Bill would create the illusion of new school funding. Kentucky needs the real thing.
Kentucky kids need the legislature to reinvest in public education, writes Jason Bailey, while Senate Bill 6 is an accounting change that does not help deliver that. (Getty Images)
Senate Bill 6 in the 2025 Kentucky General Assembly makes the most significant change in the history of the core school funding formula created by the Kentucky Education Reform Act (KERA), known as Support Education Excellence in Kentucky (SEEK). But the change does not increase spending or inject any more money into classrooms. Instead, it simply changes how some existing expenditures are categorized, clouding the picture of how much the state is putting into public education.
Under SB 6, all state payments already being made outside of SEEK for fringe benefits like health insurance and retirement benefits will be counted as part of SEEK. Of particular concern, SB 6 inappropriately adds to SEEK all the enormous catch-up pension payments for old debts incurred due to past failures of the General Assembly to fully fund teacher pensions. These catch-up payments are not a contribution to the current operation of schools, as is the purpose of SEEK.
SB 6 will artificially and dramatically inflate SEEK spending — if it had been in effect in the current budget, SEEK funding would've been 59% higher — without any additional dollars going to schools. Some may use this change to continue claiming 'record funding' for education without providing more resources to the kids attending public schools, which have received eroding state investment since 2008.
The SEEK formula was one of the major outcomes of the 1989 state Supreme Court ruling, known as Rose v. Council for Better Education, Inc., that declared the state's school system unconstitutional. SEEK plays a primary role in meeting the state's constitutional obligation for an adequately and equitably funded school system.
SEEK guarantees a minimum amount of funding per student and establishes a formula that divides responsibility between school districts and the state, with the state providing more funds to districts with lower property wealth and thus less capacity to generate local tax revenue. The SEEK formula includes additional amounts based on the number of students in each district that cost more to educate, such as at-risk pupils, special education students and English language learners. SEEK also includes funding for student transportation.
Schools receive other funding from the state outside of SEEK, including for purposes ranging from preschool to career and technical education, and from the federal government, including Title 1 funds for low-income schools and grants for school meals. But SEEK represents the single largest source of funds to help Kentucky schools carry out their basic missions in an equitable manner.
SB 6 requires that the SEEK budget unit include the full state contribution for fringe benefits like medical, vision and dental insurance for current employees as well as retiree pension and health benefits. These contributions are sometimes called 'on behalf' payments. SB 6 also requires that any reports produced by the Kentucky Department of Education on SEEK payments by school district include these fringe benefit payments.
A significant portion of retiree pension, medical and life insurance benefits are already included in SEEK and are based on contribution formulas prescribed in law. Those retirement contributions now in SEEK amount to $458 million this year and $468 million in 2026. The remainder of Teachers' Retirement System (TRS) contributions are included in the budget category General Government in the TRS budget unit, an appropriation totaling $847 million in 2025 and $1.037 billion in 2026.
Additionally, health and life insurance for current employees is currently funded by the state through the Department of Education, but not as part of SEEK. That makes it like funding for preschool, career and technical education, technology, extended school services and other non-SEEK education expenditures. The state contribution for health and life insurance totals $944 million in 2025 and $1.078 billion in 2026.
If the state had counted all these state fringe benefit payments in SEEK in the current biennium, it would've increased SEEK spending by 59%, or $1.8 billion more in 2025 and $2.1 billion more in 2026. But including them in SEEK will not increase the amount of state funding overall, just shift the category in which they are represented.
The problem with including all current pension contributions as part of 'education funding,' much less as part of SEEK, is that a huge portion of those contributions now go to catch-up payments for past underfunding of pension benefits. During the years 2009 to 2016, the General Assembly did not make the full actuarially determined contributions to pension benefits (and those contributions were not made for retiree medical benefits until a 'shared responsibility plan' passed in 2010 that increased teacher, school district and state contributions to that fund). The compounding effect of not putting in those funds for pensions caused the debt to balloon. Whereas the state TRS pension plan previously had been nearly fully funded, it fell to a low of 55% funded by 2016, and unfunded liabilities grew to $14 billion.
