logo
Two South African engineers released from Equatorial Guinea jail over two years after arrest

Two South African engineers released from Equatorial Guinea jail over two years after arrest

Daily Maverick3 hours ago

The long-awaited return of Frik Potgieter and Peter Huxham follows a presidential pardon, months of diplomatic negotiations and international calls for justice.
South African Frik Potgieter and dual UK-South African citizen Peter Huxham, oil engineers who had been imprisoned for more than two years in Equatorial Guinea, have finally returned home – freed by a presidential pardon that ends a harrowing ordeal marked by anguish, uncertainty and relentless diplomatic effort.
'This brings an end to an ordeal of anguish, uncertainty and unwavering efforts by many to secure their freedom,' said family spokespersons Shaun Murphy and Francois Nigrini.
According to a declaration by the United Nations, Potgieter and Huxham had been unlawfully and arbitrarily detained in the west African country since 9 February 2023, following their conviction and sentencing to 12 years in prison on drug trafficking charges.
However, their families believe the true reason behind the arrests lies elsewhere. Just two days before their detention, the Western Cape Division of the High Court had ordered the seizure of a superyacht owned by Teodoro Obiang Mangue, the vice-president of Equatorial Guinea and son of the country's long-time president, Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo.
That order followed an earlier court decision to seize two luxury villas in Cape Town also linked to Mangue. Both seizures were connected to a separate legal matter involving another South African citizen allegedly imprisoned unlawfully in Equatorial Guinea.
'Complex' negotiations
In July 2024, the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention issued a formal opinion stating that the men's trial had been unfair and that their continued detention was 'arbitrary and illegal'. It called for their immediate release, a call that went unheeded by Equatorial Guinea's president, despite direct appeals from both the incumbent minister of international relations, Ronald Lamola, and his predecessor, Naledi Pandor.
Their eventual release, announced on 21 June, followed clemency granted by the president of Equatorial Guinea after months of sustained diplomatic appeals led by the South African government.
'The Government of the Republic of South Africa welcomes the release,' the Department of International Relations and Cooperation said.
It expressed 'sincere gratitude' to Equatorial Guinea for granting the pardon and enabling Potgieter and Huxham to reunite with their families. It also recognised the extensive and complex diplomatic work behind the scenes, acknowledging the 'sensitive legal and bilateral dimensions' of the case.
Since the men's arrest, the South African government remained actively engaged through official diplomatic channels, regularly appealing for clemency on humanitarian grounds. Special envoys were dispatched, and ongoing engagement was maintained at ministerial level.
The department also acknowledged the constructive diplomatic engagement maintained throughout the ordeal. It reaffirmed its commitment to strengthening bilateral ties with Equatorial Guinea, praising the cooperation that allowed consular access and facilitated ongoing dialogue, even amid considerable diplomatic strain.
Families express relief and gratitude
Since their detainment, the families of Potgieter and Huxham have undertaken extensive efforts to secure their release, including launching the 'Free Frik and Peter' campaign with a dedicated website and online petition to raise awareness and demand urgent government action.
They had engaged the South African Parliament, which adopted a unanimous motion calling for their immediate release and condemned their unlawful imprisonment. The families also appealed to the Pan-African Parliament for intervention and sought support from international bodies including the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, which declared their detention illegal and arbitrary.
'We are overwhelmed with relief and joy. The last two years and four months have been unimaginably painful for both our families. Today, we are finally able to say: Frik and Peter are safely back home,' said Murphy and Nigrini.
The families extended heartfelt thanks to all who supported them during the long campaign for release, including SBM Offshore, the men's employer, the South African and UK governments, international diplomatic partners, parliamentarians, legal teams, Hostage International, civil society organisations and members of the media.
They also specifically thanked Pandor and Lamola, both of whom travelled to Equatorial Guinea as special envoys on behalf of President Cyril Ramaphosa.
'Their return home is the result of collective efforts over many, many months, and we are deeply grateful to everyone who played a role in securing their freedom,' said the families.
'This has been a long and difficult journey. We want to thank every person who stood with us – your support carried us through our darkest moments.'
As Potgieter and Huxham begin the process of recovery and healing, their families have asked for privacy. DM

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrats demand Donald Trump's impeachment over Iran strikes
Democrats demand Donald Trump's impeachment over Iran strikes

The South African

timean hour ago

  • The South African

Democrats demand Donald Trump's impeachment over Iran strikes

Progressive Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and several fellow Democrats have demanded the impeachment of US President Donald Trump. This follows his decision to bomb Iran's top nuclear facilities. They condemned the strike as 'unconstitutional' and a serious breach of Congressional war powers. Ocasio-Cortez stated firmly, 'The President's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorisation is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers.' She warned that Trump 'has impulsively risked launching a war that may entangle us for generations. It is grounds for impeachment.' The airstrike has drawn sharp criticism from lawmakers across party lines. Many expressed outrage over the unilateral military action, according to the New York Post. The strike targeted key nuclear sites in Iran, escalating tensions in an already volatile region. The situation highlights the dangers of unchecked executive power in international conflicts. The risk of prolonged warfare affects global stability and economic markets, including those linked to South Africa. The Rand could face volatility amid rising geopolitical tensions. A South African political analyst commented, 'This move by Donald Trump echoes the importance of constitutional checks and balances. It reminds us why parliamentary oversight is crucial in decisions of war and peace.' The call for impeachment reflects deep concern over the potential consequences of the strike. It underscores the need for democratic accountability in foreign policy decisions that can impact global security. Trump's Iran strike has ignited fierce debate in the US political arena. Progressive voices like Ocasio-Cortez lead the charge, demanding that such unilateral actions face constitutional scrutiny. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

