TRAFFIC ALERT: Semi-rollover on SR-191 in San Juan County limits traffic to one lane
SAN JUAN COUNTY, Utah () — A semi rollover crash on SR-191 has closed down all lanes of traffic except one, according to the San Juan County Sheriff's Office.
The crash happened roughly 20 miles north of Monticello, Utah. San Juan County Sheriff's Office said that it was a single-semi rollover, meaning no other vehicles were involved in the accident.
No injuries were reported in this crash, according to the sheriff's office.
The body of the semi is currently blocking several lanes, and traffic is limited to one lane. Traffic is being allowed through only one direction at a time until the roadway is cleared.
It is expected to take several hours until all lanes reopen, and traffic can flow freely.
Big, beautiful bill heads to the Senate
Flags placed at Arlington National Cemetery for Memorial Day
Here's Utah's history in the 'Mission: Impossible' franchise
House votes to increase SALT deduction
American Fork wins second straight 6A soccer title
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Maybe drive to a fork in the road? Idaho reintroduces ‘famous' license plate
Idaho is going retro. The state is bringing back its 1950s-era 'World Famous Potatoes' license plate, in part to help promote agriculture programs. Sleek in its black-and-white design, this plate gives Idahoans the option to personalize their vehicle while supporting the Idaho Potato Commission and highway infrastructure. The plate will cost $70, in addition to any registration fees for its initial issuance. Of this, $45 is allocated to state highway infrastructure and $25 to agricultural promotions through the commission, according to its president and CEO, Jamey Higham. It will be available to purchase starting June 18, according to a press release. 'It's a little more expensive than the usual plate that you get,' Higham said. 'The money to help with roads and stuff through the transportation department, and some of the money will also go to helping promote research for potatoes in our industry within the commission.' The bill to reboot the plate was sponsored by Rep. Douglas Pickett, an Oakley Republican and rancher, and was introduced on Feb. 11. It passed the House and Senate with no opposition. 'It was really easy to actually build a consensus for it, and kind of exciting to see such widespread support for something like that,' Pickett told the Idaho Statesman. Demand for a black license plate has been high in Idaho, according to Pickett and Higham, and they both said they've received good feedback regarding the resurgence of the 'World Famous Potatoes' plate. 'We've been thinking about it for a couple of years, and we actually had quite a few requests to have a black license plate because it's starting to be popular all over the West,' Higham said. Pickett said there was 'a lot of demand' to have a black plate. 'People like to personalize their vehicle, it's sort of a personal expression,' he said. Higham says he has gotten 'overwhelmingly positive' comments about the license plate. Pickett said there could be some apprehension to purchase it because Idahoans believe that areas funded by the other available plates could lose money when they drop those. 'There was a little concern about competition with the Idaho heritage plate. ... But at the end of the day, it boiled down to what people actually want, and people actually decided to have an alternative, and so I think it's important to give people those options,' Pickett said. The plate for the Idaho Heritage Trust helps support historic preservation efforts in the state. Pickett and Higham both said the 'World Famous Potatoes' license plate is what Idaho is all about. 'Our population is increasingly urban, but yet our interest in our identity as the home of the world famous Idaho potatoes remains intact, and people still identify with that as Idahoans,' Pickett said. 'It's just something that I think is kind of nostalgic for Idahoans to reflect back on a plate from the past.' Both men said they think it will be well-received. 'We have a lot of other great industries in Idaho, we really do, but somehow the potatoes have been kind of the iconic one that people recognize us for,' Higham said.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Trump signs bill killing California ZEV-related waivers, state immediately files lawsuit