In 2017 the legislature resumed paying the full actuarially determined pension costs. The plan has slowly improved its health since then but will not be fully funded until 2047. Unfunded liability contributions, or catch-up payments, make up approximately 82% of what the state is now contributing to the Teachers Retirement System pension plan, as shown in the graph below. Normal costs — or the contributions needed annually to pay for each current teacher's future pension benefits — are barely more than what nearly every other employer contributes for Social Security, which Kentucky teachers do not receive and the state therefore does not have to pay.
Resuming the payment of full costs in 2017 met a legal obligation of the state and was the right and responsible thing to do. But those extra dollars in catch-up payments should not be counted as 'education spending' because they do not go to current school districts, teachers, classrooms and kids. According to the actuary's estimates, TRS has $25.7 million in assets and will receive $5.6 billion in contributions that active teachers and their employers will contribute for their service in the future. That exceeds the $21.8 billion the state will owe for active teachers' pension benefits. But the state also owes another $26.8 billion to retired and disabled members and beneficiaries of deceased members. In other words, TRS has the resources to fund the pension benefits of active teachers but additional contributions are being made as catch-up payments for a large portion of the benefits for teachers who are no longer in the classroom.
The purpose of the SEEK formula, when adequately funded, is to help ensure that the 'efficient system of common schools' promised in the constitution is possible. It is not to pay back contractual obligations that the General Assembly did not meet at the time they were incurred.
Meanwhile, actual state funding for schools has been eroding since the Great Recession hit in 2008:
Total SEEK funding (as defined prior to SB 6) is 26% less now than in 2008 in inflation-adjusted dollars, and average teacher pay across districts is 20% less.
The funding gap between wealthy and poor school districts exceeds the levels declared unconstitutional in the 1980s.
The General Assembly has provided $0 for textbooks and professional developmentevery year since 2018, and has not increased funding for preschool or extended school services since 2019.
The legislature has not fully funded school transportation as required by law since 2004.
Budget cuts have caused fewer school days, higher student fees, cancelled art and music programs, fewer student supports, less health services and other reductions.
The state faces a growing shortage of school personnel, and fewer potential teachers are entering the teacher education pipeline.
Kentucky students need the General Assembly to meaningfully reinvest in the state's public schools while also meeting its other important obligations, including paying past debts for teacher pensions not funded in the first place. SB 6 is an accounting change that does not help deliver what kids need today.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
27 minutes ago
- New York Post
Feds promise to clean up Long Island's deadly traffic nightmare after congresswoman sounds alarm on 10 years of staggering crashes
Every seven minutes on Long Island can be a matter of life or death. After a decade of registering some of the deadliest roads across the US, the feds say they're now 'committed' to tackling Long Island's traffic crisis — following pressure from Rep. Laura Gillen and years of staggering crash stats. 5 After a decade of registering some of the deadliest roads across the US, the feds say they're now 'committed' to tackling Long Island's traffic crisis. Kyle Mazza/Shutterstock Advertisement US Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, in a letter to Gillen, confirmed his agency will coordinate with state transportation officials to study the surge of accidents on the Island and find ways to reduce the alarming death toll for motorists. 'These resources will be used to better understand and reduce traffic crashes on Long Island,' Duffy wrote in May. 5 Duffy confirmed his agency will coordinate with state transportation officials to study the surge of accidents on the Island and find ways to reduce the alarming death toll. Getty Images Advertisement The Long Island congresswoman penned a letter to Duffy back in March urging the US Department of Transportation to probe the issue. Gillen, in her letter, pointed to a Newsday investigation that found a serious car crash occurs every seven minutes on Long Island's 118 miles of roadway — killing more than 2,100 (roughly 210 annually) and seriously injuring more than 16,000 (about 1,600 per year) others in both Nassau and Suffolk counties from 2014 to 2023. 