Veteran diplomat Shahrul appointed Malaysia's new US ambassador
Malaysia's ambassador to the US, Shahrul Ikram Yaakob, receiving his letter of appointment from Yang di-Pertuan Agong Sultan Ibrahim at Istana Negara today. (Sultan Ibrahim Sultan Iskandar Facebook pic)
PETALING JAYA : Former foreign ministry secretary-general Shahrul Ikram Yaakob has been appointed the new Malaysian ambassador to the US.
The position had been vacant for more than four months since the previous ambassador, Nazri Aziz, ended his two-year stint in Washington in February.
Shahrul, a career diplomat, received his letter of appointment from Yang di-Pertuan Agong Sultan Ibrahim at Istana Negara today.
Shahrul served in the diplomatic service for 34 years, including two stints in the US.
He was previously assigned to Malaysia's diplomatic missions in Washington and Beijing, among others.
Shahrul held several key positions during his tenure at the foreign ministry, including deputy secretary-general for bilateral affairs, director-general of the Asean-Malaysia National Secretariat during Malaysia's Asean chairmanship in 2015, and undersecretary of the multilateral political division.
He served as first secretary at Malaysia's embassy in Washington in the 1990s and was the country's permanent representative to the United Nations in New York from 2017 to 2018.
He also served as Malaysia's ambassador to both Qatar and Austria.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
10 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Rafizi still has a shot at becoming PM
On May 10, Rafizi Ramli told Malaysians he would resign as economy minister if he failed to win re-election as PKR deputy president at the party polls on May 23. True to his word, after his defeat to Nurul Izzah Anwar, Rafizi announced on May 28 that he had submitted his resignation and that it would take effect on June 17. He noted that it was the practice in nations that upheld democratic principles for party leaders who lost internal elections to resign from government posts. He said: 'My defeat in the recent PKR election means I no longer have the party's mandate to translate the people's agenda, as championed by PKR, into government programmes.' A few hours later, minister of natural resources and environmental sustainability Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad announced that he too had submitted his resignation from his government post. Nazmi, who is aligned to Rafizi, failed to retain one of the four posts of vice president. There is no doubt that, despite denials, there is a rift in the party. Analysts have been talking about a faction that supports party leader Anwar Ibrahim and another that backs Rafizi for a while now. This rivalry reached its peak in the recent party polls, where several senior backers of Rafizi were given the boot – including Nazmi – at the divisional level. Analysts had expected either Saifuddin Nasution, seen as Anwar's strong man, or Selangor Menteri besar Amirudin Shari to contest against Rafizi. Nurul Izzah's candidacy, therefore, came as a surprise to many. It would be naïve though to assume that she challenged Rafizi without Anwar's nod of approval. As is to be expected, there are those who say Rafizi should not have resigned while some others think it was the right thing to do. Many members of the public have hailed him as a man of principle for keeping his promise to resign as minister if he lost to Nurul Izzah. I suppose this is because most Malaysians have come to think that politicians seldom, or never, keep their promises. Many young people see Rafizi as the harbinger of a new politics and as a politician who understands technological trends and embraces the digital future. They see him as a politician who stands for all Malaysians and one who does not play racial or religious politics – unlike many others. He is undoubtedly one of the few young politicians who draw support from youths of all races, not just their own race. He is also respected for his push for greater transparency and accountability in government affairs. But politics is largely about numbers, or, to be precise, votes. First one must win the votes at the party level and later in a general election or by-election. Rafizi, unfortunately, failed to get enough numbers at the party level this time. From the tone of Rafizi's remarks in recent weeks, one can detect a frustration with internal party happenings. On May 10, for instance, Rafizi said it would be a relief to be out of the cabinet as it would allow him more time and freedom to speak out on issues. So what now for Rafizi? On May 10, the Pandan MP said he would focus on his responsibility as an MP and help PKR prepare for the 16th general election if he lost to Nurul Izzah. On May 30, Rafizi said: 'I already have a plan on what to focus on next, but let everyone breathe first — with Hari Raya Haji coming up and all. I'll share more later.' This was interpreted by many as meaning that he would not quit public life. Certainly, his supporters will be anxious, as will Malaysians who like him or his brand of politics. Certainly, they will be asking questions such as: 'Will he make a comeback to the PKR leadership?' or ' Will he join some other party or start his own party somewhere down the line?' Time will tell and he has plenty of time on his hands as he is only 47, still considered young for any politician. Following the victory of Nurul Izzah, many are asking if Anwar is positioning her to become a future prime minister, if not the one after him. It may be so. She certainly has her strengths. Many would love to see her become Malaysia's first woman prime minister. I was asked by some people, especially admirers of Rafizi, if he would ever become prime minister. For a while now, some Malaysians have been throwing the names of Nurul Izzah, Khairy Jamaluddin and Rafizi as possible future prime ministers. As deputy president of PKR, Rafizi would have had the best shot at leading the party after Anwar, and, presumably also in becoming prime minister – provided Pakatan Harapan remained in power and PKR still dominated the coalition. Still, all is not lost for Rafizi. He can take heart from the fact that four Malaysian prime ministers had taken a leave of absence, or were forced to take it, in their political careers. Dr Mahathir Mohamad was sacked from Umno but came back with a bang to make history as the only man to become prime minister at two different periods, the second time as head of a new party called Bersatu. Abdullah Ahmad Badawi was not reappointed to the Cabinet by Mahathir when he became associated with Umno's Team B led by Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah who lost in the party leadership tussle to Mahathir in 1987. Abdullah was in the wilderness for several years but never left Umno, and was rewarded with a Cabinet appointment again by Mahathir in 1991. Subsequently, in 2003, he became prime minister. In 2016, Umno sacked Muhyiddin Yassin, who was then deputy president, for breaking party rules and attacking the Umno leadership. In 2020, Muhyiddin became Malaysia's eighth prime minister while leading Bersatu – although he served in this capacity for only 17 months. Anwar himself was sacked by Umno, when he was deputy president, in 1998. He was subsequently thrown into prison on sodomy and corruption charges. He received a royal pardon in 2018 and in 2022 became the tenth prime minister of Malaysia. All four faced defeat in some form and suffered the loss of position, patronage, supporters and even friends – but persevered long enough to make a smashing comeback. Rafizi's supporters can therefore take heart that he still has a shot at becoming prime minister sometime in the future. For that to happen, he has to remain in the public eye, like crafty Khairy, who was sacked by Umno, but continues to be seen and heard through his 'keluar sekejap' (out for a brief period) podcast and modelling stunts. The name of his podcast itself broadcasts his intention: he'll be back. Also, Rafizi must show voters that he is an excellent MP, continue contributing to the betterment of the nation in some way or other, and, crucially, build up his support base in PKR. The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.
