After Trump and Bannon, Musk's friendship with Stephen Miller turns nasty as the Tesla CEO walks away with his wife
Elon Musk and Stephen Miller, once allies, are now feuding. The clash involves policy disagreements over Donald Trump's bill. Miller criticized Musk's "pork-filled" comment on Fox Business. Rumors suggest a personal conflict involving Miller's wife, Katie. Katie Miller reportedly left her job and marriage to work for Musk. The former allies have unfollowed each other amid the fallout.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
What triggered the political clash between Musk and Miller?
What happened during Stephen Miller's Fox Business interview?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Did Miller respond directly to Musk's criticism?
How did Katie Miller get involved in the fallout?
How close were the Katie Millers and Elon Musk before the fallout?
Are the personal rumors making things worse?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
FAQs
What began as a political alliance between Elon Musk and top Trump adviser Stephen Miller has unraveled both professionally and personally. The drama now includes heated policy disagreements and tensions are escalating online.Without specifically naming the billionaire, Stephen Miller responded to Elon Musk's criticism of Donald Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill."Stephen Miller slammed Elon Musk in the Fox Business interview while defending Trump's contentious bill, which Musk called "pork-filled." Beyond politics, their feud has taken a personal turn, as per a report by the Daily Beast.The fallout is messy, and the former allies have unfollowed one another. Rumors of a personal dispute between Miller and Musk are still circulating at the time of the interview.Stephen Miller lamented, "Tax cuts and reforms. American energy independence. Full, complete, permanent border security and the largest welfare reform in American history.' 'That's not pork. That's not waste. That's not new spending. That is the most conservative piece of legislation in my lifetime,' as quoted in a report by the Daily Beast.His remarks were a clear jab at Musk, who has called the bill a "disgusting abomination" and "pork-filled." The tech billionaire's criticisms have sparked a contentious split with Trump, with the two titans trading barbs on social media.Miller responded to a critique of the formerly Musk-led organization where his wife worked by saying, "There's this myth out there that we could do the DOGE cuts in this bill." "But that's a different procedure."Miller didn't directly mention Musk, but host Larry Kudlow, a Trump ally, assisted him in drawing this connection.In reference to the intricacies of the law, Kudlow stated, "I don't think Elon understood that. "I prefer not to discuss that stuff. Okay, so he has $180 billion listed on his website. May he be blessed by God for that. He's been really helpful with that.' Miller grinned but remained silent.Rumor has it that Elon Musk fled the White House with Miller's wife, Katie. Katie has left Stephen Miller and her job to apparently work for Musk after serving as a top aide at Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, as per a report.During his time in government, Musk developed a close relationship with the Millers. Katie Miller was with Musk "all the time," according to the Wall Street Journal, before she followed him out the door. Even outside of work, Musk reportedly spent time with the couple.According to Miller's X post this week, the only "new" expenditure in the bill is to defend the homeland and deport illegals, with increased visa fees covering the costs."All the other provisions? Massive spending cuts. There is no 'pork' in the bill. Just campaign promises.'This comes as a blow to Musk's relationship with Katie Miller's husband.They're at odds over Trump's latest bill, and rumors of a personal feud involving Miller's wife have added fuel to the fire.Katie Miller reportedly left her government position and marriage to continue working for Musk, sparking widespread speculation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Why Musk, Trump Relationship Is Breaking Down
Ormskirk: It is not a good break-up. These were always two big beasts used to getting their own way. Two alpha males, if you like the evolutionary metaphor, trying to get along. And now the Donald Trump and Elon Musk relationship is in meltdown. Who could forget that iconic image from just a few short weeks back? Elon Musk standing behind the seated US president, Donald Trump, in the Oval Office, towering over him. Trump, his hands clasped, having to turn awkwardly to look up at him. That silent language of the body. Musk accompanied by his four-year-old, a charming and informal image, or that great evolutionary signal of mating potential and dominance, depending on your point of view. These were also clearly two massive narcissistic egos out in their gleaming open-top speedster. Musk was appointed special advisor to Trump, heading the Department of Government Efficiency, cutting excess and waste. The backseat driver for a while. There were a lot of bureaucratic casualties already, road kill at the side of the highway as the sports car roared on with frightening speed. But things were always going to be difficult if they hit a bump in the road. And they did. Perhaps, more quickly than many had imagined. There were differing views on what caused the crash. Many pointed to the dramatic fall in Tesla's sales - a 71 per cent fall in profits in one quarter - and the inevitable impact on Musk's reputation. Since the break-up, Tesla's share price has also dropped sharply, as investors have panicked. The attacks on Tesla showrooms couldn't have helped either. Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 Others pointed to Trump's proposed removal of the tax credit for owners of electric vehicles, or the political backlash in Washington over Space X's potential involvement in Trump's proposed " golden dome" anti-missile defence system. However, according to former White House strategist Steve Bannon, what really caused the crash was when the president refused to show Musk the Pentagon's attack plans for any possible war with China. There's only so far being the president's best buddy can get you. Bannon is reported as saying: "You could feel it. Everything changed." That, according to Bannon, was the beginning of the end. So now we watch Trump and Musk stumbling away from the crash scene. One minute Trump is putting on a show for the cameras. He's beaming away and introducing the " big, beautiful bill", a budget reconciliation bill that rolls together hundreds of controversial proposals. Next, he is accusing Musk of " going crazy" and talking about withdrawing government contracts from the Musk empire. Musk is unhappy too. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination," he wrote on X. "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong." Rejection and repositioning He says he's disgusted by the bill. Disgust is one of the most primitive of all the emotions. A survival mechanism - you must avoid what disgusts you. He's social signalling here, alerting others, warning them that there's something disgusting in the camp. Musk is highly attuned to public perception, perhaps even more so than Trump (which is saying something). With his acquisition of X (formerly Twitter), Musk was able to direct (and add to) online discourse, shaping public conversations. Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle? — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 Psychologically, Musk's rejection of Trump is an attempt to simultaneously elevate himself and diminish the man behind the bill. He can call out the president's action like nobody else. He is positioning himself anew as that free thinker, that risk taker, innovative, courageous, unfettered by any ties. That is his personality, his brand - and he's reasserting it. But it's also a vengeful act. And it's perhaps reminiscent of another political insider (and geek), former Downing Street adviser Dominic Cummings, who was sacked by the then UK prime minister, Boris Johnson, in 2020. Cummings was accused of masterminding leaks about the social gatherings in Downing Street. He went on to criticise Johnson as lacking the necessary discipline and focus for a prime minister as well as questioning his competence and decision-making abilities. The revenge of a self-proclaimed genius. And revenge is sweet. In a 2004 study, researchers scanned participants' brains using positron emission tomography (PET) - a medical imaging technique that is used to study brain function (among other things) - while the participants played an economic game based on trust. When trust was violated, participants wanted revenge, and this was reflected in increased activity in the reward-related regions of the brain, the dorsal striatum. Revenge, in other words, is primarily about making yourself feel better rather than righting any wrongs. Your act may make you appear moral but it may be more selfish. But revenge for what here? That's where these big narcissistic egos come into play. Psychologically, narcissists are highly sensitive to perceived slights - real or imagined. Musk may have felt Trump was attempting to diminish his achievements for political gain, violating this pact of mutual respect. This kind of sensitivity can quickly transmogrify admiration into contempt. Contempt, coincidentally, is the single best predictor of a breakdown in very close relationships. Disgust and contempt are powerful emotions, evolving to protect us - disgust from physical contamination (spoiled food, disease), and contempt from social or moral contamination (betrayal, incompetence). Both involve rejection - disgust rejects something physically; contempt rejects something socially or morally. Musk may be giving it to Trump with both barrels here. Break-ups are always hard, they get much harder when emotions like these get intertwined with the process. But how will the most powerful man in the world respond to this sort of rejection from the richest man in the world? And where will it end? (Author: Geoff Beattie, Professor of Psychology, Edge Hill University) (Disclosure Statement: Geoff Beattie does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.)
