Dentsu Group ordered to pay ¥300 million over Tokyo Games bid-rigging
The Tokyo District Court on Thursday ordered advertising giant Dentsu Group to pay ¥300 million in fines as sought by prosecutors over bid-rigging related to the Tokyo Olympics and Paralympics in 2021.
The court also sentenced Koji Henmi, 57, former assistant head of the sports department of core subsidiary Dentsu, to two years in prison suspended for four years. The prosecution had demanded a two-year prison term.
In past court hearings, the prosecutors said that Henmi played a central role in coordinating orders with a 57-year-old former senior official of the Tokyo Games organizing committee already found guilty over the bid-rigging case.
According to the indictment, Henmi conspired with the former organizing committee official and others to decide in advance the winners of contracts for planning Tokyo Games test events and managing venues for actual competition events between February and July 2018. They also conspired to have only the preselected companies take part in the bidding.
The defense argued that Henmi was not guilty because there was no agreement among the companies on the operations to manage Games competition events, which were outsourced under discretionary contracts.
Dentsu Group and five other companies as well as seven individuals, including Henmi and the former organizing committee official, have been indicted in relation to the case.
Of them, officials at ad agency Hakuhodo and event company Cerespo were found guilty last year. Their lawyers have appealed against the rulings.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asahi Shimbun
5 days ago
- Asahi Shimbun
Award-winning author sues politician for outing her
Author Li Kotomi, right, and her advocate, Yutori Takai, speak at a news conference in Tokyo on June 5. (Saori Kuroda) Akutagawa Prize-winning author Li Kotomi has sued a local politician from Yamanashi Prefecture, seeking 5.5 million yen ($38,000) in damages and the removal of social media posts that she said outed her as transgender. In a lawsuit filed at the Tokyo District Court on June 5, the 36-year-old Taiwanese-born novelist accused Hiromi Muramatsu, an assembly member from Kofu, of violating her privacy and personal rights by disclosing sensitive information online. 'There are storms in this world that only strike certain people and I was hit by such a storm,' Li said at a news conference. 'My peaceful daily life was taken from me. What happened to me is only the tip of the iceberg.' Li transitioned to being a woman before she moved to Japan in 2013 and chose not to disclose her gender identity publicly. However, after Li won the prestigious Akutagawa Prize in 2021, posts claiming that Li was transgender began circulating on social media. According to Li, Muramatsu posted on Facebook in May 2024 that Li 'has a male body and has not undergone surgery.' Muramatsu also shared photos of Li as a minor, along with Li's previous legal name. Some of these posts remain online. Li said that she has never met Muramatsu and accused her of 'suddenly exposing sensitive personal information in a targeted attack.' As a result of being outed online, Li was forced to come out publicly in November. The onslaught of online abuse continues to cause her physical and mental distress, and she has since been diagnosed with an adjustment disorder. 'I am a woman and a lesbian. I never wanted to go public with this,' she said when she came out. Muramatsu responded to the lawsuit saying, 'The initial post has already been deleted, and I have responded appropriately to subsequent posts.' Muramatsu said she would consult with a lawyer about whether this constitutes defamation. LONG-BUILT LIFE DESTROYED Yutori Takai, an associate professor of transgender studies at Gunma University, appeared alongside Li at the news conference. 'Outing Li deprived her of her peaceful life as a woman,' Takai said. 'It shattered the life she had painstakingly built.' Outing a transgender person means publicly revealing that person's birth gender or pre-transition identity without consent. Transgender people feel a deep disconnect from the gender assigned to them at birth and may find it impossible to live as that gender. However, transitioning to live in alignment with their gender identity can be a long process that may involve medical treatments and changes in appearance and name. Due to persistent social prejudice, many transgender people are forced to change schools, jobs or even sever ties with family and friends. And even after all that, legal gender recognition may not be guaranteed. Many transgender individuals chose to keep such experiences private. Li was one of them. For such people, having their pre-transition past exposed can collapse their 'painstakingly built life.' 'There are people who change their attitude the moment they learn someone is trans, as if dealing with something 'foreign,'' Takai said. 'People pry into whether they've had surgery, too.' Takai called for transgender people's past and present gender-related information to be protected as sensitive personal data. In response to the growing challenges faced by transgender people, the advocacy group Tnet issued a policy proposal in May calling for stronger privacy protections. 'Social media abuse against trans individuals has become extreme, with personal information being exposed and human rights violations worsening,' the group stated. The full proposal is available on its website: (This article was written by Saori Kuroda and Yuki Nikaido.)
