logo
The tough fight to unionize Amazon

The tough fight to unionize Amazon

Yahoo17-03-2025

Organizers rally across from Garner's Amazon warehouse on Saturday February 8, 2025 -- two days prior to the start of a union election. (Photo: Brandon Kingdollar/NC Newsline)
The number of U.S. workers belonging to a union fell to a record low of 9.8% this past year. Despite scattered victories like Starbucks unionization, the labor movement is a shadow of the brawny force it once was in American society.
The recent vote at Amazon's giant RDU1 facility in Garner underscores the obstacles to resurrecting unionism. A grassroots worker-led group called Carolina Amazonians United for Solidarity and Empowerment (CAUSE) fought successfully for a union election, but it lost the vote last month by an almost three-to-one. Just one of Amazon's more than 1,500 U.S. facilities, JFK8 on Staten Island, has voted to unionize – and the company still refuses to recognize those results.
I had a first-hand view of the Garner election and its lessons for labor organizing. As an anthropologist studying Amazon, I worked in its warehouses for two years, loading trucks at RDU1. Witnessing the sweatshop conditions there led me to join CAUSE and its spunky yet failed fight to unionize the facility.
At least in theory, the time is ripe for labor organizing. A recent poll shows seventy percent of Americans approve of labor unions, weary of corporate greed and drone jobs.
Although unions will not solve everything, working people need the benefits they can bring more than ever. The titans of 21st century commerce like Walmart, Amazon, and McDonald's enforce brutal work rates through the so-called electronic whip of algorithmic management and the threat of firing. Old fashioned generosities like holiday bonuses and paid sick days have been cut to keep costs down.
The big companies have made poverty pay the new norm. At RDU1, you make a few dollars more than cashiering at Dollar General cashiering or assembling Chick-Fil-A sandwiches, but the $18.50 hourly starting pay is less than half the $42.64 an hour that economists estimate as necessary for an adult with a child to get by in the greater Raleigh area. Some RDU1 workers sleep in their cars to save rent money — and this when Amazon cofounder Jeff Bezos banks a surreal $7.9 million an hour with his private jets, super yacht, and multiple mansions.
Unionizing a gigantic 21st century warehouse with more than 4,000 workers is daunting. What economists call 'the churn' of high worker turnover complicates solidarity-building. So does the heterogeneity of the work force at a place like RDU1 between its hip-hop princes, queer young Latinas and tractor-cap Trumpies along with migrants from more than thirty countries. The job's grind makes mustering energy to raise labor's flag tough too.
Despite the obstacles, CAUSE collected over 1,700 worker signatures to force the union election. But Amazon told organizers they could not hang flyers or hold informational meetings inside the warehouse, while firing three CAUSE leaders and calling the police to arrest volunteers handing out leaflets outside. The company blanketed the facility with vote no messaging on banners, posters, and video screens. From a hastily erected 'town hall' stage, managers seeded lies about CAUSE threatening deportation for migrant workers — and that a union victory would mean everyone losing their benefits. Over CAUSE objections, the election was held inside the warehouse under the surveillance of Amazon's video cameras, managers, 'union-avoidance' consultants, and security guards. It felt almost like some sham election in totalitarian North Korea.
CAUSE has petitioned the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which oversees union elections, to throw out the vote. The complaint cites the targeting of union activists with suspensions, random drug testing, and denying disability accommodations among sixteen different charges, although the Trump administration has signaled intentions to make the NLRB more company-friendly in its rulings.
Even when a union wins certification, companies will stall and dodge to avoid good faith bargaining for a new contract. Starbucks has so far refused to meet barista demands halfway. Here in North Carolina, the Duke Graduate Student Union and REI workers have seen little progress in contract talks despite winning elections almost two years ago.
Hopeful examples do exist of cooperation. By contrast to union-phobic Amazon and most other big retailers, many Costco stores are unionized, with the Teamsters. Most hourly employees there earn more than $30 an hour and yet the low worker turnover, strong productivity, and not needing to throw millions at union-busting saves the company money. Costco profits have steadily risen in recent years. Unionization can be a win-win for workers and owners.
So long as many companies pay misery pay while treating workers like robots, the fight for unions will continue. At RDU1 after the election defeat, CAUSE president Ryan Brown vowed to keep organizing for as long as it takes.
'Hear me well,' Brown said. 'We're not going anywhere.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is Frontier Energy (ASX:FHE) In A Good Position To Deliver On Growth Plans?
Is Frontier Energy (ASX:FHE) In A Good Position To Deliver On Growth Plans?

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Is Frontier Energy (ASX:FHE) In A Good Position To Deliver On Growth Plans?

