logo
Major SA retail group introduces fully RECYCLABLE potato bags

Major SA retail group introduces fully RECYCLABLE potato bags

These eco-friendly potato bags are available at over 1 400 Shoprite, Checkers, and Usave stores across the country, marking a significant step toward reducing packaging waste.
Traditional potato bags have long posed a recycling challenge. Although they resemble paper, they contain a moisture-resistant inner lining that couldn't be processed by South Africa's recycling facilities.
As a result, an estimated 18 600 tonnes of potato bags ended up in landfills in 2023 alone.
Worse yet, according to studies by the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, the cost to build a recycling plant specifically for this type of material was estimated at R30 million.
The turning point came from an in-house leadership development programme run by the Shoprite Group in collaboration with the Gordon Institute of Business Science (GIBS).
Through and Action Learning Project, five employees took on the challenge of finding a sustainable alternative.
'What appeared to be a straightforward task quickly revealed deep supply chain complexity,' the Shoprite Group said.
'Potato bags require an inner wet-strength layer to absorb any moisture – a specification set by industry body, Potato SA – which made them incompatible with standard recycling processes.'
Over six months, the team mapped the entire production and recycling chain, engaging with stakeholders across the board – including packaging manufacturers, recyclers, and even waste pickers.
After evaluating numerous alternatives, including international options and even potential reuse in construction, the team found none were viable for the local market.
The breakthrough came when Billerud, a Swedish paper supplier and one of the country's top three providers of potato bag material, learned of the project.
The company developed a new semi-wet-strength paper that is fully recyclable using South Africa's existing infrastructure. Although the first attempt failed, a revised version met all technical and recyclability requirements.
This new recyclable potato bag has also passed shelf-life tests.
As a result of this innovation, the Shoprite Group's recyclable, reusable or compostable packaging on the whole will increase from 88.9% to 90%.
'Beyond environmental benefits, the change also creates economic opportunity,' the Group added.
'If adopted industry-wide, the new bag could unlock more than R22 million in potential income for South Africa's informal waste pickers.'
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Constitutional Court dismisses eThekwini Municipality's appeal over R30 million payout
Constitutional Court dismisses eThekwini Municipality's appeal over R30 million payout

IOL News

time12 hours ago

  • IOL News

Constitutional Court dismisses eThekwini Municipality's appeal over R30 million payout

eThekwini City Manager Musa Mbhele. Image: Supplied The Constitutional Court has dismissed eThekwini Municipality in its long legal battle over R30 million payout to the service provider, Daily Double Trading 479 cc /Pholobas Projects. The municipality had approached the apex to appeal an earlier Durban High Court and Supreme Court of Appeal ruling that favoured the service provider. The Constitutional Court said the application brought by the municipality bears no reasonable prospects. The city revoked its contracts after discovering anomalies in the company's tender award during its investigations a few years ago. It was reported that in 2021, the company took the municipality to the Durban High Court, demanding that the cancellation of the contracts and blacklisting be declared unlawful, and for the court to rule that the municipality was indebted to it in the sum of R44.1m the amount owing for the cancelled contracts. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ However, before the Concourt could hear the matter, an out-of-court settlement was reached by the parties. A deal was struck where a municipal attorney, identified as Mr Moloi at the time, agreed that the municipality would give Daily Double R30 million as a settlement for its illiquid damages. According to the affidavit of City Manager Musa Mbhele, when this came to the attention of the former city manager, Sipho Nzuza, he refused to approve the R30 million payout. 'He stated he would not approve such a transaction as no one, including himself, had the authority to sanction payments above R30 million. He said whoever had told Moloi to strike a deal with Daily Double had been misguided,' Mbhele wrote in his affidavit. Mbhele stated that Nzuza indicated that this matter would need to go before the eThekwini full council for a decision. 'This matter was never placed before the council, and Nzuza made it clear in his affidavit before the High Court that he had refused to sanction the questionable settlement,' he added. Former eThekwini city manager Sipho Nzuza. Image: Zanele Zulu / Independent Newspapers Mbhele said that to this day, he has no idea who authorised or told Moloi to offer the company R30 million. 'If the municipality were to pay this money, no one would account for it,' he said. Additionally, Mbhele said this case raised questions of law that will impact not only eThekwini Municipality but also other municipalities throughout the country. He said the case required the Constitutional Court to clarify the ambit of an attorney's competency to enter into settlements in respect of municipalities and similar organs of state.

SA breaks record for table grape exports, UK tops destination list
SA breaks record for table grape exports, UK tops destination list

The South African

time17 hours ago

  • The South African

SA breaks record for table grape exports, UK tops destination list

A record 77.8 million cartons of table grapes were exported from South Africa for the 2024/25 season, marking a 5% increase over the previous year. According to the South African Table Grape Industry (SATI), demand remains robust across major international markets. The European Union accounted for the majority of exports at 58%, while the United Kingdom was the leading individual destination, taking 18% of the total volume. Notably, exports to North America – which includes the United States and Canada – rose by 25% year-on-year, reaching 7.4 million cartons. This surge contributed to a global export value of approximately USD $730 million for South African table grapes in 2024. 'The industry is encouraged by growing exports to the USA,' SATI chief exec Mecia Petersen told Fruitnet . 'We are closely monitoring developments regarding potential new tariffs that may impact the sector.' South Africa has exported fresh grapes to the US for over two decades. Those shipments have increased at an average rate of 19% per year over the last five years. In the 2024/25 season, trade with the US represented about 3% of total table grape exports. That's equivalent to 2.2 million 4.5kg cartons, or just under 10 000 tonnes. Petersen emphasised the sector's optimism about further growth in this market, and the importance of maintaining that market share. However, South African grapes currently face higher import tariffs in the US compared to other Southern Hemisphere suppliers, such as Peru and Chile, which export during the same off-season window. According to SATI, for South Africa to remain competitive, a careful mix of market consolidation and diversification will be required. 'Market access processes can take many years, and favourable market conditions are influenced by the tariffs South Africa may face in destinations compared to other exporting countries,' Petersen added. 'Finding alternative markets to absorb volumes currently shipped to the USA is not a desirable solution.' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