Asahi Shimbun
5 days ago
- Asahi Shimbun
High court rules TEPCO execs not responsible for nuclear disaster
Hiroyuki Kawai, center, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs, criticizes the ruling in front of the Tokyo High Court in Tokyo's Chiyoda Ward on June 6. (Masaaki Kobayashi) The Tokyo High Court on June 6 rescinded a court order for former executives of Tokyo Electric Power Co. to pay the company about 13 trillion yen ($92.6 billion) over the Fukushima nuclear disaster. In absolving the defendants of responsibility for financial damages caused to the company, the court ruled the giant tsunami that smashed into TEPCO's Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant on March 11, 2011, was 'unforeseeable.' The ruling overturned the Tokyo District Court's decision in 2022 to order the former TEPCO executives to pay compensation for failing to take measures that could have prevented the 'foreseeable' tsunami from causing the triple meltdown at the plant. 'This is unbelievable and unforgivable,' Yui Kimura, secretary-general of the plaintiffs' group, said of the high court's ruling. Hiroyuki Kawai, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs, said: 'This is an extremely unjust and logically contradictory verdict. It allows a recurrence of the nuclear accident, and we will pursue the flaws in this decision at the Supreme Court.' The plaintiffs--42 shareholders of TEPCO—had demanded 23 trillion yen in compensation to the company from five former executives and others over the damage caused by their failure to take tsunami countermeasures. The five defendants were: Tsunehisa Katsumata, a former chairman who died in 2024; Masataka Shimizu, a former president; two former vice presidents, Ichiro Takekuro and Sakae Muto; and a former managing director, Akio Komori. Katsumata's heirs succeeded him in the lawsuit. The major issues in the lawsuit were whether TEPCO management at the time could have foreseen the occurrence of such a giant tsunami and whether they could have prevented the disaster by issuing instructions for tsunami countermeasures. In 2002, the central government released a long-term evaluation of earthquake forecasts that indicated the possibility of a major earthquake followed by a massive tsunami occurring off the coast of Fukushima Prefecture. The Tokyo District Court's ruling in 2022 noted that this long-term assessment was scientifically reliable because it was made by top-level Japanese researchers, among other things. Based on this assessment, the lower court found that TEPCO's management team could have foreseen the 2011 tsunami, and that the accident could have been prevented if the defendants had ordered the construction of a watertight structure to prevent flooding of the reactor buildings and other facilities. The tsunami knocked out power to the plant, leading to three reactors melting down and forcing thousands of residents to evacuate from the area. Based on the decommissioning and decontamination costs incurred and the amount of compensation paid to evacuees, the district court concluded that the former management had caused TEPCO more than 13 trillion yen in damages. At the appeal hearing, the defendants repeated their argument that 'the long-term assessment was unreliable, as it was criticized by seismologists and other experts.'
Japan Today
5 days ago
- Japan Today
Government tells parents what not to name their babies
Those who were in Japan in August 1993 might recall a news item about the father of a newborn, who went to the Akishima City office and attempted to register his infant son with the given name "Akuma," written with two characters that combined mean devil or demon. Perhaps out of sympathy for the child, paper pushers at the city office were disinclined to accept the father's application. Akuma's dad maintained that such a name was perfectly legal, because the ideographs for aku and ma both appear in the Education Ministry's list of characters approved for standard use. The media had a field day reporting the story. In January 1994, the Hachioji branch of the Tokyo District Court ruled that Akishima City had not followed proper procedure, temporarily restoring the name so that it could be denied properly. By July of the same year the father finally gave up, agreeing to pick a different name, ending the controversy. But, reports Weekly Playboy (June 9) the root problem, of what constitutes an acceptable name, became more widespread. It seems that all too many parents these days have been saddling their infants with kirakira (flashy), i.e. silly or frivolous names. Which finally moved the Diet on May 26 to pass a new law setting standards for naming children. The new law specifies what types of names will not be accepted for entry into family registers. For example, names cannot be assigned a reading that's unrelated to the actual characters. So two characters typically read "Taro," a common Japanese male name, cannot be read "George" or "Michael." Likewise, readings cannot be assigned to characters in an arbitrary manner. The character "Ken" (meaning healthy or robust) cannot be assigned to be read as "Ken-sama" (Master Ken) or "Kenichiro." In addition, characters used in a name cannot be assigned with an opposite or contradictory reading -- sort of analogous to the practice of calling a tall man "Shorty" in the West. So for instance "Takashi" (meaning high) cannot be read "Hikushi" (low). And it goes without saying that the new law bans names that carry discriminatory and/or antisocial nuances, or which are otherwise clearly negative. Which almost certainly eliminates names like "Akuma" from the running. That said, Weekly Playboy points out that it's only fair to state that plenty of Japanese given names are quirky enough, even before the new law goes into effect next May. Certain names are based on historical precedents, such as "Asuka." Originally a village in Nara Prefecture it is used to name an historical era from the late 7th to early 8th century, and written with characters meaning "flying bird." Another example would be "Satsuki," the old name for the fifth lunar month and written with characters normally read gogatsu (May). Or take "Kazuko." Written with the character wa in heiwa (peace) and ko (child), between 1926 and 1957 it was Japan's most popular name given to baby girls. The reason why a character normally read wa came to be read kazu is obscured in the mists of time. Linguists have advanced several theories, but no one knows for sure. Some say it might be derived from the word for number (also kazu), or possibly a corruption of a verb with a similar sound, such as katsu (to win). Japanese language scholar Hiroyuki Sasahara, professor at Waseda University, tells the magazine the widespread use of given names using two characters dates back to the 8th century CE and follows a long-established naming practice in China. Japanese, however, adopt nonstandard variants in which a kanji used to name a child may be pronounced not according to its dictionary reading, but based on its root meaning, opening up a whole new can of worms. For instance, the character dai or okii, meaning "big," can be arbitrarily assigned such readings as Hiroshi, Takashi, Takeshi, Hajime, Masaru, Yutaka and numerous others. Before deciding on a child's name, some prospective parents consult fortune tellers. "That was basically modern-day style of fortune telling that first appeared during the Showa period (1926-1989)," Sasahara explains. Appealing to common sense, he encourages parents to read up on the Japanese language, kanji, and names, and make efforts to conceive how their child's name would be perceived by society. "Because names have historical and social implications, I think parents have a responsibility to consider how a child's name will be accepted by society," he asserts. Sasahara thinks the flashy name phenomenon has been enabled to some degree by the increased trend toward nuclear families, as such households lack an elderly relative who can offer sensible guidance and advice. That said, the article concludes, the names that Japanese choose for their progeny will play a role in determining whether or not their language will have a rich future. And that's reason enough to take the process seriously. © Japan Today
