Expert witness in Karen Read murder trial caught with 'errors' inflating his credentials
Massachusetts murder suspect Karen Read returned to court Monday for her trial in the death of her former boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, as DNA experts and a digital forensic scientist testified for the prosecution, linking the victim to a lone hair sample found on Read's SUV and tightening up a timeline surrounding the final moments of his life.
But under cross-examination, a witness with key new evidence for the state revealed what appears to be an exaggerated resume.
O'Keefe, 46, was found dead on Jan. 29, 2022. His then-girlfriend, the now-45-year-old Read, is accused of slamming into him with her 2021 Lexus SUV and leaving him to die on the ground in a blizzard in Canton, a suburb about 20 miles south of Boston.
Karen Read Murder Trial: Niece Reveals 'Frantic' Behavior On Morning Boston Officer Was Found Dead
Karl Miyasako, a DNA analyst with Bode Technologies in Virginia, testified that mitochondrial DNA testing connected a hair found on the back of Read's vehicle to O'Keefe. However, he testified, the hair is a match to anyone connected to Read's mother's matriarchal line, meaning his niece and nephew could have also been the source.
The sample was too small to be tested for autosomal DNA, which could have provided a link to a specific individual with certainty, he said.
Read On The Fox News App
But the case took an unexpected turn when Shanon Burgess, a Texas-based expert on digital forensics for smartphones and vehicles, admitted that his credentials don't line up with those on his resume.
He was on the stand to explain the process and analysis of "black box" data extracted from Read's car. Key information had been missed during the first case, he said, and he found it on a micro SD card and was able to extract it, answering questions left unanswered by an earlier analysis from another expert.
Karen Read Judge Blocks Sandra Birchmore Mentions; Expert Says Cases Should Be Wake-up Call For Police
On cross-examination, however, defense attorney Robert Alessi questioned Burgess' "mendacity," or untrustworthiness, after revealing inconsistencies in the expert's resume.
Several versions of it and his official Aperture bio pages describe him as having obtained a bachelor's degree from the University of Alabama, Birmingham, in various years. None of them were correct, he admitted. He does not have a bachelor's degree.
"I have represented I do not have a bachelor's degree," Burgess told Alessi.
"But in here," Alessi said, pointing to one of at least three resumes with conflicting dates he introduced as evidence, "you represented that you do, correct?"
"Yes," Burgess said. "It is in there."
Experts say his expertise likely doesn't require one, but it's the appearance of a lie that damages his credibility.
GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE True Crime Hub
"He doesn't need a bachelor of science for this field of technology," said Grace Edwards, a Massachusetts defense attorney who is closely following the case. However, she said, a mix-up could turn off the jury and lead to members completely disregarding his findings, as well as potentially haunt other cases that have already been completed.
"How many courts has he testified in with a 'padded' CV?" she asked, using an acronym for curriculum vitae, his academic resume.
Burgess' testimony regarding the clocks in Read's Lexus and O'Keefe's iPhone could be crucial to the prosecution's case. He said they have a variance of between 21 and 29 seconds, and the victim's last recorded interaction with his phone, pressing the lock button, happened at 12:32:09 a.m.
Follow The Fox True Crime Team On X
Read took her car out of reverse between 12:32:04 and 12:32:12, Burgess testified, based on computer logs recovered from her Lexus.
Burgess is expected to return to the stand on Tuesday. Read could face up to life in prison if convicted of the top charge, second-degree murder. She is also charged with drunken driving, manslaughter and fleeing the scene of a deadly accident.
She has pleaded not guilty, and her defense denies her vehicle collided with O'Keefe at all.Original article source: Expert witness in Karen Read murder trial caught with 'errors' inflating his credentials
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Luigi Mangione's request, Karen Read's defense, Bryan Kohberger's witnesses
ATTENTION DEFICIT: Karen Read denies noticing confrontation between boyfriend and ATF agent hours before his death DIGGING UP THE PAST: Key figures from Bryan Kohberger's Pennsylvania youth summoned to Idaho for student murders trial CAUSE OF DEATHS: Washington sheriff shares new photo of suspected killer dad amid manhunt in daughters' triple murder FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON X 'THAT STOOD OUT': Witness in Karen Read trial describes 'strange' exchange between Jennifer McCabe and Read before John O'Keefe's death APPEARANCE GAME: Luigi Mangione's team asks court to remove 'shackles,' bulletproof vest on UnitedHealthcare CEO murder suspect SILENT STAND: Karen Read's silence in murder trial raises stakes for defense SIGN UP TO GET TRUE CRIME NEWSLETTER KEY DENIAL: Kelly Dever denies seeing key figures near Karen Read's vehicle in 'disaster' testimony: expert TEXT FALLOUT: Lead detective's text messages cast shadow over Karen Read murder trial COMING CLEAN: Man who served 36 years for wife's murder forgives confessed killer in rare reconciliation LIKE WHAT YOU'RE READING? FIND MORE ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB JUSTICE BURIED: Indiana coroner says police 'dropped the ball' in Fox Hollow Farm serial killer case COSTLY BATTLE: Karen Read sells home and taps retirement fund to pay mounting legal bills in second murder trial CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP FACE THE FIRE: Mother of slain Boston police officer sends wordless message to Karen Read in courtroom showdown
CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
Kilmar Abrego Garcia, wrongly deported to El Salvador, brought back to U.S. to face human smuggling charges
