Public's ‘gut instinct' should count in reviewing criminal cases, says Tice
The deputy leader of Reform UK will be introducing 'Lucy's Bill', which would allow people to mount mass appeals against punishments they deem to be too severe or lenient.
It comes after Mrs Connolly, the wife of Conservative councillor Ray Connolly, was jailed last year for 31 months for inciting racial hatred, a sentence which has been criticised as being too harsh.
The Bill will be introduced to the House of Commons on Wednesday and would mean campaigners could get the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) to reconsider cases deemed unduly harsh.
Speaking outside HMP Peterborough, where he visited Connolly on Tuesday, Mr Tice said she was a 'political prisoner'.
He said: 'I genuinely fear that she is actually being treated as a political prisoner for political purposes.'
Mrs Connolly posted on X: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care … if that makes me racist so be it,' in the wake of the Southport stabbings.
An appeal against her sentence was dismissed at the Court of Appeal last month.
Mr Tice claimed Mrs Connolly had bruises on her wrists which he said were from handcuffs but that she was calm and wanted to see through her sentence and rebuild her life.
He said he hoped the Bill would enable a 'treble check' on sentences.
'The whole point about justice is it has to have the confidence of the British people,' Mr Tice said.
'We're not calling into dispute the brilliance of our legal system and our judges.
'What we're just saying is, sometimes, however good you are, you might not quite get it right, and it's not unreasonable to have a treble check of the sentence itself.'
He said that the number of people required to sign the petition could be up for debate.
He added: 'To get 500 signatures on a form is not an easy thing. You've got to explain it to 500 people, and they've got to be convinced.
'You can always say at the margin something might be abused. That doesn't mean you shouldn't talk about it.'
When asked why the public should get a say in legal cases, Mr Tice said: 'Never underestimate the common sense of the Great British public and their gut instinct for where something is fair or not fair. We're all human, judges can get things wrong, and sometimes there can be political pressure.
'In this situation, we had a prime minister that effectively ordered the judges to give very strict sentences, and people have very serious concerns about that.
'There's a lot of concern amongst the British public that Lucy Connolly and others were the victims of two-tier justice.'
Under the Bill, campaigners would need to get 500 people to sign a petition against a punishment handed down in Crown Court.
Those cases would be considered for eight weeks by the CCRC, which may refer them to the Court of Appeal for a decision.
Mr Tice said of choosing the CCRC over the Attorney General: 'The Attorney General is a busy person and ultimately a political person, whereas the (CCRC) should not be that.
'It could potentially be extra work but it wouldn't be very many cases a year. It might be an opportunity for the CCRC to say 'We actually need to relook at our competences, how we operate, our procedures. Are we getting it right? Can we improve ourselves?'.
He did not say how much the proposal could cost the taxpayer but added: 'I want to have the debate and the discussion and give the British people the ability to have ever more confidence in our justice system.
'If you lose that confidence, if you lose that trust, that's a very bad place to be.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
17 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Corruption & bribery behind bars exposed as ex-con reveals lags pay £500 for KFC & how inmates have sex with guards
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) PRISONERS are paying guards up to £500 to smuggle in a KFC bargain bucket. And they will shell out as much as £200 for a pack of Rizla fag papers to be sneaked into jail. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 6 Corruption and bribery are rife in British prisons Credit: Alamy 6 UK Prisons Exposed: Sex, Drugs and Corruption, which is available to stream on Channel 4 from tonight, is presented by ex-inmate David Navarro The bribery behind bars is revealed in a documentary that also lifts the lid on how lags get their hands on booze and drugs — and have sexual relations with warders. UK Prisons Exposed: Sex, Drugs and Corruption, which is available to stream on Channel 4 from tonight, is presented by ex-inmate David Navarro. He has spent a decade in and out of custody so knows the dodgy dealings that go on — with officers often turning a blind eye, or up to their necks in it. The documentary even features footage secretly shot by cons to show off their often sizeable stashes of contraband — known in the trade as 'bird'. Weed is heaped in a cell, along with a pile of mobile phones, bottles of high-end Ciroc vodka, Courvoisier brandy, Wray & Nephew rum and boxes of Krispy Kreme doughnuts, plus KFC, Nando's, McDonald's and Chinese takeaway feasts. 