Legislation that would overturn waivers granted by the Environmental Protection Agency to California for its multi-faceted clean vehicle push impacting trucking was signed by President Donald Trump Thursday, and the state immediately followed with its promised lawsuit over the action. At issue is the question of whether a waiver is a rule as defined by the Congressional Review Act (CRA). Rules are subject to being overturned by Congress under the CRA. But the generally accepted legal definition for waivers is that they do not come under the CRA. As Roll Call reported, Congress has never overturned a waiver by using the CRA. The EPA grants waivers to California under provisions of the 1970 Clean Air Act when the state seeks environmental standards stricter than federal rules. The key California waivers targeted by Congress in its most recent action are the Advanced Clean Trucks rule (ACT) and the Omnibus NOx rule. The Advanced Clean Fleets (ACF) rule had sought a waiver. But just days before Donald Trump took office, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) yanked the waiver request and the ACF is effectively dead. In a prepared statement, California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state had filed suit against the CRA action. He and California Attorney General Rob Bonta had threatened that action after the legislation passed both houses of Congress. The suit was filed Thursday in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Several other states that have committed to aligning with California's zero emission vehicle (ZEV) rules are also plaintiffs in the suit: Colorado, Delaware, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington. The legislation 'defies decades of precedent of these waivers not being subject to the CRA, and contradicts the non-partisan Government Accountability Office (GAO) and Senate Parliamentarian, who both ruled that the CRA's short-circuited process does not apply to the waivers,' Newsom said in a prepared statement. Both the GAO and the Senate Parliamentarian had released opinions that they did not believe the CRA could overturn a waiver as opposed to a rule. The presence of other states as plaintiffs is why the issue has become of interest to Congress. The market share of California plus its 'follower' states would effectively mean that OEMs, who want to avoid building cars for two separate regulatory regimes, would follow the standards set by California and its follower states. While much of the media focus on the Congressional action and the Presidential signing focused on how it would impact a California-led push to more ZEVS, including passenger cars as well as heavy duty trucks, the Newsom statement focused not only on that but also on the legal issues surrounding using the CRA to kill waivers. 'Waivers do not expire, and there is no process for revoking a waiver,' the statement said. 'This is important because governments and industry rely on market certainty that waivers provide for years after they are granted to deliver clean vehicles and develop clean air plans.' ACT mandates a rising percentage of ZEVs into the 2040s that OEMs must sell into California. The omnibus NoX rule called for steeper reductions in nitrogen oxide emissions from heavy duty vehicles than what is called for in federal rules. The ACF was designed to produce a demand for all those ZEV vehicles that the OEMs were expected to sell into California under the ACT. But without the ACF, the ability of the ACT to accomplish its goals has been called into question. Just days before the Presidential signing, CALSTART, which described itself as a 'national nonprofit driving the clean transportation revolution,' produced its annual report on the state of ZEV trucks nationwide. The group has a wide definition of 'truck,' as it includes cargo vans, medium-duty (MD) step vans, MD trucks, heavy-duty (HD) trucks, refuse trucks and yard tractors. Its data is as of December 31, 2024. The key numbers in the CALSTART report: More than 52,500 ZEV trucks have been deployed nationwide. The number of trucks deployed in 2024 was 22,692, which was up 76% from the prior year. But in the last six months of 2024, that number was just 9,841, so less than 50% for half of the year. The number of new truck registrations nationwide was 978,748 last year. ZEV trucks accounted for 2.3% of that, a figure that was down from 3% a year earlier. If the goal is still in place to have a fully ZEV truck fleet by 2040, and an interim goal of 30% by 2030, that pace of registrations needs to double. Of those total deployments, CALSTART said 11% are for heavy duty vehicles. The largest segment is for ZE cargo vans, such as the Rivian vehicles that are in heavy use by Amazon. That category accounts for 89% of all ZEV deployments. ZE cargo vans continue to dominate ZET deployments, comprising 89% of all ZETs nationwide. The remaining 11% is distributed across HD trucks (4%), The rest of the distribution is 3% for yard tractors and medium duty step vans, 1% for medium duty trucks, and 0.2% for refuse trucks. And while CALSTART is a vocal cheerleader for ZEV technology, it did not hesitate to say the arithmetic growth in ZEV usage was a long way from the exponential growth needed to make a serious dent in market share. The lack of that exponential growth, according to CALSTART, has been caused by several factors: high upfront costs for growing a ZEV fleet; lack of charging infrastructure; and 'the upfront costs and policy uncertainty at both the federal and state levels has created hesitation among fleets, OEMs, and infrastructure providers to invest.' More articles by John Kingston Onstage in Chicago, CHRW talks tech and staffing; RXO sees language order hitting capacity Logistics GDP share rose in '24, not likely to drop: CSCMP report Parts supplier FleetPride's debt rating cut by Moody's, outlook still negative The post Trump signs bill killing California ZEV-related waivers, state immediately files lawsuit appeared first on FreightWaves.