Hearing held for judge accused of allowing immigrant to escape ICE custody
A hearing began Monday for a Massachusetts judge facing civil charges over allegations that she allowed an immigrant in her court to evade an immigration enforcement agent.
The case stems from a 2018 incident in which Shelley Joseph, a district court judge, is accused of colluding with the immigrant's attorney and a court officer to allow him escape out a back door of the courthouse after a hearing on charges that included drug possession. An Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer had been waiting outside the courtroom to detain the defendant, Jose Medina-Perez.
'This case is about the integrity, impartiality and independence of the Massachusetts judiciary and the appearance of the integrity, impartiality and independence every judge must uphold,' Judith Fabricant, special counsel for the commission, told the hearing.
A lawyer for Joseph, Elizabeth Mulvey, said the case had been distorted over time and that everyone had come to believe that her client 'let an illegal immigrant out of the door" with half of those people believing she should be jailed and the other half calling her a 'folk hero.'
She argued Joseph had been vilified in the media and people were giving the impression that 'dozens of people' had seen Joseph 'get off the bench, escort the defendant to the door, give him a hug and wish him god speed.'
'Today in this court room and we are going to have opportunity to hear all the evidence,' Mulvey said.
The case is similar to a Milwaukee judge accused in April of helping a man evade immigration authorities. The case has escalated a clash between the Trump administration and local authorities over the Republican president's sweeping immigration crackdown.
Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan is accused of escorting the man and his lawyer out of her courtroom through the jury door after learning that immigration authorities were seeking his arrest. The man was taken into custody outside the courthouse after agents chased him on foot.
In the Massachusetts case, federal obstruction of justice charges against Joseph were dropped in 2022 after she agreed to refer herself to a state agency that investigates allegations of misconduct by members of the bench. That agency, the Commission on Judicial Conduct, concluded last year that Joseph 'engaged in willful judicial misconduct that brought the judicial office into disrepute, as well as conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice and unbecoming a judicial officer.'
Denis McInerney, the hearing officer assigned to the case by the Supreme Judicial Court, said he will hear the evidence and then make a recommendation afterward based on whether he find Joseph violated the Massachusetts Code of Judicial Conduct. The hearing is expected to last about a week.
Much of the first day was dominated by the first witness, lawyer David Jellinek, who told the court he had been hired that day to represent Medina-Perez and had been granted immunity by federal prosecutors. Along with the drug charges, Medina-Perez was in court on a warrant out of Pennsylvania.
After doing some research, Jellinek believed his client wasn't the same person wanted on the warrant. 'I was worried they were going to take a US citizen into custody,' he told the court. 'I was quite concerned for my client.'
Jellinek failed to convince the ICE agent that they had the 'wrong guy" so he came up with a plan to release Medina-Perez out the back door.
Fabricant argued that Joseph signal her approval for the plan - including an off the record conversation during a side bar — when she appeared sympathetic to Jellinek's desire for his client to avoid ICE.
But another attorney for Joseph, Thomas Hoopes, suggest that Jellinek might have misinterpreted Joseph's comments when she raised the possibility that Medina-Perez could be detained, rather than be released. The prosecutor had agreed Medina-Perez wasn't the man wanted in Pennsylvania and moved to drop the fugitive from justice charge. She also wasn't seeking bail on the drug charges so he was free to go.
Much will hinge on what was said during that off the record conversation, which lasted only 52 seconds and is being disputed by both sides.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
33 minutes ago
- BBC News
Texas abortion case: man charged over drugging partner's drink
A man in Texas has been charged with murder after he allegedly slipped an abortion drug into his pregnant girlfriend's Anthony Banta was arrested on Friday after a months-long investigation into his former girlfriend's accusation that he gave her the Plan C pill (known as an abortion drug) without her knowledge, according to police in the US Banta's ex-partner said when she disclosed her pregnancy last year, he had offered to cover the cost of an abortion, but she expressed her desire to keep the said after meeting with Mr Banta in a coffee shop, she experienced heavy bleeding and visited the emergency room, but lost her baby a few days later. Mr Banta was also charged with tampering with physical evidence and is awaiting prosecution, according to the Parker County Sheriff's said Mr Banta's former girlfriend was around six-weeks pregnant when she went for a check up with her doctor, who told her the baby was healthy and had "a strong heartbeat" and vital signs."Later that same day, the victim reported she met Banta at a coffee shop... where she expressed her suspicion that Banta had secretly added abortion-inducing pills to her drink without her knowledge or permission," the sheriff's office said in a Banta's former girlfriend also said he suggested they buy the Plan C abortion drug online after she disclosed her an interview with Mr Banta, police collected his mobile phone, but later discovered "crucial evidence relating to the case" was deleted, they said they believed Mr Banta, who worked in IT at the US Department of Justice, later accessed his phone remotely and performed a "reset".An arrest warrant for him was then obtained, and Mr Banta was charged last week with capital murder and tampering with physical said the cases against Mr Banta remained active and has some of the most restrictive abortion laws in the US, banning all abortions except in dire medical state introduced a law in 2022 that carries civil and criminal penalties for those who perform abortions.A law in 2021 also bans the termination of pregnancies after a baby's heartbeat is detected, but does make exceptions for medical emergencies.
