logo
Israel's attack on Iran sparks concern among Zoroastrians, Iranian Muslims in Mumbai

Israel's attack on Iran sparks concern among Zoroastrians, Iranian Muslims in Mumbai

Indian Express3 days ago

Following Israel's airstrikes on Tehran, members of Mumbai's Irani community—both Zoroastrians and Iranian Shia Muslims—have voiced concern over the escalating conflict in the region which is a distant homeland, a place of religious significance and familial ties.
On Friday morning, Israel struck major nuclear facilities in Iran, in what it said was 'pre-emptive military action' aimed at thwarting the nation's attempts to build nuclear weapons.
Firoza Mistree, author, curator and independent researcher on Zoroastrianism, said, 'We are not too many people in the world, we are only about 110,000-115,000 Zoroastrians living across the world. Iran is a very major centre with nearly 20,000 strong Zoroastrians living there, mainly in Tehran, Yazd and Kerman.'
Zoroastrians, also known as Parsis, migrated from Persia (modern-day Iran) to the Indian subcontinent to preserve their faith and tradition and to escape religious persecution after the Arab invasion. A map titled Parsi Migration Route at FD Alpaiwalla Museum in Mumbai highlights two major waves of migration: the first, from Khorasan (8th–10th centuries), who settled in Sanjan on the western coast; the second, from Yazd and Kerman in the 19th century, with many settling in Bombay.
Mistree added that although Zoroastrians in India migrated from Iran long ago, 'in our hearts, it is a very holy country because it is linked to our religion from where we originated from.'
'Iran has a deep and rich history that's closely tied to the Zoroastrian and Parsi communities,' she said. 'Our sacred sites are there, including Takht-e Soleyman, a UNESCO World Heritage site, and we're concerned about the potential destruction. Iran is home to around 55 fully functional fire temples and six great shrines linked to the last Zoroastrian kings. These are not just historic places, but living symbols of our faith and heritage.
Our traditions, our people, our fire temples, they're all still in Iran. Naturally, we're worried,' she added, noting that community members have been reaching out to check on the safety of those still living there.
'So far, Zoroastrians are but we are very worried that this war will escalate beyond anyone's imagination, and it is not good for any country in the world and even the world as a whole,' she said.
Calling the incident very unfortunate, Bombay Parsi Punchayet (BPP)'s chairperson Viraf Mehta said, 'We don't yet know the full extent of the loss it could cause to Zoroastrians and their places of worship. But we are a very small community, and every Zoroastrian—no matter where they are in the world—matters to us.'
He further added that it is their responsibility to look out for one another. 'If any of them wish to come to Mumbai and seek asylum, while that decision lies with the Government of India, the Parsi panchayat would certainly support them. We always have, and always must, look out for one another, to ensure that every Zoroastrian has a roof over their head and food on their plate.'
Another Zoroastrian whose family migrated to India from Iran over a century ago, shared that he has a few friends there. 'They told me that they are alright as of now. The airport is shut. There is definitely a lot of stress but let's see what happens,' he said, adding, 'You cannot do anything. One can only pray.'
Although Zoroastrians form the majority, Mumbai's Irani community also includes a significant number of Shia Muslims from Iran, currently estimated at around 2,500. While the city has long-standing ties with Iran evident in its substantial Zoroastrian and Bahá'í populations, a fresh wave of migration occurred in the early 19th century, predominantly comprising Iranian Muslims. These migrants, mostly from the inland cities of Shiraz and Isfahan, arrived in search of better economic prospects amid a recession in central Iran.
Many of these early Shia Iranian traders settled in areas like Umerkhadi and Dongri, where their descendants still live today. Familial connections with Iran remain strong across generations.
'We heard that Shiraz was attacked—a city many of us have visited and where some have family through marriage,' said a prominent member of Mumbai's Iranian Muslim community. 'We watch the news with trepidation, fearing for the lives of our loved ones and for the fate of a city so rich in culture and beauty being ravaged because of this war.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump returns to G7 summit he once loathed as Iran crisis deepens
Trump returns to G7 summit he once loathed as Iran crisis deepens