Even when a business is losing money, it's possible for shareholders to make money if they buy a good business at the right price. For example, although made losses for many years after listing, if you had bought and held the shares since 1999, you would have made a fortune. But the harsh reality is that very many loss making companies burn through all their cash and go bankrupt. So, the natural question for Frontier Energy (ASX:FHE) shareholders is whether they should be concerned by its rate of cash burn. For the purposes of this article, cash burn is the annual rate at which an unprofitable company spends cash to fund its growth; its negative free cash flow. We'll start by comparing its cash burn with its cash reserves in order to calculate its cash runway. We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. A company's cash runway is calculated by dividing its cash hoard by its cash burn. As at December 2024, Frontier Energy had cash of AU$14m and such minimal debt that we can ignore it for the purposes of this analysis. Importantly, its cash burn was AU$13m over the trailing twelve months. That means it had a cash runway of around 13 months as of December 2024. While that cash runway isn't too concerning, sensible holders would be peering into the distance, and considering what happens if the company runs out of cash. Depicted below, you can see how its cash holdings have changed over time. View our latest analysis for Frontier Energy Frontier Energy didn't record any revenue over the last year, indicating that it's an early stage company still developing its business. So while we can't look to sales to understand growth, we can look at how the cash burn is changing to understand how expenditure is trending over time. Over the last year its cash burn actually increased by 36%, which suggests that management are increasing investment in future growth, but not too quickly. However, the company's true cash runway will therefore be shorter than suggested above, if spending continues to increase. Admittedly, we're a bit cautious of Frontier Energy due to its lack of significant operating revenues. We prefer most of the stocks on this list of stocks that analysts expect to grow. Given its cash burn trajectory, Frontier Energy shareholders may wish to consider how easily it could raise more cash, despite its solid cash runway. Generally speaking, a listed business can raise new cash through issuing shares or taking on debt. Commonly, a business will sell new shares in itself to raise cash and drive growth. By comparing a company's annual cash burn to its total market capitalisation, we can estimate roughly how many shares it would have to issue in order to run the company for another year (at the same burn rate). Since it has a market capitalisation of AU$103m, Frontier Energy's AU$13m in cash burn equates to about 13% of its market value. As a result, we'd venture that the company could raise more cash for growth without much trouble, albeit at the cost of some dilution. Even though its increasing cash burn makes us a little nervous, we are compelled to mention that we thought Frontier Energy's cash burn relative to its market cap was relatively promising. We don't think its cash burn is particularly problematic, but after considering the range of factors in this article, we do think shareholders should be monitoring how it changes over time. Separately, we looked at different risks affecting the company and spotted 6 warning signs for Frontier Energy (of which 3 are concerning!) you should know about. Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies, and this list of stocks growth stocks (according to analyst forecasts) Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

John Fetterman and Bill Maher agree chaos in LA and Dem reaction to riots will be ‘good for Trump'
John Fetterman and Bill Maher agree chaos in LA and Dem reaction to riots will be ‘good for Trump'

New York Post

time42 minutes ago

  • New York Post

John Fetterman and Bill Maher agree chaos in LA and Dem reaction to riots will be ‘good for Trump'

Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., and 'Real Time' host Bill Maher agreed on Friday that the optics of Democrats defending the anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles will be 'good for Trump' as scenes of chaos from the riots continue to go viral on social media. Maher noted that some on the left condemned Fetterman after he denounced the violence happening in the streets of Los Angeles and agreed that 'it doesn't do the Democratic Party any good to defend' the violent protests. Advertisement Fetterman issued a strong message on X Monday evening denouncing the riots in L.A. and included a now-infamous photo showing a rioter standing on a car while waving the Mexican flag surrounded by raging flames. 'I agree. When they see it in a campaign ad, when they see the guy with the Mexican flag and the Waymo burning behind him, it's going to be good for Trump,' said Maher. Fetterman concurred, noting that most Americans don't want to see Los Angeles 'on fire twice in just six months now.' 3 Fetterman blasts progressives who have been sympathetic to Iran, Hamas. Youtube/ Real Time with Bill Maher Advertisement 3 Serious rioting takes place in downtown Los Angeles hundred of law enforcement are deployed as are National Guard. Toby Canham for NY Post 3 Maher noted that some on the left condemned Fetterman after he denounced the violence happening in the streets of Los Angeles. Youtube/ Real Time with Bill Maher Reflecting on the political impact of such imagery, he asked, 'And those optics, I just run that through — like what's the people in Scranton might see those kinds of images and those kinds of videos?' Maher then emphasized that Fetterman's views on free speech and immigration still align with core Democratic values, and those who are calling him out are doing so because he's not a 'progressive,' adding that 'we don't even know what these terms mean' in today's political climate. Advertisement The 'Real Time' host said that he sees himself as an 'old-school Democrat,' to which Fetterman agreed. 'That's the thing,' Fetterman replied. 'It's like your values — I don't think have changed — I know mine haven't really changed. But I think our party has changed and now if you actually kind of point out and call out a lot of these things, you know, you do take a political price for a lot of those things.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store