logo
Why I stepped in to confront fare dodger

Why I stepped in to confront fare dodger

Telegraph4 days ago

Britain is broken. Law-breaking is rife. Graffiti is everywhere. Many of our high streets are now a mix of charity stores, vape shops, and fake American candy stores. There is a collapse of basic standards in public spaces – hop on the bus and you're likely to be greeted with terrible music from someone else, stubbornly refusing to wear headphones. It's a total mess.
Once-proud towns and cities are having their soul ripped out of them by petty law-breakers. Police are bystanders in this new system, reduced to a crime-reporting outfit rather than a proactive law-enforcement body. They seem more interested in poor-taste messages online, than the bread and butter, common-sense policing of our laws.
I've had enough.
Our public realm has been steadily chipped away at and too few people in authority are doing anything about it. Our leaders seem to just shrug their shoulders, unwilling to act – resigned to defeat. Many of them don't even notice the disorder as they spend their time in the protected bubble that is SW1.
That's why last Saturday I went to Stratford station – one of the worst hotspots for fare dodging – to try and shame London's do-nothing mayor, Sadiq Khan, into action. His general approach to stopping law-breaking is to legalise it: just look at his comments on cannabis this week.
According to YouGov, 79 per cent of train and Tube passengers say that they have personally seen fare dodging. Statistics show that one in 25 people who use the capital's public transport is not paying. But from my morning in Stratford station the problem must be much bigger than that. I watched as people flooded through an empty barrier, while the enforcement officer was on his backside, feet up, watching on. It was a perfect encapsulation of Broken Britain.
Across London, the rate of prosecution for fare evasion is declining year-on-year. Pre-pandemic, in 2018/19, TfL prosecuted 31,003 people for fare evasion – in 2023/24, that figure stood at 18,570. There is now no deterrent for fare dodging and, unsurprisingly, it has exploded as a result.
For ordinary hard-working citizens travelling into work on their morning commute, the sight of somebody slipping through the barriers without paying is a slap in the face. People who do the right thing are made to look like fools for sticking to the law, while others benefit from breaking the rules with impunity.
The British state needs to reassert itself. In 1982, two social scientists in the US came up with the 'broken windows' theory of policing. They argued that visible signs of crime, antisocial behaviour, and disorder create an environment which encourages even more crime and disorder. That idea was taken up in the 1990s by William Bratton, New York's police commissioner under no-nonsense Mayor Rudy Giuliani, at a time when crime in the city was totally out of control.
Bratton cracked down on fare evasion, public disorder, and graffiti. As a result, rates of both petty crime and serious crime fell sharply. Crime declined for the following decade. When the state shows the public that it cares, it creates an environment in which law and order is the norm.
The rule of law requires that our laws are actually enforced. When small ones aren't applied, more serious offences inevitably follow. Before you know it, law and order has completely broken down and the state is left impotent, lacking all authority. That's where we're heading.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK to build up to 12 attack submarines and spend billions more on nuclear weapons system
UK to build up to 12 attack submarines and spend billions more on nuclear weapons system

BBC News

time19 minutes ago

  • BBC News

UK to build up to 12 attack submarines and spend billions more on nuclear weapons system

