
India's woeful catching lets England off the hook
Kolkata: Harry Brook led a charmed life at Headingley, till he ran out of luck. There is no greater agony than to be dismissed one run short of a hundred at a ground one has grown up playing cricket. But it's also true Brook had no business lasting as long as he did. India's woeful catching gave him two lives, at two very curious junctures of the day. Both came behind the wicket, by the wicketkeeper and then gully, positions you are probability-wise more assured of these catches being taken. This, however, was also a strange day where easy catches were dropped and stupendous catches manufactured. But that doesn't lessen the damage by any extent. Four catches were dropped off Jasprit Bumrah's bowling alone on Day 3 of the First Test against England at Leeds. (AP)
At the end of the Test, when every hour's play is expected to be audited and dissected, the dropped catches will hurt most. Because if there was ever a day worse than others to drop catches it was Sunday at Leeds, in the first of a five-match Test series, having got a first-innings total big enough to make England sweat. Both chances off Brook should have been held, both critically spaced out in the context of England's first-innings chase.
The first came in the 72nd over, off Ravindra Jadeja's bowling. It was a flighted delivery that held its line, and Brook, trying to defend off his front foot, ended up edging it. The bounce was discerning but these are catches that must be taken at this level. Hard and high hands from Pant meant Brook was let off. Lesson 101 of keeping wicket to spinners is to rise as late as possible so that the eye level moves with that of the ball. This being Jadeja, who tends to bowl quicker through the air when the ball isn't gripping as well as in India, the timing of the wicketkeeper's rise becomes doubly important. Pant, never quite the stickler for the basics, ended up being horribly placed for the edge.
Brook was on 46 then. By the time he was dropped again, Brook was on 80. In between, he had added 73 runs with Jamie Smith, blunted out Jasprit Bumrah and gone after Mohammed Siraj successfully to prompt quick bowling changes. Bumrah was summoned, and once again he was hitting the right lengths. Sensing that Brook was trying to hang back in his crease, Bumrah tried a short of length delivery and almost out of instinct Brook just hung his bat out at it. It flew off the bat but Jaiswal dropped the catch at gully, bringing the grand total of dropped catches off Bumrah to four. And this was probably the easiest, given the ball was travelling at shoulder height.
Those two lives essentially helped Brook score 53 more runs and take England to 398/7 from 300/5. Who knows what kind of lead India would have won had Brook been caught by Pant? Only twice did the Indian fielding look smart — when Brook was finally caught at deep backward square leg, and when Smith was caught by Sai Sudharsan through a lovely combination catch. That catch was all Jadeja though, and a nice shakeup from the shock of seeing him grassing Ben Duckett at backward point on Sunday. To throw the ball back to Sudharsan while going over the boundary is something Jadeja can do in his sleep, and so it would be unfair to probably judge everyone by his standard.
In total, four catches went down at the slip, Jaiswal being at the end of two of them involving Pope and Brook. Chances of edges to the slip cordon increase at venues where the ball is swinging with a fair degree of carry. Concentrating on slip catching is also relatively easier overseas since the decibel level is almost always less than in India. Which should make it all the more difficult for India to live with the fact that both Pope and Brook — centurion and near-centurion in England's innings — reached there partly because of the lives given to them.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
19 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Sports play through another dangerously hot day in parts of the US
CHICAGO (AP) — The shade — under the roof and the upper deck, in every dugout and tunnel — was a popular place at Wrigley Field on Sunday. HT Image The sunny seats, not so much. Several major league teams played through a second straight day of muggy conditions as dangerously hot temperatures dominated parts of the United States during a rare June heat wave. The PGA Tour was in a sweltering Connecticut for the Travelers Championship, and the LPGA played the KPMG Women's PGA Championship in the heat of Texas. The gametime temperature was 92 degrees for the series finale between the Mariners and Cubs in Chicago. Kids played in the fountains outside Wrigley before going into the ballpark, and the Cubs encouraged fans to take precautions in a message on the videoboard in left field. 'We don't have any secrets,' Cubs manager Craig Counsell said of playing in the heat. 'You know, we'll do the best we can. ... I think it's the catcher you worry about the most, and the pitcher. They get some time in the shade. They get some downtime between innings. People like the umpires, some of the people working, some of the fans, that's kind of who you worry about even more, actually.' Seattle reliever Trent Thornton and umpire Chad Whitson both left Saturday's game with heat-related issues. Whitson was at third base on Sunday, and Mariners manager Dan Wilson said Thornton was doing well. '(Thornton) was doing much better after the game yesterday and got some fluids in him and a cold bath and was doing much better almost immediately,' Wilson said. 'And then, you know, feels really good today again. So thankful for that and glad to see he's doing well today.' Reds manager Terry Francona said Elly De La Cruz was fine a day after the shortstop threw up during their extra-inning loss at St. Louis. Wilson, 56, a former big league catcher, said there isn't much he can do as manager to help his players with the heat. 'We're all pretty used to playing in hot days,' he said. 'Especially in the minor leagues, you play in a lot of hot places. But, you know, this is a little different. This has been pretty exceptional.' At the LPGA tournament in Frisco, Texas, the forecast called for temperatures in the mid-90s — pretty typical for the area this time of year. The windy conditions were more of an issue for the players. There were several cooling areas around the course for fans, along with spots with free bottled water. ___ AP Sports Writer Stephen Hawkins in Texas and AP freelance reporter Jeff Latzke in Missouri contributed. ___ AP sports:
