logo
Layland Museum honoring World War II vets

Layland Museum honoring World War II vets

Yahoo04-05-2025

Two ongoing — not to mention free — exhibits at the Layland Museum commemorate the 80th anniversary of World War II's end as well as the war's effect on the Johnson County home front.
'The focus is to show what was going on here during the war for Cleburne and Johnson County residents in addition to what was happening to people from here who went overseas and to pull those two things together,' Layland Director Stephanie Montero said.
The first exhibit: 'From the Home Front to the Battlefield' continues through May 31.
The second, 'Wartime Photographs by Lamar Sloane,' opens today and runs through July 26.
Pieces from Layland's collection join donated items to make up the first exhibit. The roles of local African-Americans in the war effort, female workers, Keene Seventh-day Adventist who participated in the Medical Cadet Corps, Cleburne's German POW camp and more fill the exhibit. The diverse and many ways, in other words, in which county residents contributed to the war effort both here and abroad.
'My parents lived through World War II and my father fought in it,' Montero said. 'So, for my generation, it was more recent history.
'One of the things we're hoping to accomplish is to bring the war home in a sense by showing what was happening here at that time and, for younger people, to make those times a little more real and filled out than just ancient history they might have read about in a textbook. Hoping they'll become more interested and maybe even ask their parents who can tell them about their parents and grandparents and great uncles and aunts and so forth who lived through those times.'
Layland staff worked with Southwestern Adventist University history professors Steve Jones and Chloe Northrup as well as several of their students in the planning and organizing of the exhibit.
'The classes met here all last semester with different students researching and focusing on different areas of the war,' Montero said.
A wall of photographs of local residents who served in the war donated by current residents has also proved popular, Montero said, adding that residents may still donate photos and stories.
Jerry Bradbury, father of Cleburne resident and business owner Melissa Bennett, is among those pictured.
Brabury was a pharmacy assistant and merchant Marine. He was on a boat that performed a rescue.
'They rescued some people whose boat had been kamikazed including one woman who was pregnant,' Montero said. 'She went into labor. Well, Bradbury wasn't a doctor but he had to do the best he could to help her deliver, which she did. His story made the newspapers all over the country.'
Closer to home, an old gramophone and recreation of a typical 1940s kitchen lend a feel for the times as do items related to Cleburne musician Harvey Anderson.
'He was a big band director from here and very popular,' Montero said. 'Doc Severinsen and other big names of the time played with and were good friends of his. In fact, my parents used to go to dances Harvey Anderson played.'
Another section of the exhibit highlights Johnson County's own Rosie the Riveters.
'A lot of women from here either drove or moved to Fort Worth temporarily during the war to work at Consolidated, which later became General Dynamics and then Lockheed, to help build planes back then,' Montero said.
The Cleburne Conference Center now sits on land Cleburne's German POW camp once occupied. About 425,000 German POWs were held at 700 such camps throughout the country with about 50,000 of them waiting out the war in one of Texas' 70 camps. Former Johnson County Judge Roger Harmon's father, Larry Harmon, served as a guard at the Cleburne camp.
'You kind of wonder why they went to all the effort to ship them to America and set up all those camps,' Montero said. 'Maybe they figured if they held them in Europe they might escape and go back to fighting. But here, if they escaped, there wouldn't really be anywhere for them to go or any way to get back home.'
Grandview resident Sandra Neeley donated numerous items from her father, Army Air Corps Staff Sgt. Lowell L. Harris, a member of the 494th Fighter/Bomber Squadron who served in the European theater during the war.
'He was a propeller specialists and worked on airplanes,' Neeley said.
Harris joked that her father nearly missed the war because the Army kept sending him to different schools stateside. Once there, however, he worked out of airfields in England.
The only time he got shot at was when an airplane zeroed in on him and his crew and they had to run for cover.
'He was also flown in behind the lines to an airfield after D-Day so they could go back to repairing the planes,' Neeley said. 'He stayed a while after the war and there's a picture of him in Nuremburg Stadium where Hitler and his cronies used to make speeches and carry on.'
Neeley said her father otherwise spent all of his life in Johnson County outside his war tenure and about three years in Lamesa.
'He was born in Cuba, which is now Sand Flat and his birth certificate says Cuba,' Neeley said. 'My grandfather was Dr. Larkin Harris and he moved his family of 11 kids to Cleburne since Cuba only had a small elementary school.'
Harris worked as a bookkeeper after the war and later for the post office, the current Cleburne City Hall building, until his retirement.
'He told me some stories about the war,' Neeley said. 'Unfortunately, I was too young at the time to really understand. Otherwise, he didn't talk about it much. I think most of he and his generation just sort of did their duty, came home, went to work, got married and got on with it.'
From clothing, to cards and letters to a still intact breakfast ration box to Nazi armbands and other items Harris found in a boxcar, Neeley contributed numerous items to the exhibit.
'I think daddy would be humbled and maybe overwhelmed by the attention this is getting,' Neeley said.
Neeley said she hopes the exhibit reignites interest in the older generation and spurs the same among the younger generation.
'Being married to a Vietnam veteran who has two Purple Hearts, I'm glad to see that people have an interest in honoring our veterans again,' Neeley said. 'I hope that never goes away, because those people put their lives on the line for people back then and people yet to be born.'
Neeley praised the efforts of the Layland and SWAU team members responsible for the exhibit.
'It's one of the most informative and well done exhibits I've seen at Layland,' Neeley said. 'It covers so many people and things from that era, and that's what museums are for, bringing history back to life.'
photos on display
The second exhibit consists of photos Shubert Lamar Sloan took during his time in North Africa and Italy.
'His daughter, Landa Sloan Orrick brought in a bunch of these photos,' Montero said. 'She lives in Fort Worth now but was born and raised here.'
Sloan, a member of the 36th Texas Division, participated in the first amphibious landing in Europe and was present during the 1944 Battle of Monte Cassino and was part of the group moving toward Germany as the war ended. The photos originate from a Hasselblad camera.
'Apparently he or someone else liberated the camera from a German soldier who would no longer be taking pictures to put it politely,' Montero said.
The two exhibits work together to offer a fuller picture and fresh take on World War II both here and there, Montero said.
'There's just some really great stories of that time so many of the people around here have,' Montero said. 'It's such an honor to be able to share those.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Holly Grove celebrates a community legend's 100th birthday
Holly Grove celebrates a community legend's 100th birthday