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Louisiana plays a ‘wait-and-see game' after approving a slate of bills to lower insurance rates
Gov. Jeff Landry speaks to reporters about his legislative agenda to bring down high auto insurance rates on April 9, 2025. (Photo credit: Wes Muller/Louisiana Illuminator) The Louisiana Legislature wrapped up its 2025 regular session Thursday having passed an agenda to try to lower insurance rates with legislation that focused on consumers and so-called 'tort reform' policy targeting personal injury lawyers on the belief they are the cause of the state's high coverage premiums. The agenda was part of what Gov. Jeff Landry promised to shepherd through the legislature as a 'balanced approach' to the state's insurance crisis. However, one of Landry's latest actions — vetoing a tort reform bill Wednesday — has upset a member of his own party, Sen. Alan Seabaugh, R-Many. Seabaugh sponsored Senate Bill 111, which would have watered down Louisiana's 'bad faith' statute that holds insurance companies liable when they unreasonably delay or deny claims. Such practices made headlines in the wake of hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005. Landry snubbed Seabaugh's bill, writing in his veto explanation that it would have allowed insurers to deny claims, refuse reasonable settlements and avoid accountability. 'If the legislature would like to make reasonable changes to the bad faith statute next year, I will gladly work with them over the next year to make those changes,' the governor said. In an interview Thursday, Seabaugh expressed frustration with Landry, saying he felt blindsided by the veto because he thought he had the governor's support. He contrasted Landry with former Gov. John Bel Edwards, a Democrat. 'John Bel would call and tell me when he vetoed a bill,' Seabaugh said. 'Jeff didn't.' Senate President Cameron Henry, R-Metairie, said Landry also doesn't speak to him before vetoing any legislation, though Henry did not express any frustration over it. As for the rest of the approved insurance legislation, Henry said it lives up to the governor's promise of a 'balanced approach' to rein in both sides — insurance companies and trial lawyers — and their unpopular practices that have become the target of complaints from policyholders. The Senate president said he wants to hold off on any additional reforms for a couple of years to see if the measures approved this session have any impact on policy rates. 'That's kind of a wait-and-see game,' Henry said, adding that laws the insurance industry backed last year are supposed to lower homeowner premiums but have so far not had any noticeable impact. Others are less confident that the new laws will do anything to lower insurance rates. 'I talked to people in the insurance industry who tell me none of this is gonna make rates go down,' Sen. Jay Luneau, D-Alexandria, said, citing statements from the heads of tort reform associations. Another controversial measure became the center of a public feud between the governor and Insurance Commissioner Tim Temple. Gov. Landry might get the insurance laws he wants, but not without ruffling some Republican feathers House Bill 148 by Rep. Jeff Wiley, R-Maurepas, was among the first this session that Landry signed into law, gives the state insurance commissioner power to strike down any insurance rate increase considered 'excessive' or unreasonably high. Prior to the change, the commissioner could only exercise that power after holding a public hearing in which someone proved the state insurance market lacks competition. Although Wiley sponsored the bill, the governor crafted the legislation with the help of two House Democrats and lobbied heavily for its passage, arguing that Temple wasn't doing enough to regulate insurance rates. Temple and other critics argued that Landry is using the new law to try to deflect any blame voters might place on him for Louisiana's insurance crisis. Wiley's bill allows the public to review documents insurance companies file with the state when seeking a rate increase, but only if the insurance commissioner determines the information shouldn't be kept confidential as a proprietary trade secret. It takes effect on Aug. 