Washington — Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran migrant who the Trump administration admitted was mistakenly deported back to his home country, has been returned to the U.S. to face two federal criminal counts that were detailed in an indictment unsealed on Friday. Filed in the federal district court in Nashville, the indictment charges Abrego Garcia with one count of conspiracy to transport aliens and one count of unlawful transportation of undocumented aliens. Abrego Garcia was removed from the U.S. to El Salvador in March, where he was being held at a notorious supermax prison. Attorney General Pam Bondi said in remarks that the Salvadoran government agreed to return Abrego Garcia to face the criminal charges after it was presented with an arrest warrant. "Abrego Garcia has landed in the United States to face justice," Bondi said, adding "this is what American justice looks like." ABC News first reported Friday that he was being brought back to the U.S. to face the charges. The indictment The filing alleges that between 2016 and 2025, Abrego Garcia and others conspired to bring migrants from Latin American countries to the U.S., passing through Mexico before crossing the southern border into Texas. Prosecutors allege that Abrego Garcia and an unidentified co-conspirator picked up the migrants in Houston and transported them to other parts of the U.S. The Justice Department said that Abrego Garcia and six co-conspirators used cellphones and social media platforms to move migrants into and throughout the U.S. He allegedly worked with two of the co-conspirators to transport firearms that were purchased illegally in Texas for distribution and resale in Maryland, where Abrego Garcia lived. Abrego Garcia and the six others also allegedly collected financial payments from migrants for their movements, according to the indictment. That money was then transferred between one another, the Justice Department said, claiming it was an effort to hide their origins. The indictment claims that Abrego Garcia and his co-conspirators "knowingly and unlawfully transported thousands" of migrants who were not legally authorized to live or work in the U.S., and alleges that many of those people were members of the gang MS-13 and associates. The filing includes information about a November 2022 traffic stop in Tennessee, when Abrego Garcia was pulled over by the state Highway Patrol for speeding. The agency released body camera footage from the incident. Abrego Garcia had at least eight people in the car with him when he was stopped. He said that they had been performing construction work at a site in St. Louis, Missouri. An April report from the Department of Homeland Security about the incident said Aberego Garcia was suspected of human trafficking, though he was not arrested or charged with any crime. Abrego Garcia's deportation Abrego Garcia's case sparked nationwide backlash after an immigration official in the Trump administration acknowledged that his deportation to El Salvador was an "administrative error." The 29-year-old had been granted a legal status in 2019, known as withholding of removal, that forbade the Department of Homeland Security from removing him to his home country of El Salvador because he was likely to face persecution by local gangs. Abrego Garcia was among the more than 200 people who were boarded onto planes bound for El Salvador in mid-March for confinement in the country's notorious maximum-security Terrorism Confinement Center, known as CECOT. The removals were part of the Trump administration's efforts to crack down on illegal immigration, which have prompted numerous legal battles across the country. Abrego Garcia, who had lived in Maryland since he came to the U.S. unlawfully in 2011, was initially held at CECOT but eventually moved to a lower-security facility, according to Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen, who met with Abrego Garcia in El Salvador in April. The State Department later confirmed he had been transferred. The man's case, and U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis' orders for the government to take steps to bring him back to the U.S. was the catalyst for an escalating clash between the Trump administration and the courts that has played out over the past few weeks. The government was accused of defying Xinis' demand that it facilitate his release from Salvadoran custody — which was affirmed by the Supreme Court — and refusing to provide any details about what efforts it had taken to do so. The Trump administration has claimed Abrego Garcia is a member of the gang MS-13, citing an allegation from a confidential informant and the clothes he was wearing when he was arrested in 2019, after which he was released from custody. His lawyers have denied Abrego Garcia has any ties to MS-13, and said he has never been charged or convicted of a crime in the U.S. or El Salvador. Legal battle goes to Supreme Court Three courts — the district court on which Xinis sits, a federal appeals court and the Supreme Court — all said the Trump administration had to facilitate Abrego Garcia's release from Salvadoran custody. The Supreme Court also directed the government to ensure that his case "is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador." But lawyers for Abrego Garcia said the administration has defied those decisions by repeatedly refusing to take steps to bring him back to the U.S. or provide any information about whether it has even made attempts to do so. In response, Xinis ordered an expedited examination into the Trump administration's refusal to return Abrego Garcia to the U.S. and allowed his lawyers to pose 15 questions to government officials and make 15 requests for documents. Abrego Garcia's lawyers told Xinis that the Trump administration turned over "nothing of substance" and provided "non-responsive" answers to their questions. The judge then blasted the administration for its responses and blamed it for "continued mischaracterization" of the Supreme Court's order. She said their objection to certain requests for information "reflects a willful and bad faith refusal to comply with discovery obligations." Regarding the administration's attempts to invoke certain privileges to shield certain details from Abrego Garcia's lawyers, the judge said they rely on "boilerplate assertions." "That ends now," Xinis wrote.
CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
Kilmar Abrego Garcia, wrongly deported to El Salvador, brought back to U.S. to face charges
Washington — Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran migrant who the Trump administration admitted was mistakenly deported back to his home country, has been returned to the U.S. to face two federal criminal counts that were detailed in an indictment unsealed on Friday. Filed in the federal district court in Nashville, the indictment charges Abrego Garcia with one count of conspiracy to transport aliens and one count of unlawful transportation of undocumented aliens. Abrego Garcia was removed from the U.S. to El Salvador in March, where he was being held at a notorious supermax prison. Attorney General Pam Bondi said in remarks that the Salvadoran government agreed to return Abrego Garcia to face the criminal charges after it was presented with an arrest warrant. "Abrego Garcia has landed in the United States to face justice," Bondi said, adding "this is what American justice looks like." ABC News first reported Friday that he was being brought back to the U.S. to face the charges. The indictment The filing alleges that between 2016 and 2025, Abrego Garcia and others conspired to bring migrants from Latin American countries to the U.S., passing through Mexico before crossing the southern border into Texas. Prosecutors allege that Abrego Garcia and an unidentified co-conspirator picked up the migrants in Houston and transported them to other parts of the U.S. The Justice Department said that Abrego Garcia and six co-conspirators used cellphones and social media platforms to move migrants into and throughout the U.S. He allegedly worked with two of the co-conspirators to transport firearms that were purchased illegally in Texas for distribution and resale in Maryland, where Abrego Garcia lived. Abrego Garcia and the six others also allegedly collected financial payments from migrants for their movements, according to the indictment. That money was then transferred between one another, the Justice Department said, claiming it was an effort to hide their origins. The indictment claims that Abrego Garcia and his co-conspirators "knowingly and unlawfully transported thousands" of migrants who were not legally authorized to live or work in the U.S., and alleges that many of those people were members of the gang MS-13 and associates. The filing includes information about a November 2022 traffic stop in Tennessee, when Abrego Garcia was pulled over by the state Highway Patrol for speeding. The agency released body camera footage from the incident. Abrego Garcia had at least eight people in the car with him when he was stopped. He said that they had been performing construction work at a site in St. Louis, Missouri. An April report from the Department of Homeland Security about the incident said Aberego Garcia was suspected of human trafficking, though he was not arrested or charged with any crime. Abrego Garcia's deportation Abrego Garcia's case sparked nationwide backlash after an immigration official in the Trump administration acknowledged that his deportation to El Salvador was an "administrative error." The 29-year-old had been granted a legal status in 2019, known as withholding of removal, that forbade the Department of Homeland Security from removing him to his home country of El Salvador because he was likely to face persecution by local gangs. Abrego Garcia was among the more than 200 people who were boarded onto planes bound for El Salvador in mid-March for confinement in the country's notorious maximum-security Terrorism Confinement Center, known as CECOT. The removals were part of the Trump administration's efforts to crack down on illegal immigration, which have prompted numerous legal battles across the country. Abrego Garcia, who had lived in Maryland since he came to the U.S. unlawfully in 2011, was initially held at CECOT but eventually moved to a lower-security facility, according to Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen, who met with Abrego Garcia in El Salvador in April. The State Department later confirmed he had been transferred. The man's case, and U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis' orders for the government to take steps to bring him back to the U.S. was the catalyst for an escalating clash between the Trump administration and the courts that has played out over the past few weeks. The government was accused of defying Xinis' demand that it facilitate his release from Salvadoran custody — which was affirmed by the Supreme Court — and refusing to provide any details about what efforts it had taken to do so. The Trump administration has claimed Abrego Garcia is a member of the gang MS-13, citing an allegation from a confidential informant and the clothes he was wearing when he was arrested in 2019, after which he was released from custody. His lawyers have denied Abrego Garcia has any ties to MS-13, and said he has never been charged or convicted of a crime in the U.S. or El Salvador. Legal battle goes to Supreme Court Three courts — the district court on which Xinis sits, a federal appeals court and the Supreme Court — all said the Trump administration had to facilitate Abrego Garcia's release from Salvadoran custody. The Supreme Court also directed the government to ensure that his case "is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador." But lawyers for Abrego Garcia said the administration has defied those decisions by repeatedly refusing to take steps to bring him back to the U.S. or provide any information about whether it has even made attempts to do so. In response, Xinis ordered an expedited examination into the Trump administration's refusal to return Abrego Garcia to the U.S. and allowed his lawyers to pose 15 questions to government officials and make 15 requests for documents. Abrego Garcia's lawyers told Xinis that the Trump administration turned over "nothing of substance" and provided "non-responsive" answers to their questions. The judge then blasted the administration for its responses and blamed it for "continued mischaracterization" of the Supreme Court's order. She said their objection to certain requests for information "reflects a willful and bad faith refusal to comply with discovery obligations." Regarding the administration's attempts to invoke certain privileges to shield certain details from Abrego Garcia's lawyers, the judge said they rely on "boilerplate assertions." "That ends now," Xinis wrote.