'That bird just keeps on coming,' a man can be heard chuckling. Another adds: 'It's like Carphone Warehouse.' Bringing things in, that's their (officers) bread & butter. It might be a pack of Rizlas for £200. I've seen it so many times on different occasions Nathan But officers not earning big money will often stand back and do nothing. In one clip, a warder smells drugs but just says: 'I told you, open the f***ing window.' A prisoner called Nathan, wearing a balaclava as a disguise, claims that many staff — who are on about £33,000 a year — are wide open to bungs. Prisoner who had sex with female guard is violently attacked while holding baby in family visit – fracturing tot's skull He reveals: 'I have seen it so many times. 'It could have been a Nando's from outside or a KFC. 'It could be phones, it could be drugs. 'It could be anything.' Asked how much prisoners pay for deliveries, Nathan adds: 'That all depends on the officer. Secret affair 'If she wants to say to you, '500 quid' and you really want it, then you're gonna pay 500 quid for a KFC bargain bucket. 'That's an expensive KFC.' He adds of the guards: 'Bringing things in, that's their bread and butter. 'It might be a pack of Rizlas for one hundred, two hundred quid.' Big-money backhander payments are often processed by someone on the outside. But prisoners also blackmail officers into bringing them banned items, by amassing personal text messages to use against them. Nathan says of getting guards to play ball: 'You've got to build up slowly, slowly, build up your relationship on the wing, test the waters or be flirty — do what you gotta do until you secure the bag. 6 Prisoner Nathan claims that many staff — who are on about £33,000 a year — are wide open to bungs, pictured being interviewed by David Credit: Channel 4 6 Former prisoner Beatrice, who did time for money laundering, says guards make moves on inmates Credit: Channel 4 'If there are text messages . . . I've got you under my thumb.' Meanwhile, another jailbird reveals how lusty lags get it on with prison visitors as well as officers. In a video call made on an illegal phone, he says: 'We call it patterning up with them. 'It's a mixture of male and female. 'It could even be your healthcare worker, it could be your education teacher, it could be anybody.' A former warder who gives her name as just Rachel, was a married mother of four when she began a secret affair with an armed robber serving a ten-year sentence. Rachel, 29, says about her old job: 'The hours were ridiculous, the overtime was ridiculous, it ruined my marriage because I was never there. 'We hit rock bottom, I took my ring off.' An inmate then started coming on to her at work. She recalls: 'He approached me wanting help, we had a few conversations. 'There was banter, inappropriate comments — then I shared photos and a sexually explicit letter. Storeroom romp 'As soon as I'd given it to him, I said, 'You need to flush it away'. He told me had.' But the images were found, and in 2022 Rachel was convicted of neglecting her duties, got a suspended sentence and community service — and was fired. She insists: 'There had been no storeroom romp.' But at her trial, the judge said 'CCTV footage shows the two of you together and you were in a room privately, together. Intimacy must have taken place.' Another ex-officer, called Moses, reveals goings-on such as this are common. 6 What lags are smuggling in He says: 'Female prison officers get a lot of attention from prisoners, it's bound to happen. 'If they are not strong-minded they get drawn in. 'If they are smart and keep their mouth shut it can go on for a long time. 'But when it moves to exploitation — getting the officer to bring in phones, [synthetic cannabis substitutes] spice and black mamba, all the illegal substances, it becomes too big to manage. 'From the prisoners' perspective it's just business. 'He's trying to bring in illicit items, and sell them.' But former prisoner Beatrice, who did time for money laundering, says guards also make moves on inmates. While the vast majority of prison staff are honest, we are catching more of the small minority who break the rules, through our Counter-Corruption Unit A Prison Service spokesman She reveals: 'An officer would regularly comment on my appearance. 'He suggested he would want to come in my cell or meet up when I was released. 'He would say things like, 'I'm all yours'. 'Other members of staff recognised his behaviour was creepy but if you make a complaint the staff are going to protect each other. 'I heard other allegations that officers had relationships with women on the drug-addiction wing, it's common knowledge that this happens all the time.' A Prison Service spokesman said: 'While the vast majority of prison staff are honest, we are catching more of the small minority who break the rules, through our Counter-Corruption Unit. 'Where officers fall below our high standards, we take robust action.'
