
The Most Dangerous Part Of The World
An Indian paramilitary personnel stands guard near Pahalgam, south of Srinagar, on April 22, 2025, ... More following an attack. Gunmen in Indian-administered Kashmir opened fire on a group of tourists on April 22, with the chief minister saying the "inhuman" attack was one of the worst targeting civilians for years. At least five people were killed, a senior politician in the Himalayan region said. (Photo by Tauseef MUSTAFA / AFP) (Photo by TAUSEEF MUSTAFA/AFP via Getty Images)
Tensions are escalating rapidly in the most dangerous part of the world. No, it's not Gaza. It's not Ukraine either. It's not even Taiwan. The most dangerous part of the world is the Indian subcontinent in South Asia, and specifically Kashmir, a long-disputed territory between India and Pakistan, and especially since Pakistan was partitioned off from the British India Mandate in 1947.
On Tuesday, April 22, Islamic terrorists targeted non-Muslims when they murdered 26 innocent tourists in the same disputed region, after first demanding to know which of the tourists were Muslim. India quickly blamed Pakistan for the atrocity, and in a remarkable statement later in the week, Pakistan's Defense Minister Kwajalein Asif actually admitted that Pakistan had been supporting such groups for decades. https://www.thehansindia.com/news/national/pakistan-admits-to-backing-terror-groups-tensions-escalate-after-pahalgam-terror-attack-protests-sweep-india-965918. However, Mr. Asif called the historic support a mistake, and even blamed it on the United States, together with the West as a whole, suggesting that Pakistan was somehow doing America's bidding by maintaining such support.
Meanwhile, India and Pakistan possess nuclear weapons. They also approach this conflict with decades of animosity toward each other, going back even earlier than the original Partition.
Despite not being in the western media as much as the Middle East, the tensions in South Asia, and the historic animosity between India and Pakistan, are at least equally as intense. India, now led by an assertive Hindu government, is majority Hindu, albeit with a large Muslim minority. Pakistan is Muslim, having driven out almost the entirety of its non-Muslim minority over the last century.
Quickly following the recent Kashmir attack, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi cancelled the Indus Water Treaty, which had shared water between India and parched Pakistan. Pakistan considers this a direct threat to its national existence, as it is notoriously dry and has insufficient natural water supplies of its own.
While not blessed with water, Pakistan announced last week that it had discovered large deposits of natural gas which might change its future economic prospects. https://www.dnaindia.com/business/report-india-s-neighboring-country-hits-jackpot-with-huge-natural-gas-and-crude-oil-reserves-the-country-is-pakistan-3146413. India, meanwhile, is projected to need a massive influx of energy over the next 25 years, including a tripling of its current natural gas supply. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=61423.
As with the Middle East, what all sides need most of all is to work together, as it appears that both India and Pakistan each have supplies of that the other most needs to survive. Unfortunately, the intensity of historic grievances not only makes it difficult for them to recognize the symbiotic nature of their situation, but it also increases the likelihood that they may wind up working at cross purposes with each other.
While following the Hamas atrocities of October 7, 2023, the international press has published innumerable stories of the displacement of the Palestinians in 1948, the reality is that the number of Palestinians actually forced to flee at that time was only a fraction of the numbers of both Hindus and Muslims who were each expelled from their historic homes the year before in order to create Pakistan. Now, the potential casualties from a South Asia conflict threaten to dwarf the number of people killed in Israel and Gaza most recently.
With both energy and water being indispensable commodities for future growth of these two societies, hope springs eternal that cooler, more dispassionate heads will eventually prevail and these two nuclear powers will cooperate for the benefit of the entire region. Unfortunately, it may be more realistic to expect that hope will remain buried under the rubble of historic wrongs, perceived and otherwise, which continue to overpower rational discourse today.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Trump Will Make Iran Decision 'Within Two Weeks': WH
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump will make a decisoin on whether or not to have the United States join Israel's war with Iran "within the next two weeks," a senior White House official said Thursday. "He will make a decision within the next two weeks" about taking a direct military role in the conflict, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters at a press briefing. Smoke billows over Tehran, Iran on June 17, 2025. Smoke billows over Tehran, Iran on June 17, 2025. ATTA KENARE/AFP via Getty Images Leavitt said the decision was based on Trump's view that Iran "may" or "may not" agree to a diplomatric resolution through negotiations over its nuclear program, Leavitt said. The remarks come as Iran, Israel and America's allies wait for Trump's decision on whether to get involved in the escalating war in the Middle East. Trump has called on Iran's "unconditional surrender" in recent days, something the Iranian regime has rejected.