5 Gillen pointed to a Newsday investigation that found a serious car crash occurs every seven minutes on Long Island's 118 miles of roadway. Kyle Mazza/Shutterstock 'The Department remains committed to eliminating fatal crashes and working with you to achieve that goal,' Duffy wrote in response. Advertisement While the feds already coordinate with state agencies to flag high-crash locations and dole out safety grants, Duffy said his agency will now work even closer with state DOT and the Governor's Traffic Safety Committee on Long Island. The state DOT, however, wouldn't confirm whether it had spoken with federal transportation officials — only saying it 'welcomes continued support from partners across government.' 5 'The Department remains committed to eliminating fatal crashes and working with you to achieve that goal,' Duffy wrote in response. Getty Images Even though the federal government provides funding and sets certain traffic safety standards for states, Long Island's roads are owned and maintained by a patchwork of state and local agencies — creating confusion when it comes to accountability. Advertisement But Gillen, a Democrat, charged that's no excuse for inaction. 'The deadly surge in traffic fatalities over the past decade demands our swift federal attention and intervention,' she wrote. 'We can and must do much more.' 5 Long Island's roads are owned and maintained by a patchwork of state and local agencies. Obtained by NY Post The lawmaker encouraged towns, villages and counties across Long Island to apply for grants under the Safe Streets and Roads for All program — a federal initiative that awards up to $25 million for roadway design upgrades and other safety efforts. The deadline to apply is June 26. Duffy noted that Long Island is already getting $1.2 million in federal funding this year from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, earmarked for traffic enforcement, local safety programs and resources for medical examiners. Meanwhile, state transportation officials said there are also several safety projects either underway or recently completed, including a $7 million overhaul of intersections in Valley Stream and Huntington as well as a $27 million redesign of Exit 53 on the Long Island Expressway.


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
California looters now face ‘hard-charging' consequences after blue state abandoned soft-on-crime approach
Amid the continuing unrest and flash mob-style looting incidents in Los Angeles, California is making a significant pivot toward tougher criminal enforcement. Criminal defense attorney David Wohl told Fox News Digital that the legal consequences are no longer a slap on the wrist for looters following the reversal of Proposition 47, which notably did not criminalize theft under $950. Advertisement 'Now we have a very conservative, hard-charging DA in Los Angeles,' Wohl said. 'He's adding up what is stolen by each individual co-defendant, and if that's over $950, everybody's getting charged with felonies.' In a city once known for turning a blind eye to petty theft and soft prosecution, looters who are taking advantage of protests over federal immigration operations now face stricter penalties. In 2014, California voters approved Proposition 47, a ballot initiative that reclassified several nonviolent felonies, including shoplifting, theft and drug possession, as misdemeanors if the value involved was $950 or less. Supporters argued the measure would reduce prison overcrowding and redirect state funds to additional programming. Advertisement 8 Vulgar graffiti was spray-painted onto an Apple store after it was looted during the riots in Los Angeles on June 10, 2025. REUTERS 8 Protesters loot a gas station convenience store in Paramount, California on June 7, 2025. Getty Images Critics argued that it contributed to a noticeable increase in retail theft and emboldened looters. In 2024, voters voiced their concerns and overwhelmingly chose a sharp course correction from the progressive reforms that Proposition 47 implemented and voted in favor of Proposition 36. Advertisement Prop 36 restored the ability to file felony charges against repeat offenders, regardless of whether their latest crime falls under the $950 limit. It also enhances penalties for group theft and organized looting, which had previously fallen into legal gray zones under Prop 47. 8 Police officers detain a group of protesters in the streets of Los Angeles on June 11, 2025. AFP via Getty Images The shift stems from a growing rejection of the previous criminal justice model championed by former District Attorney George Gascon, who Wohl described as 'more liberal than a lot of public defenders.' Advertisement Under Gascon's leadership, prosecution was often delayed or diminished, with an emphasis on giving offenders 'second, third, fourth, fifth chances,' Wohl said. William Jacobson, a law professor at Cornell University and founder of offered a sharp critique of California's criminal justice policies in light of the emergence of looters during the ongoing L.A. protests against immigration enforcement. 