's good evidence that these kinds of delays literally kill people,' said Dr Ed Weisbart, former chief medical officer for Express Scripts, one of the largest prescription benefits managers in the US. 'For some people, this isn't just an inconvenience and an annoyance and an aggravation.
'It's a death sentence, and the only reason the insurance companies do that is to maximize their profits. The fact that they might be killing you is not in the equation of what they care about.'
Americans spend the most on healthcare in the industrialized world – an estimated $4.9tn in 2023 – but have the worst health outcomes, according to analysis by the Commonwealth Fund.
The fatal shooting of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson last month prompted an outpouring of public anger toward the healthcare industry. While private insurers report billions in profits every year, many patients – and their doctors – struggle to navigate a complex financial system to get what they need.
Lobbyists for the insurance firms insist they are 'working to protect' people from higher costs, and stress that everyone in the space, including doctors, are responsible for making the US healthcare system care more affordable and easier to navigate.
But in a series of interviews, medical professionals described their frustration with a powerful industry which had prevented them from helping patients.
Dr Cheryl Kunis, a board member at the Physicians for a National Health Program and nephrologist in New York City, still thinks about what happened when one of her patients needed a PET scan. He had a tumor, and before deciding on how to treat it, Kunis and her colleagues wanted to establish if it had spread.
'The surgeon was very honest that he only wanted to operate if the tumor was localized, and without the PET scan, he really would not be able to make that decision,' said Kunis. 'The surgeon and his office, as well as my office, spent hours on the phone. We were speaking to somebody who was sitting at UnitedHealthcare in front of a computer screen who was really not knowledgeable on the underlying medical problem or the test that we are asking for the patient to have.'
After an initial denial, the patient's appeal for the scan was ultimately approved six months later. By that the time, the patient had died.
'We assume that if he had been diagnosed earlier, he may have been able to do better,' said Kunis. 'There's no way of proving it, but there was a reasonable chance he would have been in better shape had there not been a six-month delay in getting the scan.'
The healthcare system is 'just really stuck in this terrible, vicious circle', she said, 'of prices constantly going up, lack of regulation and the insurance companies unfortunately having leverage over the patients who are trying to receive the care'.
Health insurance companies often require 'peer to peer' reviews, where doctors are required to speak with a medical representative from a health insurance company to justify treatment. But the insurance representatives are often far less experienced, according to physicians who spoke to The Guardian, and may not even have training in the specific field they are weighing in on.
'When I have engaged in 'peer to peer' review, the peer is never a physician that has my training,' said Dr Philip Verhoef, an Intensive Care Unit physician based in Honolulu, Hawaii, and former president of Physicians for a National Health Program. 'It's kind of a farce to even call it 'peer to peer'. I've never had a 'peer to peer' conversation that was actually with a real peer.'
Instead, the representatives are 'second-guessing our judgment as clinicians', he claimed. 'To be totally clear, I don't have a financial incentive to admit patients to the ICU. It's both demoralizing and insulting when a bureaucrat somewhere looks at a submitted claim from the hospital and says, 'The decision to admit to the ICU was wrong.''
Verhoef said he often sees patients coming into the intensive care unit for preventable illnesses caused by health insurance company denials, such as refusing to cover required medication, like insulin, or an inhaler for asthma.
Sign up to Headlines US
Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
after newsletter promotion
'When people need to use their private health insurance, it actually fails them,' he added. 'Insurance is supposed to be there to cover you from financial calamity, when unfortunate things happen, and the current system that we have based on private health insurance has really failed everyone. I don't think that we're going to regulate our way out of this mess.'
Much of the friction patients encounter when seeking medical care or assistance is fundamental to the insurance firms' business models, according to Weisbart. 'They don't care about you, and they see you as an expense, not someone whose health needs to be improved,' he said. 'The healthier you are, the more they want you to have them as their insurance, and the sicker you are, the more comfortable they are with you being dissatisfied with them and searching for a different insurance company.
'Once they have that money, every time somebody has to get health care, that's just an expense that they don't want to let go of.'
The insurance industry's profits revolve around delaying and denying medical care, Weisbart claimed. 'When they delay your care by a day, by a week, by a month or totally deny it, it's not a random event,' he said. 'It's a calculated business strategy to maximize their profits.'
