
2025 NBA Finals: OKC Thunder Paint Defense Has Pacers Out Of Character
OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA - JUNE 08: Andrew Nembhard #2 of the Indiana Pacers attempts a lay up ... More against the Oklahoma City Thunder during the second quarter in Game Two of the 2025 NBA Finals at Paycom Center on June 08, 2025 in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. (Photo by Julio Cortez - Pool/Getty Images)
OKLAHOMA CITY – 110 points. That's the line in the sand for the Indiana Pacers during the 2025 playoffs. Through 18 postseason games, they're a perfect 13-0 when scoring more than 110 points and winless at 0-5 when they don't. In Game 1 of the NBA Finals, that trend held steady as Tyrese Haliburton's heroic shot just before the final buzzer put 111 on the scoreboard for Indiana.
Yet 111 is just barely over that 110 threshold. And in Game 2, the Pacers final tally was 107. It took a monster 66-point second half featuring some garbage time to get there, though the blue and gold do deserve credit for reaching that total. And Indiana dropped that game as the Thunder evened the series 1-1.
Splitting the two games in Oklahoma City is a good result for the Pacers. But their offense has put up two of their six lowest scoring games in the playoffs so far to open the NBA Finals. OKC's defense is a monster. They are limiting the Pacers by cutting off the paint, and it's become the biggest issue to address for the Eastern Conference champions.
'They sell out to the paint. They are willing to give up a multitude of shots, three, mid-range, whatever it is, so we don't get in the paint,' Pacers center Myles Turner said. 'Now it's just about making a decision [and]
In Game 1, Indiana won despite scoring just 34 points in the paint, their second-worst in the playoffs, but overcame it with red-hot jump shooting and solid-enough defense. They drove to the basket 48 times, which is about average for their playoff run but still below their regular season norm of 50.3 per game.
The challenge of penetrating OKC's interior is no secret. Guard Ben Sheppard noted as much in between the first two battles of the series. 'I feel like they take away the whole paint. They're flying around everywhere,' Sheppard explained. 'They play a tight-knit defense… it's like five [defenders] on a string.'
In Game 2, with a known challenge in their way, the Pacers scored just 34 points in the paint again. The problem persisted. It was tied for their second-lowest in the playoffs and regular season. They had exactly 48 drives again, though many of them came late. After one quarter, the Pacers had zero points in the paint and made only a pair of two-point shots.
They were shut down. A core part of their offensive identity is missing in this series, and they need to re-capture it.
'We have to find ways to get the ball in there (the paint), it's just there are so many things that have to go right on a set of two possessions to get the ball into the heart of their defense. You've got to get a stop, a rebound. You've got to be able to get the ball up the floor without a turnover and then you have to be able to get it to the lane and to the rim,' Pacers head coach Rick Carlisle detailed. 'It's a tough task. So we'll look at it. There were some stretches where we did some good things attacking the paint but there weren't enough.'
Oklahoma City Thunder forward Jalen Williams (8) defends against Indiana Pacers guard Tyrese ... More Haliburton (0) during the first half of Game 2 of the NBA Finals basketball series Sunday, June 8, 2025, in Oklahoma City. (AP Photo/Kyle Phillips)
This is what the Thunder do. They led the league in paint defense during the regular season and have remained dominant in the playoffs. Three of the five lowest scoring-in-the-paint games this postseason have come against them – the Denver Nuggets and Minnesota Timberwolves both mustered just 20 points in the paint against the Thunder, and the Nuggets had a separate game with only 26.
In the regular season, two of the lowest points in the paint games also came against OKC. Their work on the less glamorous end of the floor was just as brutal. Teams want to score at the rim but can't against the mighty Thunder defense. Their rim protection is elite and backed by a line of terrific perimeter stoppers.
'I'd say it's kind of our defense as a whole. It starts with pressuring the ball before it crosses halfcourt, stopping teams from scoring in transition so we can set our defense,' Thunder big man Chet Holmgren said of his team's paint presence. 'Defending actions, the screens, slide-outs, whatever, kind of controlling them within those. It makes it harder to get to the paint in the first place. It starts early. Making sure we have each other's back at the rim if somebody does get beat.'
