India's mother tongue teaching spells reading success
Sitting together on the classroom floor in Kalyanpur in northwest India, a dozen children aged five and six are trying to identify Hindi words beginning with the "p" sound.
After a spontaneous "papa", the children unanimously agree on "papaya" -- spelt out at the top of their lungs by the entire class.
But for these children, born into an Indigenous tribe in Rajasthan state, learning to read in a language neither they nor their parents speak is a challenge.
To break this pattern, authorities launched a programme in two Rajasthan districts to teach students to read in their mother tongue.
Months after the experiment began, there is progress.
"I used Hindi language with the children, but I could see that they were not responding well," said their teacher, Jashoda Khokariya.
"They were scared, and were not able to answer my questions," she added.
"Now, it's a miracle -- there is not a single child who is not able to respond."
Indian school enrolment rates are high -- but performance is much lower.
One key problem in the world's most populous country, where 1.4 billion people speak a mosaic of over a hundred languages, is that primary school teaching is often in a language the children do not understand.
- 'Multilingual society' -
At the age of eight, only 39 percent of Indian students reach the required reading level.
At 15, the situation is even worse. The rate drops to 10 percent.
Poverty, early marriage and poor teacher training are all to blame -- but language plays a part too.
"We have a multilingual society; this needs to be accounted for when children come to school," said Saadhna Panday, from the UN children's agency (UNICEF).
"Several studies have demonstrated that children learn best in the early years in their mother tongue."
But this is rarely the case.
In many Indian states, students are taught in English and Hindi, of which families may have little knowledge.
Since 2020, the national education ministry has said that primary education in students' mother tongue is a priority.
Rajasthan ticked all the boxes to host a pilot project.
A survey in nine of its rural districts revealed the magnitude of the task: 250,000 primary school students speaking 31 languages.
Three-quarters of them are far from understanding -- let alone speaking -- Hindi.
- 'Many obstacles' -
The programme faces multiple hurdles -- one of these being that teachers are not trained to use the children's language for formal teaching in the classroom.
"There were many obstacles," said Shweta Fageria, director of Rajasthan's State Council of Educational Research and Training centre.
"We first created dictionaries by using the local dialect," she added, before making them trilingual with Hindi and English.
At the Kuwadi Nichala Fala School, a spartan concrete building on a dusty hill, 13 first graders -- aged around five to six -- leaf through the dictionary every schoolday.
It is a far cry from the other side of India's education system -- the ultramodern technology institutes whose prize pupils are snapped up by Californian tech giants.
In the sweltering heat, the top student deciphers a few lines.
He is still far from mastering reading in his native Wagdi -- a language with more than three million speakers, according to the last census.
But he is making great progress, like all the students in his class, according to his teacher.
"They can now read words," Lakshmi Kumari Patel said.
"At this age, it takes time for a child to be confident, to actively participate," she added. "Now they are more expressive... engaging in conversations without hesitation."
- 'Abysmal' schooling -
Parents are now more involved too.
Since they speak the language being taught, it's up to them to support their children by having them read and telling them stories.
Lalita Parmar, 62, understands the benefits that her grandchildren's education can bring.
"They will be able to get a job, then they will earn and eat," she said. "If one gets a job, the whole family will benefit."
The state government, UNICEF and a local partner have given themselves two years to succeed and, if necessary, to expand.
"Through the programme in Rajasthan, we have seen an improvement in children's attendance at school... teachers are more structured, more planned in using the learning materials available in the classrooms, parents are getting more involved in schools," said Panday from UNICEF.
"We expect children to have better learning outcomes."
The future of India and its economy depends on it, writes economist Ashoka Mody in his recent book, "India is Broken."
"The quality of school education in India remains abysmal," Mody wrote, noting how competitors were progressing.
"India's attempt to make progress on the cheap by unconscionably delaying these investments in education, health and cities has taken its toll."
pa/pjm/cms/sco
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
6 hours ago
- Washington Post
Readers critique The Post: Spelling bees are pointless. So is correct spelling.
