logo
Why Koreans don't apologize when bumping into others

Why Koreans don't apologize when bumping into others

Korea Herald24-03-2025

Crowd density isn't the only reason minor physical contact is tolerated in South Korea
During William Smith's first experience riding the subway in Seoul several years ago, he initially felt that some Koreans were rude and didn't respect other passengers' personal space. People would push past him and walk away without apologizing.
'In the United States, if I accidentally bump into someone — even after apologizing — I could be accused of something like sexual harassment. But here, people seem more understanding,' the 37-year-old American said.
Now he understands that in South Korea, unintentional "minor physical contact" doesn't necessarily warrant an apology. 'I might just say 'excuse me,' or the other person might give me a small nod to express their apology,' he said. 'No harm, no foul.'
On the surface, one might say that Koreans, unlike people in some other countries, are more accustomed to crowded public spaces like buses and subways as part of their daily lives. After all, differences in environment and living conditions strongly influence cultural norms and etiquette.
But on a deeper level, experts say this apparent inattentiveness to others' private space is rooted in Korea's collectivist culture, where individual privacy often takes a back seat.
Tolerance of minor physical contact
In a collectivist society, harmony within the community is of the utmost importance, explains Han Min, a psychology lecturer at Ajou University who has authored multiple books on Korean culture and psychology. 'So if an action isn't a serious wrongdoing, people don't make an issue of it,' he said in an interview with The Korea Herald.
'There are things that are culturally understood without being said. In a crowded subway, the person who bumps into someone assumes it wasn't intentional, and the person who was bumped into thinks the same.'
Park Jae-kyung, head of the Korean Language Culture Association and a Ph.D. holder in Korean Language and Literature from Seoul National University, agrees about the role of collectivism.
He also noted that Seoul is not the only densely populated city in the world and that people's reactions to these situations vary, reflecting cultural differences.
Seoul ranks 33rd among the world's most populated cities in 2024, according to the World Population Review. Tokyo tops the list, followed by Delhi, Shanghai and Dhaka.
Park pointed out cultural differences between Korea, Japan and the United States.
In Japan, people immediately apologize when bumping into others on the subway, saying 'sumimasen,' he explained. The same is generally true in the US, where respect for one's personal space is culturally emphasized, whereas in Korea, people traditionally have had little concept of individuality.
The prevalent use of 'we' instead of 'I' in the Korean language is a clear example of how Koreans value community over personal space, he added.
'We (Koreans) don't say 'my house,' 'my village' or 'my school.' Instead, we say 'our house,' 'our village,' 'our school' -- even 'our country,'' Park said.
'Two or three decades ago, when children in the same neighborhood fought and someone's glasses were broken, (the victim's) parents often let it go, thinking it happened while 'our' children were playing,' he said. 'If someone's car was scratched in an apartment parking lot, they might have dismissed it, considering it an accident within 'our' neighborhood.'
From this emphasis on 'we' comes a tolerance for physical proximity, he said. It is common for friends to walk arm-in-arm or hold hands, a behavior that might be considered unusual in Western cultures. In public bathhouses, it is common to see Koreans to leave their private parts uncovered in resting areas outside the baths.
Young Koreans don't like being bumped
However, experts note that attitudes toward physical contact in public spaces are rapidly changing, especially among younger Koreans.
Young Koreans in their 20s and 30s interviewed by The Korea Herald said they feel offended when people push past them without apologizing.
'I can understand a small bump because there are just too many people. But sometimes, older people push me hard without saying anything. I use swear words in my head when that happens. I rarely see young people behaving that way,' said Song, who identified herself only by her surname and is in her mid-30s.
Kwak Geum-joo, a psychology professor at Seoul National University, said there is a generational difference stemming from changes in living conditions over the past few decades.
'Three or four decades ago, when Seoul's population was exploding and public transportation was inadequate, students and office workers had no choice but to ride overcrowded buses every day,' she said. These buses were so packed that it took several attempts to properly close the doors.
She said that older people seemingly pushing and shoving others more often doesn't necessarily mean they lack proper etiquette or are rude. 'Their behavior was simply tolerated in their generation,' she explained.
'But young people today are more Westernized and individualistic. They are sensitive about personal space and try to avoid invading the space of others. When they do make physical contact, they are more likely to apologize,' she said.
shinjh@heraldcorp.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