The Herald Scotland
33 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
MSPs vote down curriculum body proposals
The body would also be given oversight of the development of teachers and staff, as well as being tasked with accrediting qualifications. Ms Duncan-Glancy told MSPs the creation of the body would not increase costs on the Government, with funding, staffing and office space taken from Education Scotland. Control over the curriculum, accreditation and improvement in education is 'spread over too many bodies' which 'do not always speak to each other'. 'The amendments in this group propose a remedy to this – Curriculum Scotland,' she said. 'A single, arms-length organisation that will steer what is taught, guarantee the standards of certificates that flow from that teaching and the continuous improvement of both.' Responding to the Labour MSP, Education Secretary Jenny Gilruth said: 'My decision to refocus Education Scotland, which I announced to Parliament in June of last year, was a fundamental step in realising the shared ambition in relation to education reform. 'The curriculum improvement cycle, as members will know, is also already under way, with Education Scotland leading that work with the teaching profession. 'When considering these amendments, I am thoughtful about the principle of legislating only when necessary and I ask members to keep that at the forefront of their minds for voting on these amendments.' She added: 'While I appreciate the intention behind these amendments, I cannot support them. 'I do not believe there are sufficient advantages to establishing a new standalone curriculum body in legislation and the expense that will incur, when we already have a national education agency being refocused on curriculum improvement and supporting implementation across the system.' The amendment was defeated by 94 votes to 22. Asked by Scottish Tory MSP Miles Briggs if creating such a body would require a standalone Bill rather than an amendment to an existing one, Ms Duncan-Glancy admitted it was not the 'neatest opportunity to do this, but it is the only opportunity that we face'. While fellow Scottish Tory MSP Stephen Kerr said he understood the intentions behind the amendments, but added he did not think the plans were the right method of doing so. The Bill will scrap the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) and replace it with Qualifications Scotland, which would work alongside a re-tooled Education Scotland and a newly-created chief inspector of education – who would be tasked with inspecting nurseries, schools and colleges. In an hours-long session at Holyrood, hundreds of amendments to the Bill were discussed by MSPs. Ms Duncan-Glancy did not push another raft of changes – on the make-up of Qualifications Scotland's strategic advisory council – she proposed to a vote after receiving assurances from Ms Gilruth on the group's membership. MSPs also backed a push for a review of the accreditation of qualifications in Scotland proposed by Scottish Lib Dem MSP Willie Rennie. Consideration of remaining amendments and a final vote on the Bill are scheduled to take place on Wednesday afternoon.
Powys County Times
41 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Public's ‘gut instinct' should count in reviewing criminal cases, says Tice
The British public's 'gut instinct' should count when reviewing criminal cases, Richard Tice said as he proposed a Bill named after Lucy Connolly, who was jailed for social media posts in the wake of the Southport murders. The deputy leader of Reform UK will be introducing 'Lucy's Bill', which would allow people to mount mass appeals against punishments they deem to be too severe or lenient. It comes after Mrs Connolly, the wife of Conservative councillor Ray Connolly, was jailed last year for 31 months for inciting racial hatred, a sentence which has been criticised as being too harsh. The Bill will be introduced to the House of Commons on Wednesday and would mean campaigners could get the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) to reconsider cases deemed unduly harsh. Speaking outside HMP Peterborough, where he visited Connolly on Tuesday, Mr Tice said she was a 'political prisoner'. He said: 'I genuinely fear that she is actually being treated as a political prisoner for political purposes.' Mrs Connolly posted on X: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care … if that makes me racist so be it,' in the wake of the Southport stabbings. An appeal against her sentence was dismissed at the Court of Appeal last month. Mr Tice claimed Mrs Connolly had bruises on her wrists which he said were from handcuffs but that she was calm and wanted to see through her sentence and rebuild her life. He said he hoped the Bill would enable a 'treble check' on sentences. 'The whole point about justice is it has to have the confidence of the British people,' Mr Tice said. 'We're not calling into dispute the brilliance of our legal system and our judges. 'What we're just saying is, sometimes, however good you are, you might not quite get it right, and it's not unreasonable to have a treble check of the sentence itself.' He said that the number of people required to sign the petition could be up for debate. He added: 'To get 500 signatures on a form is not an easy thing. You've got to explain it to 500 people, and they've got to be convinced. 'You can always say at the margin something might be abused. That doesn't mean you shouldn't talk about it.' When asked why the public should get a say in legal cases, Mr Tice said: 'Never underestimate the common sense of the Great British public and their gut instinct for where something is fair or not fair. We're all human, judges can get things wrong, and sometimes there can be political pressure. 'In this situation, we had a prime minister that effectively ordered the judges to give very strict sentences, and people have very serious concerns about that. 'There's a lot of concern amongst the British public that Lucy Connolly and others were the victims of two-tier justice.' Under the Bill, campaigners would need to get 500 people to sign a petition against a punishment handed down in Crown Court. Those cases would be considered for eight weeks by the CCRC, which may refer them to the Court of Appeal for a decision. Mr Tice said of choosing the CCRC over the Attorney General: 'The Attorney General is a busy person and ultimately a political person, whereas the (CCRC) should not be that. 'It could potentially be extra work but it wouldn't be very many cases a year. It might be an opportunity for the CCRC to say 'We actually need to relook at our competences, how we operate, our procedures. Are we getting it right? Can we improve ourselves?'. He did not say how much the proposal could cost the taxpayer but added: 'I want to have the debate and the discussion and give the British people the ability to have ever more confidence in our justice system. 'If you lose that confidence, if you lose that trust, that's a very bad place to be.'
