logo
Hostel chain to replace receptionists with self check-ins after Reeves raid

Hostel chain to replace receptionists with self check-ins after Reeves raid

Telegraph05-04-2025

The boss of a major hostel chain is planning to swap his receptionists for automated check-in machines because of Rachel Reeves's tax raid on employers.
Larry Lipman, chairman of Safestay, said his company would have to rely on automated self check-in booths instead of human staff as costs soar following the October Budget.
He said the Chancellor's decision to increase National Insurance (NI) contributions and lower the threshold at which they are paid meant the company would look at 'doing away with receptionists' in favour of automated check-ins in some cases.
'Costs are costs, and they eat profit. We're a listed business and we want to deliver value to our shareholders, and that means controlling our expenditure. That means controlling payroll. I'm not happy with it, of course I'm not,' he said.
He added there would be a 'natural reduction' in staff rather than specific job cuts, with Safestay opting not to rehire for positions when people move on rather than make redundancies.
'We're not going to call our 400 staff in 12 countries and say we're losing 10pc of them,' Mr Lipman said.
'I'm very cognisant of the fact that we pay their mortgages. But people do leave, especially a lot of our staff who are transient. They are young, and they work for six to 12 months, and then they go to another country.'
Founded by Mr Lipman in 2006, Safestay runs 20 travellers' hostels across the UK and Europe. The company listed on London's Alternative Investments Market in 2019.
Trade association UK Hospitality has warned that the combined impact of tax rises in the Budget would cost the hospitality industry £3.4bn annually. Bosses have warned this will prompt them to slow or cancel investments and cut jobs.
Mr Lipman said: 'It just means we're looking harder at automation. This is where I think the Government may have it wrong, because if all of business is doing what we're doing, because we must, then you're going to hit employment levels.'
He said the industry was being 'forced in the direction' of reducing staff. 'I love to grow people and it's part of what we should be doing for society. It's a great thing for a business to be giving that sort of opportunity. It all seems counterproductive.'
Mr Lipman said it would be difficult for Safestay to use price rises to mitigate the cost increases without damaging its position in the market as a budget operator.
'There's little we can do with bed rate, because there's a ceiling to what people will pay, and people are feeling the pressure. I fear, without being political, that the Government didn't think this through.'
A government spokesman said: 'Since the start of this parliament there are 190,000 more jobs in the economy, and going forward we are delivering on our plan for change by providing economic stability to create growth, jobs and put more money into people's pockets.
'The OBR forecasts unemployment to stay low by historical standards throughout this parliament and to fall to 4.1pc in 2029.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Fuming' Angela Rayner locked in ‘tense' row with Rachel Reeves over crucial spending review
‘Fuming' Angela Rayner locked in ‘tense' row with Rachel Reeves over crucial spending review

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

‘Fuming' Angela Rayner locked in ‘tense' row with Rachel Reeves over crucial spending review

ANGELA Rayner and Rachel Reeves are locked in a row over this week's spending review — which fellow ministers have dubbed, 'The War of the Roses'. The Deputy PM was last night still refusing to sign up to her housing department's budget. 8 8 8 Ms Rayner has been demanding billions more for home building. Talks are going down to the wire, leaving Chancellor Ms Reeves with little time to get her numbers to add up before she presents her spending plans to Parliament on Wednesday. If Ms Rayner — dubbed 'Red ­Rayner' for her leftie views — refuses to agree to her budget then No11 will have to take the highly unusual step of imposing it on her. One senior minister told The Sun on Sunday: 'Things are tense. The two most powerful women in ­Cabinet can't agree. 'It's like War of the Roses. Angela represents a Lancashire seat and Rachel's is in Yorkshire.' 8 8 The War of the Roses was a series of battles for the throne waged between the House of York and House of Lancaster. The Yorkist symbol was a white rose and Lancaster's was a red rose. The Labour Party's emblem is also famously a red rose. 8 A senior government insider said: 'Angela is definitely not happy. She could blow up at any moment.' Another said: 'Angie used to work for a trade union and has taken those hardline negotiation tactics with her into the Treasury talks.' The Government has vowed to build 1.5 million new homes in England by 2029, but Ms Rayner fears she will miss the target without more cash. Nailbiting negotiations between the pair were still ongoing last night. 8 8 Many departments face having to make deep cuts because of a tight spending squeeze. But Ms Reeves will tell MPs on Wednesday she is spending shedloads of cash on infrastructure investment to turbocharge the economy. This will include £86 billion on Britain's fastest growing sectors, including tech, sciences and defence. Writing in today's Sun on Sunday, Cabinet minister Peter Kyle said 'tough decisions' have been made to knock the economy into shape.

