
Taiwan to pull plug on nuclear power, sparking energy security fears
TAIPEI, May 15 — Taiwan will turn off its last nuclear reactor on Saturday, fuelling concerns over the self-ruled island's reliance on imported energy and vulnerability to a Chinese blockade.
The island, which targets net-zero emissions by 2050, depends almost entirely on imported fossil fuel to power its homes, factories and critical semiconductor chip industry.
President Lai Ching-te's Democratic Progressive Party has long vowed to phase out nuclear power, while the main opposition Kuomintang (KMT) party says continued supply is needed for energy security.
Ma'anshan Nuclear Power Plant in southern Pingtung county is being closed as China intensifies military activity around Taiwan, which Beijing claims as part of its territory and has vowed to bring under its control one day.
During large-scale military drills around Taiwan in April, China simulated strikes on key ports and energy sites as well as blockading the island.
Ma'anshan has operated for 40 years in a region popular with tourists and which is now dotted with wind turbines and solar panels.
More renewable energy is planned at the site, where state-owned Taipower plans to build a solar power station capable of supplying an estimated 15,000 households annually.
But while nuclear only accounted for 4.2 per cent of Taiwan's power supply last year, some fear Ma'anshan's closure risks an energy crunch.
'Taiwan is such a small place and currently there's no other better and more efficient natural energy source that can replace nuclear power,' said Ricky Hsiao, 41, who runs a nearby guesthouse.
'The reality is that TSMC and other big companies need a lot of electricity. They would leave Taiwan if it's not stable,' he told AFP, referring to chipmaking giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company.
But mother-of-two Carey Chen fears an accident like the 2011 Fukushima nuclear meltdown in Japan, which like Taiwan is prone to earthquakes.
'If we can find other stable power sources, I support a nuclear-free homeland for everyone's safety,' Chen, 40, told AFP.
Stable supply
At its peak in the 1980s, nuclear power made up more than 50 per cent of Taiwan's energy generation, with three plants operating six reactors across the island.
Concerns after the Fukushima disaster saw a new plant mothballed in 2014 before it was even finished.
And two plants stopped operating between 2018 and 2023 after their operating permits expired.
Most of Taiwan's power is fossil fuel-based, with liquefied natural gas (LNG) accounting for 42.4 per cent and coal 39.3 per cent last year.
Renewable energy made up 11.6 per cent, well short of the government's target of 20 per cent by 2025.
Solar has faced opposition from communities worried about panels occupying valuable land, while rules requiring locally made parts in wind turbines have slowed their deployment.
Lai insists Taiwan's energy supply will be stable even as AI technology boosts demand, with new units in existing LNG and coal-fired plants replacing Ma'anshan's output.
The KMT and Taiwan People's Party, which control the parliament, amended a law on Tuesday enabling nuclear plants to extend their operating life by up to 20 years.
'Nuclear power is not the most perfect way to generate electricity,' KMT lawmaker Ko Ju-chun told AFP.
'But it is an option that should not be eliminated when we are developing technology, defence, and strengthening national security.'
Chinese threat
Taiwan's reliance on imported fossil fuels is of particular concern given the risk of a Chinese blockade.
The island has enough LNG and coal reserves to last just 11 and 30 days, respectively, government data show.
Taiwan's centralised electricity grid also leaves swaths of the island at risk of major power outages in case of a single fault.
Without nuclear, 'our energy security cannot be guaranteed, and national security will be affected', said Yeh Tsung-kuang, an energy expert at Taiwan's National Tsing Hua University.
Environmental activists argue renewables are the best way to bolster Taiwan's energy resilience.
'If every community has solar panels on its roofs, the community can be (more) self-sufficient', said Tsui Shu-hsin, secretary-general of Green Citizens' Action Alliance.
But others note Taiwan's break-up with nuclear is at odds with global and regional trends.
Even Japan aims for nuclear to account for 20-22 per cent of its electricity by 2030, up from well under 10 per cent now.
And nuclear power became South Korea's largest source of electricity in 2024, accounting for 31.7 per cent of the country's total power generation, and reaching its highest level in 18 years, according to government data.
Yu Shih-ching, chief of Hengchun town where Ma'anshan is located, said the plant had brought jobs and boosted the local economy.
'Our view is that nuclear power is necessary,' he told AFP, calling it 'an important driving force for the national economy' and a 'great help to local areas'.
And Lai acknowledged recently he would not rule out a return to nuclear one day.