8 Graffiti is sprayed onto the glass windows of an Apple store hit by looters during the Anti-ICE riots in California. REUTERS 8 Apple products are scattered around a store that was looted during the Los Angeles riots on June 9, 2025. REUTERS 'Looting and violence have always been illegal, even in California,' Jacobson told Fox News Digital. 'Unfortunately, California's lax enforcement of the criminal laws, including the former decriminalization of shoplifting, has created a culture of criminality that has played out in numerous riots over the years.' 'The current riots against immigration enforcement and violence targeting both ICE and the community are part of the California political ecosystem,' he said. Looters in LA Several stores across downtown Los Angeles were hit by looters in the early morning hours as anti-ICE riots continued. On Monday night, looters took to the streets and ransacked a series of storefronts, the Los Angeles Police Department confirmed with Fox News Digital. Apple and Adidas were among the stores hit by thieves, as well as several mom-and-pop shops. Advertisement 'What have they done to my business? I don't know,' one local business owner shared with Fox News affiliate KKTV. 'I have to go inside and see what's going on. I don't know what they have done with the business.' 8 A shoe sits on the floor in an empty Adidas store attacked by looters in Los Angeles. ALLISON DINNER/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock 8 Workers board up a CVS pharmacy after it was looted by rioters in Los Angeles on June 10, 2025. REUTERS One video, taken by Brendan Gutenschwager, captured looters ransacking an Apple storefront on Monday night. Advertisement The video captured a slew of individuals dashing up to the technology storefront and grabbing goods before dispersing as police arrived. The footage captured the store's glass windows spray-painted with 'F— ICE.' Other photos showed ransackers disappearing into the night with stolen goods after a smash-and-grab in Compton, a city south of Los Angeles. It was unclear if the thieves were participating in the ongoing anti-ICE protests or if they were being opportunistic of the city's unrest. Advertisement 'Let me be clear: ANYONE who vandalized Downtown or looted stores does not care about our immigrant communities,' Mayor Karen Bass said in a post to X. 'You will be held accountable.' On Tuesday and Wednesday, after continued protests, other businesses set out to protect their stores. Fox News Digital saw a T-Mobile store on the corner of 3rd Street and Broadway boarding up ahead of likely another night of protests in the city. While a security guard protected the property, a repairer worked on the CVS store on the corner of 7th and Spring streets in downtown Los Angeles after several nights of rioting. Attorney General Pam Bondi offered a blunt message to would-be robbers and looters in the deep-blue city on 'Fox & Friends' Tuesday. Advertisement 'If you loot a business in California during this, we're charging you with robbery under the Hobbs Act. No longer are the days of non-prosecution for looting. It's a criminal act,' she said. 8 Police officers detained masked protesters after a demonstration near Los Angeles City Hall on June 11, 2025. AFP via Getty Images The administration is also determined to crack down on those who inflict harm on law enforcement. 'We've all made over 190 arrests, [and] more [are] coming. If you hit a police officer, you assault a police officer, state or federal, we are coming after you.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The big, beautiful AI disaster coming to a school near you
"AI-generated images and chatbot responses about the Los Angeles situation have further exposed the startling lack of information and AI literacy among the American public." (Getty Images) Predictably, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement riots in Los Angeles have been viewed through a partisan lens. The left has suggested that the federalizing of the California National Guard is a mere dress rehearsal for a full military dictatorship by President Donald Trump, while the right has pounded the drum of pseudo-law and order with '[i]f they spit, we will hit.' Both of these viewpoints are irresponsible, ill-conceived, and lean into misinformation. Trump is within his lawful and precedential authority to federalize the National Guard given the current circumstances seen in and around Los Angeles. Spitting on a law enforcement officer is assault. However, Trump's remark about spitting directly leading to hitting overtly encourages disproportionate use of force. Couple this with the speaker of the House saying that the governor of California 'should be tarred and feathered.' Lost among the politics of this moment is something media analysts have been concerned about for quite some time — moments of social upheaval ceding fertile ground to the rapid spread and uptake of misinformation via artificial