How South African mainstream media fuels xenophobia
How South African mainstream media fuels xenophobia

IOL News

timean hour ago

  • IOL News

How South African mainstream media fuels xenophobia

Displaced African migrant workers seek refuge at a warehouse, turned into a shelter by a group of volunteers to house migrant workers who fled Israeli bombardment in southern Lebanon. June 20 marked World Refugee Day. Anthony Kambi Masha Foreigners, especially refugees in South Africa, face numerous challenges, including language barriers, discrimination, xenophobia, and financial difficulties. The perception of refugees is often negative, even when the host country benefits from them. Access to public resources is increasingly tied to citizenship and ethnicity, contributing to marginalisation. Refugees lack the power and voice to overcome these boundaries of exclusion and belonging, which hinder their full contribution to economic growth and development. Refugees face language barriers, discrimination, xenophobia, and financial issues. All South African cities have discourse exclusionary practices like name-calling, discrimination, prejudice, and outright violence and intimidation, but Greater Johannesburg has the most anti-refugee xenophobia. Today, there is a dizzying array of labels to describe those who cross an international border. Humiliating and derogatory name-calling such as makwerekwere, amagrigamba, and amaGhana constitutes a form of bullying and classifies xenophobia towards refugees. Other names are alien and mkeres mooo, meaning an intruder. In isiZulu, refugees are referred to as abokufika, which means people who came from elsewhere. While such a designation may not necessarily be underpinned by malicious intentions, it classifies refugees as outsiders who do not belong to their adopted communities. A study of YouTube videos featuring reports of xenophobic incidents in South Africa shows that discourse on xenophobia is based on the us/them dichotomy, emphasising the positive traits of the ingroup and the negative traits of the outgroup (refugees). The media's role in xenophobic behaviour, including discrimination and violence against refugees, is a complex issue. Traditional media still dominates as a source of news and knowledge about refugees in South Africa, with the internet and social media trailing in terms of public trust in information about refugees. The distribution of the public across different forms of media may reflect the wide reach of radio and television across rural and urban areas. The media's reportage of immigration has possibly exacerbated tensions between native South Africans and African migrants in the country. The media's agenda-setting function influences consumer thoughts about refugees, but it does not necessarily control how they think about these things. It plays a huge role in spreading hostility towards refugees, with the deployment of predominantly negative language in South African tabloid and mainstream print media presenting refugees as a threat, aliens, and outsiders. Social media platforms can influence culture, fostering cross-cultural understanding and potentially reinforcing social divisions. However, they can also amplify xenophobia, particularly in communities like South Africa with pre-existing xenophobic sentiment. A study by Dube and Setlalentoa (2024) found that xenophobia is a significant social pathology in South Africa, affecting migrant learners and causing increased incidents, bullying, school violence, and social exclusion in schools. This highlights the risk of intolerance and prejudice in society. The media spreads hate and division, and people believe it. When news stories about refugees are written, only the bad things are shown. Hardly are refugees seen as victims. South Africa's refugee policy allows refugees to seek employment and access basic services, but they often face discrimination and exclusion from the formal labour market. Refugees, especially those from Africa, are sometimes viewed as a burden on the country's resources and are scapegoated for economic problems. Discrepancies across personalised social media feeds often incorporate harmful stereotypes and make implicit assumptions about people that are problematic from the standpoint of representation. This xenophobic sentiment further exacerbates the challenges refugees face in finding employment. Following apartheid, South Africa has experienced a shift in national identity and nationalism, with politicians refraining from endorsing violence. This is fueled by state action and exclusive conceptions of citizenship, including the notion of South African exceptionalism compared to the rest of the continent. Government institutions target illicit refugees, such as the police force, which arrest and harass refugees. The high level of xenophobia is directed at both youth and older persons who happen to find themselves in the country, black African migrants, and refugees. Common stereotypes include allegations that African refugees import diseases and crime, are labelled as people who steal jobs and women, drain the health care system, and other state resources. Physical and systematic xenophobia contribute to refugees' appalling experiences in South Africa. Murray (2013) reveals that the unsettled circumstances of urban living in the "new South Africa" have proven to be a fertile breeding ground for alarmist fantasies about unwanted refugees that occasionally spill over into genuine moral panics. These moral panics arise at times of political instability and uncertainty, and the fear, apprehension, and anxiety linked to urban disorder can be more easily accommodated if traced to an identifiable cause and attached to a particular socially stigmatised menace. Dr A. K. Masha is a social realist and a leadership catalyst. He writes in his personal capacity.

South African engineers released from Equatorial Guinea prison after two years
South African engineers released from Equatorial Guinea prison after two years

IOL News

time2 hours ago

  • IOL News

South African engineers released from Equatorial Guinea prison after two years

South African engineers, Peter Huxham and Frik Potgieter have been released from the Equatorial Guinea prison, where they had been detained since February 2023. The two South African engineers who were locked up in an Equatorial Guinea's Mongomo Prison for two years, have finally been released. Frederik 'Frik' Potgieter, 53, and Peter Huxham, 55, were arrested at their hotel in Malabo in Equatorial Guinea on February 9, 2023 on drug-related charges. They were later found guilty of trafficking and illicit possession of drugs and sentenced to 12 years' imprisonment each. In addition, they were ordered to pay $5 million (more than R96m) each in damages with an additional $2.5m (more than R48m) fine to be shared between them. The men denied any wrongdoing. Since their arrest, their families as well as the South African government had advocated for their release. Government efforts included sending Special Envoys, to secure their release on humanitarian grounds.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store