Every week, The Post runs a collection of letters of readers' grievances — pointing out grammatical mistakes, missing coverage and inconsistencies. These letters tell us what we did wrong and, occasionally, offer praise. Here, we present this week's Free for All letters. As a proud English teacher for 60 years, I read Nicole Krauss's May 25 Opinion essay, 'The end of writing and reading will be the end of freedom,' with enthusiasm — and with horror at the knowledge that so many young people have no concept of the joy of reading. It put into words all the fears I have had over the years about the written word becoming obsolete. It also brought me back to a sense of optimism that some of our youths still cherish reading. I hope I have nurtured all my students to read and appreciate the written word.
Chicago Tribune
7 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Donna Vickroy: We'll never know our family history if we don't ask questions
It was during a break in the interview with his 108-year-old aunt that the man whispered, 'Wow, I didn't know any of this. I'm learning so much.' I've written a lot of stories about a lot of people over the years. So often, family members have been shocked to learn of the hardships and accomplishments of their own elders. In most cases, the younger people knew facts about the older person's life — they'd been in the service or grew up an orphan — but not details, like they went hungry or embraced kindness even when in distress. When it comes to recounting how the ordinary folks in our own families endured extraordinary circumstances, so much seems to go unsaid. In any given episode of the PBS documentary, 'Finding Your Roots,' you'll watch the featured celebrity express shock at the events of an ancestor's life. Years ago, I interviewed the family of a Chicago Heights man who served in the Italian army during World War I. The father had passed away and his adult children uncovered his war journal, which was written in an obscure Italian dialect. With the help of a professor in Italy, they were able to translate the book to English, revealing a heartbreaking story of suffering. Though he had immigrated to America, the man had been drafted to fight in the Italian army back home. During a brutal battle, in which he recalled most of the soldiers in his trench were killed, he was captured. As a prisoner of war, he nearly starved to death. Upon learning her father's history, his daughter was moved to tears. She finally understood why he always ate so slowly, savoring every bite of food, including a common apple. 'I never knew any of this,' she said. More than not, history gaps are a common occurrence in families, including my own. It was on the eve of a serious surgery that my father-in-law finally agreed to be interviewed. I knew he had served during World War II, and that he had been back to the same parts of France and Germany several times. But, until that night, I didn't know why. He was a stoic man not given easily to emotion. I'd asked on many occasions about his war experience and he simply supplied cursory facts about time served. But on this night, a simple question opened the floodgates: 'You've been all over the world. But why did you travel to the same parts of Europe again and again?' 'To visit the grave of my friend,' he said. I grabbed a notebook. He had been a soldier in the 290th Engineering Combat Unit of the U.S. Army during World War II. Deep in the winter of 1944, he was on the frontlines in northern Germany, battling both the Nazis and a bad case of frostbite. When he couldn't get his boots on one morning, his commanding officer sent him to the field hospital. That night while he was recovering in the safety of the medical facility, the Germans attacked, killing almost everyone in his unit, including his best Army buddy. Many of the slain were subsequently buried at an American cemetery in France. Over the years, my father-in-law felt compelled to pay his respects to his friend and fallen comrades again and again. Upon hearing the story, my then-50-something-year-old husband became emotional. 'How come I never knew any of this?' he asked. His father shrugged and said, 'You never asked.' I think that simple explanation is why so many of us know so little about the family members who came before us. We can search ancestry files for facts and records, but the stories attached to that data often go unsaid. I recently learned that my maternal grandmother, who died in 2003, was a family heroine whose sacrifice and resilience went unnoticed or at least uncelebrated by most of her descendants. She found a way to divorce her abusive husband and retain custody of her four children during the 1940s, at a time when women had little say in the court system. I was very close to my grandmother and I am sorry she never confided in me, that I had to learn of her gallantry third-hand. I am even sorrier I never asked the right questions. I can't imagine how frightening it had to be for her to press charges against an abusive man, knowing the best outcome