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Holly Grove celebrates a community legend's 100th birthday

HOLLY GROVE, Ark. – A birthday celebration was held on Sunday at the Holly Grove community center for a man who sacrificed all for our country, Irunoes Johnson. 'That's what keeps me going, looking back at where I come from,' Johnson said. Little Rock World War II veteran celebrates her 100th birthday with parade Johnson turned 100 years old, having lived a life of service in the U.S. Army and fought in World War II, driving a 6×6 truck into Germany. General Dwight D. Eisenhower called the 6 x 6 trucks one of the six most vital U.S vehicles to win the war. The Holly Grove community honored all Johnson has done, along with his family. His grandchildren sang a song of thanks and his children gifted him with special plaques. His daughter Barbra Casey, says her father has always been an example to her and everyone he's crossed paths with. 'He's been kind of a trailblazer where he's worked at the rice mill, and he helped train people and stuff, so for those people to come and give back to him on this day, he had tears in his eyes,' Casey said. Johnson was full of gratitude himself and shared some words of wisdom. 'All I can tell you is when you start getting up in age, you've got to start taking care of yourself, you can get there,' Johnson said. Arkansas World War II veteran turns 102-years-old on Valentine's Day He advised for those who want to make a difference and have an impact just like he did. 'Don't worry about what the other person is doing, you take care of yourself, because you go worrying about what other people are doing or want to be like other people, you've got a problem,' Johnson said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

First comes marriage. Then comes a flirtatious colleague.
First comes marriage. Then comes a flirtatious colleague.

Vox

time2 hours ago

  • Vox

First comes marriage. Then comes a flirtatious colleague.

