Judge: Elizabeth School District must return banned books to libraries during appeal process
DENVER (KDVR) — While the Elizabeth School District is working to appeal a ruling that prevents the district from removing books for expressed views from its libraries, a judge ruled that the banned books must be put back on the shelves while the trial plays out.
On Thursday, a U.S. district court judge for the District of Colorado announced that the school district needs to return the removed books to their libraries by 5 p.m. on Saturday.
This came after a U.S. District Court judge ruled the district must return all books it removed no later than March 25, which the district appealed.
Elizabeth School District facing further legal action regarding book ban
The Elizabeth School District argued to keep the books off the shelves during the appeal process; however, on Thursday, a judge ruled that the books must be put back by Saturday while the appeal is underway.
This court ruling stems from an ongoing effort by the district to remove several books from libraries. In August 2024, the Elizabeth School District 'temporarily' pulled 19 books from the shelves and adopted a 'sensitive topic protocol' due to the material in the books. This material includes LGBTQ+ topics and racial issues.
These books included:
'The Hate U Give,' Angie Thomas
'Thirteen Reasons Why,' Jay Asher
'Pride: Championing LGBTQ Rights,' Rebecca Felix
'You Should See Me in a Crown,' Leah Johnson
'It's Your World — If You Don't Like It, Change It,' Mikki Halpin
'The Kite Runner,' Khaled Hosseini
'Beloved,' Toni Morrison
'The Bluest Eye,' Toni Morrison
'The Perks of Being a Wallflower,' Stephen Chbosky
'Looking for Alaska,' John Green
'Nineteen Minutes,' Jodi Picoult
'Speak,' Laurie Anderson
'Identical,' Ellen Hopkins
'Fallout,' Ellen Hopkins
'Glass,' Ellen Hopkins
'Burned,' Ellen Hopkins
'Crank,' Ellen Hopkins
'Smoke,' Ellen Hopkins
'George,' Alex Gino
The district was sued in December 2024 after the American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado, representing two students in the Elizabeth School District and other stakeholders, claimed that the books were removed because they violated some 'school board members' partisan and political values.' The lawsuit claimed that removing the books violated the First Amendment.
FOX31 Newsletters: Sign up to get breaking news sent to your inbox
A U.S. District Court judge ruled in March that the district can't remove books if it 'disagrees with the views expressed therein or merely to further their preferred political or religious orthodoxy.' The judge ordered the district to lift the ban while it plays out in court, but the district appealed that ruling.
The district is still working to appeal this ruling, but for now, the books are ordered to go back on the shelves by Saturday.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
A Teen Killed Himself After Talking to a Chatbot. His Mom's Lawsuit Could Cripple the AI Industry.
The Orlando Division of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida will hear allegations against Character Technologies, the creator of in the wrongful death lawsuit Garcia v. Character Technologies, Inc. If the case is not first settled between the parties, Judge Anne Conway's ruling will set a major precedent for First Amendment protections afforded to artificial intelligence and the liability of AI companies for damages their models may cause. The case was brought against the company by Megan Garcia, the mother of 14-year-old Sewell Setzer III, who killed himself after conversing with a chatbot roleplaying as Daenerys and Rhaenyra Targaryen from the Game of Thrones franchise. Eugene Volokh, professor emeritus at UCLA School of Law, shares examples of Sewell's conversations included in the complaint against Character Technologies. Garcia's complaint alleges that Character Technologies negligently designed "as a sexualized product that would deceive minor customers and engage in explicit and abusive acts with them." The complaint also asserts that the company failed to warn the public "of the dangers arising from a foreseeable use of including specific dangers for children"; intentionally inflicted emotional distress on Sewell by "failing to implement adequate safety guardrails in the product before launching it into the marketplace"; and that the company's neglect proximately caused the death of Sewell who experienced "rapid mental health decline after he began using and with which he conversed "just moments before his death." Conway dismissed the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim on the grounds that "none of the allegations relating to Defendants' conduct rises to the type of outrageous conduct necessary to support" such a claim. However, Conway rejected the defendants' motions to dismiss the rest of Garcia's claims on First Amendment grounds, saying, "The Court is not prepared to hold that the Character A.I. [large language model] LLM's output is speech at this stage." Adam Zayed, founder and managing attorney of Zayed Law Offices, tells Reason he thinks "that there's a difference between the First Amendment arguments where a child is on social media or a child is on YouTube" and bypasses the age-verification measures to consume content "that's being produced by some other person" vs. minors accessing inappropriate chatbot outputs. However, Conway recognized Justice Antonin Scalia's