logo
New Jersey asks appellate court to deny school desegregation case appeal

New Jersey asks appellate court to deny school desegregation case appeal

Yahoo4 days ago

Nonprofits and a group of public school parents argue that the state's school system is unconstitutionally segregated. (Courtesy of the New Jersey Governor's Office)
Attorneys for the state of New Jersey want an appellate court to deny a request by nonprofit groups and several public school families who want the court to hear their case that New Jersey schools are unconstitutionally segregated along racial and socioeconomic lines.
In a 46-page brief filed last week, the state's attorneys argue that it is premature for the appellate division to hear the case because a trial judge overseeing the dispute has not issued a final order. The record before the trial judge is too limited, and an appellate court weighing in now would result in 'piecemeal review,' the state argues.
'There is no grave damage or injustice necessitating immediate appellate review,' the state said.
The case, filed in 2018 by Latino Action Network and the statewide NAACP, among others, alleges that school district boundaries tied to municipalities exacerbate de facto segregation across schools. They cited a UCLA study that found New Jersey had the seventh most segregated school system, with nearly half of all Black and Latino students in New Jersey attending schools that are more than 90% non-white, schools that are often mere blocks from predominately white districts. The plaintiffs note that the state has a constitutional duty to provide students with a 'thorough and efficient' education.
In October 2023, a state superior court judge ruled that the plaintiffs demonstrated a 'marked and persistent racial imbalance' in public schools, but said the lack of data did not prove their sweeping claim that the system is 'unconstitutionally segregated because of race or ethnicity.' He declined the plaintiffs' request for an immediate ruling. The plaintiffs appealed.
In Wednesday's filing, the state criticizes the plaintiffs for failing to show what desegregation would look like or offering any 'practical solution.'
The state's recent filing came one day after the New Jersey Policy Institute, a nonprofit think tank that supports school choice, filed a 20-page motion in the case arguing in favor of expanding a state program that allows students to attend schools outside of their hometowns.
Enrollment in the program has been virtually frozen since 2015. Lifting that freeze would be a cost-effective way to increase racial diversity and would not require any significant additional administration, they said, adding that districts could be incentivized to participate.
The program offers a 'ready-made solution that can be implemented almost immediately,' according to the institute, which says more than 2,000 students are currently on waitlists. And school choice expansion could help integrate schools more quickly than redistricting, according to the brief.
'The state has already built the infrastructure. All that's left is to unfreeze it,' the brief states.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Corrupt Cop Who Leaked To Proud Boys Learns His Fate
Corrupt Cop Who Leaked To Proud Boys Learns His Fate

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Corrupt Cop Who Leaked To Proud Boys Learns His Fate