Many doctors have recently expressed similar issues with private insurers. Physicians are 'forced to become insurance experts on top of our medical expertise, spending countless hours on paperwork instead of patient care,' Dr Bayo Curry-Winchell of Nevada wrote in an article for Katie Couric Media, while Dr Claudia Fagan, chief medical officer of Cook County Health, wrote in an article for Common Dreams that she had 'seen patients suffer and die in order to pad the bottom lines of corporate health insurers – and in recent years I have seen this problem getting much worse'.
UnitedHealthcare did not respond to multiple requests for comment. AHIP, a lobby group for the industry, said in an emailed statement: 'In the fragmented and heavily regulated healthcare system, health plans, providers and drugmakers share a responsibility to make high-quality care as affordable as possible and easier to navigate for the people we collectively serve. Health plans are working to protect patients from the full impact of rising costs while connecting them to care that is safe, evidence-based and coordinated.'
Doctors who spoke to the Guardian suggested fixing problems with the US healthcare system will require more than tinkering at the edges.
Both Weisbart and Verhoef argued the solution would require moving away from private health insurance, toward a single payer healthcare system, similar to other wealthy countries that provide healthcare to all.
'The solution is effectively to overhaul the system entirely and then start from scratch with the national health insurance system,' said Verhoef. 'Solutions that depend on trying to regulate the private insurance industry are simply going to fail.'
There is 'no way to modestly reform a fundamental flaw in a business model', added Weisbart. 'Their business model is designed on delaying, denying and redirecting healthcare We know a much better way: the much better way is to build a system on the traditional Medicare program. Fix the things that are wrong with Medicare … and then simply provide that to everybody.'
Moving to a single-payer, universal healthcare system would likely cost less than current national healthcare expenditure, according to a 2020 academic analysis – and save tens of thousands of lives each year.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Lidl urgently recalls breakfast staple over concerns it contains pieces of metal
Shoppers have since been urged not to consume the product. Lidl shoppers have been warned not to eat a batch of hash browns. There are fears that the breakfast favourite may contain foreign bodies, making them "unsafe to eat." The German supermarket giant has issued a recall for its popular Harvest Basket Hash Browns after it was discovered that they "may contain pieces of metal." A food alert posted to the Food Standards Agency (FSA) has advised customers that the recall affects a 750g pack size, with the batch code 5144L and the best before date of May 24, 2027. The full risk statement posted to the FSA read: "This product may contain metal pieces which presents a choking hazard and makes it unsafe to eat." Due to the potential health risk, the supermarket has since advised customers who have bought the affected hash browns not to eat them but to return them to store where a full refund will be provided. For further information, shoppers are also being advised to contact the customer care line on or 0203 966 5566. Lidl said in its recall notice: "We apologise for any inconvenience caused and thank you for your cooperation." What is a food alert? Food alerts are issued by the FSA when there is a problem with a food product that means it should not be sold, leading to it either being 'withdrawn' or 'recalled' from store shelves. In response, the food watchdog issues alerts to let consumers and local authorities know the problems associated with the affected product. There are also 'allergy' alerts when a food is found to contain missing or incorrect allergy labelling, meaning that they could pose a potential health risk to certain customers. We recently reported that Iceland had recalled its popular 4 Sub Rolls because they contained undeclared barley (gluten), with the best before date June 2, 2025 affected. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. On a more serious note, we also shared with customers that Brits had been urged to "dispose of" a popular brand of American sweets after they contained ingredients that were " compliant with UK laws". The FSA issued an urgent 'Food Alert For Action' that urged UK retailers to stop selling four types of Jolly Rancher confectionary products as they contained two mineral oils, with one being linked to an increase in cancer. All batch codes and dates of each bag of sweets were affected as they include Mineral Oil Aromatic Hydrocarbons, (MOAH), and Mineral Oil Saturated Hydrocarbons, (MOSH), both which are not allowed in the UK. The Hershey Company, owner of Jolly Rancher, is said to have be working closely with the food watchdog to remove non-compliant and unsafe products from the UK market since 2024. While the company made the decision not to supply the UK market going forward, its products are still imported to the country, which is why the FSA has urged enforcing authorities to take action.