[Lim Woong] Teaching digital natives
[Lim Woong] Teaching digital natives

Korea Herald

time8 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

[Lim Woong] Teaching digital natives

When Marc Prensky, an American writer, introduced the term "digital natives" in a 2001 article, he proposed a clear distinction between those born into the digital age and those who had to learn and adapt to digital technologies. Since then, the terminology has expanded: we now hear of digital immigrants, nomads and tribes — each reflecting different relationships with our rapidly evolving technological world. At first glance, today's young generations seem to fit the mold. Instagram stories flash across the screen, demanding attention; TikTok videos compress complex ideas into seconds, often offering little lasting value. Online or mobile gaming isn't just a pastime but a habitat. Travel and self-care trends are curated online, liked and shared. Homework? One Google/Naver search, a YouTube tutorial, a prompt to ChatGPT — and it's done. Yet beneath this surface-level fluency lies a paradox: mastery of digital tools does not equate to mastery of thought or an authentic sense of learning. After all, being skilled in media use or shopping platforms does not necessarily make one discerning, reflective, or resilient. That said, generational labels like "digital natives" or "Generation Z" can help identify broad social patterns. They can guide schools and educators in designing relevant curricula. For example, it's often claimed that digital natives are liberated from rote memorization and traditional knowledge-based schooling. However, memorization is widely regarded as essential by learning scientists. It enables students to retrieve, combine and build upon knowledge. If we abandon memory because "AI can remember for you," we risk losing literacy. The result could be a classroom divided — not only by ability, but by access to AI tools and the ability to think critically about their use, potentially widening educational inequalities. In 'The Anxious Generation,' Jonathan Haidt warns that smartphones and social media are rewiring children's brains. Constant screen exposure increases the risk of dependency, as their brains demand ever more dopamine-triggering content. The consequences? Shortened attention spans, diminished tolerance for complex stories and weakened empathy. Children immersed in short-form media may struggle to process long texts or to interpret emotional subtleties in relationships. These concerns have prompted governments across the globe to restrict or ban smartphone use among children. But meaningful reform demands more than bans — it requires strong civic literacy, critical thinking and the ability to separate fact from disinformation. So it's quite troubling to hear that resistance to smartphone bans in classrooms is framed as a matter of student rights. Allowing unrestricted smartphone use during instruction is akin to handing out soda and YouTube to pacify a public tantrum. Public education must stand for more than appeasement. On the other hand, generational narratives can be misleading. As Rebecca Eynon of the University of Oxford explains, technology use exists on a spectrum shaped by education, gender and socioeconomic context — not by catchy metaphors. Nature once published a piece titled "Homo zappiens," only to conclude that the so-called tech-savvy generation may not differ significantly from those before them. Also, politicians and marketers often capitalize on generational branding. Millennials prefer this, Gen Z buys that and Gen Alpha wants something else. These sweeping claims obscure more serious divides — particularly within age groups — related to education, income and opportunity. Sociologist Jin-Wook Shin of Chung-Ang University argues that viewing inequality solely through an age-based lens distracts from the deepening class-based divisions within each generation. These dynamics reflect recurring patterns of human society. Good educators already know this. They refuse to reduce students to simplistic categories. Instead of assuming that every child is a digital native, we should resist untested assumptions. Not all teens thrive through gamified learning or digital platforms. Educators must engage students as individuals. What young people need most are not brainwave-monitoring headsets or VR goggles, but real human connection: authentic stories, lasting friendships, play and a sense of belonging. Ultimately, embracing the uniqueness of each student is essential. Imagine youth as a forest — almost uniform from a distance, but filled with quiet variation: moss growing in shade, early-turning maples and slender saplings reaching for the sky. Algorithms trained on averages may predict, "green today, perhaps green — or not — tomorrow," but human educators perceive the nuance. They notice the outliers, the overlooked, the quietly flourishing. That ability to truly see and nurture others lies at the heart of teaching. This attentive seeing — this honoring of complexity — is the true work of education. It ensures that no learner, regardless of digital fluency, is overlooked. In an era increasingly shaped by artificial intelligence, let us recommit to fostering community, honoring diversity and upholding dignity. I believe overinvesting in AI while underinvesting in teachers, students and all members of the school community undermines the core of education. We must invest not just in tools, but in people.