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
26 minutes ago
- First Post
India still in control, but costly errors keep England alive at Headingley
The first Test between India and England at Headingley remains evenly poised after three days, with India slightly ahead. However, costly fielding lapses and questionable selection choices may come back to haunt India later on, especially if they go down. read more Another day in the books at Headingley, another that ends with this Test fascinatingly poised – a back-and-forth contest with all results still very much possible. India may very well win this game, in fact statisticians CricViz have them as 48% favourites to do so (England 37%, the draw 15%) – but as those numbers indicate they could also quite easily lose too and if they do they may well look back and rue the small but crucial moments that could cost them dearly. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Thakur's selection backfires? Perhaps the first of these came before the toss, India opting for the selection of Shardul Thakur, picked as a bowling all-rounder who would bat at number eight. Except Thakur only bowled six overs in England's innings, which, considering it lasted more than 100 overs, is little more than a part-timer might expect to get. Not only that but they went for 38 wicketless runs – 6.33 per over – and to add insult to injury, he also managed to bowl nearly 30% of India's no-balls too. To cap off the all-around performance, he also made just 1 with the bat. If India had wanted Thakur in the side for his bowling then why did he bowl so little? It is difficult to argue that any of Akash Deep, Arshdeep Singh or Kuldeep Yadav wouldn't have added far more to the visitor's cause on that front. And if they wanted someone to bolster the lower-order batting while chipping in with the occasional over, then surely Nitish Reddy would have made more sense. India's collapse proves costly However, it would be churlish to lay all of the blame on the selection of Thakur. Arguably, when the dust settles from this match, the moment India will regret the most is the hour either side of the lunch break on Day Two. To collapse from 430/3 to 471 all out is unfortunate, but to do so on a pitch where three of your top five have already made hundreds smacks of carelessness. Fielding errors may haunt India Perhaps where India were the sloppiest though was in the field. When Jasprit Bumrah had England under the cosh early on it was Indian mistakes that allowed the hosts to just about cling on. Zak Crawley was already back in the shed and both Ben Duckett and Ollie Pope looked far from secure at the crease – it seemed more like a case of when rather than if the next Bumrah breakthrough would come. Indeed, it should have been the last ball of the seventh over, Duckett carved Bumrah straight to backward point, except the normally outstanding Ravindra Jadeja spilled the catch; England's opener reprieved on just 15, the hosts given an enormous let off. It marked the start of a loose period in the field for India, several fumbles allowing England to pick off extra runs here and there – a gradual easing of the pressure at the very moment that they should have been trying their hardest to really turn the screw. Pope would also be reprieved on 60, dropped by Yashasvi Jaiswal again off the bowling of Bumrah – he would have a century before the close. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Even India's premier fast bowler wasn't immune from the disease, Bumrah overstepping for a potentially match-turning no ball when he'd had Harry Brook caught at midwicket for 0 – he would ultimately make 99 priceless runs to drag England almost to parity. Unfortunately for India, their sloppiness in the field was something that carried over into Day Three. Brook given a lifeline with lunch looming, put down by Rishabh Pant on 46 off the bowling of Jadeja. India still hold the edge In fact, there was no greater beneficiary of Indian profligacy than Brook, bailed out again by a dropped catch on 82 – Jaiswal off the bowling of Bumrah for the second time in the match. Given he dropped both of England's top scorers, it is fortunate the opener had plenty of credit in the bank following his sparkling first innings ton. Ultimately, India should probably not be too concerned. Should they win, then all these moments will be forgotten; should they lose they can at least take solace in the fact that they have displayed enormous firepower with both bat and ball, with only a few minor adjustments needed to iron out the kinks. Whatever the result, on the evidence of three days in Leeds, we should be in for a cracking series.


The Hindu
35 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Bumrah defends Indian fielders
In a parallel world, Jasprit Bumrah could have had more than the five wickets he ended up with in England's first innings here, and that too in double quick time. But a disastrous fielding display by his teammates – they dropped three catches off his bowling – and some rotten luck – he dismissed Harry Brook off a no-ball when on nought – ensured India was on the field for far longer than desired. But Bumrah was empathetic towards his fielders. 'You have to move forward,' he said on Sunday. 'I try to quickly forget. They [fielders] are also new [to England] and sometimes the ball is tough to sight. I don't want to be angry and kicking and putting more pressure.' Bumrah also stated that the wicket was still good to bat. 'There is a little bit of two-pace and the new ball might swing. But no demons. It's a fast scoring ground. So the more runs we get, the better.' By his own admission, the 31-year-old is not looking to play more than three Tests this series for better management of his workload. But the potential limited participation doesn't affect his thinking and preparation, he said. 'You don't look at what is going to happen. At this moment, I am trying to assess the wicket, and the batter. I am not thinking about how many games I am going to play.' The constant chatter about his career ending because of injuries also doesn't bother him. 'It was once said that I can't play cricket at all. Then it became six months, eight months. But it's been more than 10 years now in internationals and 12 to 13 years of IPL. Still people are saying 'I will go'. People can keep saying, but I am going nowhere. I will keep playing until god allows me to and try taking Indian cricket forward.'