would be to become a single mother during wartime. As the story goes, the Army actually provided her the opportunity. When her husband was called up, he immediately went into hiding. Seizing the moment, she apparently ratted out his location and, with him shuffled off to boot camp, quickly filed for divorce. My nana endured a difficult life. But because of her quiet disposition, her grandchildren never would have guessed it. Even though America is a relatively young country, it has generational stories to tell. Tales of struggle, resilience, personal successes, heartbreaking losses, hilarious antics and big dreams offer a spotlight on the past and insight into who we are. Unless we find a way to prime the pump, too many these personal accounts will die with the protagonist.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Yes, there are illegal baby names. Here's what you can't call your kid in Arizona
One of the biggest, and most permanent, decisions new parents make is naming their baby. For some, a baby name honors family, culture or tradition. For others, it's a chance to unleash creativity and get, well ... a little unique. But before you name your kid after a popular movie character or your favorite food, know this: You can't just name your baby anything you want. While rules vary by state, many ban names with numbers, symbols, obscenities or royal titles. Arizona plays it fairly chill — the state doesn't have a list of banned baby names but names must use standard characters and fit on legal forms. So if you're dreaming up a one-of-a-kind baby name, here's what to know before it gets flagged at the birth certificate office. Yes, there are things you can't legally name a baby but it depends on the state. In general, names that include symbols like @ or #) numbers, obscene language or titles like King or Messiah can be rejected. Here are 11 names that have been banned in the U.S., according to King. Queen. Jesus Christ. Santa Claus. Majesty. Adolf Hitler. Messiah. @. Nutella. 1069. III. Arizona's primary law about baby names pertains to length: Arizona parents can use a maximum of 141 characters for a full name — allocating 45 characters each for the first, middle and last names and up to six characters for a suffix. Here are more key rules about baby names in Arizona: What's allowed: You can use letters, apostrophes, hyphens, periods and spaces. What's not allowed: No numbers, emojis, symbols or non-English letters (like ñ or é) are permitted. Offensive names: There's no official banned list in Arizona, but names that are obscene or harmful may be rejected. No, you legally can't name your son "King" in Arizona. It has been ruled illegal by U.S. courts. In general, parents can choose nearly any name they want for their child, including unique or culturally significant names. Most states allow the use of letters from the English alphabet, hyphens and apostrophes — so names like 'Mary-Jane' or 'O'Connor' are typically fine. Some states allow a single-name mononym, like 'Prince,' though that may require a special petition or court approval. Some baby-name restrictions are designed to maintain consistency in record-keeping and to avoid potential harm or confusion. For example, numerals and symbols, such as 'Baby #1' or '1069,' are usually prohibited, as most government forms and databases can't process them. Similarly, most states limit the total number of characters allowed in a name. Names that include obscenities, racial slurs or hate speech are also rejected. Another common restriction is on the use of titles like 'Doctor,' 'King,' or 'Judge,' which are often denied because they could be misleading. Some states also restrict religious names like 'Messiah' or 'Jesus Christ,' though these decisions have been challenged in court with varying outcomes. Looking for the ? Sign up for our newsletter. The name 1069 was banned in the U.S. because courts in North Dakota and Minnesota ruled that names composed solely of numbers could confuse legal and administrative systems. It all started in 1976 when Michael Herbert Dengler attempted to change his name to 1069 for personal and philosophical reasons. Courts denied his request, suggesting he could use the spelled-out version, "One Zero Six Nine," instead. This case highlights how U.S. naming laws, though generally permissive, restrict names that consist entirely of numerals, symbols or titles to prevent confusion and maintain clarity in official records. You cannot legally have no name. Government systems like Social Security and motor vehicle departments, banks, and health-care providers require a name for identification. Even if you tried to leave it blank, the system would assign a placeholder. However, you can legally change your name to something extremely minimal, such as just one name, or even something very unconventional, all within reason. Got a story you want to share? Reach out at Follow @tiffsario on Instagram. This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: From Nutella to 1069: Baby names that are illegal in the US