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
India seeks exemption from US' 10% baseline tariff
The fate of the 10% baseline tariffs that the Trump administration invoked on imports from all countries on April 2 is among the issues now at the heart of negotiations between New Delhi and Washington as they attempt to hammer out an early tranche of the trade deal, people aware of the matter have said. Delhi is not in favour of replicating, as suggested by the American negotiators, the approach in the trade deal struck between the US and the UK, where British goods are still subject to the baseline tariffs, these people added. According to a person with direct knowledge of the discussions, Indian negotiators are pushing for their American counterparts to remove the baseline 10% rate as well as commit to assurances that the additional 16%, due to be implemented on July 9, will be left off. An American negotiating team led by assistant US Trade Representative Brendan Lynch 4 landed in Delhi on June for what is the fifth time negotiators from either side have gone to the other's capital for face-to-face talks. The American delegation is expected to be in Delhi till June 10, longer than the previously expected two-day visit. ALSO READ | India-US trade negotiations hit top gear, American delegation extends Delhi stay 'Ideally, both the 10% baseline tariff on Indian goods and the additional 16% from July 9 must end simultaneously after an interim deal is signed. Else, India will also have rights to continue proportionately similar tariffs on American goods till the time the US withdraws the entire 26% reciprocal tariff,' one of them said, citing a joint statement by the two countries' leaders issued on February 13 in Washington. While expounding 'Mission-500' to double bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030 on February 13, the two leaders – Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Donald Trump – in their joint statement mentioned the need for new 'fair-trade terms' that are 'mutually beneficial', the person said. A second person aware of the matter corroborated India's stance: 'Only a mutually beneficial deal would have a long life'. 'Both India and the US are sovereigns. One is the oldest democracy and the other is the largest democracy. While the US is the largest economy, India is the fastest growing major economy of the world. Hence, the deal must be balanced, equitable, fair and acceptable to their people,' the first person said. The second person added that India sees trade interests between both nations as being 'complementary and not competitive', hence New Delhi is open to giving greater market access to the American goods in the Indian market provided Washington reciprocates. 'The trade negotiations continue in New Delhi covering all these matters in a constructive manner as we speak and both sides are hopeful for a win-win,' he said. ALSO READ | Donald Trump claims India willing to cut 100% tariffs on US goods, 'but…' After UK industries faced American tariffs of 25% on all aluminium, steel and derivatives (announced on March 12), 25% tariff on passenger vehicles (announced on April 3), 25% tariff on automobile parts (beginning May 3), and a 10% baseline tariff on all imports (from April 5) – the UK and the US on May 8 announced an economic prosperity deal (EPD). The mini deal secured some concessions for the UK, but the 10% baseline tariff continued. Both partners are racing to conclude an interim, or regarded as an 'early harvest', deal before July 9, which will be followed by a wider first tranche of Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) by September-October 2025. After that a comprehensive BTA will be negotiated, they said. ALSO READ | How Donald Trump decided the tariff for India The current negotiations for an early harvest deal involve greater market access for goods by eliminating tariffs and non-tariff trade barriers, and improving supply chain integration, they said. The current New Delhi round is followed by a face-to-face negotiation between the two teams in the US. During that period, Union commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal was also in the US from May 17-22 where he held meetings with his counterparts, US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick and USTR Jamieson Greer.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
NFL players double down on SpaceX amid the ongoing Donald Trump and Elon Musk dramatic feud
Atlanta Falcons safety Jessie Bates made a lucrative early investment in SpaceX (Getty Images) Atlanta Falcons Pro Bowl safety Jessie Bates is known for his playmaking ability on the field, but off the gridiron, he's making headlines for a different kind of game-changer—his bold investment in Elon Musk 's aerospace giant, SpaceX . Bates, who first backed the company in 2019, is now seeing the kind of growth most investors only dream of. But as Musk's political ties stir heated debate, Bates—and other NFL investors—are navigating not just rocket launches, but reputational turbulence. A touchdown investment: how Jessie Bates bet early on SpaceX Bates made his initial six-figure investment through Rise Sports Advisors, a firm that helps pro athletes tap into high-growth startups. He doubled down three years later through Summit Peak Ventures, joining former Bengals lineman D'Ante Smith in SpaceX's Series J round, when the company was valued at $127 billion. Now valued at over $350 billion, SpaceX has become one of the world's most lucrative private firms. 'I didn't know what to expect from it,' Smith said. 'I didn't think it would fail but I didn't know what to expect.' For Bates, the decision was about long-term vision. 'It would be crazy if we didn't think that [one day] people will be going to space normally,' he said. 'You would be crazy not to educate yourself in that space and maybe participate in some investments.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo The Musk factor: business genius or political liability? While Bates respects Musk's acumen, he stops short of backing him politically. 'You can't ignore how business-savvy these guys are and the leadership that they have in this space,' he explained, acknowledging SpaceX's 'polarizing reputation.' That reputation has only intensified. Musk's past close relationship with Donald Trump drawn criticism amid sweeping federal job cuts and regulatory rollbacks. Still, Rise Sports' VP of Finance Jay Bass said Musk's government connections 'help more than it hurts' from an economic lens. Until SpaceX goes public or sells, Bates and his fellow athlete-investors are holding tight. 'This is one of the pretty big investments that I've made,' he said. 'To see that it can be a 10x type of deal, that's exciting.' Also Read: Donald Trump and Elon Musk feud turns ugly as NFL stars like Robert Griffin III and Ryan Clark become unlikely pawns But with growing media scrutiny and protest movements targeting Musk's companies, the question remains: will SpaceX's value soar high enough to eclipse the controversy—or will politics bring it back down to Earth?