Business Standard

time7 hours ago

  • Business Standard

Trump returns to G7 summit he once loathed as Iran crisis deepens

Instead of speaking to allies about the fighting, Trump discussed the conflict in a Saturday call with the G-7's main adversary, Russian President Vladimir Putin Bloomberg By Josh Wingrove and Sakura Murakami President Donald Trump arrives in Canada as the center of attention for a Group of Seven summit of world leaders whose main purpose will be to mollify him — and one where spiraling conflict in the Middle East offers another test of its unity. Trump was traveling Sunday night to Kananaskis, Alberta, for the first big international summit of his second term. Wary of opening new rifts with the US president, other G7 leaders won't even try for a statement of unity on matters such as Ukraine or climate change. Trump has called for a ceasefire but is helping Israel defend itself, while others such as French President Emmanuel Macron have urged the sides to avoid further escalation. Instead of speaking to allies about the fighting, Trump discussed the conflict in a Saturday call with the G7's main adversary, Russian President Vladimir Putin, a central antagonist in a war with Ukraine that's also frustrated Trump. Macron, speaking to reporters on Sunday, dismissed the notion of Putin mediating the Middle East conflict, saying the Russian leader, given his flouting of international norms, could not 'be in any way a mediator.' More than a dozen leaders from around the world were set to join Trump at the Pomeroy Kananaskis Mountain Lodge looking to strike trade deals to stave off a fresh round of US tariffs as early as next month. The meeting's remote location means it will be inaccessible to protesters and give leaders freedom to meet Trump on neutral turf instead of under the glare of the cameras in the Oval Office where he's in control and playing to his domestic audience. Trade deals Leaders from Brazil, South Africa, India, and South Korea will be there seeking to protect their own interests, as will Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskiy, looking to shore up support for his nation's fight against Russia despite Trump's ambivalence. Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum is likely to get her first one-on-one in-person meeting with Trump, while also seeking a fresh US-Mexico-Canada trade deal along with the event's host, Prime Minister Mark Carney. The Canadian leader, meanwhile, will seek to balance standing up to Trump's calls to make Canada the 51st state while avoiding the flareups that turned past summits into displays of rancor and disunity. 'The best case scenario in my mind, coming out of this, is that there's no real blowups,' said Josh Lipsky, chair of international economics at the Atlantic Council think-tank. Trump has long considered such summits tedious, and used them to pick fights with fellow leaders. One of his first, the 2017 G-20 in Hamburg, was marked by widespread protests, with posters plastered around the city calling Trump a clown. An enduring image of his first G7, in Italy, was six leaders walking together while Trump traveled separately in a golf cart. A year later at a G7 meeting also in Canada, Trump made his most indelible mark on the summit circuit. A viral photo showed him sitting defiant, with arms crossed, staring up at then-German Chancellor Angela Merkel, while other leaders stood around her. He then upended the event by pulling out of the joint communique that had been forged in the meeting and firing an angry tweet at then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau over the Canadian leader's criticisms of Trump's tariff policies. That photo, along with Trump's eruption, casts a 'long shadow' over this year's summit, said Caitlin Welsh, who served as a US summit official during Trump's first term and is now a program director with the Center for Strategic and International Studies. It showed 'that consensus outcomes could not be taken for granted in the G7 or G-20 or other bodies,' Welsh said. Even after that, leaders were never quite sure what to make of Trump. In 2019, a hot mic caught leaders — including Trudeau — at another summit griping about Trump running late. At President Joe Biden's first G7 in 2021, he declared 'America is back,' to which Macron shot back — 'For how long?' Now Trump returns, both to the summit sanctum and to Canada, after a bruising tariff war and his refusal to back down from the 51st state threat. That stoked widespread anger in the country and helped fuel Carney's spring election victory. Trump himself has claimed credit. Playing nice But while earlier summits saw Trump spar with counterparts, this batch of leaders have tended to try to play nice with Trump, soothing his ego and avoiding confrontations. And several, such as UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Macron and Carney have all had relatively successful — or at least unremarkable — meetings with Trump since his return to office. And there are widespread signs the bloc wants to maintain that approach. Macron is the sole holdover from Trump's first term. While he'll look to maintain pleasant relations with Trump, he visited Greenland on the way to Canada, a nod of support after Trump mused about annexing the Danish territory. Leaders are not preparing a joint communique this time around given that differences are too large on everything from climate change to artificial intelligence to women's empowerment. Instead they are set to issue statements on half a dozen subjects, though Ukraine isn't among them. The US will also push to discuss trade, expanding exports of American energy and AI development, a White House official said Friday in a briefing that made no direct mention of Iran. The leaders are also expected to discuss breaking their dependency on China for critical minerals, according to a German official. Trump has set so-called 'reciprocal' tariffs at 10 per cent for about five dozen countries and the EU, but has made a July 9 deadline to reach deals or see the tariffs rise again. That threat hangs over nearly every leader at the summit. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has touted the progress made so far, as his trade negotiator makes near-weekly visits to the US to negotiate terms, but has also expressed caution about rushing into an agreement. Japan is seeking removal of the levies — and is a test-case of Trump's willingness to negotiate auto tariffs in particular. 'What's important is to achieve an agreement that's beneficial to both Japan and the US,' Ishiba said last week. 'We won't compromise Japan's interests by prioritizing a quick deal.'

