The first US solar storm emergency drill did not go well
The federal government released the results of a multiday emergency drill intended to assess our ability to handle the next massive solar storm. Unfortunately, it sounds like there's a lot of room for improvement. According to a report published earlier this month by the Space Weather Operations, Research, and Mitigation (SWORM) task force, institutions across the board need to better coordinate their interoffice responses, at the very least. Meanwhile, educating both themselves and the public on the complexities of cosmic forces that threaten societal infrastructures is a major must that remains unfulfilled.
Governmental emergency response agencies don't only train for somewhat predictable events like hurricanes, wildfires, and other natural disasters—they need to be prepared for rarer or even far-fetched scenarios. Experts routinely review protocols and options for the next inevitable cataclysmic asteroid strike, for example. But while that kind of cosmic predicament only occurs roughly once every 25,000 years, massive solar storms happen more frequently. These flare-ups generate gigantic clouds of energized gas and dust that can bombard Earth at speeds of roughly 2 million miles per hour. Such particles subsequently distort the planet's magnetosphere and produce atmospheric displays like the aurora borealis. But in an interconnected and digitized world, these forces can also wreak havoc on power grids, communications systems, and satellite arrays.
In order to respond to these threats, government agencies need to coordinate. That is where SWORM comes in. Formed in 2014 to develop and advance national space weather preparedness, SWORM includes agencies like the National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
The task force hosted its first-ever Space Weather (SWx) Tabletop Exercise (TTX) on May 8 and 9, 2024 across the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory and Colorado's FEMA office. The scenario focused on four modules relating to the fallout from a series of solar events, including loss of GPS functionality, power outages, radio blackouts, orbital satellite communication disruptions, and even extreme radiation exposure for astronauts.
The hypothetical emergency occurred over eight days in early 2028. In this situation, an active solar region begins to flare as it rotates towards a position aimed at Earth. Intensifying this simulated crisis is the variable that a two-astronaut Orion spacecraft crew is en route to the Moon, while another pair of Artemis astronauts are already situated on the lunar surface.
The organizers then asked each participating agency group what protocols they had in place to handle such a priority problem. The results, while productive, laid bare just how difficult it still is for state and national agencies to coordinate on something as fundamentally complex as geomagnetic storms. This related both to the emergency responders themselves and the general public.
'Space weather is a complex subject and its potential impacts are not well understood outside of NOAA and NASA,' reads the report, adding that participants, 'without space weather expertise struggled to translate the scientific information and determine what the specific impacts would be on Earth.'
'There is a strong need to educate not only government and agency staff but the general public, as well,' SWORM concluded.
Another issue is that many relevant government institutions lack Continuity of Operations (COOP) plans for solar storms.
'Even those organizations that include space weather in their documents fail to provide clarity regarding how and at what point a COOP would be activated for this type of event,' states the report.
However, even if agencies implement better response protocols and clearly articulate risks to the public, the fact remains that a solar storm's lead time is incredibly short. Currently, experts are only able to accurately assess the incoming impacts of a coronal mass ejection around 30 minutes before it reaches Earth. SWORM noted 'significant discussion was dedicated' to just how little a half an hour's heads up affords agencies, and suggested developing an advanced warning system—even if it's imprecise.
Another conclusion was the need to more heavily invest in more advanced space weather satellite systems, along with deploying a new generation of sensors capable of monitoring the complex factors underlying cosmic conditions. This could be accomplished through collaborations with both international partners and private companies.