intelligence. AI-generated images and chatbot responses about the Los Angeles situation have further exposed the startling lack of information and AI literacy among the American public. It is one thing for adults to engage with potential AI-driven misinformation, but consider that the minds of Generations Z and Alpha are developing within this information environment. The pertinent question to be asked is this: How will this caustic environment shape their information consumption habits? The information environment surrounding Los Angeles right now is not an outlier. It once again reveals the scale of misinformation AI is capable of generating and the ease with which it can inflame public discourse. Yet, amid this crisis, Congress is pushing forward with what has been dubbed the big beautiful bill — a federal budget package that includes a 10-year moratorium on any state-level AI regulation. This regulation would prevent schools from teaching the vital skill of AI-driven information literacy. Squirreled away in the 1,000-plus pages of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is a clause which reads: '…no state or political subdivision may enforce, during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this act, any law or regulation limiting, restricting, or otherwise regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems entered into interstate commerce.' This clause explicitly forbids states and their political subdivisions (i.e. school boards) from enacting or enforcing any law or policy that 'limits, restricts, or otherwise regulates' artificial intelligence systems. This broad language would ban everything from AI plagiarism checkers to basic AI literacy curricula in public education. While proponents claim this is about ensuring regulatory uniformity, the effect is much more pervasive. It locks state governments and schools into inaction in a time of dynamic technological change. When teaching students to assess the authenticity of information, there is a hard line to walk between healthy skepticism and corrosive cynicism. AI makes this line ever more opaque to navigate. Developing minds are already traversing AI-saturated landscapes without the tools they need. Teaching AI literacy in schools is not a partisan demand; it is a civic necessity. Teachers should not demand students to be zealots or Luddites in regard to any topic. But teachers should encourage them to become friendly critics of digital information and AI — capable of examining the tools they use with both curiosity and caution. To its supporters, the 10-year moratorium is being championed as a win for unfettered innovation. In a purely capitalistic sense, this is true and could lead to widespread economic prosperity. However, it is worth recalling that similar rhetoric surrounded the onset of social media platforms. We now know what happened when those technologies were left unregulated and used as substitutes for the in-person socialization of developing minds. Mental health spiraled, polarization deepened, and a generation came of age in an isolating echo chamber. We cannot afford to wait and see what AI will do on a larger, accelerated scale. As the R Street Institute argues, the moratorium is a way to avoid a patchwork of conflicting state laws. What it actually does is prevent local communities from crafting age-appropriate, culturally relevant responses to a fast-moving technological frontier. This is not about red states or blue states, right or left. If Democrats controlled the Legislature, the tech lobby would have courted them the same way. This is about whether any policymaker who claims to care about children or families will acknowledge the responsibility of schools to prepare their students for the rapidly changing world beyond their walls. The next chapter of American life will be molded by the technologies developing minds use. This is precisely why a 21st-century, technology-focused curriculum needs to be at the forefront of every school board discussion this summer. Students should learn not only how to prompt AI responsibly, but how to verify the accuracy of its output. They should study its biases, understand its limitations, and consider its societal impacts. In doing so, they will be less likely to fall for the kinds of digital falsehoods intended to exacerbate moments of social upheaval. AI and information literacy are not passing educational trends like social-emotional learning or whole language instruction. They are part of a new baseline for civic competence. School districts should be empowered, not prohibited, from integrating these skills into their curricula. The technology shaping this generation will evolve faster than the ability to legislate solutions to its shortcomings. Education is the answer to prepare young minds for a world awash in AI and digital information. Let us hope this answer does not get taken away from states and local school boards, leading students down the road to a big, beautiful AI disaster.