Free Malaysia Today
10 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Trump administration plans US$1,000 fee to fast-track tourist visas
The proposed visa fee came alongside Donald Trump's 'gold card' plan, which aimed to sell US citizenship for US$5 million. (EPA Images pic) WASHINGTON : The Trump administration is considering a US$1,000 fee for tourists and other non-immigrant visa applicants seeking an expedited interview appointment though government lawyers have raised legal red flags over the plan, according to a US official and an internal state department memo. Individuals entering the US on tourist and other non-immigrant visas already pay a US$185 processing fee. The new US$1,000 option the US is considering would be a premium service that allows some people to jump to the front of the line for visa interviews. The programme could arrive in pilot form as soon as December, the memo reviewed by Reuters said. The proposed fee for visa appointments, which has not been previously reported, comes alongside President Donald Trump's vision of a 'gold card' that would sell US citizenship for US$5 million, granting faster access to those willing to pay. But the state department's legal team said there was a 'high risk' it would be rejected by the White House budget office or struck down in US courts, the memo said. Setting a fee above the cost to provide the service 'is contrary to settled supreme court precedent,' the memo said. A state department spokesperson said the department does not comment on internal documents and communications. 'The department's scheduling of non-immigrant visa interview appointments is dynamic and we are continually working to improve our operations worldwide,' the spokesperson said. Since taking office on Jan 20, Trump has aggressively cracked down on immigration, including revoking some student visas and increasing scrutiny of all visa applicants. The state department issued 10.4 million non-immigrant visas in fiscal year 2023, including 5.9 million tourist visas, according to the agency's most recent annual report. International travel spending in the US is expected to decline about 7% in 2025 as opposition to Trump's policies and a strong dollar prompt foreign visitors to opt for other destinations, the World Travel and Tourism Council said in May.
Free Malaysia Today
10 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Anger as US vetoes Gaza ceasefire resolution at UN security council
US envoy Dorothy Shea vetoes UN security council ceasefire resolution demanding immediate, unconditional peace between Israel and Hamas. (Reuters pic) NEW YORK : UN security council members criticised the US Wednesday after it vetoed a UN security council resolution calling for a ceasefire and unrestricted humanitarian access in Gaza, which Washington claimed undermined ongoing diplomacy. It was the 15-member body's first vote on the situation since November, when the US – a key Israeli ally – also blocked a text calling for an end to fighting. 'This resolution would undermine diplomatic efforts to reach a ceasefire that reflects the realities on the ground and emboldens Hamas,' Washington's UN envoy Dorothy Shea said ahead of Wednesday's 14 to 1 vote, with the US casting the lone vote against. 'This resolution also draws false equivalence between Israel and Hamas,' she said. The draft resolution had demanded 'an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza respected by all parties.' It also called for the 'immediate, dignified and unconditional release of all hostages held by Hamas and other groups.' Underlining a 'catastrophic humanitarian situation' in the Palestinian territory, the resolution, had it passed, would have demanded the lifting of all restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza. 'This will remain not only a moral stain on the conscience of this council, but a fateful moment of political application that will reverberate for generations,' said Pakistan's ambassador to the UN Asim Ahmad. China's ambassador to the UN Fu Cong said 'today's vote result once again exposes that the root cause of the council's inability to quell the conflict in Gaza is the repeated obstruction by the US.' The veto marks Washington's first such action since US President Donald Trump took office in January. Israel has faced growing international pressure to end its war in Gaza, which was triggered by the unprecedented Oct 7, 2023 attack by Hamas on Israeli soil. That scrutiny has increased over flailing aid distribution in Gaza, which Israel blocked for more than two months before allowing a small number of UN vehicles to enter in mid-May. The United Nations said that was not enough to meet the humanitarian needs. 'Judged by history' A US-backed relief effort called the Gaza Humanitarian Fund (GHF) has also faced criticism for going against long-standing humanitarian principles by coordinating relief efforts with a military belligerent. Israeli bombardment on Wednesday killed at least 16 people in the Gaza Strip, including 12 in a single strike on a tent housing displaced people, the Palestinian territory's civil defence agency told AFP. On Tuesday, 27 people were killed in southern Gaza when Israeli troops opened fire near a GHF aid site, with the military saying the incident was under investigation. 'The council was prevented from shouldering its responsibility, despite the fact that most of us seem to be converging on one view,' said France's ambassador to the UN Jerome Bonnafont. Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian ambassador to the UN, on Tuesday had urged the council to act. 'All of us will be judged by history as to how much have we done in order to stop this crime against the Palestinian people,' he said. Israel's ambassador to the UN Danny Danon attacked the text. 'The resolution voted on was a gift to Hamas and risked emboldening terrorism,' he said. 'We thank the US for standing on the right side.'