While the drill's results aren't the most comforting, nearly all participants reported leaving the event with a better understanding of solar storms and their consequences, as well as the need for better interagency communications about space weather. Ironically, SWORM couldn't have asked for a better event grand finale: exactly one day after the meeting, an extreme geomagnetic storm hit Earth that temporarily affected power grids and satellite orbital patterns.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
Moon over Musk
Presented by The Spotlight The alliance between Donald Trump and Elon Musk — to borrow a phrase from the space community — has undergone a rapid unscheduled disassembly. Yet amid all the fireworks Thursday from the duo's public meltdown, one area of the space world seems to have a brighter future: the moon mission. Context: Musk, the SpaceX founder and well-known Mars enthusiast, has argued against returning astronauts to the lunar surface. But the stunning forced exit of the billionaire's hand-picked nominee for the top NASA job and Musk's massive rupture with the president has handed moon backers in Congress and industry an opening — and they're seizing it. What's happening, Part I: A ton of major space companies — just not SpaceX — are launching an ad campaign going big on the moon, according to two industry officials granted anonymity to discuss the effort. The move is the first sign of real pushback against the behemoth space company and its founder, who only days ago seemed to lock down government contracts every time he blinked. A television ad funded by the companies, who do not go by an umbrella name, will appear on television in the coming days with a pitch clearly aimed at Trump. A narrator, underlaid by dramatic images of America's Apollo missions, implores voters to call senators in support of the moon mission and 'keep America first in space.' A separate letter addressed to the Senate Commerce Committee and obtained by POLITICO backs investments in the moon, and is signed by a lengthy slate of prominent space companies — but not (you guessed it) SpaceX. What's happening, Part II: The Senate Commerce Committee on Thursday evening unveiled a new reconciliation bill that would channel $10 billion to NASA, much of it for the space agency's effort to return to the moon through the Artemis program. The White House's NASA budget had proposed major cuts to Artemis, including slashing a planned lunar space station and moon missions. 'Anybody who's following space will have noticed how deeply committed [the committee is] to getting back to the moon, particularly before the Chinese get there,' said a committee aide, who was granted anonymity to discuss the bill. SpaceX'd Out: All of this is happening amid Musk's very public fall from grace. Trump, during the social media showdown with his former confidante, threatened to cancel Musk's contracts with the government. The SpaceX founder responded by saying he would end the Dragon spacecraft contract, which is the U.S.'s only reliable way of accessing the International Space Station. (But he also suggested late Thursday night that he might not actually do so.) And of course, Trump last week abruptly pulled the NASA administrator nomination for Musk ally Jared Isaacman, just days ahead of his likely confirmation by the Senate. Isaacman, speaking on a podcast this week, linked his ouster to Musk's provocative departure from the White House. 'I don't think the timing was much of a coincidence,' he said. What next: This all means Congress may now have a stronger hand in negotiations with the White House over the NASA budget, which was written before Musk's break from Trump and heavily favors Mars. The administration's budget proposes major cuts to spending for the moon in favor of nearly $1 billion for landing an astronaut on Mars. SpaceX, thanks to provisions in the bill, was likely to snag a lucrative contract to build the landing system for any red planet mission. That seems much less feasible now. Senators from states with large NASA centers — think Alabama and Louisiana — are particularly keen to latch onto moon funding. Trump has voiced support for a Mars mission, meaning the idea may not have completely faded. But with Musk's implosion and the latest moon push, a return to the lunar surface is on firmer ground than it was just a week ago. WELCOME TO POLITICO PRO SPACE. It's our inaugural edition and a telling time to start. We've seen deep slashes to NASA's budget, the space agency's nominee pulled, and a feud explode between the world's biggest space contractor and the president. We can't wait for next week. Email me at sskove@ with tips, pitches and feedback, and find me on X at @samuelskove. We're offering this newsletter for free over the next few weeks. After that, it will be available only to POLITICO Pro subscribers. Read all about what we're doing here. Galactic Government MAKE A DEAL: Florida Rep. Mike Haridopolos, who chairs the House's subcommittee on space and aeronautics, told me Wednesday that he was against the White House's massive NASA cuts — making him one of the first Republicans to publicly voice opposition. 'Will a 26 percent cut to NASA hold? Absolutely not,' he said. 'We're going to be talking with the president and his team, with OMB about the paramount importance of space.' China: Haridopolos emphasized competition with China as a driving reason not to slash the space agency's funding. The proposed cancellation of Gateway — a lunar space station partnership with the European Space Agency — opens the way for Chinese influence, he said. Sen. Ted Cruz, the Texas Republican who leads the committee that oversees NASA, underscored a remarkably similar message during Isaacman's confirmation hearing. The Florida lawmaker said he was optimistic that the cuts wouldn't come to fruition. Trump 'believes in the space program,' he said. 