logo
I tried supermarket versions of Magnums… 38p per treat winner was packed with first-class flavour & chunky chocolate

I tried supermarket versions of Magnums… 38p per treat winner was packed with first-class flavour & chunky chocolate

The Sun2 days ago

MAGNUM lollies have long been a favourite summer treat but they're even more popular since Brat pop star Charli XCX was spotted with one at Cannes this month.
However, stocking up on them can be expensive as they cost around £3.50 for a pack of three.
9
Last week Aldi launched new ­flavours of its own dupes for around £2.49 a pack.
But how do they compare on taste?
Laura Stott put stores' own versions to the test and rated them out of five.
Classic Magnum, 3 x 100ml, £3.50, Tesco
ORIGINAL Magnums – which are made by big-name brand Wall's – are famous for their thick and ­delicious choccie ­coating and they don't disappoint on this front.
When you unwrap and tuck in, the shell shatters and snaps in the most satisfying way but the shards of choc I found ­surprisingly lacking in flavour, with none of the creaminess you'd expect considering the generous amount you get.
The vanilla ice cream was tasty, nice and thick and it didn't melt too quickly so I had both ice cream and coating on my stick all the way to the bottom of this eat.
There is nothing wrong with what you'll find in this box and they are a best-seller for a reason, but that comes at a price.
3/5
Amour Choc Mint, 3 x 110ml, Morrisons, £2.25
9
LIKE the classic after-dinner nibble but in ice cream form, if you love fresh flavours these will be a good buy.
Inside you find three minty ice creams with a thick ­texture, so it doesn't drip if you want to savour it and eat slowly.
'survey reveals what your ice cream eating habits could say about your personality'
Nice chocolate around the outside but despite having decent ingredients this perfectly pleasant lolly just lacked a little something to make it really spark.
The ice cream perhaps needs a bit more mint coming through and the chocolate on the outside was noticeably ­thinner than on some of the others.
The price is excellent, however, and you get a big lolly. If you like mint they are certainly worth a go.
3/5
Gianni's Pink Lemonade, 3 x 90ml, Aldi, £2.49
ALDI'S new Gianni's Luxury Pink Lemonade Chocsticks cost £2.49 for three ­lollies, which shouldn't cause as much of a meltdown at the till as buying a packet of ­genuine Magnums.
These certainly look rather flashy, with a fun appearance which is bound to go down well with the kids if you stick a pack in the freezer when doing the family shop.
The combo inside of lemon ice cream and raspberry sorbet with an exterior coated in thick white chocolate and ­pieces of popping candy is good fun and has some serious 'by the beach and on holiday' vibes.
This was a very sugary-tasting lolly and the citrus flavour of the ice cream middle gets a bit lost with all the competing tastes.
But as a warm weather treat it's a bit different and very jolly. Rather like an ice cream sundae on a stick.
4/5
Almond Sticks, 3 x 75g, M&S/Ocado, £2.40
VERY good value from M&S but these own-brand ice cream options were a little disappointing when it came to flavour, despite looking and smelling ­delicious.
More of a short and chunky choc ice on a stick but they did seem rather fun-sized compared to some of the other own-brand whoppers and it was hard not to feel a little short-changed when they came out of the box.
The taste is inoffensive but I thought the ice cream was very bland and thin, with none of the creamy vanilla richness I was hoping for.
A bit of a choc ice of two halves ­however, as the choccie coating was ­delicious, with a great flavour and rammed with nutty nibs.
A better ice cream filling would be a real game-changer here.
3/5
Chocolate and Caramel, 3 x 110ml, £1.19, Tesco
A WARM weather bargain from Tesco. This box of three lollies was a winner at the till, coming in at an incredible 38p per ice which is a summer steal, and almost a third of the price of buying the big brand.
Flavour-wise I thought they were first class and in the box you get three massive licks which should satisfy the whole family.
Each has tasty caramel flavour ice cream in the middle, which is coated with a chunky layer of milk choc, enhanced with Crunchie-style honeycomb pieces.
The choccie outer was the best part of this bite, thick enough to ensure you get that lovely snap if you like to nibble off shards to eat first, like I do.
There wasn't a huge amount of the honeycomb pieces which some might find disappointing but, for me, any more would have been too sickly, so I was very happy. Great value for money, and a tasty treat.
Winner - 5/5
Double Dip Choc Raspberry, 3 x 88ml, £3.25, Sainsbury's
THESE are very fancy choc and fruit-flavoured ice creams which will bring a touch of luxury to your freezer and work just as well as a dessert or garden eat.
Inside you get yummy raspberry ice cream which has a thick, creamy flavour and tastes just as delicious and decadent as any posh tub you might buy.
There's a double-thickness milk chocolate layer on the outside which delivers the satisfying shatter you want, and to cut through all that richness there's a sparky and zingy raspberry sauce sandwiched in the middle.
These are a real grown-up treat and ­delicious, but the cost is rather high.
And considering the price tag, the lollies themselves are a bit too dinky.
3/5
Chocolate Almond Coated, 3 x 110ml, Asda, £2.10
A WELL-PRICED own-brand choc treat that works well as a keep-everyone-happy summertime snack.
More classic in taste than some others, so what you find on your stick is a scrummy vanilla ice cream dipped in a coating of milk choc with tasty roasted almond nibs.
For the price I thought these were super quality and you also get a lot for your money as they are very substantial.
The vanilla whippy-style middle tasted enjoyable, with an ice cream van- style soft texture, and roasting the nutty nibs gave enjoyable additional taste as well as texture.
The choc was a little thin and the lolly did start to ­separate and melt too fast, but that didn't stop me scoffing the lot and then licking my ­fingers!
4/5
Gelatelli Double Caramel, 4 x 85ml, Lidl, £4.49
9
I WAS surprised at the steep price of these own-brand licks from Lidl, which were the second-costliest I tried after the Wall's original Magnums.
That said, they are pretty fancy lollies with a lot of ­flavours packed on to the wooden stick.
Inside the chunky milk choc outer you'll find it crammed with nutty nibs, then a thick layer of caramel sauce, ice cream with biscuit, more nut flavours and then more white chocolate, plus biccie pieces.
There's an awful lot going on here, which is generous – and if you love a ­toffee-style ice cream cone you'll ­probably think these are fab.
I found them a bit messy to eat, and the stick was almost too small for all the goodies attached to it. But if you have a sweet tooth you'll be in heaven.
They're overpriced though, and paying less for a more streamlined ice will keep everyone just as happy.
2/5