Your WhatsApp messages could get you fired
Your WhatsApp messages could get you fired

Eyewitness News

timea day ago

  • Eyewitness News

Your WhatsApp messages could get you fired

Jonathan Lord, University of Salford ; Gordon Fletcher, University of Salford , and Saad Baset, University of Salford It's late evening and your phone vibrates with some banter from colleagues. You join the conversation and go to bed feeling part of the work community. You then wake up and have a feeling of apprehension as to how the messages will be perceived. WhatsApp might have started as a casual messaging app for friends, but it has now firmly become embedded in workplace communication – and increasingly in workplace conflicts, too. WhatsApp chats have also been used to corroborate or refute claims in employment tribunals. An employee might claim they were promised a pay rise or flexible hours via WhatsApp, for example. But on the other hand, employers have also used WhatsApp logs to prove misconduct. This evidence has included sharing confidential information. In the workplace, WhatsApp chats have replaced many casual real-life conversations. Colleagues create groups to coordinate work, message each other after hours and vent their frustrations in private messages. Although this feels informal, it can leave employees vulnerable. But when disputes escalate to legal action, these messages can help judges understand what really happened. Tribunals treat WhatsApp messages like any other document. Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK's latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences. We examined more than 2,000 cases brought to UK employment tribunals since 2019 that involved WhatsApp. The findings reveal a surprising range of ways in which these casual chats became evidence. WhatsApp conversations have increasingly played a crucial role in misconduct and discrimination disputes, being used as evidence of harassment or inappropriate behaviour. The messages are also cited in unfair dismissal and contract claims, especially where informal work communications and digital records were seen as central to the case. In 2018, 48 cases brought to employment tribunals involved WhatsApp messages. By 2024, that had climbed to 562. The cases span a wide range of jurisdictions, but unfair dismissal, contract breaches, harassment and discrimination were dominant. From the cases we examined, several themes were clear. 1. Removal or exclusion from a WhatsApp group In the case of Ms B Djagbo v Women's Health Dulwich Ltd, the claimant successfully brought a claim for unfavourable treatment due to pregnancy and maternity. This followed a series of incidents that took place after she informed her employer of her pregnancy. Several actions made her feel as though her employment was being prematurely ended, including being removed from the workplace WhatsApp group chat. The tribunal awarded her almost £20,000. 2. Discriminatory messages or harassment via WhatsApp In the Mr D Robson v NGP Utilities Ltd case, the claimant is a gay man and brought a complaint of harassment. This included a series of inappropriate and offensive incidents at work, notably, a WhatsApp group message from a colleague. The message was part of a wider pattern of jokes targeting gay colleagues. The employment tribunal awarded him more than £36,000. 3. Termination of employment via WhatsApp The case of Miss J Hodkinson v B&R Care Ltd highlights a pregnant care worker who was awarded more than £40,000 in compensation after being unfairly dismissed via WhatsApp. The fact the dismissal was carried out informally and insensitively supported the tribunal's findings of 'procedural and substantive unfairness'. 4. WhatsApp communications submitted as evidence The Mr M D Black v Alain Charles Publishing Ltd tribunal noted that the claimant's evidence was consistent with WhatsApp message screenshots included in the evidence bundle. As a result, compensation of almost £100,000 was awarded. WhatsApp groups can also offer a window into workplace culture. Tribunals have seen examples of co-workers using WhatsApp to share sexist and racist jokes or to gossip about colleagues. With remote and flexible working, these chats illustrate a growing tension between constant connectivity and work burnout. The tribunal cases show just how deeply WhatsApp has become part of working life, blurring the line between personal and professional. Colleagues chat the way friends do. But when working relationships sour or rules are broken, each of these informal chats carries legal weight. What someone thought was a single throwaway remark in a private conversation can later be dissected as part of a wider body of evidence. There have been cases where an employer was ordered to hand over work-related WhatsApp exchanges, and others where an employee's own messages were used against them. It's a clear lesson. Privacy in digital communication is never guaranteed. Even encrypted messages can become public in a courtroom. WhatsApp dos and don'ts The volume of references to WhatsApp in tribunal cases frames some key lessons for both employees and employers. In a nutshell, if you wouldn't write it in a company email or say it in a meeting, don't put it into WhatsApp. Jokes can be misinterpreted and offensive remarks don't just go away. Many have learned this the hard way. Using WhatsApp to share instructions and decisions might seem convenient, but it shouldn't replace formal process. And for employers, it's time to update communication policies, including guidelines on after-hours messaging, the use of group chats and respecting expectations of inclusivity. Banning WhatsApp might not be practical, but setting out expectations is important. Even a policy stating that any work-related communication on personal messaging apps should adhere to the company's expected code of conduct is a start. Many people are unaware that a private chat can reappear as evidence. Knowing that a tasteless joke on WhatsApp could support a harassment claim potentially costing an unlimited fine, or that ignoring a late-night work message might be used as evidence of poor performance, will harden most people to conduct more mindful communication. Jonathan Lord, Lecturer in Human Resource Management and Employment Law, University of Salford ; Gordon Fletcher, Associate Dean, Research and Innovation, University of Salford , and Saad Baset, Associate Lecturer & Researcher, Salford Business School, University of Salford This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store