Children in poverty living without bedding is not 'unusual'
It comes as the charity said the Scottish Government's legally binding targets to reduce child poverty to 10% by 2030 will not be met unless urgent action is taken.
That action includes increasing the Scottish Child Payment to £40 per week after statistics showed it had made positive steps to reduce poverty.
Speaking exclusively to The Herald as part of the Scotland's Forgotten Children: Poverty in Focus series, the charity boss warned: 'There are families waking up in the morning and planning their day around how do they get through because they live in poverty.
'Can their child have a shower? Can they wash their clothes? Do they have a fridge? Do they have food to eat, and if they do, can they cook it? Do they have nappies for their baby? Do they have beds and bedding?
'We had a practitioner who said she was in terms after being in a family's house because we had supported the family to get new quilts, new pillows and new bedding and the children were literally like this is the first time they've ever had new bedding in their house.'
That is 'not unusual,' she warns.
Approximately £150,000 has been spent by the charity since last July on essential items like bedding for more than 1,700 children, funded by Nationwide.
READ MORE:
Wake up call: Extreme child poverty in Scotland is now higher than 1990s
Rebecca McCurdy: I was ashamed of growing up poor – but I am proud of it now
'Beds and bedding are very common for us to support families with,' she said.
'A practitioner was sharing with me last week about a family living in a house where there were concrete floors – there was no flooring. That is devastating."
Ms Steel praised the Scottish Government's 'commitment' to eradicating child poverty after First Minister John Swinney declared it as his key mission in government last year.
Figures showed that child poverty rates in Scotland decreased slightly to 22% in 2023-24, down from 26% the previous year, with policies like the Scottish Child Payment credited with making progress.
But charities, including Action for Children want to see that figure uplifted from the current £27.15 per week, to £40.
Doing so is estimated to lift an additional 20,000 children out of poverty and put the Scottish Government on track to meet legally binding targets to cut child poverty to 10% by 2030.
Ms Steel told The Herald: 'There is an opportunity for the government to make a significant difference to child poverty through progressive policies.'
She also described the commitment to mitigate the two-child benefit cap as a 'positive move'.
'We can't talk about what the Scottish Government is doing in a vacuum without considering the UK Government.'
If UK Government scrapped two child limit that would lift 400,000 children out of poverty immediately – however, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has maintained there is not currently the means to do this.
Ms Steel added: 'The Scottish Government has committed to mitigating against that. If they weren't having to do that they would have more money to spend on addressing poverty in Scotland, potentially.
'But what we would like to see is we still think there is scope to increase the Scottish Child Payment and we will be calling on the government to increase that to a minimum of £40 per week by the end of this parliamentary term.
'That provides that financial support which we know is really important.'
But in an exclusive interview with The Herald, Mr Swinney said there were no current plans to increase the Scottish Child Payment.
He warned it had reached its 'limit' and could remove the 'incentive to actually enter the labour market'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Prisoners to be transferred to lower security jails to ease overcrowding
Prisoners are to be transferred to lower security jails in an effort to ease overcrowding, as part of a new measure quietly unveiled by the government. Sky News understands that as of Monday, offenders serving standard sentences can be transferred to open or category D prisons up to three years earlier than previously, to free up space in higher security jails. Open prisons have minimal security and allow eligible prisoners to spend time on day release away from the prison on licence conditions to carry out work or education. It's unclear how many prisoners this will apply to, but the majority of those in prison custody serve standard determinate sentences. This is an extension of a policy which previously existed, as the prison service is warned of urgent capacity pressures. Exemptions will include sex offenders, terrorists, violent criminals, those convicted of stalking, and prisoners serving a sentence of over four years. It could mean those convicted of domestic abuse-related crimes are eligible for transfer to open prisons. The Prison Governors Association told Sky News it has "concerns" about the measure. "This would still mean that after just two weeks in prison a man serving a seven and a half year prison sentence could be moved to an open prison, where there are no physical barriers like high walls, fences, secure gates and minimal staff supervision that could prevent prisoners from simply walking out," the association said in a statement. Prison governors will have some discretion to judge the risk of the move, but it's understood the "presumption" will be that the transfer should take place. Despite early release measures, prisons in England and Wales continue to face chronic overcrowding. The male estate is currently operating at around 98% capacity. This latest measure comes after the government accepted recommendations made in the sentencing review, which will see almost 10,000 fewer people sent to prison in the next three years. However, these measures will take time to become legislation. A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: "We are building new prisons and are on track for 14,000 places by 2031 - the largest expansion since the Victorians. Our sentencing reforms will also force prisoners to earn their way to release or face longer in jail for bad behaviour, while ensuring the most dangerous offenders can be kept off the street. "Only certain thoroughly risk-assessed offenders are eligible for moves to open prison and anyone found breaching the rules can be immediately returned to a closed prison."