is a senior reporter for Vox's Future Perfect and co-host of the Future Perfect podcast. She writes primarily about the future of consciousness, tracking advances in artificial intelligence and neuroscience and their staggering ethical implications. Before joining Vox, Sigal was the religion editor at the Atlantic. Your Mileage May Vary is an advice column offering you a unique framework for thinking through your moral dilemmas. To submit a question, fill out this anonymous form or email Here's this week's question from a reader, condensed and edited for clarity: My husband and I have a good relationship. We're both committed to personal growth and continual learning and have developed very strong communication skills. A couple of years ago we were exposed to some friends with an open marriage and had our own conversations about ethical non-monogamy. At first, neither of us were interested. Now, my husband is interested and currently is attracted to a colleague who is also into him. She's married and has no idea that he and I talk about all of their interactions. He doesn't know what her relationship agreements are with her husband. I'm not currently interested in ethical non-monogamy. I see things in our relationship that I'd like to work on together with my husband. I want more of his attention and energy, to be frank. I don't want his attention and energy being funneled into another relationship. I don't have moral issues with ethical non-monogamy, I just don't actually see any value-add for me right now. The cost-benefit analysis leaves me saying 'not now.' My husband admitted that he's hoping I will have a change of mind. I don't want to force his hand, although I am continuing to say very clearly what I want in my relationship. How do we reach a compromise? If he cuts ties with this woman, he has resentment towards me. If he continues to pursue something with her, I feel disrespected, and while I don't want to leave him I would feel the need to do something. Dear Monogamously Married, I want to start by commending you for two things. First, for your openness to discussing and exploring all this with your husband. Second, for your insistence on clearly stating what you actually want — and don't want. I think Erich Fromm, the 20th-century German philosopher and psychologist, would back me up in saying that you'd do well to hold tight to both those qualities. For starters, radical openness is important because, according to Fromm, the basic premise of love is freedom. He writes: Love is a passionate affirmation of its 'object.' That means that love is not an 'affect' but an active striving, the aim of which is the happiness, development, and freedom of its 'object.' In other words, love is not a feeling. It's work, and the work of love is to fully support the flourishing of the person you love. That can be scary — what if the person discovers that they're actually happier with somebody else? — which is why Fromm specifies that only someone with a strong self 'which can stand alone and bear solitude' will be up for the job. He continues: This passionate affirmation is not possible if one's own self is crippled, since genuine affirmation is always rooted in strength. The person whose self is thwarted can only love in an ambivalent way; that is, with the strong part of his self he can love, with the crippled part he must hate. So far, it might sound like Fromm is saying that to be a good lover is to be a doormat: you just have to do whatever's best for the other person, even if it screws you over. But his view is very much the opposite. In fact, Fromm cautions us against both 'masochistic love' and 'sadistic love.' In the first, you give up your self and sacrifice your needs in order to become submerged in another person. In the second, you try to exert power over the other person. Both of these are rooted in 'a deep anxiety and an inability to stand alone,' writes Fromm; whether by dissolving yourself into them or by controlling them, you're trying to make it impossible for the other person to abandon you. Both approaches are 'pseudo-love.' Have a question you want me to answer in the next Your Mileage May Vary column? Feel free to email me at or fill out this anonymous form! Newsletter subscribers will get my column before anyone else does and their questions will be prioritized for future editions. Sign up here! So although Fromm doesn't want you to try to control your partner, and although he suggests that the philosophical ideal is for you to passionately affirm your partner's freedom, he's not advising you to do that if, for you, that will mean masochism. If you're not up for ethical non-monogamy — if you feel, like many people, that the idea of giving your partner free rein is too big a threat to your relationship or your own well-being — then pretending otherwise is not real love. It's just masochistic self-annihilation. I'm personally partial to Fromm's non-possessive approach to love. But I equally appreciate his point that the philosophical ideal could become a practical bloodbath if it doesn't work for the actual humans involved. I think the question, then, is this: Do you think it's possible for you to get to a place where you genuinely feel ready for and interested in ethical non-monogamy? It sounds like you're intellectually open to the idea, and given that you said you're committed to personal growth and continual learning, non-monogamy could offer you some benefits; lots of people who practice it say that part of its appeal lies in the growth it catalyzes. And if practicing non-monogamy makes you and/or your husband more fulfilled, it could enrich your relationship and deepen your appreciation for each other. But right now, you've got a problem: Your husband is pushing on your boundaries by flirting with a woman even after you've expressed that you don't want him pursuing something with her. And you already feel like he isn't giving you enough attention and energy, so the prospect of having to divvy up those resources with another woman feels threatening. Fair! Notice, though, that that isn't a worry about non-monogamy per se — it's a worry about the state of your current monogamous relationship. In a marriage, what partners typically want is to feel emotionally secure. But that comes from how consistently and lovingly we show up for and attune to one another, not from the relationship structure. A monogamous marriage may give us some feeling of security, but it's obviously no guarantee; some people cheat, some get divorced, and some stay loyally married while neglecting their partner emotionally. 'Monogamy can serve as a stand-in for actual secure attachment,' writes therapist Jessica Fern in Polysecure, a book on how to build healthy non-monogamous relationships. She urges readers to take an honest look at any relationship insecurities or dissatisfactions that are being disguised by monogamy, and work with partners to strengthen the emotional experience of the relationship. Since you feel that your husband isn't giving you enough attention and energy, be sure to talk to him about it. Explain that it doesn't feel safe for you to open up the relationship without him doing more to be fully present with you and to make you feel understood and precious. See if he starts implementing these skills more reliably. In the meantime, while you two are trying to reset your relationship, it's absolutely reasonable to ask him to cool it with the colleague he's attracted to; he doesn't have to cut ties with her entirely (and may not be able to if they work together), but he can certainly avoid feeding the flames with flirtation. Right now, the fantasy of her is a distraction from the work he needs to be doing to improve the reality of your marriage. He should understand why a healthy practice of ethical non-monogamy can't emerge from a situation where he's pushing things too far with someone else before you've agreed to change the terms of your relationship (and if he doesn't, have him read Polysecure!). It's probably a good idea for you to each do your own inner work, too. Fern, like Fromm, insists that if we want to be capable of a secure attachment with someone else, we need to cultivate that within ourselves. That means being aware of our feelings, desires, and needs, and knowing how to tend to them. Understanding your attachment style can help with this; for example, if you're anxiously attached and you very often reach out to your partner for reassurance, you can practice spending time alone. After taking some time to work on these interpersonal and intrapersonal skills, come back together to discuss how you're feeling. Do you feel more receptive to opening up the relationship? Do you think it would add more than it would subtract? If the answer is 'yes' or 'maybe,' you can create a temporary relationship structure — or 'vessel,' as Fern calls it — to help you ease into non-monogamy. One option is to adopt a staggered approach to dating, where one partner (typically the more hesitant one) starts dating new people first, and the other partner starts after a predetermined amount of time. Another option is to try a months-long experiment where both partners initially engage in certain romantic or sexual experiences that are less triggering to each other, then assess what worked and what didn't, and go from there. If the answer is 'no' — if you're not receptive to opening up your relationship — then by all means say that! Given you'll have sincerely done the work to explore whether non-monogamy works for you, your husband doesn't get to resent you. He can be sad, he can be disappointed, and he can choose to leave if the outcome is intolerable to him. But he'll have to respect you, and what's more important, you'll have to respect yourself. Bonus: What I'm reading This week's question prompted me to go back to the famous psychologist Abraham Maslow, who was influenced by Fromm. Maslow spoke of two kinds of love : Deficit-Love and Being-Love. The former is about trying to satiate your own needs, while the latter is about giving without expecting something in return. Maslow characterizes Being-Love as an almost spiritual experience, likening it to 'the perfect love of their God that some mystics have described.' In addition to Polysecure, which has become something of a poly bible in the past few years, I recommend reading What Love Is — and What It Could Be , written by the philosopher Carrie Jenkins. I appreciated Jenkins's functionalist take on romantic love: She explains that we've constructed the idea of romantic love a certain way in order to serve a certain function (structuring society into nuclear family units), but we can absolutely revise it if we want.