opinion in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) that the First Amendment "is written in terms of 'speech,' not speakers." Conway ruled that defendants "must convince the court that the Character A.I. LLM's output is protected speech" to invoke the First Amendment rights of third parties— users—whose access to the software would be restricted by a ruling in Garcia's favor. Conway says that Character Technologies "fail[ed] to articulate why words strung together by an LLM are speech." Whether LLM output is speech is an intractable philosophical question and a red herring; Conway herself invokes Davidson v. Time Inc. (1997) to assert that "the public…has the right to access social, aesthetic, moral, and other ideas and experiences." Speech acts are broadly construed as "ideas and experiences" here—the word speech is not even used. So, the question isn't whether the AI output is speech per se, but whether it communicates ideas and experiences to users. In alleging that targeted her son with sexually explicit material, the plaintiff admits that the LLM communicated ideas, albeit inappropriate ones, to Sewell. Therefore, LLM output is expressive speech (in this case, it's obscene speech to express to a minor under the Florida Computer Pornography and Child Exploitation Prevention Act.) The opening paragraph of the complaint accuses Character Technologies of "launching their systems without adequate safety features, and with knowledge of potential dangers" to "gain a competitive foothold in the market." If the court establishes that the First Amendment does not protect LLM output and AI firms can be held liable for damages these models cause, only highly capitalized firms will be able to invest in the architecture required to shield themselves from such liability. Such a ruling would inadvertently erect a massive barrier to entry to the burgeoning American AI industry and protect incumbent firms from market competition, which would harm consumer welfare. Jane Bambauer, professor of law at the University of Florida, best explains the case in The Volokh Conspiracy: "It is a tragedy, and it would not have happened if had not existed. But that is not enough of a reason to saddle a promising industry with the duty to keep all people safe from their own expressive explorations." The post A Teen Killed Himself After Talking to a Chatbot. His Mom's Lawsuit Could Cripple the AI Industry. appeared first on
Epoch Times
2 days ago
- Epoch Times
Blake Lively Cannot Refile Emotional Distress Claims Against Justin Baldoni, Judge Rules
A federal judge has ruled that actress Blake Lively cannot refile her emotional distress claims against actor-director Justin Baldoni in the ongoing legal dispute stemming from the production of the film 'It Ends With Us,' according to court documents filed on Tuesday. The decision, issued by U.S. District Judge Lewis J. Liman of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, comes after Lively chose to drop the emotional distress claims from the case.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Events to celebrate Juneteenth at a Dayton Metro Library
DAYTON, Ohio (WDTN) — There are several events on tap at Dayton Metro Libraries that will celebrate Juneteenth, beginning today. The following events are for guests of all ages to enjoy and will be happening throughout the month. Family Storytime: Holidays and Celebrations, Wednesday, June 4, 4-4:45 pm, Burkhardt Branch: Enjoy books, songs, and activities that recognize Juneteenth. A screening of '12 Years a Slave,' Saturday, June 7, 2-4 pm, Southeast Branch: The movie released in 2013 and is rated R. Teen DIY: Craft Stick Wall Hangings!, Tuesday, June 10, 3-5 pm, Southeast Branch. Coloring for Adults, Wednesday, June 11, 10-11 am, Northwest Branch: Registration is required. A screening of 'Selma,' Saturday, June 14, 2-4 pm, Southeast Branch: The movie released in 2015 and is rated PG-13. Juneteenth Bingo and Crafts, Monday, June 16, 4-5 pm, Trotwood Branch: For students in grades 1-4. African American Genealogy, Monday, June 16, 7-8 pm, Northwest Branch: A presentation by Shawna Woodward, a DML Genealogy Librarian. Registration is required. Teen DIY: Juneteenth, Tuesday, June 17, 3-5 pm, Southeast Branch: A craft making session that will also feature a history on Juneteenth. Juneteenth Paper Freedom Quilt, Tuesday, June 17, 6-7 pm, Trotwood Branch A Juneteenth Discussion, Tuesday, June 17, 7-8:15 pm, Northwest Branch: Karen D. Brame of DML's Special Collections Department and community guests will speak about the holiday and its global impact. Juneteenth Jewelry Making, Wednesday, June 18, 1:30-2:30 pm, West Branch: For students in grades 1-4. Black is Also a Rainbow Color Storytime, Wednesday, June 18, 4-4:30 pm, Trotwood Branch: A reading of 'Black is a Rainbow Color,' as well as craft making. This event is for babies and toddlers. Juneteenth: The Hate U Give, Saturday, June 21, 2-4 pm, Southeast Branch: A screening of 'The Hate U Give,' which released in 2018 and is rated PG-13. Juneteenth Attire Fashion Show, Saturday, June 28, 3-5 pm, West Branch: Those interested in modeling need to register beforehand. Spots are limited. All Dayton Metro Library locations will be closed on Thursday, June 19, the day the holiday is observed. To register for events visit the library's website or call the help line at 937-463-2665. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