Scotsman
6 hours ago
- Scotsman
Award winning chippy shares secret for 'perfect' fish and chips
But if you've ever wondered how to get the perfect golden fried fish and crispy chips, then one Scottish chippy owner has shared her secret. Sarah Heward, owner of The Real Food Café in Tyndrum, has shared her secret for creating the perfect fish supper - and it's all about attention to detail. Regularly featured in 'Best Of' lists as one of Scotland's favourite chippies, and a seven times winner in the National Fish & Chip Awards, The Real Food Café' is known for its quality, care and sustainability. It's also famed for its gluten-free fish and chips, with some customers making a 500-mile round trip to enjoy them, a testament to the restaurant's iconic status as one of the go-to places for an exceptional fish supper and its inclusive menu. How to make 'perfect' fish and chips Picture: Real Food Cafe Here's what Sarah says makes the ultimate fish and chips. 'Fish and chips might sound simple, but making a truly outstanding chippy is anything but. It's all about layers of detail. The Real Food Café only uses MSC-certified, sustainably sourced fish. "Once prepped and portioned, it's carefully layered in a Fish Fridge, no more than two or three fillets deep, ready for frying. 'Our signature light, golden batter is made with chilled water. The cold temperature causes the wheat proteins to expand, and when the batter hits the hot oil, it explodes, creating that crisp, airy texture you want – nobody likes a soggy fish and chips! "We also use a specialised batter-whisking machine to keep the consistency just right. 'But the chips matter just as much. Ours are made fresh daily, sometimes up to a quarter of a tonne. "When the tatties arrive, we test them for sugar content because too much sugar means chips that fry too dark. We rumble 25kg of potatoes at a time, eye them by hand and chip them in a machine that can process a full sack in about 20 seconds. 'Cooking times are constantly adjusted throughout the year for variations in potato and wheat crops. Once it's all cooked, we finish with the final secret ingredients: salt, vinegar, and a generous serving of love.' The Real Food Cafe in Tyndrum has been going strong as one of the best places to stop for a bite to eat for almost 20 years and it all came about after Ms Heward took over the site after chancing upon an advert for the then-derelict premises while working in the City. She and her husband decided to snap up the former Little Chef and move up north, seeking a better work-life balance and feeling that they could 'do something better than the previous occupiers'. After a 'very rudimentary patch-up job', including filling the holes in the roof, the cafe opened its doors for the first time in April 2005, timed to capitalise on the key summer trading period. 'We did that, and that was really the start of the journey [but] over the years there's been a huge number of challenges, both personal and professional.' These include the sudden death of her husband, who had planned to work as a consultant in Aberdeen in the oil industry when they moved to Scotland but took an active role in the café. But she persisted, and the business, which benefits from its location on the West Highland Way, started picking up awards including for their fish and chips.
Telegraph
6 hours ago
- Telegraph
The burqa is inconsistent with integration
Churchill once said, 'Nothing can save England, if she will not save herself. If we lose faith in ourselves, in our capacity to guide and govern, if we lose our will to live, then, indeed, our story is told.' Let those words settle – less as a relic of the past than as a stern admonition for the present. As we reopen a debate many in Westminster have long preferred to bury, we must ask: has Britain still the will to save herself? Or will we, through cowardice and confusion, allow our national story to end not with a bang, but a whimper? The question of banning the burqa and niqab is not a trivial sideshow in the culture wars. It is a litmus test of national self-belief. It goes to the heart of whether Britain has a solution to the complex problems caused by rapid population increase and demographic change. Starmer, predictably, has neither the inclination nor the courage to approach this subject. But a new government with spine, conviction, and a willingness to take the slings and arrows of metropolitan outrage might yet do so. And it must – for the issue before us is no longer about fabric and facial coverings. Are we, or are we not, a society confident in our values? And if the answer is yes – if we are to stem the disintegration of national cohesion and restore a shared civic space – then we must start by outlawing one of the most visible symbols of separation: the full-face veil. Libertarian objections, while intellectually consistent, fall short of lived reality. It is true that in a free society, individuals ought generally to wear what they wish. But there are limits to freedom, and always have been – limits defined by the need to preserve what the French, with admirable clarity, call le vivre ensemble: the capacity to live together. France and Belgium, far from authoritarian states, understood this when they enacted bans in 2010. In 2014, the European Court of Human Rights – an institution I criticise more often than not – nevertheless ruled correctly in S.A.S. v France. The court unanimously acknowledged that the ban infringed individual freedoms of religion and private life, but held that the interference was justified in order to protect a broader societal good: the integrity of social life in an open, liberal democracy. Interestingly, the court rejected the public safety rationale, instead identifying the core issue as one of cultural compatibility. In a Western, pluralist society, being able to see and be seen, to look one another in the face without impediment, is not merely a nicety. It is a necessity. It underpins trust, empathy, and the social contract itself. The burqa and niqab are not akin to turbans, yarmulkes, headscarves or motorcycle helmets. They are garments of erasure – of identity, of individualism, and of the mutual recognition that life in community demands. No law compelling British Sikhs to remove their turbans, or Orthodox Jewish women to discard sheitels, has ever been proposed – because those traditions do not negate the possibility of social interaction. Full facial coverings do and any ban could reasonably make exceptions for sporting, health or professional reasons or for riding a motorbike (as in France). There is also a deeper hypocrisy. When I have travelled in Middle Eastern or Catholic countries, I have covered my shoulders, legs, and hair when asked. I have done so not under duress, but in a spirit of respect. I have entered women-only spaces and abstained from alcohol when custom required it. Is it so outlandish to expect that those who come to Britain might return the courtesy? Other nations are unapologetic in defending their ways of life. Why are we so ready to abandon ours at the first hint of discomfort? Our culture – rooted in Judeo-Christian values, Enlightenment reason, and the hard-won principle of sexual equality – has made this country one of the most tolerant and liberal on earth. But tolerance cannot mean indifference. A society that tolerates everything, even its own erosion, will not survive. The answer must now be: no more. Not because we are intolerant – but because we wish to remain a society worth integrating into. A society with the courage to demand participation, not parallelism. A society with the clarity to say: there are lines, and they matter. Churchill warned us that if we lose faith in ourselves, then indeed, our story is told. That warning echoes now more than ever.