Voters overwhelmingly back tax on wealthy to protect public services
Voters overwhelmingly back tax on wealthy to protect public services

Daily Mirror

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Voters overwhelmingly back tax on wealthy to protect public services

A poll commissioned by the Trades Union Congress (TUC), found the public support tax increases on the wealthy and big businesses by a margin of almost two to one - 58% to 28% Voters overwhelmingly back taxing the wealthy more in order to protect public services, a new poll found today. The research, commissioned by the Trades Union Congress (TUC), found the public support tax increases on the wealthy and big businesses by a margin of almost two to one - 58% to 28%. ‌ And the number rises among people who switched their vote from the Tories to Labour in last year's election - where a mammoth 71% said they supported the idea, compared to 23% who did not. ‌ And Labour voters who are now strongly considering voting Reform also backed it by 61% to 32%. The new polling comes ahead of the Spending Review, which the TUC says can be the "next key step" in the government's plan to rebuild Britain and deliver industrial renewal. The TUC said the findings highlight the public's appetite for rebuilding public services - and suggested a "fairer" tax system should be part of plan. General Secretary Paul Nowak said: 'The Spending Review can be the next key step in the government's plan to rebuild Britain and deliver industrial renewal. 'Communities are still crying out for meaningful change after more than a decade of Tory austerity and neglect. 'That's why the government must stay on track – building on the positive start it made at last year's Budget by providing sustained funding for our public services and infrastructure. ‌ 'The global outlook is challenging, but leaving our decimated public services without sufficient investment would risk both future growth and public trust." The poll also found nearly 6 in 10 voters - 59% - believe the wealthiest don't pay their fare share. And a clear majority - 56% - said big businesses don't pay their fare share. ‌ More than two thirds (67%) said there were too many tax loopholes that could be exploited by the wealthy. Asked how more could be raised from the richest, two thirds backed an annual wealth tax on estates over £10 million. Some 63% backed a windfall tax on banks, and half said they supported increasing capital gains tax - the tax people pay on the profits from selling assets like property. ‌ 'The message from voters is clear," Mr Nowak said. "They want the government to protect and rebuild our public services. 'If that means asking the wealthiest to pay more, the public are behind it. People are fed up with a system where those with the broadest shoulders don't pull their weight.' Pollsters Hold Sway surveyed 2000 adults in Great Britain online between 30 May and 2 June.

Unions pile pressure on Reeves to avoid cuts and impose wealth taxes
Unions pile pressure on Reeves to avoid cuts and impose wealth taxes

The Independent

time3 hours ago

  • The Independent

Unions pile pressure on Reeves to avoid cuts and impose wealth taxes

Labour 's biggest financial backers are piling pressure on Rachel Reeves to avoid making cuts at next week's spending review and instead pursue wealth taxes to fund Britain's public services. Polling commissioned by the Trades Union Congress (TUC) reveals a majority the public (54 per cent) back taxes on big corporations and the most wealthy individuals as an alternative means of raising revenue. Just 28 per cent oppose the move. TUC general secretary Paul Nowak urged the government to 'stay on track' and build on the 'positive start it made at last year's budget by providing sustained funding for our public services and infrastructure' - warning that people are 'fed up with a system where those with the broadest shoulders don't pull their weight.' It comes after deputy prime minister Angela Rayner pressed Ms Reeves to consider eight wealth taxes rather than try to impose cuts on departments. The civil war within the government over next Wednesday's spending review has seen hold outs from Ms Rayner's Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government as well as Yvette Cooper's Home Office. The chancellor is expected to unveil a swathe of spending cuts as she attempts to walk the tightrope between delivering on the party's election promises while sticking within the bounds of her self-imposed fiscal rules. The TUC has also joined criticism of the Office of Budget Responsibility (OBR) over question marks on whether its flawed predictions are having a negative impact on spending plans. The OBR produces forecasts twice a year alongside the Autumn budget and spring statement, which are used by the government to make fiscal policy decisions. But Mr Nowak said it is now 'time to review the role of the OBR and its fiscal assumptions to give the UK greater flexibility to invest in our future', with the TUC arguing that short term changes in forecasts should not be driving long term government decision making. Mr Nowak said next week's spending review 'can be the next key step in the government's plan to rebuild Britain and deliver industrial renewal' as 'communities are still crying out for meaningful change after more than a decade of Tory austerity and neglect'. 'The global outlook is challenging, but leaving our decimated public services without sufficient investment would risk both future growth and public trust', he added. 'The message from voters is clear. They want the government to protect and rebuild our public services', he said. 'If that means asking the wealthiest to pay more, the public are behind it. People are fed up with a system where those with the broadest shoulders don't pull their weight.' The warning from the TUC - which represents 5.3 million people in 47 member unions - will pile pressure on Labour, a party which has historically been heavily dependent on the funding it receives from trade unions. In 2024, Labour declared £2.4m from union backers - significantly less than the £5m it declared from unions in 2019 after Unite refused to endorse the party's manifesto. The poll of more than 2,000 adults, conducted by Hold Sway, for the TUC shows there is widespread frustration at the current amount of tax paid by the wealthiest in Britain. Nearly 6 in 10 (59 per cent) think the wealthiest do not pay their fair share – including 74 per cent of Conservative to Labour switchers and 72 per cent of those strongly considering switching from Labour to Reform. More than half (56 per cent) think big businesses do not pay their fair share of tax, while just 31 per cent think they do. The polling showed that two thirds of (67 per cent) voters back an annual wealth tax for estates above £10m, including 88 per cent of Tory to Labour switchers; and 81 per cent of Labour voters now strongly considering Reform. Meanwhile, more than six in ten (63 per cent) back a windfall tax on banks – including 85 per cent of Tory to Labour switchers, and 78 per cent of those Labour voters now strongly considering Reform. Some 50 per cent back raising capital gains tax, including 75 per cent of Tory to Labour switchers, and 67 per cent of those Labour voters now strongly considering Reform. Just 26 per cent oppose a capital gains tax hike. The Hold Sway poll surveyed 2000 adults in Great Britain online between 30 May and 2 June.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store