Head of NSW schools agency told staff to ‘change' demographic data, inquiry told
The former head of the NSW Education Department's school building unit allegedly instructed a data expert to manipulate demographic data to 'make it a higher number', an instruction she told a corruption inquiry she understood to be about securing more budget funding.
The Independent Commission Against Corruption heard evidence on Thursday that the former head of School Infrastructure NSW, Anthony Manning, told an employee to change the data prepared for a pre-budget submission to the then-Coalition government.
'He was quite direct, he said change it to be higher,' she said.
The state's corruption watchdog is holding a public inquiry into the conduct of Manning, the chief executive of the department's school infrastructure unit from 2017 until last year.
Jannatun Haque, a senior data expert in the department who worked under Manning, described her former boss as 'very Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde'.
'If you were on his good side [he was] very positive and if it was something he disagreed with you, it was brutal,' she said.
Loading
She described a meeting with Manning in 2021 in which they discussed the agency's projections on school-age population in which he was unhappy with falling population data. She said Manning told her to 'change' the figures before a pre-budget submission.
When she refused to change the data, telling Manning 'we can't just amend those numbers', he told her 'we will find someone who can do what we want them to do'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Australian
6 hours ago
- The Australian
Dutch government falls as far-right leader Wilders quits coalition
Far-right Dutch leader Geert Wilders withdrew his party from the government Tuesday in a row over immigration, bringing down a shaky coalition and likely ushering in snap elections. Wilders has been frustrated with what he saw as the slow pace of introducing the "strictest-ever immigration policy", agreed with coalition partners after his shock election win in November 2023. "No signature for our asylum plans... PVV leaves the coalition," said Wilders on X, formerly Twitter, referring to his far-right Freedom Party. The withdrawal opens up a period of political uncertainty in the European Union's fifth-largest economy and major exporter, as far-right parties make gains across the continent. The latest government crisis also comes just weeks before the Netherlands is due to host world leaders for a NATO summit. Last-ditch crisis talks on Tuesday morning lasted barely half an hour before the leaders of the four coalition parties came out in a testy mood. "I have just informed the prime minister that I will withdraw the PVV ministers from the cabinet and that we can no longer bear responsibility for this," said Wilders. "I signed up for the strictest asylum policy, not for the downfall of the Netherlands and that our responsibility for this cabinet therefore ends at this moment," he added. Eighteen months after his surprise election win sent shockwaves through Europe, polls suggest his PVV is still the strongest. However, the gap to his nearest rivals has narrowed, with the left-wing Green/Left party of former European Commission vice-president Frans Timmermans following close behind. The liberal VVD party, a traditional powerhouse in Dutch politics, are also running near the top two, meaning any election would likely be closely fought. VVD leader Dilan Yesilgoz, visibly angry, described Wilders' move as "super irresponsible", adding she was afraid it would open the door to left-wing parties. "How can you do this to the Netherlands?" she told reporters. - 'Patience was up' - In late May, Wilders called an impromptu press conference to announce his "patience was up" with the government of Prime Minister Dick Schoof. He threatened to torpedo the coalition if a new 10-point plan to crimp immigration was not implemented within a few weeks. His plan included border closures for asylum seekers, tougher border controls and deporting dual nationals convicted of a crime. Summarising his demands, he said: "Close the borders for asylum seekers and family reunifications. No more asylum centres opened. Close them." Political and legal experts criticised the plans as unworkable or illegal, with some suggesting Wilders was creating a crisis to collapse the government. The far-right leader has often been called the "Dutch Trump" for his anti-immigrant views -- and instantly recognisable bouffant hairstyle. His ambitions to lead his country were frustrated after his election win, as his coalition partners blocked his premiership bid, settling instead on Schoof as a compromise candidate. The leaders of the four coalition partners agreed not to take up cabinet positions, instead running their parties as parliamentary chiefs. Wilders has been an uncompromising figure in parliament, his quick-witted jousting with Timmermans being a highlight of debates. He has frequently said that the only way to implement his anti-immigrant policies is for him to become prime minister. However, in the fractured Dutch political system, no party can win an absolute majority