Exhibition focuses on early Joseon art
Exhibition focuses on early Joseon art

Korea Herald

time21 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Exhibition focuses on early Joseon art

First 200 years of Joseon shaped Korean identity, National Museum of Korea says For the next three months, an exhibition at the National Museum of Korea will look at how the first 200 years of Joseon (1392-1910) formed what is quintessentially Korean identity today through exceptional artworks. The exhibition 'Art of Early Joseon: Masterpieces from the 15th and 16th Century' illustrates the initiative and vibrancy the Joseon people projected as they fostered what would become Korea, according to Kim Jae-hong, the NMK director general, during a preview tour Monday. 'Joseon's early years were pivotal to Korean history because the social fabric as well as physical borders of Korea were established by then,' Kim added, saying artworks on display would help people recognize the continuity of society over centuries. A total of 691 ceramics, calligraphy and Buddhist paintings are on view, 40 of which are on loan from 24 institutions in the US, UK, Germany, France and Japan. Of the 40 items, 23 are being shown in Korea for the first time, an NMK official said, adding that 79 items on display are state-designated National Treasures and Treasures. Some 300 ceramics, which account for almost half of the entire objects featured, testify to Korea's shifting focus on white porcelain from the celadon of the preceding Goryeo Kingdom (918-1392). Buncheong, a type of stoneware that bridged the transition in the 15th century, uses a greater range of decorative techniques than Goryeo celadon, and is more colorful than white porcelain, the museum said. White porcelain replaced buncheong in the following centuries. Calligraphy and paintings by Joseon officials, who doubled as scholars promoting Confucian values and teachings, shed light on Joseon aesthetics, chiefly expressed in ink wash paintings that stress various tonal effects employing just black ink and water. 'Through ink-wash landscape paintings rendered in deep tones of black ink with masterful shading, the scholar officials of Joseon depicted the ideal world envisioned by the newly established Confucian ideology,' the museum said. Buddhist objects, from paintings to statues, add context to the exhibition dedicated to the deeply Confucian state. The Wooden Seated Buddha at Jogyesa, the main temple of Jogye Order of Korean Buddhism, shows the influence Buddhism still held over the people even after the state adopted Confucianism as its ruling ideology, a museum official said. Hunminjeongeum Haeryebon, a book annotating Hangeul, the Korean writing system created by King Sejong the Great in 1443, which will be on display until July 7. The exhibition comes 20 years after the museum's reopening in Seoul's Yongsan-gu. It runs through August, and admission fees are waived from Tuesday to Sunday.

Boys outscore girls in math, while girls lead in English on Suneung: data
Boys outscore girls in math, while girls lead in English on Suneung: data

Korea Herald

time2 days ago

  • Korea Herald

Boys outscore girls in math, while girls lead in English on Suneung: data

Male students outscored their female peers in math on the national college entrance exam, or Suneung, in 2024, a trend that has continued for four consecutive years, data shows. In contrast, female students continued to lead in English, while performance in Korean remained nearly identical across genders. According to the Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation on Sunday, which oversees the annual College Scholastic Ability Test, male students had a higher average score of 102.7 in math, compared to 97.1 points for female students. The average standard score in Korean was higher among female students, at 100.8 points, compared to 99.1 points for male students. These figures are not raw scores, but are weighted and adjusted to reflect performance relative to other test takers. The institute's analysis also showed that a higher percentage of male students ranked in the top two performance levels in math. Specifically, 5.9 percent of male students were in Level 1 and 9.4 percent in Level 2, compared to just 2.2 percent and 5.3 percent of female students, respectively. In Korea's college entrance exam, students are ranked in nine levels based on their relative performance, with Level 1 representing the top 4 percent of test takers and Level 2 roughly covering the top 11 percent. In English, a higher percentage of female students placed in the top two levels. Among female test takers, 6.3 percent scored in Level 1 and 16.6 percent in Level 2, slightly higher than the 6.1 percent and 16.1 percent recorded for male students. In Korean, the proportion of top-performing students was nearly the same between male and female students. In Level 1, 4.3 percent of male students and 4.4 percent of female students were represented — a difference of just 0.1 percentage point. The gap was equally narrow in Level 2, with 7.1 percent for male students and 7 percent for female students. A total of 463,486 students took the College Scholastic Ability Test in 2024, up 4.18 percent from 2023. Of them, 238,346 were male and 225,140 were female.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store