Would this be the last letter he would write?
Would this be the last letter he would write?

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Would this be the last letter he would write?

The sun was setting in England on June 10, 1944. Back home, it was still afternoon. He was sitting in the cab of his deuce-and-a-half — a 2.5 ton Army truck, ready to roll onto a ship that would take him and other truckers across 435 miles of the English channel to Omaha Beach in Normandy, France. Some 2,400 Americans had already been killed, wounded or reported missing on that beach in the four days since June 6. And now, he was on his way. It was the fifth anniversary of the day he and the girl he loved had eloped 'Girl' was right. She was 17. He was 21. And now, they — like so many other couples — were so far apart. So, as he waited to roll onto the ship, he started to write a letter home. He must have wondered if it would be the last he would ever write. 'Dearest Darling Wife: Hello, Honey, how are you by now? I feel better already. Just as I started, they came in. I mean the mail. Ha! Ha! I got three regular letters and a V-mail from you. I got my anniversary card yesterday and a V-mail from you. Sure was glad to get them. It was on time too and so cute.' He added, 'I am reading over your letters and I wanted to write you some more today of all days. This is one anniversary I will remember a long time. From the looks of things, now maybe I will get to be with you the next one and I hope a lot sooner. I guess you are worried about me, but no need of that, Honey. It won't do any good. I guess maybe you will start getting mail now that the big push is underway.' After crossing the channel, the trucks rolled off the ship into the water. They couldn't get all the way to the beach. Several trucks stalled in the water. But his made it. His next letter came from France on June 19. 'Dearest Darling Wife: Well, Honey, I haven't got to write you since our anniversary. I have been rather busy since. I think I will like this place pretty good when they quit celebrating so much. Ha! Ha! I wonder if I'll ever learn to talk to anyone here? It seems to me like these people have had a lot of stuff to put up with the past four years. Guess I can't say anything much except I'm in France.' It would be December of 1945 before he made it back home to her. And I was born 15 months later. That's just one story out of hundreds of thousands from those days 81 years ago when America fought to save the world.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store