I had a loving family. My life changed at 46 when my birth sister revealed I was adopted
My parents hid my adoption. But somehow, the truth brought us closer
As a child, I used to love looking at our family photos. They sat in a drawer under the large TV console in the family room. Among them was a small white album with a red spine. Inside were 10 square black and white photos of me when I was a toddler in the 1960s — in a bathtub or happily posing in a restaurant booth among others.
At some point, that album disappeared. No matter how often I looked for it, I couldn't find it. My parents provided no answers to my questions about where it might be. It remained a disappointing mystery.
Several decades later, I received a disturbing message on Facebook Messenger.
"You don't know me and I don't mean to upset you, but I have reason to believe you might be my sister."
Confused, I shared this message with my equally shocked brother. My first thought was: "Who are these people and what do they want with me?"
And yet, there were clues in my life that suggested something was amiss. My birth certificate said I was born in Halifax although I always thought I was born in Digby, N.S., where my family lived when I was a baby. And I remembered this mysterious girl who was always at a friend of my family's house when we went to visit.
Clearly there was more to this story. I eventually determined it wasn't a hoax and the woman on the other side was indeed my sister. I had been adopted and was never told.
I was in my mid-40s with children of my own. I never felt like anything was missing in my life. So, I had to ask myself: Was it worth disrupting my life and my family relationships to engage with this biological family?
After some soul-searching, I decided the answer was yes. I went to meet my birth father, who was living in Yarmouth, N.S., and my younger half-sister who was also living in Nova Scotia. Then I flew to Alberta to meet my older sister. We had an instant connection — almost as if the 40 years of separation had never happened.
From these relatives, I learned my birth mother had disappeared when my sister was three and I was a baby.
Our birth father took us to live with his parents in Digby. At the time, the couple who adopted me lived nearby. They were newly married and having fertility challenges. When they were asked if they could help out with my sister and me, they readily said yes. Although they wanted to adopt us both, my sister was inconsolable and stayed with our birth family.
Nanny Hanson wanted me to know her as my grandmother, so there were frequent visits between our families, including with my sister — until Nanny died when I was about six. After that, the families drifted apart.
When I confronted my father a few weeks after being contacted, he said three things that have stuck with me.
The first, after a long pause, was: "That is another long story." The second was: "If you want to change your name…." A generous offer and yet the two times I married, I did not change my name. My last name, Jourdain, was and is part of my identity.
The third thing he said was: "It was love at first sight."
Image | Kathy's family photo and album
Caption: On the left, Jourdain, centre, with her adoptive parents, Hector and Mary Jourdain. On the right, the photo album that disappeared for several years. (Submitted by Kathy Jourdain)
Open Image in New Tab
It's true, my dad and I had a soul connection. As our family began to cope with my mother's dementia, I became dad's go-to person for everything. While our relationship had been rocky at times, I knew without a doubt his love for me was deep.
On the eve of my mother moving into long-term care in June 2008, months after our conversation about me being adopted, Dad handed me the "lost" photo album. It had been hidden because my mother was afraid of how I would react if I found out the truth. Those pictures of me as a toddler? My sister is in seven of 10 of them — something I had never realized as a child.
Image | Jourdain and Nanny Hanson
Caption: Jourdain, right, with her Nanny Hanson and sister, Deb. Jourdain's parents hid this photo and others like it to keep her adoption a secret. (Submitted by Kathy Jourdain)
Open Image in New Tab
Someone asked me: "Wasn't I angry that my parents had lied to me my whole life?"
It was an interesting question.
I never thought about it in that way. I was rocked to discover there was a whole part of myself I had no idea existed, but I knew my parents loved me and would not act out of malice. They wanted to wait to tell me until I was old enough to understand. But as the years went by, it was harder and harder for them to speak up about our family secret.
Learning the truth has helped me make sense of some parts of my life — why my birth certificate didn't match what I had been told and the missing photo album. Other things also clicked into place. For example, my parents and most of their friends were married forever. But I had been married twice — just like my birth father and my sister. In some ways, this made me feel more "normal," or at least not like some outlier in my family.
This isn't just a story about reconnecting with my birth family. It is also a story about how I made peace with my family's secret and with all of who I am.
