Tory calls for flags to be put up and taken down every day at East Ayrshire HQ
He described it as 'a very British way of expressing joy and pride'.
A call to fly the Union Flag, Saltire and East Ayrshire flags daily at East Ayrshire Council's headquarters was roundly rejected following concerns over cost, resources, and political motivations.
Conservative Councillor Neill Watts had proposed flying the three flags every day at the London Road HQ in Kilmarnock, describing it as 'a very British way of expressing joy and pride' and 'a symbol of unity.'
His motion suggested that these flags be flown daily except when a different flag is more appropriate for special occasions.
However, the proposal was met with strong opposition, particularly from Labour group leader Councillor Barry Douglas, who questioned both the practicality and its similarity to moves at Reform UK run councils in England.
He challenged the resource implications, asking whether flags would be installed at all council buildings, how much that would cost, and who would be tasked with raising and lowering the flags.
'There's a cost involved in all of that,' Cllr Douglas said. 'Raising and lowering flags takes staff. Are council officers to stop their duties to do this every day?'
He also took issue with Cllr Watts' description of the Conservatives as 'Scotland's strongest unionist party,' suggesting the recent general election results told a different story. 'Are we really talking about community cohesion,' he asked, 'or making a political point around the flag?'
Labour councillor Peter Mabon also opposed the move, stating that while flags were appropriate on special days, raising them daily would eat into officer time.
He said: 'We're talking about 200-plus hours every year in all weathers to raise and lower flags. Our officers have enough to do.'
SNP Council leader Douglas Reid also opposed the motion, expressing support for the current approach. 'We've got a policy that's lasted before my time as leader. Raising flags for special occasions, like Ukraine or Rainbow Flag (for Pride), makes it meaningful. Changing that sends the wrong message.'
Conservative councillor John McFadzean argued the proposal was modest in scale. 'For all the time it would take to hook on one flag and wind it up, there's not a huge implication. Civic pride helps lift morale.'
Cllr Douglas responded by drawing parallels with Reform UK-run councils in England, where flag-related motions have gained traction.
He acknowledged Cllr Watts' claim that he had been approached by Reform but had declined. 'Maybe he wants to tell the chamber something today. It is a big issue for Reform, but why is it such a big issue for him?'
Chief Governance Officer David Mitchell then intervened to clarify that there is no East Ayrshire Council flag. 'There has never been a council flag and we certainly don't have one at the moment.'
Cllr Watts denied any political motive, explaining his motion was based on personal observation.
'I would be more than happy just to have a flag – it doesn't matter whether it's the Saltire, it doesn't matter whether it's the flag of the United Kingdom,
'I just think that we should have at least a flag at this building as a mark of respect to our communities.'
He also reiterated his Conservative affiliation and rejected any association with Reform. 'I certainly am a Conservative and I am nowhere near Reform in that respect.'
In the end, councillors voted overwhelmingly to maintain the current flag policy, with 24 voting in favour of an amendment to retain existing arrangements and just four supporting the motion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Keir Starmer warned against creating 'two tier' benefit system after U-turn
Keir Starmer said the Government's welfare reforms 'strike the right balance' after he made major concessions to Labour rebels to avoid a potential Commons defeat Keir Starmer is battling to push through watered down cuts to disability benefits as he faced warnings it would create a "two tier" system. In a dramatic climbdown, the Prime Minister offered a series of concessions to Labour rebels opposed to moves that would see hundreds of thousands of disabled people lose lifeline benefits. But campaigners said it risked "betraying the next generation of disabled people" - and some Labour MPs remain opposed ahead of a Commons vote next week. After fraught negotiations on Thursday, the Government agreed to protect all existing claimants from losing Personal Independence Payments (PIP). Plans