Metro
2 hours ago
- Metro
Urgent recall of Lidl's hash browns over fears they contain metal
Lidl has issued an urgent recall of its Harvest Basket Hash Browns over fears they could contain metal. The budget supermarket said the metal could be a choking hazard. The recall, shared by Food Standards Agency (FSA), affects 750g packs with a batch code of 5144L and a best before of May 2027. Customers who have bought the hash browns have been told not to eat them. They can return the product to their nearest store for a full refund. For more information contact Lidl's customer care team by or calling 0203 966 5566. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Urgent recall for over 19,000 Dr Pepper Zero Sugar cans over 'serious' health risk MORE: Urgent recall of American sweets 'unsafe to eat and not compliant with UK law' MORE: Popular Aldi snack recalled in 13 US states due to 'life-threatening' allergen


Daily Mail
17 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Diet soda shockingly linked to devastating disease that kills 100,000 Americans each year
Diet soda might no longer be a healthier option after all. A new study found people who regularly drink the diet alternatives have more than double the risk of developing Type 2 diabetes compared to people who reach for full-sugar beverages. And artificial sweeteners may be to blame. The scientists found that high intake of saccharin - a common zero-calorie artificial sweetener found in diet drinks - could be the main risk factor for the chronic illness, which is suffered by 37 million Americans. The FDA approved the use of saccharin as a zero-calorie alternative to sugar in various foods and beverages in 1977. But saccharin is at least 300 times sweeter than regular sugar and researchers now believe excess consumption may interfere with the body's natural process of utilizing glucose - a sugar the body uses for energy. Based on their findings, study author Lyn Steffen recommended 'limiting the use of any sweetener' and suggested choosing 'unsweetened water, coffee, tea, milk or a small amount of 100 percent fruit juice' for beverages. The researchers examined the diets of 4,654 adults between 1985 to 2015. The participants' average intake of artificial sweeteners, diet beverages, aspartame (a low-calorie artificial sweetener) and sucralose (a synthetic artificial sweetener) were measured in the first year, seventh year and Year 20. The study did not include people who regularly or occasionally drink full sugar sodas. Based on their results, the participants were divided into groups to determine their probability of developing Type 2 diabetes. During this 30-year period, 691 participants developed diabetes. Results showed that the participants who consumed the most diet sodas in the 30 year period had a 129 percent greater chance of developing diabetes than those who barely drank any diet beverages. Additionally, the researchers also found that those who drank sodas loaded with saccharin such as fountain Diet Coca Cola, Diet Dr Pepper and Tab had a 110 percent increased risk of diabetes. No link was found between diabetes and aspartame or sucralose. The observational study did not determine the reason why artificial sweeteners may lead to Type 2 diabetes. However, the researchers believe that consuming excessive diet sodas with artificial sweeteners that are overall much sweeter than real sugar may interfere with the body's metabolism process and lead to excess sugar in the bloodstream. According to the American Heart Association, men should consume no more than 36 grams or 150 calories of sugar per day while women should consume no more than 25 grams or 100 calories of sugar per day. However, an 8oz can of Sprite Zero contains 50 mg artificial sweeteners, Coke Zero contains 58 mg and Pepsi Max has 77 mg. Along with this, Diet Pepsi and Caffeine-Free Diet Pepsi both contain 111 mg and 118 mg, respectively while Diet Dr Pepper has a shocking 123 mg of artificial sweeteners. Both Diet Coke and Caffeine-Free Coke have 125 mg of artificial sweeteners too. Excess sugar consumption can pave the way for weight gain, high blood pressure, heart disease and insulin resistance, which can cause Type 2 diabetes. Type 2 diabetes is the most common form of the condition and over 37 million American adults suffer from this form of the chronic illness. The CDC reports that over 100,000 Americans die of diabetes every year. It is caused by either the pancreas not producing enough insulin - a hormone that regulates blood sugar levels - or the body's cells not responding properly to insulin. When you eat sugar, your body breaks it down into glucose, which the enters your bloodstream for energy absorption. To regulate blood sugar levels, the pancreas releases insulin, which helps glucose enter your cells for energy. But consuming excessive amounts of sugar can make the body resistant to insulin, meaning it can't effectively use the insulin to lower blood sugar. This leads to high blood sugar levels and a buildup of glucose in the bloodstream, which can damage the eyes, kidneys, nerves and heart.