US Supreme Court to hear KC case to determine legality of retroactive punishments
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — The United States Supreme Court will use a case from Kansas City to decide the legality of some retroactive punishments.
The nation's highest court announced on Monday that it will hear the appeal of Holsey Ellingburg, Jr.
Ellingburg was sentenced to 27 years in federal prison and ordered to pay $7,500 restitution for his role in a December 1995 bank robbery in Georgia.
In April 1996, Congress passed the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act (MVRA), which changed the statutory period of time for paying restitution ('restitution liability term').
After being released from prison in 2022, Ellingburg moved to the Kansas City, Missouri, area.
Authorities used the 1996 restitution law – passed after Ellingburg's sentencing – to try and force him to pay the remainder of his restitution.
Ellingburg argued that his restitution liability term under the Victim and Witness Protection Act (VWPA) had expired in 2016.
Ellingburg and his attorneys also argued that retroactively applying an expanded restitution liability term under the MVRA violated the U.S. Constitution's Ex Post Facto Clause.
A federal appeals court ruled against Ellingburer in August 2024.
The court on Monday also agreed to hear a second, unrelated case – also dealing with ex post facto laws.
The Supreme Court has not yet announced a date for oral arguments in the cases.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Minnesota Shootings Shake Capitol Hill, Spark Security Fears
The names of some congressional officials from the state were listed in the suspected shooter's papers.
Axios
10 hours ago
- Axios
Gov. Pritzker defends Illinois' sanctuary policies in heated Congressional hearing
Gov. JB Pritzker joined other Democratic governors Thursday in a tense hearing over immigration policies in front of the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Why it matters: Illinois' sanctuary state policies are in the crosshairs of the Trump administration, which has threatened to withhold federal funding for the state and the city of Chicago. The big picture: The spotlight on immigration is intensifying as protests continue across U.S. cities, including what could be Chicago's largest single-day anti-Trump demonstration this weekend. What they're saying: " Illinois follows the law, but let me be clear, we expect the federal government to follow the law, too," Pritzker said in his opening remarks. "We will not participate in abuses of power. We will not violate court orders. We will not ignore the Constitution." Context: Pritzker sat on a panel with Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul. The hearing was scheduled last month, before widespread protests erupted across U.S. cities, including Chicago. The original topic was states' sanctuary laws that limit how local law enforcement can work with federal immigration officers. But Thursday's question were largely about border security, the mobilization of the National Guard in Los Angeles and whether the Democratic governors are supporting illegal immigration. Zoom in: Republicans took aim at Pritzker, calling Chicago a haven for drugs and crime and pointing to crimes committed in Illinois by undocumented immigrants. In one heated moment, chair Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) repeatedly interrupted Pritzker while pressing him on a fatal crash involving an undocumented immigrant. Rep. Mary Miller (R-IL), who doesn't sit on the Oversight committee but was allowed to speak, said "illegal aliens in our state have overwhelmed local communities and schools causing untold pain and suffering." She continued by asking Pritzker to apologize to family members of the woman who died in the fatal crash, who were present in the chambers. Pritzker was also asked to comment on border czar Tom Homan's perceived threats to arrest local officials who have sanctuary policies. Pritzker replied, "he can try." The other side: Democrat representatives defended Pritzker, including Oversight Committee member Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.), who took his time to boast about Illinois' overall achievements. He also noted that it was Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner who first created Illinois' sanctuary laws, which allow state agencies to cooperate with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers only when they present a federal warrant. " This is Illinois law," Krishnamoorthi said. "Donald Trump may not like state law as we are seeing in California, but what Donald Trump likes is irrelevant. The law is the law." The intrigue: Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) quizzed Pritzker on transgender bathroom policies and Hamas — not immigration.