Those tactics are crushing the Pacers offense. They can't generate clean drives. They're frustrated, and it shows. Forced shots and stalled possessions are creeping in. With no simple answers, players have been forcing the issue. It's not how the blue and gold want to play.
They need to figure out how to get into the paint. Maybe individual brilliance can be enough, but that isn't the right blueprint. The more viable path to success lies in the details. They need to set harder screens. They must keep the ball circulating and move with purpose as players. If there's space, Indiana has to take it.
On Tuesday, multiple members of the team described needing to play with pace and keep the rock moving from side to side quickly as possible solutions. They are necessary and must be executed well.
The Thunder defense is terrific. Breaking it down is challenging. But the Pacers have to. They need to find their offensive rhythm, regain their identity, and hit that 110 threshold with consistency. That's their win condition.
'Ball movement and player movement will help,' guard Andrew Nembhard said, simply as he always does. He shared what is known – that's it's a point of emphasis for OKC to take away the paint.
The Pacers still have to move toward the rim. If they don't, they won't reach 110 points often enough to win four times in this series. Without their offensive thesis, they're in trouble. It's currently their biggest problem to solve in the 2025 NBA Finals, and it's up to the coaching staff and players to adjust and find solutions. It's the only way forward.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

NBC Sports
37 minutes ago
- NBC Sports
Offensive-minded Pacers use high-pressure defense to take 2-1 Finals lead on Thunder
INDIANAPOLIS — It started on the opening play of the game: Andrew Nembhard met Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, out high on the pick-and-roll and was into his body. When the Thunder star made his move and drove, Nembhard was still right there, drew an offensive foul when SGA hit him in the head with his off-arm. That play set the tone for the night. As much as the Pacers are known for their free-flowing up-tempo offense, they lead the NBA Finals 2-1 because they played an elite defensive game Wednesday night. 'We've put an incredible amount of work into becoming better defensively,' Pacers coach Rick Carlisle said. 'We're still not great. But we're way better than we were. It's taken tons of work. It's taken tons of, you know, it's constant relationship building. It's a difficult system. And it just requires a lot of sacrifice.' Nembhard was at the heart of that defensive improvement, spending 8:39 of the game guarding Gilgeous-Alexander and holding him to 2-of-7 shooting in that time. He wasn't alone, Aaron Nesmith had a strong defensive game. One of the quiet sparks of the night was Ben Sheppard coming off the bench in the first half and playing fantastic defense on SGA, holding him to 1-of-4 shooting in the 2:39 he was on him. Nembhard or whoever was guarding SGA were up in the body of the MVP all night, meeting him much higher on the court than Game 2. 'I didn't think they really changed their schemes very much. I just thought they were sharper with the physicality and the pressure,' Thunder coach Mark Daigneault said. 'Their physicality was stronger than our force in a lot of those possessions.' 'I think in Game 2 specifically, if you watch a lot of my coverages, I did a poor job of being at the level [of the screen],' Haliburton said. 'I was back and then he could come off and he had so much space… I thought that was something we really had to clean up coming into today.' 'They were aggressive. They were high in the pick-and-rolls,' Gilgeous-Alexander said. 