1. Included among the many insurance bills passed this session are: Consumer-focused bills House Bill 329 by Rep. Troy Hebert, R-Lafayette, allocates $5 million per year to the Louisiana Fortify Homes Program with fees collected from insurance companies. It will take effect July 1, 2026. The program, managed by the Louisiana Department of Insurance, offers $10,000 grants to homeowners for the installation of hurricane-resistant roofs and has been effective at lowering homeowner insurance costs, according to a review by Louisiana Legislative Auditor Mike Waguespack. Senate Bill 28 by Sen. Kirk Talbot, R-River Ridge, would give homeowners a nonrefundable income tax credit for up to $10,000 for out-of-pocket expenses used to pay for a fortified roof. Combined with an LDI grant, the new tax credit could allow more Louisiana homeowners to invest in fortified roofs. Talbot's bill is pending approval of the governor. House Bill 345 by Rep. John Wyble, R-Franklinton, requires a 60-day notice, up from 30 days, from an insurer to a policyholder prior to any cancellation or non-renewal of a homeowner policy except when termination of coverage is for nonpayment of premium. The bill is pending the governor's consideration. House Bill 496 by Rep. Troy Hebert, R-Lafayette, would give policyholders a pass protecting them from any rate increases tied to a lapse in auto coverage so long as the lapse doesn't exceed 90 days. The bill would prohibit insurers from penalizing policyholders for a single instance of nonpayment during a five-year period. It received overwhelming bipartisan support from both chambers and is pending approval by the governor. Senate Bill 34 by Luneau would prohibit an insurance company from changing or altering the repair estimate filed by the adjuster originally assigned to the claim without that adjuster's permission. It is pending approval by the governor. Pro-insurance, tort reform bills House Bill 450, by Rep. Michael Melerine, R-Shreveport, ends the Housley presumption, a standard of evidence explained in a 1991 Louisiana Supreme Court ruling that applies to auto accidents, medical malpractice and other injury lawsuits. In a nutshell, the Housley presumption says courts should assume a plaintiff's injuries resulted from the accident in question if they were in good health beforehand. Lawmakers tried repeatedly to revoke the presumption in previous years, only to see their attempts fail or vetoed. Landry signed Melerine's bill into law May 28, and it took effect immediately. Lawmakers reject insurance bills that had direct relief for Louisiana homeowners Senate Bill 231 by Sen. Mike Reese, R-Leesville, deals with a concept called 'collateral source' that prevents civil defendants from admitting certain types of evidence into court, which critics say has allowed plaintiffs to sue for medical expenses they never actually had to pay. Reese's bill would effectively undo that rule and could ultimately reduce the money plaintiffs can recover in auto accident lawsuits. It is pending consideration by the governor. House Bill 431, by Rep. Emily Chenevert, R-Baton Rouge, limits the ability for people to recover damages for injuries sustained in accidents for which they are mostly at fault. The bill changes Louisiana's comparative fault statute, which assigns a percentage of blame to each party in an accident and allows for the recovery of damages in proportion with those percentages. Under prior law, a person partly at fault in an accident would be liable for their share of the damages and can recover the remaining amount found to be the fault of the other party. Chenevert's bill changes that to prohibit recovery of any amount by a party who's 51% or more at fault. It will take effect Jan. 1. House Bill 436, by Rep. Gabe Firment, R-Pollock, prohibits 'unauthorized aliens' — defined in the measure as individuals illegally in the United States under federal immigration law — from receiving general damages stemming from auto accidents. General damages include compensation for pain and suffering, but the proposal would still allow recovery for 'special damages' such as medical expenses and property damage. It will take effect Aug. 1. House Bill 291, sponsored by Rep. Jay Gallé, R-Mandeville, would extend the filing deadline, called a 'prescriptive period,' for wrongful death lawsuits from one year to two, aligning Louisiana with the deadline in most other states. It does not apply to medical malpractice cases. Proponents of the bill have argued a shorter prescriptive period attracts more tenuous lawsuits by essentially forcing people to quickly file claims so as to not lose their litigation rights. The proposal, which awaits the governor's consideration, also complements a similar measure lawmakers approved last year to extend the deadline for filing personal injury claims. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
