Four Palestinians killed as starving Gazans storm UN warehouse amid spiralling hunger crisis
At least four Palestinians were killed after thousands of starving Gazans stormed a UN World Food Programme warehouse in Deir al-Balah in search of food.
Two people were crushed in the chaos and two were fatally shot, although it was not yet clear who had fired the bullets.
A Red Cross field hospital said it was treating women and children with gunshot wounds. Video footage captured crowds ripping apart the warehouse and scrambling for flour and supplies.
The UN World Food Programme said the humanitarian situation in Gaza had spiralled out of control after almost three months of Israeli blockade, with only limited aid allowed in recently.
'Hordes of hungry people broke into WFP's al-Ghafari warehouse in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza, in search of food supplies that were pre-positioned for distribution,' the WFP said, describing the situation as 'alarming and deteriorating'.
'Humanitarian needs have spiralled out of control after 80 days of complete blockade of all food assistance and other aid into Gaza. Gaza needs an immediate scale-up of food assistance. This is the only way to reassure people that they will not starve.'
After 11 weeks under complete siege and a continuing Israeli blockade, hunger in Gaza has reached critical levels. Medics and aid workers have reported widespread malnutrition, with UN-run bakeries shutting down due to a lack of cooking gas and food prices soaring beyond reach.
Most people are struggling to find enough to eat as the humanitarian crisis deepens. The WFP noted that it had 'consistently warned of alarming and deteriorating conditions on the ground and the risks imposed by limiting humanitarian aid to hungry people in desperate need of assistance'.
Israel started allowing limited aid into Gaza last week after the launch of a controversial private aid group backed by the US and Israel known as the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation.
Bypassing the UN and using US security contractors, the group has set up distribution centres claiming to prevent aid theft by Hamas, an allegation the Palestinian militant group denies.
The UN has criticised the group as unworkable and unethical.
Palestinian health officials reported that Israeli troops had opened fire at a food distribution site set up by the controversial group in southern Gaza on Tuesday, killing at least three civilians and injuring 48 as large crowds gathered. The foundation dismissed the information as 'totally false'. The UN didn't confirm any deaths in the chaos, but said at least 47 Palestinians had suffered injuries, mostly from gunfire, during the aid distribution.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump could yet deliver a ceasefire in the Middle East
It is given to few to peer inside the minds of the Hamas leadership, so their precise motives for rejecting the latest ceasefire offer cannot be easily discerned. However, there are some consequences of their policy which are not difficult to determine. Many more innocent Palestinian people will starve to death, or be injured and die, more children will be orphaned, the remaining Israeli hostages will continue to be kept in tortuous conditions, the war will continue, and neither the state of Israel nor the Palestinian occupied territories will enjoy the kind of security taken for granted in most nations on earth. The slide into the abyss, in other words, will continue. The tragedy of the Palestinian people has many facets and many cruel ironies attached to it. An overriding one that has come into sharp focus since Hamas committed its terrorist atrocities on 7 October 2023 is that which condemns the people of Gaza and the occupied West Bank to continued suffering. The paradox is that those who have the power to help the Palestinians – the Israeli authorities, Hamas and the Trump administration – do not really wish to do so; and those who want to help the Palestinians – European and other nations, the UN agencies, bodies of opinion in Israel and America too – lack the power to do so. The fundamental, inconvenient and obscene fact of political life in the region is that it suits the Netanyahu administration and the Hamas leadership equally well to prolong this war. That is why so many ceasefire initiatives have failed, and the few uneasy periods of peace have soon enough collapsed into renewed bloodshed and misery. Indeed, the last such ceasefire and its failure, in March, arguably made matters even worse because the Israelis then decided to impose a blockade on humanitarian aid reaching the civilian population, who are, in any case, continually displaced and left under bombardment of one kind or another. Every so often, there is some diplomatic breakthrough and a ceasefire is proposed by one side, brokered by the US and maybe some regional partner such as Qatar or Egypt… which is then rejected by the other. Often this happens even where the two sides are surprisingly – but also suspiciously – close to agreement. It is very much as though these leaders do not yearn for peace. In the latest failing case, Hamas won't accept the terms because they wouldn't necessarily mean a permanent end to the war. But the fact that the Israelis won't offer such an outcome unconditionally is only to be expected – and a 60-day ceasefire could lead to an extension and an eventual end to the war, and especially if those remaining hostages were to be released. Obviously, there's nothing to stop the Israelis resuming the violence, but that will always be the case, just as Hamas is unlikely to renounce violence forever, as Israel demands. The point of a ceasefire is that it opens up possibilities. These possibilities include the survival of more blameless civilians, and a chance for some sort of progress towards at least a temporary settlement, and to avoid the bizarre Trump plan to turn a depopulated Gaza into an American-administered beach resort. The Israelis must have come under some pressure from the Trump administration and its envoy, Steve Witkoff, to assent to a ceasefire of any