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Meet the muscular military man influencing Trump's Iran strategy as president weighs crucial decision
WASHINGTON — President Trump's Iran strategy is being influenced by a muscular military leader who has been given authority to draw up possible plans for a US strike on Tehran's nuclear sites, potentially with bunker-busting bombs that could eliminate underground facilities. US Central Command chief Gen. Michael Erik Kurilla, known as 'The Gorilla,' has been leading strategy over Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, with a lot of his proposals for more military assets being approved, despite other administration officials being wary of more involvement in the Middle East, Politico reported. The commander, described by at least one former official as a 'jacked' general with the 'lethality look' that Trump's Pentagon has been keen to promote, has also been getting more face time with Trump, according to the outlet. Advertisement 'Secretary Hegseth empowers all of his combatant commanders the same way—by decentralizing command and harnessing their real-world expertise regarding the defense of their respective AORs,' Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement to The Post. 'The entire DOD leadership team—from the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs to the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy—similarly provide courses of action and counsel to the Secretary based on their expertise,' Parnell added. 3 Gen. Michael Kurilla, commander, U.S. Central Command, testifies during the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on the U.S. Central Command. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images Advertisement 'The Secretary then makes a decision and final recommendation to the President. This is how the Pentagon does, and should, function. Our senior leaders are in lockstep and will continue to work in unison to deliver on President Trump's national security agenda.' Before Israel carried out its first strikes against Iran, Kurilla indicated that he gave the president the option to use the US military to strike Iran to destroy its nuclear weapons capability. 'President Trump has made it clear that if Iran doesn't permanently give up its nuclear enrichment, military force by the US may be necessary,' said House Armed Services Chair Mike Rogers at a June 10 Congressional hearing. 'If the president directed, is CENTCOM prepared to respond with overwhelming force to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran?' Rogers asked Kurilla. Advertisement 'I have provided the secretary of defense and the president a wide range of options,' Kurilla responded, later saying 'yes' to the question. Kurilla is set to leave his post at CENTCOM in just a few months after serving since 2022, leading some to believe he's grown bolder in his approach. 3 Trump hasn't ruled out getting the US military involved in Iran. AP 3 An excavator removes debris from a residential building that was destroyed in today's attack by Israel in Tehran, on June 13, 2025 in Tehran, Iran. Getty Images Advertisement The four-star Army general would be in charge of carrying out whatever strategy Trump decides on in the region in response to Iran and has also been responsible for the US response to Hamas' attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Kurilla deployed to Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan during his service and deployed to Germany in 2022 to oversee US troop deployment in response to the Russia-Ukraine war. Dan Caldwell, Hegseth's former senior adviser, indicated that reports of Kurilla being more open to aggressive policies due to his upcoming retirement from CENTCOM could be true. 'It's been reported, and, you know, based on my experience with him, is that he takes a fundamentally different view of the importance of the Middle East than a lot of other people in the administration,' Caldwell said in a 'Breaking Points' interview on Monday. 'He also, I think, believes that a military campaign against Iran will not be as costly as others. So, that's his view — and I think there are a lot of folks that want to see some type of military action occur before he retires as a result of that,' he said. 'He retires, I believe, in the middle of July — and I don't think it's a coincidence you see a lot of the pressure ramping up to do something prior to his retirement.'


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
How Dems really view Trump's economic approach — and what it means for the 2026 midterms
A plurality of American voters are supportive of President Trump's economic approach — and nearly one-quarter of Democratic voters are inclined to support House GOP candidates in the 2026 midterms as a result of his trade-focused policies, a new megapoll found. At least 22% of Democrats said Trump's tax-and-tariff agenda makes them more likely to back Republicans in House races next year, a massive Stack Data Strategy multilevel regression and post-stratification poll first reported by Politico Playbook concluded. A firm 18% of white Democrats also said Trump's handling of the economy boosts their chances of backing Republicans, compared to 24% of Hispanic Democrats, 27% of black Democrats, and 30% of Asian Democrats, agreeing with that. Democrats had hemorrhaged minority voters, particularly male ones in the 2024 election cycle and the megapoll indicates there could be additional opportunities for Republicans on that front. Additionally, while only 35% of voters approve of Trump's handling of the economy, compared to 41% who disapprove — a dramatic turnaround from his high standing during his first term and 2024 campaign — a plurality of voters believe tumult could be worth it. 4 The megapoll found silver linings with voters' perspectives of President Trump's handling of the economy, immigration and the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. REUTERS 4 President Trump has been keen on reshoring manufacturing jobs to the US. Boston Globe via Getty Images A considerable 42% of voters argued that economic turbulence could be 'worth it in the long-run' compared to 37% who disagreed, per the poll. Overall, voters surveyed for the poll narrowly favored Democrats over Republicans 44.9% to 43.3%, with 10.2% unsure. If the election unfolds that way, Democrats will flip just seven House seats and have a 222 to 212 majority in the lower chamber. Currently, Republicans have a 220 to 212 GOP majority. That is not a surprising result. The party in power has lost House seats in every midterm election since 1938, with two exceptions: 1998 and 2002. Republicans are still favored to retain the Senate. 4 House Republicans have an ultra-slim majority. Getty Images The poll also found that Trump's strongest issue was immigration, with a 49% approval to 33% disapproval. Even a quarter of voters who backed former Vice President Kamala Harris in 2024 backed his immigration policy. The megapoll was taken before protests and riots against US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) broke out across Los Angeles. Additionally, the massive survey found that key provisions of Trump's marquee legislative agenda, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, are popular with voters. 4 President Trump's tariff policy has proven controversial, but the poll indicated that many voters are open-minded to it. AFP via Getty Images On net, respondents backed extending the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act 45% to 20%, and supported boosting border security funding 53% to 21%. Democrats have pummeled Republicans over Medicaid reforms in the legislative bundle, but 42% supported the main change of imposing work requirements, compared to 32% who opposed that. Those findings were published after a brutal Fox News poll that dropped on Wednesday showed voters opposing the One Big Beautiful Bill Act 59% to 38%. Senate Republicans are currently making modifications to the mammoth bill and are hoping to get it passed by the Fourth of July. GOP leaders have repeatedly predicted that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act could boost their electoral prospects once they get it over the finish line. The Stack Data Strategy survey was taken from May 23 to June 13 and sampled 8,008. The Post has contacted the pollster about the margin of error. In late 2023, the firm released a massive survey that found Trump was on pace to beat former President Joe Biden in the Electoral College.