PMC's welfare schemes for transgender community translate into nothing on ground
PMC's welfare schemes for transgender community translate into nothing on ground

Time of India

time16 hours ago

  • Time of India

PMC's welfare schemes for transgender community translate into nothing on ground

Pune: Over a year after the Pune Municipal Corporation announced a range of welfare schemes for the transgender community, not a single benefit, monetory or otherwise, reflected on the ground. Schemes rollout in Jan 2024 promised a comprehensive upliftment package for the transgender community. Along with the healthcare stipend, PMC also proposed Rs 15,000 grants for self-help groups (SHGs) run by transgender people, one-time vocational training and self-employment assistance of Rs 10,000 for transgender persons between 18 and 45 years. Civic authorities were also reported to be actively looking for empty plots to build shelter homes for the city's transgender population, a part of the initiatives announced. None of the schemes moved forward. Transgender activists call it another chapter in a long history of tokenism. "There has been no consideration, no call for discussion, nothing from PMC," Bindumadhav Khire, an LGBTQ+ rights activist and founder of Samapathik Trust, told TOI. "We even wrote a letter to PMC asking for access to one of the many abandoned school buildings in the city. We offered to run a shelter home for the transgender community there free of cost, find our own funding and manage the space. We only asked for one or two rooms. We said we were open to a dialogue, but no one ever responded. They say all the right things in public, but do nothing," the activist said. "The social justice department, where I was part of the transgender grievance committee, was no different. I eventually resigned because they never acted on anything," Khire told TOI. Among these schemes, one of the most publicized was monthly Rs1,000 healthcare allowance for transgender people over the age of 45. It was meant to begin in early 2024, but it is stuck in the proposal stage without any progress on budget, disbursement, etc, to date. "All these initiatives are in the proposal stage," confirmed Nitin Udas, deputy commissioner, social empowerment department, PMC. "A major issue is the lack of documentation for transgender people to apply for any such schemes for their welfare," Udas said. Members of the community say that lack of documentation is an old excuse. "We are asked for Aadhaar, bank account details, name match with IDs. But most of us do not have these documents because the system still hasn't caught up with our identities and gender. All these welfare schemes are just lip service," said Parvati Chavan (52), a transwoman. MSID:: 121863304 413 |

'India's blood not meant to be shed': Amit Shah on PM Modi's message to Pakistan after Operation Sindoor
'India's blood not meant to be shed': Amit Shah on PM Modi's message to Pakistan after Operation Sindoor

Hindustan Times

timea day ago

  • Hindustan Times

'India's blood not meant to be shed': Amit Shah on PM Modi's message to Pakistan after Operation Sindoor

With Operation Sindoor targeting and destroying terror bases, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has sent a message to Pakistan that India's blood is not meant to be shed, and whoever does dare will be punished for it, Union Home Minister Amit Shah said during a public gathering in Uttar Pradesh's Lucknow on Sunday. Shah is in the city to attend the ceremony to give appointment letters to more than 60,000 newly selected police constables. On the occasion, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath handed the letters to the new recruits. Shah also attacked Congress for not being able to curb terrorist attacks across the country during the UPA-led years before 2014. "Terrorist attacks used to happen every day under Congress' rule, Ahmedabad, Jaipur, Coimbatore, Delhi, and don't even mention Kashmir. Pakistan tried to attack India thrice during PM Modi's rule. When they tried in Uri, they were met with a surgical strike. After Pulwama, they were met with an air strike, and after Pahalgam, the headquarters of terrorists were razed to the ground with Operation Sindoor. PM Modi sent a message to the whole country that India's blood is not meant to be shed, and whoever dares to do this will be punished," Shah said during the program. Talking about the promise of eradicating Naxalism by March 31, 2026, Shah added how in 11 years of governance led by PM Modi, Naxalism's spread has been reduced from over 11 states to just 3 districts. "In 11 years of PM Modi, the country has gotten safe. Naxalism was prevalent in 11 states of the country. After these last 11 years of PM Modi, naxalism is present in only three districts now. Don't forget my words: by 31. 3. 2026 this country will be free from Naxalism," he said. Operation Sindoor was one of the responses by India to the deadly Pahalgam terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir in April. The attack killed 26 people, mostly tourists. Operation Sindoor was launched on May 7, following which Pakistan retaliated and the Indian armed forces carried out targeted strikes against terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, resulting in the deaths of over 100 terrorists linked to groups such as Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Taiba, and Hizbul Mujahideen. Meanwhile in Chhattisgarh and border areas, security forces have been carrying out multiple operations, with various Naxal leaders killed in the recent months. On May 21, an encounter in the forests of Boter village resulted in the elimination of 27 Naxals. The two most high profile cases in the recent months has been the neutralisation of CPI (Maoist) General Secretary and Polit Bureau member Basavaraju alias Gaganna and also Central Committee Member Gautam (alias Sudhakar), and Bhaskar. According to government data, there has been a 53 per cent drop in the incidents of Naxal violence over the last ten years between 2014 and 2024, compared to the decade before. Between 2004 and 2014, the data mentions, there were 16,463 incidents of Naxal violence. However, from 2014 to 2024, the number dropped to 7,744. As per the officials in the security establishment, the reduction in Naxal violence reflects "the success of intensified counter-insurgency operations and strategic policies by security forces."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store