to tighten eligibility will now only apply to new claimants from November 2026, in a reprieve to around 370,000 people who were due to lose around £4,150-a-year. And existing recipients of the health element of Universal Credit will have their incomes protected in real terms. The original plans to reform the welfare system were designed to save around £5billion from the benefits bill by 2030. But economists said the changes will cost around £3billion, on top of around £1.5billion for the U-turn on the winter fuel allowance, leaving Chancellor Rachel Reeves to make up the shortfall. No10 failed to rule out such raising taxes to foot the bill, saying 'tax decisions are set out at fiscal events'. Today, Mr Starmer said the reforms now "strike the right balance". "It's very important that we reform the welfare system, because it doesn't work and it traps people, and therefore we're going to press ahead with the reforms," he said. "We need to get it right. That's why we've been talking to colleagues and having a constructive discussion. We've now arrived at a package that delivers on the principles with some adjustments, and that's the right reform, and I'm really pleased now that we're able to take this forward." Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said the Government had listened to concerns. She told broadcasters: "I think we're in a good place now, alongside the huge investments we are putting in to create the jobs that people need in every part of the country, to get waiting lists down in the NHS, to ensure stronger rights at work, but also to make sure there's employment support for those who can work and protections for those who can't." She insisted it was "very common in the welfare system that there are protections for existing claimants". Leading rebel Meg Hillier said she would now support the bill and is expected to drop her amendment, which had been signed by 126 Labour MPs. Ms Hillier, who chairs the Commons Treasury Committee, said it was "a good deal" involving "massive changes" to protect vulnerable people - and said disabled people would be involved in designing future reforms. She said: "It's encouraging that we have reached what I believe is a workable compromise that will protect disabled people and support people back into work while ensuring the welfare system can be meaningfully reformed." But Labour MP Nadia Whittome said "Even these revised proposals are nowhere near good enough and frankly are just not well thought through. It would create a two-tier system in both PIP and the UC system when somebody became disabled.' Andy McDonald, the Labour MP for Middlesbrough, said: "I'll be voting against it because it hasn't dealt with the totality of the is bringing about the change, it's just poverty delayed, or poverty postponed for millions of people in the future." Charles Gillies, Senior Policy Officer at the MS Society and Policy Co-Chair of the Disability Benefits Consortium, said: 'These supposed 'concessions' to the cuts bill are just a desperate attempt to rush through a disastrous piece of legislation. By pushing the cuts onto future claimants, the government are betraying the next generation of disabled people." He urged MPs to "stop this impending disaster" when the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill comes to the Commons on Tuesday. Mikey Erhardt, Policy Lead, Disability Rights UK said: 'We completely reject the imposition of the two-tier system on offer. It is not a massive concession to have a benefit system where future generations of Disabled people receive less support than Disabled people today." He added: "By attempting to push through cruel cuts to the benefits of Disabled people, the Government prioritised balancing its books over improving the lives of Disabled citizens... the Government needs to stop playing politics with our lives." James Taylor, director of strategy at disability equality charity Scope, said: "It is encouraging that the government is starting to listen to disabled people and MPs who have been campaigning for change for months. "But these plans will still rip billions from the welfare system. The proposed concessions will create a two-tier benefits system and an unequal future for disabled people. "Life costs more if you are disabled. And these cuts will have a devastating effect on disabled people's health, ability to live independently or work. "We urge the government to properly engage with disabled people and MPs on how best to reform welfare and create an equal future."