'They were, like Coach said, more aggressive, more forceful… They were higher tonight in the pick-and-rolls. They were above the screen. When you come off it, you got to go backwards.' It wasn't just the defense on Gilgeous-Alexander. Myles Turner had five blocked shots on the night and dominated his matchup with Chet Holmgren late. BLOCK. STAY IN FRONT. ANOTHER BLOCK. FORCE THE TURNOVER. LET 'EM KNOW, MYLES 😤😤😤 Then there was T.J. McConnell, who fired up the crowd with three hustle-play steals of inbounds passes (and five total steals on the night). T.J. DID IT AGAIN!!! HIS 5th STEAL AND THE BUCKET TO TIE IT 🤯 Thunder (1-1) Pacers going down to the wire on ABC 👀 'When T.J. is playing with that type of energy, I mean, obviously the crowd loves him,' Pascal Siakam said. 'So it's great for us because every time he does something good, they go crazy.' This Pacers defense didn't come out of nowhere. While they struggled on that end (and in general) in the first couple of months of the season, after Jan. 1, they became a top-10 defensive team in the league. After the All-Star break, the Pacers ranked eighth in the league defensively, boasting a 111.5 defensive rating. In their two wins this series, the Pacers have held the Thunder to an offensive rating of 107.9 and 107.3, in the one loss it was 126. If the Pacers can bring that same defensive effort in Game 4 and keep Gilgeous-Alexander and the Thunder on their heels, they have the chance to take command of this series. It's going to be all about their defense.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
NBA Finals betting: The Thunder are still favored to win the Finals despite 2-1 deficit
The Oklahoma City Thunder are still favored to win the NBA Finals. The Indiana Pacers took a 2-1 series lead after a 116-107 win in Game 3 on Wednesday night yet are still significant underdogs to win the series. The Thunder are -250 to win three of the next four games at BetMGM while the Pacers are still +200 despite needing just two more victories. Advertisement As they did in Game 1, the Pacers outplayed the Thunder in the fourth quarter to take a series lead. The Pacers have not trailed in a series all playoffs, and the Thunder lost their previous two Game 3s on the road to the Nuggets and Timberwolves before Wednesday night's game. Oklahoma City won Game 4 after those losses in the previous two series and also took Game 5 back at home. Friday night's Game 4 is in Indianapolis before the series returns to OKC on Monday. The Thunder are favored by 6.5 points to win Friday night. They covered in Game 2 but are otherwise also 1-2 against the spread. Oklahoma City was careless with the ball on Wednesday night as Indiana employed a full-court press on a regular basis after made baskets. The Thunder turned the ball over 17 times and only forced 13 turnovers themselves. OKC also missed nine of its last 10 shots and allowed Indiana to shoot nearly 52% from the field despite the Pacers going just 9-of-27 from behind the 3-point line. If the Thunder are to come back and win the series as favorites, the most likely outcome is now a seven-game series. The Thunder in seven is +170 at BetMGM, while a six-game series win is +195. If you think the Pacers can win the series, there's serious money to be made on the correct result. A six-game Pacers win is +575, a win in Game 7 is +725 and three straight wins to close out the series in five games is +1000.


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
2025 NBA mock draft: A consensus survey shows the latest predictions from experts