'He knows that we want there's no second place to space.' TICKET TO RIDE: Sens. John Cornyn, Ben Ray Luján, Rick Scott, and Mark Kelly introduced a bill Thursday that would streamline licensing processes for commercial space companies, opening the way to a boom in rocket launches. The bill, dubbed the Launch Act, would allow the Federal Aviation Administration to eliminate overly bureaucratic steps in the application process. The law would also create a streamlined process for licensing commercial satellites used to observe the Earth. And it would move the Office of Space Commerce from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and place it directly under the Transportation secretary, a move that would elevate the office's access to key decision makers. Why it matters: Companies such as SpaceX have long complained about the slow pace of launch licensing. Streamlining the process could lead to a significant uptick in an already booming schedule. Companies launched 145 U.S. rockets in 2024, up from 109 the previous year. Military SPACE COMMAND: Lawmakers pressed Air Force Secretary Troy Meink on Thursday to keep U.S. Space Command in Colorado as the Trump administration weighs moving the headquarters to Alabama. The Defense Department established the command in 2019 and temporarily placed it in Colorado while the Air Force evaluated permanent sites. Trump chose Alabama as the permanent headquarters but former President Joe Biden reversed that decision and selected Colorado. What he said: Meink, in a House Armed Services Committee hearing, conceded that Space Command would see civilian employees quit if the HQ moved from Colorado to Alabama. 'It would be very important that we manage that move over a period of time, if that occurs,' the Air Force chief said. Rep. Jeff Crank (R-Colo.) called for the Pentagon to resume headquarters construction at Peterson Space Force Base in Colorado Springs, calling it the 'most effective' home for Space Command. Context: Officials have paused construction because of a legal requirement to hold off until the Pentagon inspector general and the Government Accountability Office released their reports on the Biden administration's 2023 basing decision. Those reports are out, but Meink said the Air Force is still reviewing the GAO's findings. The Reading Room — Senate Commerce reconciliation bill proposes new space launch fee: POLITICO — Space Force awards BAE $1.2B for missile warning sats in MEO: Breaking Defense — Impulse Space Raises $300M Series C: Payload — Space Force shifts upfront range upgrade costs to commercial firms: Defense News — Some parts of Trump's proposed budget for NASA are literally draconian: Ars Technica Event Horizon TUESDAY: Axiom-4 launches private astronauts to the International Space Station. The Hudson Institute holds a discussio n on defending in outer space with Rep. Jeff Crank. Rep. George Whitesides speaks with SpaceNews on space issues. FRIDAY: The FAA ends public comments on a launch licensing-related issue. Photo of the Week
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Statins can reduce sepsis deaths, study suggests
People who are critically ill with sepsis may be more likely to survive if they are given statins, a new study suggests. Researchers wanted to explore whether the cholesterol-busting drugs may bring additional benefits for patients. The new study examined information on sepsis patients who received statins during a stint in intensive care and compared it with patients in a similar situation who did not receive statins. Sepsis can be life-threatening, but knowing the signs can save lives. Symptoms differ in adults, children, & infants under 5. Learn more: — The UK Sepsis Trust (@UKSepsisTrust) January 7, 2025 Some 14.3% of 6,000 sepsis patients who were given statins died within 28 days. This is compared with 23.4% of 6,000 patients who did not receive statin therapy. The research team from China said that this equates to a 39% reduced risk of death within a month. The research, based on data from thousands of patients at a hospital in Israel between 2008 and 2019, also found that 7.4% of statin patients died while in the intensive care unit compared with 13.6% of those who did not receive statins. And during their overall hospital stay, some 11.5% of sepsis patients who were given statins died, compared with 19.1% of sepsis patients who did not take statins. However, it appeared that those who were not prescribed statins had a slightly shorter hospital stay compared with those who did receive them – an average of eight days compared with almost 10 days. 'We found that statin users exhibited decreased 28-day all-cause mortality,' the authors wrote in the journal Frontiers in Immunology. Sepsis is a life-threatening reaction to an infection that occurs when the immune system overreacts and starts to damage the body's tissues and organs. In the UK, 245,000 people are affected by sepsis every year. UK sepsis experts said that 'anything which might reduce the burden of a condition which claims one in five lives worldwide needs to be rigorously explored' as they called for larger trials to confirm the findings. Statins are known as cholesterol-busting drugs because they can help lower the level of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in the blood. But experts said that they also have other benefits, including reducing inflammation and antibacterial effects. The research team called for larger trials to confirm their findings. 'Our large, matched cohort study found that treatment with statins was associated with a 39% lower death rate for critically ill patients with sepsis, when measured over 28 days after hospital admission,' said Dr Caifeng Li, the study's corresponding author and an associate professor at Tianjin Medical University General Hospital in China. 'These results strongly suggest that statins may provide a protective effect and improve clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis.' Commenting on the study, Dr Ron Daniels, founder and chief executive of the UK Sepsis Trust, said: 'It has been known for some time that the anti-inflammatory properties of statins confer a survival benefit on those who take them if they develop sepsis. 'Whilst previous studies have failed to show a similar survival benefit in treating people with sepsis with statins, this new study supports calls for a large, multi-country, randomised control trial. 'Anything which might reduce the burden of a condition which claims one in five lives worldwide needs to be rigorously explored.'