in the 150-seat parliament and Wilders will need partners. He can count on the support of the BBB farmers' party. The backing of the VVD -- currently an uneasy coalition partner -- is less certain. The fourth party in the current coalition -- the anti-corruption New Social Contract -- has seen support collapse since charismatic leader Pieter Omtzigt stepped down. Far-right parties have been on the rise across Europe. In May, the far-right Chega ("Enough") party took second place in Portuguese elections. In Germany, the anti-immigration far-right AfD doubled its score in legislative elections in February, reaching 20.8 percent. And in Britain, polls show the anti-immigration, hard-right Reform UK party of Nigel Farage is making significant gains following a breakthrough in local elections. ric/fg
Sydney Morning Herald
7 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘No secrets in there': The photos and the files at centre of ICAC inquiry
A former contractor to the NSW schools building unit has conceded to a corruption watchdog he should have deleted files he downloaded before going on to tender for a lucrative contract with the agency. The Independent Commission Against Corruption is investigating the former chief executive of Schools Infrastructure NSW, Anthony Manning, over allegations that as head of the school-building arm of the Department of Education, he awarded friends lucrative contracts while punishing others who questioned his conduct. Stuart Suthern-Brunt – Manning's long-time cycling buddy – was recruited in 2019 to School Infrastructure NSW as an executive on $2800 a day, the equivalent of $644,000 a year, but told the inquiry on Tuesday that by the end of 2021 he was ready to leave to take a break and 'do some soul-searching'. After leaving, Suthern-Brunt joined a consortium called APP, and it won a $39 million contract for a project to implement a rapid-build, pre-fabricated construction method for school infrastructure known as the Pavilion Project. At the start of the six-week hearing, it was alleged Suthern-Brunt was privy to a range of confidential information about the project, but on Tuesday he said nobody had yet articulated to him exactly what that was. Just before his contract finished at the end of 2021, he was considering different pathways including the possibility of tendering on the prefabricated schools project. When Manning asked him about joining a steering committee to decide the criteria for that tender for prefabricated modular schools, he declined because he knew it would be a conflict of interest which would prevent him from bidding for the contract. 'I said, I don't want to be part of it because I don't want to miss the opportunity, if there is one in the future,' he told the inquiry. Counsel assisting the inquiry, Jamie Darams, SC, asked him more about the exchange. 'Did [Manning] say, 'Stuart, that's going to be inappropriate with all the information you had [access] to.' He didn't say anything over those lines, did he?' Darams asked.
The Age
7 hours ago
- The Age
‘No secrets in there': The photos and the files at centre of ICAC inquiry
A former contractor to the NSW schools building unit has conceded to a corruption watchdog he should have deleted files he downloaded before going on to tender for a lucrative contract with the agency. The Independent Commission Against Corruption is investigating the former chief executive of Schools Infrastructure NSW, Anthony Manning, over allegations that as head of the school-building arm of the Department of Education, he awarded friends lucrative contracts while punishing others who questioned his conduct. Stuart Suthern-Brunt – Manning's long-time cycling buddy – was recruited in 2019 to School Infrastructure NSW as an executive on $2800 a day, the equivalent of $644,000 a year, but told the inquiry on Tuesday that by the end of 2021 he was ready to leave to take a break and 'do some soul-searching'. After leaving, Suthern-Brunt joined a consortium called APP, and it won a $39 million contract for a project to implement a rapid-build, pre-fabricated construction method for school infrastructure known as the Pavilion Project. At the start of the six-week hearing, it was alleged Suthern-Brunt was privy to a range of confidential information about the project, but on Tuesday he said nobody had yet articulated to him exactly what that was. Just before his contract finished at the end of 2021, he was considering different pathways including the possibility of tendering on the prefabricated schools project. When Manning asked him about joining a steering committee to decide the criteria for that tender for prefabricated modular schools, he declined because he knew it would be a conflict of interest which would prevent him from bidding for the contract. 'I said, I don't want to be part of it because I don't want to miss the opportunity, if there is one in the future,' he told the inquiry. Counsel assisting the inquiry, Jamie Darams, SC, asked him more about the exchange. 'Did [Manning] say, 'Stuart, that's going to be inappropriate with all the information you had [access] to.' He didn't say anything over those lines, did he?' Darams asked.