The 2025 NBA Draft is less than two weeks away and we are finally starting to get a consensus of when each player could hear their name called. To get a sense of where prospects stand as of right now, For The Win has surveyed all of the leading mock drafts to provide a general consensus. For this exercise, we're using my latest mock along with other mainstream mocks from the following publications (sorted alphabetically): Our scoring methodology was based on a trade value chart from ESPN's Kevin Pelton. Meanwhile, for more prospect coverage, here is our latest NBA mock draft at For The Win. Note: These rankings do not reflect our personal opinions or team fit but rather where experts currently have each prospect slated. The best takes and the sharpest bets on all the hoops storylines you need to know. Sign up for our Layup Lines newsletter, hitting your inbox on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. 1. Cooper Flagg TEAM:Duke POSITION: Wing HEIGHT: 6-9 DRAFT AGE: 18.5 2. Dylan Harper TEAM: Rutgers POSITION: Guard HEIGHT: 6-6 DRAFT AGE: 19.3 3. Ace Bailey TEAM: Rutgers POSITION: Forward HEIGHT: 6-10 DRAFT AGE: 18.9 4. V.J. Edgecombe TEAM: Baylor POSITION: Wing HEIGHT: 6-5 DRAFT AGE: 19.9 5. Tre Johnson TEAM: Texas POSITION: Wing HEIGHT: 6-6 DRAFT AGE: 19.3 6. Kon Knueppel TEAM: Duke POSITION: Wing HEIGHT: 6-7 DRAFT AGE: 19.9 7. Jeremiah Fears TEAM: Oklahoma POSITION: Guard HEIGHT: 6-4 DRAFT AGE: 18.7 8. Khaman Maluach TEAM: Duke POSITION: Big HEIGHT: 7-2 DRAFT AGE: 18.8 9. Derik Queen TEAM: Maryland POSITION: Big HEIGHT: 6-10 DRAFT AGE: 20.5 10. Egor Demin TEAM: BYU POSITION: Guard HEIGHT: 6-9 DRAFT AGE: 19.3 11. Kasparas Jakučionis TEAM: Illinois POSITION: Guard HEIGHT: 6-6 DRAFT AGE: 19.1 12. Noa Essengue TEAM: ratiopharm ulm (Germany) POSITION: Wing HEIGHT: 6-8 DRAFT AGE: 18.5 13. Carter Bryant TEAM: Arizona POSITION: Forward HEIGHT: 6-8 DRAFT AGE: 19.6 14. Collin Murray-Boyles TEAM: South Carolina POSITION: Big HEIGHT: 6-8 DRAFT AGE: 20.1 15. Nolan Traoré TEAM: Saint-Quentin (France) POSITION: Guard HEIGHT: 6-3 DRAFT AGE: 19.1 16. Cedric Coward TEAM: Washington St. POSITION: Forward HEIGHT: 6-6 DRAFT AGE: 21.8 17. Nique Clifford TEAM: Colorado St. POSITION: Forward HEIGHT: 6-6 DRAFT AGE: 23.4 18. Jase Richardson TEAM: Michigan St. POSITION: Guard HEIGHT: 6-3 DRAFT AGE: 19.7 19. Asa Newell TEAM: Georgia POSITION: Forward HEIGHT: 6-11 DRAFT AGE: 19.7 20. Thomas Sorber TEAM: Georgetown POSITION: Big HEIGHT: 6-10 DRAFT AGE: 19.5 21. Liam McNeeley TEAM: Connecticut POSITION: Wing HEIGHT: 6-7 DRAFT AGE: 19.7 22. Danny Wolf TEAM: Michigan POSITION: Big HEIGHT: 7-0 DRAFT AGE: 21.2 23. Joan Beringer TEAM: KK Cedevita Olimpija Ljubljana (Slovenia) POSITION: Big HEIGHT: 6-11 DRAFT AGE: 18.6 24. Rasheer Fleming TEAM: Saint Joseph's POSITION: Forward HEIGHT: 6-9 DRAFT AGE: 21.0 25. Will Riley TEAM: Illinois POSITION: Wing HEIGHT: 6-8 DRAFT AGE: 19.3 26. Walter Clayton Jr. TEAM: Florida POSITION: Guard HEIGHT: 6-3 DRAFT AGE: 22.3 27. Drake Powell TEAM: North Carolina POSITION: Wing HEIGHT: 6-6 DRAFT AGE: 19.8 28. Maxime Raynaud TEAM: Stanford POSITION: Big HEIGHT: 7-1 DRAFT AGE: 22.2 29. Noah Penda TEAM: Le Mans Sarthe (France) POSITION: Forward HEIGHT: 6-8 DRAFT AGE: 20.5 30. Ben Saraf TEAM: ratiopharm ulm (Germany) POSITION: Guard HEIGHT: 6-5 DRAFT AGE: 19.2 SECOND ROUND 31. Ryan Kalkbrenner 32. Hugo González 33. Adou Thiero 34. Yanic Konan Niederhäuser 35. Hansen Yang 36. Alex Toohey 37. Chaz Lanier 38. Bogoljub Marković 39. Kam Jones 40. Tyrese Proctor 41. Johni Broome 42. Koby Brea 43. Jamir Watkins 44. Javon Small 45. Hunter Sallis 46. Sion James 47. John Tonje 48. Eric Dixon 49. Rocco Zikarsky 50. Micah Peavy 51. Ryan Nembhard 52. Alijah Martin 53. Vlad Goldin 54. RJ Luis Jr. 55. Kobe Sanders 56. Tamar Bates 57. Payton Sandfort 58. Amari Williams 59. Brice Williams 60. Michael Ružić