Dad and I became each other's strength because of my mom's illness, but she and I had never talked about my adoption or biological family because of the extent of her dementia by the time I learned the truth.
One day, out of the blue, my mother surprised me by asking me how my sister was.
Did she know at some subconscious level that we had reconnected? I can't think of any other explanation for such a seemingly random question.
It was such a brief moment. I was both disappointed that it could not become a full conversation and in awe at how deeply we may be connected at levels we cannot see.
My parents have both passed since then, and I'm still learning more about my biological family and myself. I'm learning to embrace and flow with all that life throws my way.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Revealed: How Harry is the 'spare in his relationship' as the prince struggles to carve out a career for himself following the Sentebale debacle
It was widely seen as the charity perhaps closest to Harry's heart when he founded Sentebale in 2006 when the prince was just 22 years old. The charity - which helps children and teenagers tackle HIV or AIDS diagnoses - was after all named after the Sesotho word for 'forget-me-not' in reference to Princess Diana 's favourite flower and her much praised charity work during her life. But now Prince Harry finds himself no longer part of the charity he spent nearly 20 years building after he dramatically parted ways with Sentebale. The charity's chair Dr Sophie Chandauka made several damaging claims against the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, calling their brand 'toxic' and accusing Harry of 'harassment and bullying at scale' - a claim that is denied. This followed claims that Meghan Markle disrupted the Sentebale charity polo match in Spring last year when she turned up at short notice alongside tennis legend Serena Williams. The duchess had originally said she would not be attending. Speaking to MailOnline, royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams said that Harry's struggles to carve out a career for himself, coupled with Meghan's own 'ruthless' ambitions, have meant the prince has found himself 'the spare' in their relationship. Richard said that Meghan has ambitions to become a billionaire with her various projects including TV and investing in start-ups, but Harry lacks the same 'ruthlessness'. Dr Sophie Chandauka, the chair of Sentebale. Dr Sophie made several damaging claims against the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, calling their brand 'toxic' 'Harry is increasingly finding himself as the spare in a relationship with Meghan which undoubtedly involves mutual affection, but where their priorities differ widely.' He said that Harry's comfort zone is his charity work, and this is the direction in which he naturally finds himself leaning. 'Invictus means a lot to him, it was a joy to see him at the WellChild Awards last year. He genuinely enjoyed being with the children, it seemed as though the "old Harry" was temporarily back,' he said. However, he cautioned that the duke has made a 'large number of mistakes'. These include his 'angry and resentful half-hour interview with the BBC after he lost his court case over security and his ill-judged memoir Spare'. Richard added: 'However, though often emotional, he lacks Meghan's ruthlessness, which was so apparent in the Oprah interview.' Although The Mail On Sunday revealed in May that Prince Harry is planning to launch his own as-yet-undisclosed commercial venture in the next few months, he remains focused on his charity work. Harry is still involved heavily with the Invictus Games and the foundation that supports the tournament as well as the HALO Trust - a charity working to remove landmines, which Princess Diana was supportive of. The Duke of Sussex also launched more new projects in recent years including an eco-travel campaign through his non-profit Travalyst, aimed at encouraging sustainable travel. Harry with Sentebale in 2006. The charity - which helps children and teenagers tackle HIV or AIDS diagnoses - was named after the Sesotho word for 'forget-me-not' in reference to Princess Diana's favourite flower and her much praised charity work during her life In November 2023 he became the global ambassador for Scotty's Little Soldiers - a charity that cares for children whose parents died while serving in the armed forces. Earlier this year, Harry had his most high-profile fallout with a former charity to date when he, alongside Prince Seeiso of Lesotho, resigned from their roles as patrons of Sentebale. This followed a dispute between the charity's trustees and Dr Sophie - the charity's chair. Harry and Dr Sophie's working relationship had been in trouble for some time but it was only after the duke announced he was stepping down that an excruciating video showing Meghan Markle moving the Sentebale chief away from her husband took on new importance. It was claimed the polo event was gatecrashed by the former Suits star with Serena Williams and a Netflix crew in tow. The Duchess of Sussex seemingly forced Dr Sophie Chandauka to duck under the trophy as Harry celebrated the Royal Salute Polo Challenge in Wellington, Florida, in support of Sentebale's work. Moments before, Meghan had kissed her husband to celebrate his win – with a Netflix camera crew there to capture the moment for his TV series on polo. The footage of Meghan and Dr Sophie with Harry at the centre has been watched millions of times online in the past year but is being viewed again in a new light after Dr Sophie's bombshell interview with Sky News where she discussed the notorious clip. Speaking to Sky News' Trevor Phillips, Dr Sophie recalled the chaotic event, telling him: 'We would have been really excited had we known ahead of time [Meghan was coming], but we didn't. 