Shane Lamond, the former leader of the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department's intelligence division, will spend 18 months in prison for leaking information ahead of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol to Henry 'Enrique' Tarrio, the leader of the far-right Proud Boys. U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson sentenced Lamond on Friday morning. Tarrio is a free man after President Donald Trump pardoned him in January. Tarrio had been sentenced to serve 22 years in prison for seditious conspiracy charges but instead was in the courthouse on Friday, watching the proceedings. Also present was Oath Keepers leader Elmer Stewart Rhodes. Like Tarrio, Rhodes was charged and convicted of seditious conspiracy. Trump commuted Rhodes' 18-year sentence. Lamond was found guilty last year of obstruction of justice and lying to federal investigators at the FBI and Department of Justice after a bench trial before Jackson in Washington, D.C. He waived his right to a jury trial. Prosecutors originally sought a sentence of four years. The FBI and DOJ opened a probe into Lamond's conduct in 2021 after the December 2020 burning of a Black Lives Matter banner at a historic Black church in Washington, D.C. Tarrio was charged with destroying the banner and sentenced to five months in prison. At Lamond's trial, prosecutors said it was thanks to Lamond that Tarrio was tipped off about the banner investigation and learned that a warrant for his arrest was incoming. At trial, prosecutors accused Lamond of telling Tarrio that police had footage of Tarrio burning the banner and warning him that the FBI and Secret Service were 'all spun up' about the Proud Boys' presence in Washington. Tarrio had appeared on Infowars and said members of the extremist group would start prowling public events incognito or dressed up as supporters of Joe Biden. Lamond kept that conversation — and many others — from his colleagues at the department who were pursuing the banner probe. One omission included a meeting of Tarrio and Lamond just three days after the banner burning. Ahead of the meeting, Tarrio pressed Lamond about how the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department perceived the Proud Boys. Lamond wouldn't say over text. Instead, he asked Tarrio to meet him for a beer at a local bar. Lamond denied ever hearing a confession from Tarrio that night at the bar or at any other time in their communications leading up to Jan. 6. When Tarrio took the stand at Lamond's trial, the Proud Boys leader denied ever making a confession to Lamond but stumbled when prosecutors presented him with a secret Telegram chat. The chat showed Tarrio asking Lamond if police would add the hate crime enhancement to the destruction charge and Lamond telling him he had been asking supervisors at MPD about it. The intelligence division chief told Tarrio that if he were going to be charged with a hate crime, then police would have to start investigating hate crime charges for Trump flags burned in the district. From the witness stand, Tarrio smirked and told the courtroom: 'Whoever said this is a genius because he is right.' Records showed that Lamond and Tarrio spoke for months over text, sharing at least 500 texts. They typically used iMessage or Google to chat. But after the 2020 election, Lamond asked Tarrio to move their conversations to an encrypted texting app. A forensic review of Lamond's and Tarrio's devices showed many of the messages in the encrypted app were set to delete automatically, something a law enforcement officer would not typically do, or be encouraged to do, when engaging with a confidential human source. Lamond's supervisors also told the judge during the trial that using Telegram to speak with a source secretly, or disclosing investigators were 'all spun up' was something that would have never been authorized by the department. FBI agents who testified about the texts between the men said the imbalance in Lamond's relationship with Tarrio was clear: Tarrio rarely provided useful information to Lamond about Proud Boys activities or whereabouts that weren't already available through Tarrio's own social media posts. Messages on Tarrio's device showed him telling fellow Proud Boys that he knew the warrant was incoming thanks to his D.C. cop contact. The knowledge, according to prosecutors, allowed Tarrio to coordinate his arrest on Jan. 4, 2021, giving him a helpful alibi for his whereabouts on Jan. 6. He was only held in jail briefly, however, and then he was ordered out of Washington, D.C. Tarrio obliged; he left D.C. and headed to a hotel room in Baltimore, Maryland, where he watched the rioting unfold and cheered on Proud Boys from afar online and in private discussions. As Lamond sat right across from him inside Jackson's courtroom last year, Tarrio said he had lied to fellow Proud Boys about knowing the warrant was coming. It was a sort of 'marketing ploy,' Tarrio said, because he knew it would invigorate and excite members of the extremist group. Lamond has denied being a 'double agent' and denied having any sympathy for the Proud Boys. This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

Highland approves golf carts on 25 mph city roads
Highland approves golf carts on 25 mph city roads

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Highland approves golf carts on 25 mph city roads

HIGHLAND, Utah (ABC4) — Golf carts are now conditionally allowed on Highland streets after the city council voted on an ordinance Tuesday. Four out of five councilmembers voted in favor of allowing golf carts on 25 mph roads in Highland, with Councilmember Scott Smith objecting due to safety concerns. The ordinance passed with a few restrictions, namely that golf carts are only allowed on city roads with speed limits of 25 mph and under, drivers must be at least 18 years of age, and no driving after dark. Utah House Majority leader resigns to take new role in Governor's Office The council also added penalties for cart owners who allow minors to drive a golf cart on city roads. Penalties would also be given to those who drive under the influence. The council's debate was between personal liberty and safety, with concerns centered around children on laps and speeding vehicles on the same roads as carts. 'The problem is we have neighborhood after neighborhood come in here complain about speeding, so no one follows the 25 mph,' Smith said. 'I just think we've got to be really careful because they're going to be competing at a lower rate with cars that are going 25 plus … So what street is really safe is my question.' Councilmembers in favor of the ordinance argued that this is 'a desire of our residents,' with many community members expressing interest in driving golf carts to visit neighbors or go to church and parks. WATCH: Bodycam footage released after over 150 dogs rescued from Ogden home 'Why are we restricting things when we don't have to restrict them?' Councilmember Ron Campbell said in his argument for the ordinance. 'We all have a right to risk, we all have a right for liberty, and golf carts are a part of the community that has come forward and said we would like this.' Smith, who is a physician, said he is 'very concerned' about safety issues and isn't against liberty just because he thinks this is an 'act of foolishness.' Ultimately, Smith said he would support what the majority votes for. The council decided to pass the ordinance and look at it after some time to see if changes needed to be made to the regulations. Highland is now the sixth Utah community to allow golf carts on city roads. Baby fox rescued after falling into irrigation drain in Farmington Keeping hydration delicious and effective Utah couple flown to hospital after semi-truck crashes through Wellington home CBO: House GOP plan exceeds $880B savings target Trump signs executive order aimed at slashing prescription drug costs Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Biden book author reveals how White House staff truly felt about Karine Jean-Pierre as press secretary
Biden book author reveals how White House staff truly felt about Karine Jean-Pierre as press secretary