Forbes
11 hours ago
- Forbes
Trump-Musk Blowup Could Be Good News For Boeing
President Donald Trump waits to address the crowd during the debut event for the Dreamliner 787-10 at Boeing's South Carolina facilities on February 17, 2017 in North Charleston, South Carolina. Boeing has been making steady progress toward righting its commercial airliner business under new CEO Kelly Ortberg. The spectacular collapse of the relationship between President Donald Trump and his former first buddy Elon Musk could provide a lift for its struggling space division. Amid a shocking exchange of angry statements on social media Thursday, Trump threatened to cancel federal contracts with Musk's companies. The world's richest man responded by asserting that his rocket and satellite company, SpaceX, would 'begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately." Should Musk do that, it could provide a boost for Boeing's erstwhile Dragon competitor, the Starliner crew capsule. Thursday's blowup could also have a payoff for Boeing in two other areas: the embattled Artemis moon landing program, for which Boeing produces giant rockets; and for United Launch Alliance, its rocket joint venture with Lockheed Martin. It's unlikely that Trump would follow through on his threat to cancel contracts – that would provide rich grounds for legal challenges, said Todd Harrison, a space and defense analyst at the American Enterprise Institute. But there's plenty of room for the administration to direct new business to Boeing and others – and potentially pull back from the support Trump promised in his inaugural address for Musk's ambition to reach Mars. 'Where Trump can single handedly harm SpaceX in a significant way is redirecting the mission goals for NASA,' Harrison said. NASA contracted Boeing and SpaceX in 2014 to develop spacecraft to fly U.S. astronauts to the International Space Station on a commercial basis rather than owning and operating the vehicles itself. But Boeing has suffered a series of embarrassing setbacks with Starliner, leaving NASA dependent on SpaceX's Dragon. The agency has since added three more launches to SpaceX's contract, for a total of nine. Boeing has lost $2 billion on its $4.6 billion, fixed-price contract. There have been questions over Starliner's future following its troubled first crewed test flight to the ISS last year. Though it transported astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore successfully to the ISS, thruster malfunctions led NASA to decide it was too risky for them to return to Earth on Starliner. The astronauts were forced to wait aboard the space station for nine months for a Dragon capsule to arrive to take them back. Musk's threat to retire Dragon could change the calculus for the administration. 'I think NASA may feel that having alternatives would be wise,' said Tim Farrar, an independent satellite industry consultant. A wildcard: Russia hasn't committed to supporting the ISS beyond 2028. If Russia withdraws, it could force NASA to deorbit the station earlier than the end of 2030, as planned, reducing the need for transport services. In its 2026 budget request, the Trump administration proposed a radical overhaul of the Artemis program, begun during the president's first term to return Americans to the moon. The administration wants to phase out the giant Boeing-produced rocket at the heart of the program, the Space Launch System, after two more launches. Nicknamed the 'Senate Launch System' for the pork the program provides, a single launch costs a steep $4 billion. The budget request proposed transitioning to cheaper commercial systems – with the chief candidates expected to provide them being SpaceX and Blue Origin. But it hasn't been clear that Congress would go along with cutting SLS, which supports jobs in all 50 states. The Senate Commerce committee reportedly is considering restoring $4 billion cut from NASA's budget for SLS, and the Trump administration may not be inclined to fight them. 'It seems more likely now that NASA may continue with an Artemis program that utilizes SLS,' said Harrison. One other potential winner besides Boeing: Blue Origin. NASA has contracted the Jeff Bezos-owned company and SpaceX to both produce lunar landers for the Artemis program. With three successive failed flight tests for SpaceX's massive Starship rocket, which is needed to transport the company's lander, NASA could well decide to double down with Blue Origin. The blowup could lead the Department of Defense and other national security agencies to redouble their efforts to diversify their stable of satellite launch providers, which is dominated by SpaceX. But the immediate upside could be limited for ULA, Boeing and Lockheed's launch company, which needs to scale up the launch rate of its new Vulcan heavy rocket. 'ULA couldn't take all of SpaceX's contracts, even if they were handed to them,' Harrison explained The toxic breakup with Musk could also lead defense officials to reconsider how much they would want to rely on SpaceX for Golden Dome, the administration's plan to create a missile defense shield for the United States. 'This might give people pause when thinking about whether that money should go to Musk or to more traditional contractors,' said Farrar. Like, say, Boeing.