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Robbie Williams, Murrayfield Stadium, review: The most spectacular end-of-the-pier show ever seen
Robbie Williams, Murrayfield Stadium, review: The most spectacular end-of-the-pier show ever seen

Telegraph

time24 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Robbie Williams, Murrayfield Stadium, review: The most spectacular end-of-the-pier show ever seen

'Allow me to reintroduce myself!' yelled the squat, muscular, tattooed, silver haired 51-year-old, standing on a runway in the centre of the vast Murrayfield Stadium in Edinburgh, Scotland, a tiny, isolated figure in the midst of a 70,000 strong crowd. 'My name is ROBBIE! F______! WILLIAMS!' And the crowd roared back with a gusty, noisy delight to match the star's own. He's back, folks. To be fair, I am not sure how far he ever really went away, but Britain's self-proclaimed 'King of Entertainment' is on the march, determined to reclaim his crown. Oasis mania is about to be unleashed once more in the UK, as the biggest band in Britpop returns to the stage next month. Cheekily stealing their thunder, they are being preceded around Britain's stadiums by the biggest British hitmaker of the 1990s and 2000s in a show mischievously entitled Britpop, filled with buzzing guitars and mighty singalongs. Mind you, that's where any resemblance to the fiercely dour and belligerently stationary Oasis ends. Because Williams throws everything he's got at his audience – special effects, jokes, choreography, stunts and, mainly, himself – in a relentless, almost desperate desire to please. His spectacular show opened with a gasp-inducing high dive from a giant winged platform suspended above the stage and ended two hours later with fans singing the choruses of Williams's beloved ballad Angels louder than the giant PA, whilst the star of the occasion looked on beaming with emotional delight. I am not sure who was more moved by Williams's relentless antics – the woman named Debbie from Dundee openly weeping as Williams clambered into the crowd to serenade her with a version of She's The One, or Williams himself as he basked in the glow of love and acceptance. A neurotic neediness is at the heart of Williams's appeal but is crucially wrapped up in songs with meaningful lyrics, flowing melodies, snappy hooks and huge choruses that the audience seem even more eager to sing than the performer. Indeed, it is not really a criticism, but Williams talks as much as he sings, frequently interrupting his own emotional performances with silly jokes and overexcited chatter. 'I'm s_______ hits all over the place!' he shouts in the middle of an otherwise gorgeous A Love Supreme and makes a lewd penis joke during his most vulnerable anthem Come Undone. A Robbie Williams show is a lot to take in. It's an end of the pier cabaret routine staged with the firepower of a Hollywood blockbuster; a cheesy pop extravaganza infused with darkly witty postmodern irony; an exposed bundle of raw human neuroses transposed into monster pop anthems interlaced with old fashioned showbiz comedy patter and interrupted by scatological stream of consciousness babble. He makes unscripted comments about age ('I'm 51,' he repeatedly shouted in self-amazement), anxiety ('I've been s_______ myself for weeks, old feelings from Take That, PTSD'), his family ('my mum has dementia, and my dad has Parkinson's, I feel like I'm in sniper's alley'), and sings the showbiz standard My Way in a pink suit and boa with all the feeling of a man who can't quite believe he's made it this far. He's 51, you know. There is a theme to proceedings, roughly hovering around the question of 'what is entertainment?'. Williams offers himself as the answer to his own question, to which the crowd offer noisy validation. From the riotous bombast of Let Me Entertain You to the vulnerability of anthemic ballad Feel, Williams arrived fully armed with the singalong hits that his massive audience have already taken to heart. In his natural element on stage, he put them across with a combination of ridiculous humour, raw humanity and powerful musicality that proved irresistible. We let him entertain us. I suspect from his gurning delight that the experience was mutual.