kind, because Mr Netanyahu depends so much for his domestic political survival on prosecuting an unceasing, disproportionate and inhumane war. But rejection of the ceasefire also suits Hamas, who have shown definitively that they care little for the people of Gaza. They are, in fact, using their intolerable suffering to move opinion among Israel's Arab neighbours, the Muslim world and among Israel's traditional friends and allies in the West militantly against Israel. That may not have been a concrete, conscious plan when they contemplated the 7 October attacks – but Israel's unprecedented and increasing international isolation, exacerbated by extreme elements calling for the expulsion of Palestinians from their land, is nonetheless extremely welcome to Hamas and its friends in Tehran. The principal hope for something like a respite in the fighting and averting a mass famine is that President Trump can now add to the pressure on both sides to accept his ceasefire. Events in recent weeks point to the president becoming impatient with his Israeli counterpart, and more willing to make him change course and at least to permit aid to get through. Mr Trump has his own business and geopolitical agenda in the Middle East, as witnessed in his recent tour of the Gulf States, the acceptance of a luxury Boeing 747-8 jumbo jet from the Qatari government, and the series of direct talks with the Iranians in Rome. It is through these channels that the White House can also push Hamas towards accommodating Israeli wishes and securing the ceasefire. The gap between Hamas and Mr Netanyahu could be easily bridged and, with his keenness on improving relations with Iran and his frustration with Mr Netanyahu, Mr Trump is well placed and well incentivised to build that bridge – if others will let him.
Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump's threat to destroy Iran nuclear sites a clear red line
DUBAI, May 30 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's threat to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities is a clear red line and will have severe consequences, the semi-official Fars News Agency reported on Friday. "If U.S. seeks a diplomatic solution, it must abandon the language of threats and sanctions," an unnamed Iranian official said, adding that such threats "are open hostility against Iran's national interests." Trump told reporters, opens new tab on Wednesday at the White House: 'I want it (nuclear agreement) very strong where we can go in with inspectors, we can take whatever we want, we can blow up whatever we want, but nobody getting killed. We can blow up a lab, but nobody is gonna be in a lab, as opposed to everybody being in the lab and blowing it up.' Trump has repeatedly threatened to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities if diplomacy fails to resolve a decades-long dispute over Tehran's nuclear programme. Trump said on Friday that an Iran deal was possible in the "not-too-distant future."
North Wales Chronicle
31 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Four billion endured extra month of extreme heat due to climate change
The extreme heat caused illness, death, crop losses, and strained energy and healthcare systems, according to the analysis from World Weather Attribution, Climate Central and the Red Cross. 'Although floods and cyclones often dominate headlines, heat is arguably the deadliest extreme event,' the report said. Many heat-related deaths are unreported or are mislabelled by other conditions such as heart disease or kidney failure. The scientists used peer-reviewed methods to study how much climate change boosted temperatures in an extreme heat event and calculated how much more likely its occurrence was because of climate change. In almost all countries in the world, the number of extreme heat days has at least doubled compared with a world without climate change. Caribbean islands were among the hardest hit by additional extreme heat days, the report said. Puerto Rico, a territory of the United States, endured 161 days of extreme heat. Without climate change, only 48 would have occurred. 'It makes it feel impossible to be outside,' said Charlotte Gossett Navarro, chief director for Puerto Rico at Hispanic Federation, a non-profit focused on social and environmental issues in Latino communities, who lives in the San Juan area and was not involved in the report. 'Even something as simple as trying to have a day outdoors with family, we weren't able to do it because the heat was too high.' When the power goes out, which happens frequently in Puerto Rico in part because of decades of neglected grid maintenance and damage from Hurricane Maria in 2017, Ms Gossett Navarro said it is difficult to sleep. 'If you are someone relatively healthy, that is uncomfortable, it's hard to sleep… but if you are someone who has a health condition, now your life is at risk,' she said. Heatwaves are silent killers, said Friederike Otto, associate professor of climate science at Imperial College London, one of the report's authors. 'People don't fall dead on the street in a heatwave… people either die in hospitals or in poorly insulated homes and therefore are just not seen,' she said. Low-income communities and vulnerable populations, such as older adults and people with medical conditions, suffer the most from extreme heat. The high temperatures recorded in the extreme heat events that occurred in Central Asia in March, South Sudan in February and in the Mediterranean last July would have not been possible without climate change, according to the report. At least 21 people died in Morocco after temperatures hit 48C last July. The report says strategies to prepare for heatwaves include monitoring and reporting systems for extreme temperatures, providing emergency health services, cooling shelters, updated building regulations, enforcing heat safety rules at work, and designing cities to be more heat-resilient. But without phasing out fossil fuels, heatwaves will continue becoming more severe and frequent and protective measures against the heat will lose their effectiveness, the scientists said.