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Biden book author reveals how White House staff truly felt about Karine Jean-Pierre as press secretary

CHICAGO - One of the authors of the new bombshell Joe Biden book pulled back the curtain Thursday on how White House staffers truly felt about former White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre. During their book tour in Chicago, "Original Sin" authors Alex Thompson and Jake Tapper were asked about the announcement of Jean-Pierre's new book promising to shed light on the "broken White House" she worked in and that she left the Democratic Party to become an independent. "Someone just texted me before I got on stage, a former Biden person, which is, 'It is quite the ballet move to say that you're leaving the Democratic Party because they were disloyal to Joe Biden.' But that is what she's saying," Thompson told the Windy City audience Thursday at The Vic Theatre. Biden-era White House Reporters Express Disbelief On Karine Jean-pierre's Sudden Party Switch Thompson noted that despite "mass bad reviews" within the Biden administration of Jean-Pierre's job performance as White House press secretary, she was seen as "untouchable" due to her allyship with top Jill Biden aide Anthony Bernal. "I think what's really provoking anger from former Biden people… there was mass frustration on how she went about the job, felt that she was not good at it, was not aware she was not good at it, she did not try hard to get better at it. And there's more focus on elevating her own profile than not," Thompson said. Read On The Fox News App "And now for her to then go out after the Democratic Party elevated her to the top spokesperson job in the country and then for her to then try to sell books by leaving the party, they say that simmering resentment just exploded instantly," the Axios reporter added. Tapper speculated that there would have been less "scorn" aimed at Jean-Pierre if she didn't announce she had become an independent, something the CNN anchor made little sense to him. Credibility Crisis: Karine Jean-pierre's Defense Of Biden's Mental Fitness Over The Years The event moderator, NPR media correspondent David Folkenflik, asked Tapper and Thompson why former Biden staffers by and large "aren't using their names" as they criticize Jean-Pierre. "I totally wonder that too," Tapper reacted. "Because, like, what are you afraid of?" Click Here For The Latest Media And Culture News Thompson responded by insisting many of them don't want to speak publicly because they have since landed new jobs and don't want their employers to be associated with the mudslinging. "I'd also say that the Biden culture was to punish and try to destroy people who spoke out," Thompson said. "And yes, they don't have power anymore, but they are watching very closely. I think some people still fear retaliation." Tapper added that since Jean-Pierre was a trailblazer" as the first Black woman and LGBTQ press secretary, that was another reason why her former colleagues aren't speaking out. Both authors took turns scrutinizing Jean-Pierre's credibility following her loyal defense of Biden before and after his disastrous debate performance. Tapper recalled a 2023 private fundraiser Biden attended in which he didn't have a teleprompter and how he told donors his canned remarks about how the events of Charlottesville inspired his presidential run in 2020 twice in the span of a few minutes, and how at the following press briefing, Jean-Pierre told reporters, "Well, that's how strongly he feels about that moment." "In her defense, she rarely saw him," Tapper article source: Biden book author reveals how White House staff truly felt about Karine Jean-Pierre as press secretary

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store