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Major hack exposes 86 million AT&T customer records with Social Security numbers... see if you're at risk
A massive breach of personal data from more than 86 million AT&T customers has been leaked on the dark web, with fully decrypted Social Security numbers included. The stolen data was posted to a Russian cybercrime forum on June 3. The files contain full names, birthdates, phone numbers, email addresses, home addresses, and 44 million Social Security Numbers in plain text. The breach appears linked to a large-scale cyberattack that exploited vulnerabilities in Snowflake, a US-based cloud storage platform used by major companies to manage sensitive data. Hackers reportedly accessed AT&T's data by infiltrating accounts that lacked multi-factor authentication, a basic security feature that requires more than a password to log in. To check if your data was exposed in the breach, visit the cybersecurity firm's website at Enter your information to see if any of your accounts were affected. Security researchers are urging customers to monitor their credit reports and take immediate steps to protect themselves. Law enforcement is actively investigating. The files are being widely shared across cybercrime forums, repackaged into three cleanly formatted CSV files that make them easier to access and exploit. AT&T said the hack impacted 86 million former and current customers. It said the Russian hacking group ShinyHunters was behind the breach. Around 73m customers included in the hack had their data originally stolen in 2019 and were notified at the time. However, the group appears to have accessed more records since then. 'After analysis by our internal teams as well as external data consultants, we are confident this is repackaged data previously released on the dark web,' said AT&T in a statement. 'Affected customers were notified at that time. We have notified law enforcement of this latest development,' the spokesperson added. Cybersecurity researchers at Hackread, who first analyzed the files, found matching customer names, email addresses, physical addresses, and phone numbers across both the previous leak and the latest dataset. Security researchers are urging customers to monitor their credit reports and take immediate steps to protect themselves. Law enforcement is actively investigating ShinyHunters, the group linked to both AT&T breaches, is also behind the recent Ticketmaster breach that compromised data on 560 million people. Their growing list of high-profile leaks has prompted US lawmakers to demand answers. Senators Richard Blumenthal (Connecticut) and Josh Hawley (Missouri) have called on both AT&T and Snowflake to explain repeated failures to protect customer data. Experts say the exposure of decrypted SSNs and birthdates is especially damaging, as it enables criminals to open credit lines, impersonate victims, or apply for government services using stolen identities. 'The original breach of sensitive records from AT&T was enough to worry their customers, now it poses a significant risk to their identities,' said Thomas Richards, Infrastructure Security Practice Director at Black Duck. AT&T paid a $370,000 ransom last year, in an attempt to have stolen customer data deleted. The payment, made in Bitcoin, was routed through an intermediary known as 'Reddington.' AT&T reportedly received a video showing the files being deleted, but experts say there's no way to confirm the data wasn't copied or shared before that.
BBC News
37 minutes ago
- BBC News
LA protests: Newsom says Trump 'deranged' to deploy of thousands more troops
President Donald Trump's administration has sent thousands more troops to Los Angeles on a fourth day of chaotic protests against immigration raids, as the unrest spread to other US 700 US Marines have been deployed to the Los Angeles area and the contingent of National Guard troops mobilised to help quell the disorder has been doubled to 4, Governor Gavin Newsom said the deployment was fulfilling "the deranged fantasy of a dictatorial president".The state is suing the president for sending in troops without the governor's permission. It is highly unusual for US military troops to have any domestic law enforcement role. It is the first time since 1965 that a president has sent National Guard troops to a US city without a governor's Marines were previously deployed domestically for major disasters such as Hurricane Katrina and the 11 September 2001 the Trump administration has so far not invoked the Insurrection Act, which would allow the troops to directly participate in civilian 700 troops of 2nd Battalion, 7th Marines, from Twentynine Palms, California, will help protect federal property and personnel, including immigration agents, said the US Monday evening, Los Angeles police officers fired stun grenades and gas canisters to disperse hundreds of demonstrators who gathered outside a federal detention centre in downtown LA where undocumented immigrants have been Guard forces formed a cordon to keep protesters out of the building in the heart of America's second largest city. LAPD said late on Monday afternoon some demonstrators had thrown objects at also sprang up in at least nine other US cities, including New York, Philadelphia, Dallas, Austin and San took to the streets of LA on Friday after it emerged Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers were raiding Latino protests unravelled into looting, self-driving cars being torched, rocks thrown at law enforcement and a major freeway blocked by say they arrested 29 people Saturday night and made 21 more arrests on face charges ranging from attempted murder with a Molotov cocktail and assault on a police officer to LAPD also says more than 600 rubber bullets and other less-than-lethal rounds were used over the the White House on Monday, Trump said his decision to send in the National Guard had stopped the city from "burning down". "You watch same clips I did: cars burning, people rioting, we stopped it," the president said. "I feel we had no choice... We did the right thing."The Republican president said he supported a suggestion that California's governor should be arrested over possible obstruction of his administration's immigration enforcement who has engaged in a war of words in recent days with Trump, responded on X that "this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism". He said the troop deployment was "about stroking a dangerous President's ego".Trump meanwhile posted a warning to protesters in LA who confront police and federal wrote on social media: "IF THEY SPIT, WE WILL HIT, and I promise you they will be hit harder than they have ever been hit before. Such disrespect will not be tolerated!"His border tsar, Tom Homan, who has been conducting ICE raids, applauded Trump's show of force in LA."I was there for two nights," Homan said on Fox News on Monday. "It was out of control. The city was burning. Governor Newsom did nothing."The mayor did nothing. So President Trump, God bless him. He sent the National Guard in to save property and save lives, and I salute him for doing well." But at a press conference on Monday evening, LA Mayor Karen Bass said the deployment of troops was a "deliberate attempt" by the Trump administration to "create disorder and chaos in our city".The city leader also said she was aware of at least "five raids by ICE throughout the region" on Monday, including one near her grandson's Monday, Governor Newsom's administration sued the Trump administration for deploying the National lawsuit argued that the president was violating the US Constitution and state has argued that Democratic President Joe Biden's administration allowed far too many immigrants to enter the has pledged to deport record numbers of people who are in the country illegally and to lock down the US-Mexico border, setting a goal of at least 3,000 daily arrests.