Politico
10 hours ago
- Politico
‘Political violence is a sickness': Elected officials worry that attacks will escalate
Republican and Democratic politicians are warning about rising violence targeting elected officials in the aftermath of a series of attacks, including the killing of a state official in Minnesota on Saturday. Within the last year, there have been multiple assassination attempts against President Donald Trump, an arson attack on Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro's residence, and the killing of two Israeli Embassy staffers in Washington — setting a new cycle of violence in the country. That violence culminated this weekend after two Minnesota lawmakers and their spouses were shot in their own homes, leaving two dead and two others seriously wounded. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, formerly the Democratic nominee for vice president, went so far as to direct his public safety department to recommend citizens avoid political events out of fear for their safety. Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon warned that the brutality his state witnessed on Saturday was not unique to Minnesota, but rather part of the broader trend of political animosity turning into acts of harm. 'Political violence is a sickness,' Simon, a Democrat, said. 'And unfortunately, it's on the rise. I want to be real clear here, we've had recent examples on both sides of the political spectrum. I am really very worried about where this is all headed.' He added that 'to perpetrate it, to encourage it, to pretend to ignore it, all of those things will only further poison our democracy, and I — all of us — have to work hard now more than ever, to reinforce the idea that we have to settle our political differences lawfully, peacefully and ultimately at the ballot box.' According to lawmakers from across the political spectrum, threats of violence and even murder that were once rare are now commonplace, as tensions amid heightened polarization spill over into charged confrontations. 'We're all getting death threats pretty regularly, and violent threats,' Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) said of his congressional colleagues. 'You go online and you just see all of the vile and hate and vitriol that is pulsing through mostly right wing politics and platforms, but there's some of it on the left too.' And the threats don't just begin and end online. 'People have showed up outside my home,' Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat who is running for governor next year, said. 'We've had swatting attacks, we've had bomb threats. I've experienced all three of those things at my home. When things like this happen, it is a devastating reminder of the reality that we're living in in this moment.' In 2020, several men were accused of plotting to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer in order to start a civil war. Two suspects were later convicted on charges related to the incident. President Donald Trump recently floated pardoning the men convicted in the kidnapping plot. Huffman said he and other members of Congress are 'taking all kinds of precautions' to boost their safety that they never before would have thought necessary in the U.S. Federal campaign finance officials signed off last year on allowing members of Congress and candidates to use campaign cash for a wide array of personal security measures due to the threats they now routinely face. Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), who has young children, said he, too, had beefed up his security in the past year, because 'people have lost all sense of responsibleness and civility.' Lawler said that the 'volatility' in political discourse has 'gotten so hot that people have lost perspective,' resulting in people 'making decisions that result in bodily harm of elected officials and the general public.' 'I think both parties have to recognize that some of the rhetoric really results in grave consequences,' the New York representative added, referencing the attempts on Trump's life in July and September. 'And how things are described, how people talk about actions being taken by the government, just all of it is destructive towards the public discourse, and frankly, put people's lives in jeopardy. And I hope people wake up to it, because it really is destructive.' Members of Congress and Capitol police have been warning about an increase in threats to federal lawmakers for years. But the spike is particularly acute for state lawmakers, many of whom only work part time and do not have the resources that federal elected officials have. 'If Trump has literally the best security in the world, ostensibly, and can't stop it, how could they feel safe?' said Amanda Litman, the co-founder of the Democratic candidate recruitment group Run for Something. 'And I think the thing we came back to is — we want to be really honest with folks — there's nothing we can do to guarantee safety at all times. All we can do is control what we can control.' But some political experts said that the rise in violence is further inflamed by the rhetoric and actions pushed by the Trump administration and other Republicans. 'I mean, it's not rocket science,' Harvard political scientist Steve Levitsky, who co-authored the book 'How Democracies Die' in 2018, said. 'You condone the January 6 insurrection. You pardon them all, or virtually all of them, including those who physically assaulted police officers, and you treat them as heroes. You send around unmarked cars with masked vigilante like agents, abducting people off the streets. You politicize the armed forces and send them in threatening violence upon peaceful protesters. And you condone the physical assault of a or arrest of a U.S. senator for peaceful expression of his views. … You've created an atmosphere that's not just permissive of political violence, it encourages political violence.' Republican politicians are aware of the problem and say so privately, Levitsky said, but are 'worried' to speak up publicly. Trump said of the shootings on Saturday that 'such horrific violence will not be tolerated in the United States of America.' The White House did not immediately respond to Levitsky's criticism. The escalating violence comes amid heightened political tension, including millions of Americans pouring onto the streets to protest on Saturday as a counter to Trump's multi-million dollar military parade and the administration's recent immigration crackdowns. Huffman noted the challenge for Democrats of threading the needle between resistance to the president, who Democrats have characterized as an authoritarian leader, and maintaining non-escalatory, peaceful protests. 'I don't want to pull punches, I don't want to stand down in any way, but I don't want to fan the flames that could lead to violence, and so I just try to strike that difficult balance,' Huffman said. 'We're also fighting for democracy and our rights against an authoritarian president who's trying to be a dictator, and you can't sugarcoat that, it's just reality.' 'So how do you confront that without contributing to this ladder of escalation that could lead to violence?' he asked. 'It's not simple.'