Daily Mirror
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'I saw first-hand the grit, sacrifice and pride of our service men and women'
This Armed Forces Day, we honour the men and women who serve, those who have served, and the families support them. They are the backbone of this country. I've served in our Armed Forces. I've seen first-hand the grit, sacrifice and unshakable pride our service men and women carry. They don't ask for much - just that we, as a country, keep our promises to them. Keir Starmer's Labour Government came into office a year ago next week with a clear mission and commitment to renewing the covenant with our Armed Forces community. That means action, not just warm words. We are bringing 36,000 military homes back into public hands and investing over £7billion throughout this Parliament to fix long-neglected accommodation, delivering homes fit for our heroes. We're also making it easier for veterans to access support. Our new VALOUR system ensures help with housing, employment and health is more accessible. No one should ever fall through the cracks after serving this country. Our Armed Forces got their largest pay rise in over 20 years last year and another inflation busting pay rise this year. Because if you're willing to risk your life for this country, you deserve a decent wage and a secure future. But supporting our Armed Forces means more than just looking after them. It means making sure they have the resources they need to keep us safe. This week, the Prime Minister made an historic commitment at the NATO Summit: to raise national security spending to 5% of GDP. This is about putting Britain back in control of its own defence, as we face an increasingly volatile world. It's putting the British values we share into action. Follow our Mirror Politics account on Bluesky here. And follow our Mirror Politics team here - Lizzy Buchan, Mikey Smith, Kevin Maguire, Sophie Huskisson, Dave Burke and Ashley Cowburn. Be first to get the biggest bombshells and breaking news by joining our Politics WhatsApp group here. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you want to leave our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Or sign up here to the Mirror's Politics newsletter for all the best exclusives and opinions straight to your inbox. And listen to our exciting new political podcast The Division Bell, hosted by the Mirror and the Express every Thursday. This will be a whole-of-society strategy that strengthens security while also creating jobs, boosting wages and driving growth. It will give working people a direct stake in our country's safety, and its future. I'm proud to be a Labour MP and even prouder to serve in Parliament shoulder to shoulder with many other veterans like Calvin Bailey and Louise Jones and so many other brilliant colleagues. Their presence in the Commons strengthens the voices of those who have served and their families. As we face new challenges, at home and abroad, it's more important than ever that we recognise and value the work our Armed Forces do every single day. We must also continue to honour those who've served in generations past, from the beaches of Normandy to the deserts of Helmand. Today, we thank all who serve, have served, and their families. We are safer because of them.
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Inheritance tax poses difficult decisions for Northern Ireland farmers
Getting your head around numbers can sometimes be a difficult task. Even more so when it comes to exactly what Northern Ireland's farming community has had to do though, in just a few the end of 2024, the Labour government said it was going to remove relief on inheritance tax for farmers. From April 2026, agricultural assets which total over £1m will be taxed at a rate of 20%.That includes animals, buildings and land - with change now looming for many farms in Northern have been exempt from Agricultural Property Relief and Business Property Relief for many years but that could now be was a decision not welcomed by many farmers then, and even now, including dairy farmer Keith runs a large operation just outside of Newry, Co Down.'The simple fact is that the sector isn't profitable enough whenever you count the valuation of property, to be able to sustain this for one generation, never mind two.'Keith spoke to UTV at Markethill Livestock Sales in Co Armagh. Dairy and beef cattle were being sold on the day of filming and interest was still strong, but under it all, lay concern for what the future Hewitt is the man behind the microphone and the man who coordinates the sales. 'They (the government) have brought these proposals in, genuinely without thinking about it and not realising the knock-on effect,' he added that he was worried about the 'long-term' effects on farmers and other way farms can be exempt from the new proposals is if the family farm is gifted, but the donor must live on it for seven years Kinnear was forced into adapting, not by his own father John died in 2017, leaving the family farm in Derrynoose to his mother Shirley before she passed it on to Timothy.'Something so simple can absolutely obliterate farming,' he told UTV.'If they (the government) don't watch themselves, they will do away with Irish produce.'If inheritance tax hit me today, I would have to sell a third of the place and if I was to sell a third of the place there wouldn't be enough income to support me or if I was to have a future family.'The Ulster Farmers' Union is urging the government to take on the concerns of farmers in Northern Ireland.'It is gut-wrenching and really does pull on the heartstrings, some of the things which farmers are actually considering,' said James McCluggage from the union.'We need to see some sort of morality clause in there for the elderly, for the disabled, for those who are incapacitated, that [sic] can't make a decision or cannot get plans in place at the moment.'The government says the changes won't affect every farmer and that they are necessary to better fund public a statement, a spokesperson for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said: 'Our commitment to farming and food security is steadfast, which is why we've allocated a record £11.8billion to sustainable farming and food production over this parliament. 'We are also slashing costs and red tape for food producers to export to the EU, have appointed former NFU president Baroness Minette Batters to recommend reforms to boost farmers' profits, and we're ensuring farmers get a bigger share of food contracts across our schools, hospitals, and prisons.'For now, the industry looks determined to continue speaking up as farmers prepare to count the cost of change, whatever it may be. On Friday UTV were joined by Agriculture Minister Andrew Muir to address the central issues within the farming community.