'And so the choreography went badly on stage because we had too many people on stage. The international press captured this, and there was a lot of talk about the duchess and the choreography on stage and whether she should have been there and her treatment of me. 'Prince Harry asked me to issue some sort of a statement in support of the duchess, and I said I wouldn't. 'Not because I didn't care about the duchess, but because I knew what would happen if I did so, number one. And number two, because we cannot be an extension of the Sussexes.' While Harry's own career aspirations may appear rudderless at the moment, Meghan's appear more ambitious than ever with the former Suits actress reportedly hoping to become a billionaire. As for her hopes of reaching this goal, Richard said that her public image could be problematic. 'Her declining popularity in the United States is partly due to the bullying allegations which have dogged her though she strongly denies them, and partly because, as was pointed out by critics of her With Love, Meghan cookery show, she is too self-obsessed,' he explained. Speaking to MailOnline, royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams said that Harry's comfort zone is his charity work, and this is the direction in which he naturally finds himself leaning 'She should take advice from the infamous but pragmatic 16th century diplomat Nicolo Machiavelli who wrote 'It is not necessary that a prince (in her case a princess) be just. It is very necessary that he (she) appear to be'. 'The talent isn't there, the ambition is boundless, the self-love infinite and it shows far too obviously. The novelty has worn off, too. If you preach love but rubbish the royal family, which you married into, you might not make the fortune you seek!' Indeed, Meghan does appear to have focused much of her energy on her solo business projects in recent years. In March 2024, she soft-launched American Riviera Orchard before changing the company's name to As Ever. Announcing the new venture, Meghan said: 'This new chapter is an extension of what has always been my love language, beautifully weaving together everything I cherish - food, gardening, entertaining, thoughtful living, and finding joy in the everyday.' The food products sold by the brand include an assortment of teas, edible flower sprinkles and a £20 jar of honey. Meghan has also invested in a number of companies including the vegan coffee brand Clevr Blends and haircare line Highbrow Hippie. She has also invested in asset manager Ethic, which focuses on sustainable investments. Harry and Meghan signed a lucrative £18million deal with Spotify in 2020. However, despite appearing to be a joint venture, the only show they produced was hosted by Meghan. In the series, titled Archetypes, Meghan interviewed various celebrities from Serena Williams to Paris Hilton. The deal was 'mutually ended' in June 2023 with sources claiming the music streaming giant did not see a enough content to warrant the full payout. Earlier this year, the duchess launched her Confessions of a Female Founder with Meghan podcast which saw her chat with female business owners from an array of successful companies. In a slight career change, Meghan also penned a children's book in 2021 titled The Bench. The book follows the relationship of a father and son through the eyes of the mother. It received mixed reviews from critics. In their television projects, Harry and Meghan have kept a much more united front but even so the couple do now appear to be doing much more separate projects. Although an official figure was never announced, Harry and Meghan's deal with Netflix was allegedly worth around £80million and has seen the couple produce multiple shows. Harry's brief cameo at the end of Meghan's Netflix lifestyle programme. A source from the show has since reported that neither Harry nor their children will appear in the next season of the show In 2022, the first Netflix series about the Sussexes was released aptly named Harry and Meghan. In their television projects, Harry and Meghan have kept a much more united front but even so the couple do now appear to be doing much more separate projects. Although an official figure was never announced, Harry and Meghan's deal with Netflix was allegedly worth around £80million and has seen the couple produce multiple shows. In 2022, the first Netflix series about the Sussexes was released aptly named Harry and Meghan. While it holds the record for the biggest debut for a Netflix documentary it received mixed reviews. The pair were also executive producers on the Polo sports documentary series which followed athletes at the US Open Polo Championship. In 2023, Meghan did not join Harry as an executive producer on the Heart of Invictus series, although the duke and duchess did appear together during the show. Meghan's first major solo television project was her lifestyle programme called With Love, Meghan which saw the duchess team up with a number of famous guests to cook and create homeware products. Harry was almost entirely absent from the series aside from a very brief cameo in the last episode.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Implied Volatility Surging for Allegiant Travel Company Stock Options