Update: Date: 07:51 BST Title: We're not at war, says defence minister. But we're not at peace, either Content: Luke Pollard, pictured in Portsmouth in April Defence minister Luke Pollard says "we're certainly not at war at the moment, but it's also true that we're certainly not at peace". Speaking to BBC Breakfast, he says "we know that we live in a very dangerous world" and there are "new threats" to the UK. The government inherited a situation where military morale was "falling" and there had been a "lack of investment", he says. The defence review will set out new investment, address the "scandal" of military accommodation, and set out plans to make defence an "engine for growth", he says. Update: Date: 07:47 BST Title: How much does the UK spend on defence - and how is it changing? Content: What the UK spends on defence In 2023/24, the UK spent around 2.3% of GDP on defence, or £53.9bn, according to government figures. As a member of Nato - the North Atlantic military alliance - the UK is committed to spending at least 2% of national income, as measured by GDP, on defence. But there is growing pressure to go further. What's the planned increase? In February, the government announced defence spending would rise to 2.5% of GDP by 2027, with an "ambition" to reach 3% after the next general election. To fund the initial increase, Starmer announced a cut to the UK's aid budget from 0.5% of GDP to 0.3% in 2027. Has the government committed to reaching 3%? Defence Secretary John Healey, in an interview with The Times, said there was "no doubt" the UK would reach defence spending of 3% in the next Parliament, so by 2034. But the government has not formally announced a commitment to reaching 3%. Update: Date: 07:40 BST Title: Defence firm welcomes submarine plans Content: The Ministry of Defence says building up to 12 new attack submarines "will support 30,000 highly skilled jobs into the 2030s as well as 30,000 apprenticeships and 14,000 graduate roles across the next 10 years". And the announcement has been welcomed by defence technology firm, Cohort. "It's certainty a very ambitious plan and very pleasing to see what's been announced," Andy Thomis, Cohort's chief executive, tells BBC Radio 4's Today programme. "I think it recognises the serious security situation and the need for us to respond to it." Thomis, though, says the government may need to commit a greater percentage of spending to defence, in order to meet the plans. "It certainly does look like a challenge within 2.5% of GDP or indeed even 3%, but I think it is what we need to keep the country safe." Update: Date: 07:08 BST Title: Will extra defence spending be enough for Nato - and Trump? Content: Jonathan BealeDefence correspondent Over the past week, the government has been trailing its defence review with a series of announcements: billions of pounds to produce more missiles and drones; new technology; and better housing for troops. The aim - not just to modernise an underfunded armed forces but to make them ready to meet rising threats. The prime minister will today also underline the importance of the defence industry for creating jobs and economic growth. So far the government is committed to increasing defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2027. But will it be enough? Nato allies are being urged to increase defence spending to 3.5% of GDP. The US president, Donald Trump wants more. The government says Britain will be the leading European nation in Nato; but other allies are going further and faster. Lithuania's defence minister called 2.5% "old news". She told the BBC 3.5% should be the bare minimum. Update: Date: 07:08 BST Title: We must face down Russia, says defence secretary Content: Defence Secretary John Healey says the UK's new submarines will help "face down Russian aggression". In a statement released last night, Healey says: "Our outstanding submariners patrol 24/7 to keep us and our allies safe, but we know that threats are increasing and we must act decisively to face down Russian aggression. "With new state-of-the-art submarines patrolling international waters and our own nuclear warhead programme on British shores, we are making Britain secure at home and strong abroad, while delivering on our plan for change with 30,000 highly-skilled jobs across the country." Update: Date: 07:08 BST Title: New nuclear-powered submarines expected as Starmer unveils defence plans Content: The UK will build up to 12 new nuclear-powered submarines under plans due to be announced by Keir Starmer today. The government will unveil a major defence review, which will set out the government's long-term plans and is expected to recommend the armed forces move to "warfighting readiness". The new attack submarines are expected to replace the UK's current fleet from the late 2030s onwards, with the government saying production will also create jobs. The submarines will be conventionally-armed but nuclear powered, and developed under a partnership agreement with the US and Australia. The prime minister is also expected to confirm a £15bn investment in the UK's existing nuclear warhead programme. Starmer will speak to BBC Radio 4's Today programme at 08:10 BST - you'll be able to listen live on this page.

How Queen Elizabeth II clashed with Prince Philip over the televising of her coronation
How Queen Elizabeth II clashed with Prince Philip over the televising of her coronation

Daily Mail​

time27 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

How Queen Elizabeth II clashed with Prince Philip over the televising of her coronation

Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip clashed over plans to televise her coronation, a royal insider has revealed. While the black and white footage was grainy, the BBC 's live broadcast was an incredible feat which took months of preparation and attracted 27million viewers. But if the Queen's original wish had been honoured, it would not have been televised. This position was supported by the then-prime minister Winston Churchill and the Queen Mother but there remained one vocal supporter of opening up Westminster Abbey to the cameras - Prince Philip. Philip and Elizabeth butted heads over the issue, according to royal author Andrew Morton. He wrote: 'On this crucial matter she butted heads with her husband, who chaired the coronation committee. 'He wanted to let daylight in on the magic, believing that televising the ceremony would make the monarchy relevant to a new generation and herald a new, dynamic Elizabethan Age.' But Philip was overruled and it was announced that the coronation would not be broadcast. However, 'people power' convinced the Queen to U-turn. Morton, in his book Elizabeth & Margaret, added: 'For once people power - with the eager support of of the television manufacturers - won the day. 'Ministers and MPs were overwhelmed with an avalanche of mail protesting against the decision to keep the cameras out of the abbey.' Royal commentator Alexander Larman wrote in his book Power and Glory: 'So overwhelming and consistent was the outcry, ably communicated to their elected representatives, that in October 1952, it was stated that in view of the "serious public disappointment", the sacred event would need to be broadcast live.' By then Elizabeth had a change of heart and said: 'All her subjects should have an opportunity of seeing [the coronation].' Preparations took on a new life after this decision, with TV stations needing to be built across the country to ensure all could watch the historic occasion. The Duke of Edinburgh kneels in front of the Queen. The BBC's live broadcast was an incredible feat which took months of preparation Plans were even made to show the event in France for the Duke and Duchess of WIndsor's benefit, according to Hugo Vickers in his book Coronation: The Crowning of Elizabeth II. Westminster Abbey also had to be kitted out with all the latest technology. This included four cameras mounted across the ceiling and 26 microphones placed close to the throne. John Snagge was given the role of commentating for BBC Home Service radio, while RIchard Dimbleby led the TV coverage. According to Vickers, concerns about the logistics of the broadcast continued to be raised. 'Snagge was worried about what he would do if the Queen fainted under the heavy robes and hot lights or if a peer carrying the regalia should fall over,' he wrote. In the end, the coronation went off without a hitch. Churches installed their own TVs so congregations across the country could 'surround the Queen with their prayers'. For royals fans across the pond, recordings of the coronation were flown in bombers to Canada and the United States. The coronation brought to the throne a picture of youth, hope, innocence and beauty in one compelling mix. Upwards of 45,000 troops from 50 countries lined the four-mile procession route, designed so three million spectators could witness the New Elizabethan age's dawn. Some 8,000 guests crammed into Westminster Abbey, falling into silence as Elizabeth gave her Coronation Oath. On The Mall, a million spectators cheered themselves hoarse when she stepped on to the Buckingham Palace balcony. All this for one modest, 25-year-old woman. Even today, despite King Charles's historic coronation two years ago, it remains a high point - a piece of magic which could never be replicated. The renowned author Dame Rebecca West was overawed by the spectacle, describing Elizabeth as 'the emblem of the state, the symbol of our national life, the guardian of our self-respect'. Writer Nancy Mitford put it more jauntily: 'How much NICER to have a young queen than that very dull old man!' While the nation celebrated with thousands of street parties, in the ancient walls of Westminster Abbey an act of immense sobriety was taking place. 'She was consecrated,' said Canon John Andrew, the senior chaplain, 'and that makes her Queen. It is the most solemn thing that has ever happened in her life. She cannot abdicate. She is there until death.' And many who witnessed the broadcast view the coronation as one of the most memorable days in their own lives.

Chelsea on verge of £30m Liam Delap transfer after agreeing personal terms with Ipswich striker on six-year contract
Chelsea on verge of £30m Liam Delap transfer after agreeing personal terms with Ipswich striker on six-year contract

The Sun

time33 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Chelsea on verge of £30m Liam Delap transfer after agreeing personal terms with Ipswich striker on six-year contract

CHELSEA are poised to confirm the capture of Liam Delap on a six-year deal. The 22-year-old striker has been a top summer target for the Blues after a breakthrough season for Ipswich. Delap netted 12 goals in 37 Premier League matches as the Tractor Boys headed back to the second tier. The former Man City ace had a £30million relegation release clause written into his contract. Chelsea have now agreed personal terms with Delap, according to The Athletic. The England under-21 striker will sign until 2031 at Stamford Bridge. He selected a move to Chelsea ahead of Manchester United, Newcastle and Everton. Delap is set to undergo a medical at Chelsea's Cobham base later today. 2 Liam Delap talks about joining Ipswich Town

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store