Duke of Sussex ‘asked Diana's brother if he should change his family name to Spencer'
Duke of Sussex ‘asked Diana's brother if he should change his family name to Spencer'

Telegraph

time24 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Duke of Sussex ‘asked Diana's brother if he should change his family name to Spencer'

Prince Harry asked Princess Diana's brother about changing his family name to Spencer, according to reports. During a rare visit to Britain, Prince Harry is said to have sought advice from his uncle Earl Spencer, about whether to assume his mother's surname. It would have meant dropping his current family name, Mountbatten-Windsor, which is used by his children, Prince Archie, six, and Princess Lilibet, three. The Duke, 40, was advised against the move by the Earl, 61, because of the legal hurdles, according to the Mail on Sunday. 'They had a very amicable conversation and Spencer advised him against taking such a step', a friend of the Duke told the newspaper. Mountbatten-Windsor is the surname available to descendants of the late Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip. It combines the British Royal family's House name of Windsor and Prince Philip's adopted surname of Mountbatten. The Duke's apparent desire to abandon the name speaks to the growing rift with his family. An interview with the BBC last month, in which he made a series of comments about the Royal family, is understood to have deepened the divide between Buckingham Palace and the Duke and his wife, Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex. On their birth certificates, the couple's children are Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor and Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor. However, it was revealed last year, they had started using 'Sussex' as the official surname for their children. The Royal family name of Windsor was confirmed by Queen Elizabeth II following her accession to the throne in 1952. But in 1960, the late Queen and then Duke of Edinburgh elected for their direct descendants to carry the name Mountbatten-Windsor. This meant that when the Queen's children needed to declare a surname, it would be Mountbatten-Windsor. Mountbatten-Windsor first appeared on an official document on Nov 14 1973 upon the marriage of the Princess Royal and Captain Mark Phillips.

'Transformational' new drug could stop breast cancer tumours before they grow, trial finds
'Transformational' new drug could stop breast cancer tumours before they grow, trial finds

Sky News

time27 minutes ago

  • Sky News

'Transformational' new drug could stop breast cancer tumours before they grow, trial finds

A new drug could stop some breast cancer tumours from using hormones to grow, a trial has found. Results from the Serena-6 trial, carried out with the Institute of Cancer Research in London, suggest that using camizestrant could help patients stay well longer and delay the need for chemotherapy. According to Cancer Research UK, the drug works by blocking oestrogen from getting into the breast cancer cell, which researchers hope can then stop or slow the growth of cancer. Breast cancer patients given the drug in the trial reduced their chances of the disease progressing by 52% compared to standard therapies. Professor Kristian Helin, chief executive of the Institute of Cancer Research, said the results "represent more than a clinical milestone, they represent a transformational shift in how we approach precision medicine". Co-principal investigator Professor Nick Turner also called the development of the drug "a pivotal moment in breast cancer care". 1:48 The study, funded by AstraZeneca, looked at patients with hormone-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer - about 70% of cases. More than 3,000 patients from 23 countries took part in phase three of the trial, which saw doctors use blood tests to detect changes in the cancer's DNA to see which treatments were ineffective. For those taking camizestrant, their cancer stabilised for around 16 months on average, compared with about nine months for other treatments. However, 1% of patients taking the new drug stopped taking it because of side effects. Further results from the Serena-6 trial will be presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting in Chicago on Sunday. Cancer Research UK reports that breast cancer is the most common type of the disease, with around 56,400 women and around 390 men diagnosed in the UK each year. The trial was also the first worldwide study to show that using blood tests to find early signs of cancer resistance to treatment helps patients. Dr Catherine Elliott, director of research at Cancer Research UK, praised the breakthrough as a "clear example of how blood tests are starting to transform cancer treatment". "By tracking tiny traces of tumour DNA in the blood, researchers were able to spot early signs of treatment resistance and switch therapies before cancer had a chance to grow," she added. "It shows how circulating tumour DNA, or ctDNA, could help doctors make smarter, more timely treatment decisions. "This approach could become an important part of how we personalise care for people with advanced breast cancer."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store