Investors in Allegiant Travel Company ALGT need to pay close attention to the stock based on moves in the options market lately. That is because the July 18, 2025 $120 Call had some of the highest implied volatility of all equity options today. Implied volatility shows how much movement the market is expecting in the future. Options with high levels of implied volatility suggest that investors in the underlying stocks are expecting a big move in one direction or the other. It could also mean there is an event coming up soon that may cause a big rally or a huge sell-off. However, implied volatility is only one piece of the puzzle when putting together an options trading strategy. Clearly, options traders are pricing in a big move for Allegiant Travel Company shares, but what is the fundamental picture for the company? Currently, Allegiant Travel Company is a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) in the Transportation – Airline industry that ranks in the Top 19% of our Zacks Industry Rank. Over the last 60 days, no analyst increased the earnings estimates for the current quarter, while five have dropped their estimates. The net effect has taken our Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current quarter from $2.28 per share to 84 cents in that period. Given the way analysts feel about Allegiant Travel Company right now, this huge implied volatility could mean there's a trade developing. Oftentimes, options traders look for options with high levels of implied volatility to sell premium. This is a strategy many seasoned traders use because it captures decay. At expiration, the hope for these traders is that the underlying stock does not move as much as originally expected. Check out the simple yet high-powered approach that Zacks Executive VP Kevin Matras has used to close recent double and triple-digit winners. In addition to impressive profit potential, these trades can actually reduce your risk. Click to see the trades now >> Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


South Wales Guardian
12 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
UK consumers urged not to buy ‘unsafe' American sweets amid cancer concerns
Candies from the Jolly Rancher brand contain mineral oils, a food additive which can pose health risks if consumed regularly over a sustained period of time, the agency said. The chemical compounds in the products: mineral oil aromatic hydrocarbons (Moah); and mineral oil saturated hydrocarbons, (Mosh); are used in confectionary to prevent stickiness and create a glossy appearance, but do not comply with UK law. US producer, Hershey, which owns the brand, has been working with the FSA to remove all Jolly Rancher products from the UK market since 2024 – but some businesses in Britain continue to import their products, the agency added. The affected products include the Jolly Rancher Hard Candy, 'Misfits' Gummies, Hard Candy Fruity 2 in 1, and Berry Gummies, the FSA said. A food alert published by the FSA on Wednesday said: 'Consumption of the affected sweets is of toxicological concern, especially in younger age groups and where consumers eat a lot of the products or eat them regularly. 'Moah can cause damage to DNA and has the potential to increase the risk of cancer, particularly if consumed in high quantities over a prolonged period of time. Moah is a genotoxic carcinogen, therefore no exposure is without risk to human health.' Wednesday 11 June 2025. Food Alert "For Action": To Consumers who have purchased and Food Businesses who have purchased and sold Jolly Rancher products manufactured by The Hershey Company #FoodAlert — Food Standards Agency (@foodgov) June 11, 2025 It added: 'If you have bought any of the above products, do not eat them. 'Instead, dispose of them at home. If you are concerned, notify your Trading Standards department or environmental health department in the local authority you purchased it. 'For consumers, don't buy them, and if you've eaten these products, there should be no immediate cause for concern, as food safety risk is low, but don't eat any more.' The agency has also urged UK retailers and food businesses to cease all imports and sales of the candy brand, and asked enforcement authorities to ensure the products are removed from the shelves. The FSA said: 'Food businesses who import these products are advised to discontinue import and distribution of products. 'Food businesses selling these products in the UK are advised to immediately stop sales, undertake product withdrawals and where there have been retail sales, to undertake product recalls. 'The Hershey Company, who is the brand owner, has taken action to remove these products from the UK market. 'We are asking enforcement authorities to make immediate contact with businesses who may have been supplied with or received the affected products, and to take action to ensure that the non-compliant and potentially unsafe products are withdrawn from the market and where sold at retail, recalled. 'We are also asking the local authorities to inform the FSA of product recall and withdrawal actions.'