'Whether or not we will use nuclear power in the future depends on three foundations which include nuclear safety, a solution to nuclear waste, and successful social dialogue,' he said. — AFP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Ancom Nylex moves to take full control of delisted Nylex through capital reduction plan
KUALA LUMPUR, June 7 — Ancom Nylex Bhd is seeking to take full ownership of its former subsidiary, Nylex (M) Bhd, following the latter's delisting from Bursa Malaysia in March this year. According to The Edge, the proposal involves a selective capital reduction and repayment exercise, with entitled shareholders set to receive a total capital repayment of RM5.3 million, or 5.1 sen per share, in cash. The exercise is to be carried out by Ancom Nylex and its wholly owned unit, Rhodemark Development Sdn Bhd. The two entities, which currently control 42.21 per cent of Nylex, will become the sole shareholders upon completing the plan. The offer price of 5.1 sen per share for the remaining 103.89 million shares, representing a 57.79 per cent stake, is based on Nylex's net assets of RM16.96 million, minus deferred tax assets of RM7.79 million, divided by its share base of 179.79 million shares. According to the report, in a letter of offer issued yesterday, Ancom Nylex and Rhodemark said the proposed capital reduction exercise would be funded through Nylex's internal funds. Several persons acting in concert (PACs), who collectively own a 0.33 per cent stake in Nylex, are also participating as entitled shareholders. The PACs include Datuk Siew Ka Wei and his family, Tan Sri Mohamad Fuzi Harun, Low Huoi Seong, Rizainal Mustaffa, and Asmariah Ismail. Siew, who serves as Nylex's group managing director and is also the executive vice chairman of Ancom Nylex, is among its major shareholders. Ancom Nylex and Rhodemark explained that consolidating full control of Nylex would provide them with greater flexibility in determining the company's business direction, The Edge reported. They also noted that the plan offers entitled shareholders a timely opportunity to realise their investments. As of the end of May, Nylex had 12,145 shareholders. Nylex was delisted on March 11 after failing to secure an extension to submit its regularisation plan. It had been classified as a Practice Note 17 (PN17) company following the divestment of all its assets and liabilities to Ancom Nylex, then known as Ancom Bhd, in January 2022. The RM179.3 million deal was a mix of cash and shares. Shares in Ancom Nylex closed at 95 sen yesterday, up half a sen or 0.53 per cent, giving the company a market capitalisation of RM1.11 billion.


Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Stanley Thai's wife appeals order blocking Supermax Holdings winding-up
Married in 1987, Supermax co-founders Stanley Thai and Tan Bee Geok are in the midst of divorce proceedings. KUALA LUMPUR : Stanley Thai's estranged wife has appealed a High Court ruling that bars her from pursuing a winding-up petition against Supermax Holdings Sdn Bhd until their divorce proceedings are resolved. FMT understands Tan Bee Geok disagrees with the reasons given by Justice Evrol Mariette Peters in a written judgment handed down last week. Peters had on May 31 issued an order restraining Tan from pursuing the winding-up of Supermax Holdings – a company she jointly owns with Thai – until their divorce proceedings are fully resolved. In her judgment, the judge acknowledged that the family court does not generally have jurisdiction to intervene in matters that fall exclusively under the purview of the winding-up court. 'These are matters expressly governed by the Companies Act 2016 and fall within the supervisory jurisdiction of the commercial or insolvency courts, specifically designated to oversee winding-up proceedings,' she said. However, the judge said the limitation on subject-matter jurisdiction did not exclude the family court from exercising its authority, particularly where the parties have voluntarily submitted to its jurisdiction. 'The authority of the family court in the present case arose not from an intrusion into the winding-up court's domain, but over the parties' conduct in the matrimonial dispute before it,' Peters said. She added that the family court was in this case acting as a court of equity to ensure that the parties did not undermine or frustrate the objectives of matrimonial proceedings – particularly in cases involving financial remedies, asset division or preservation orders – by taking unilateral steps in parallel forums. 'This exercise of jurisdiction is consistent with the family court's mandate to regulate the conduct of parties before it, and to ensure that the integrity of its orders and processes is maintained,' she said. Married in 1987, Tan and Thai have endured a rocky marriage. In April 2022, Tan petitioned for judicial separation from her businessman husband. In her petition, she sought a division of matrimonial assets, including shares in Supermax, and early last year secured an injunction restraining Thai from dealing with them. In April last year Thai filed a divorce petition, and, in August, Tan responded with a cross-petition, again praying for the division of assets, including the Supermax shares. By doing so, Peters said Tan had expressly invited the family court to assume jurisdiction over, and determine, the appropriate division or disposition of those shares. The judge also said it was inherently inconsistent and inequitable for Tan to now pursue the winding-up petition in another court when she had earlier sought judicial intervention to preserve the status quo. 'Her current course of action undermined the integrity of the judicial process and suggested a tactical shift that was both disingenuous and abusive of the court's process,' she said. Peters said the inference was that the winding-up petition was filed to prevent the family court from potentially adjusting Tan's shareholding to her detriment. The judge said Tan's petition to wind up Supermax was also an attempt to interfere with the family court's division of matrimonial assets, thus constituting an abuse of process. She said this was especially so since Supermax's assets were liable to be sold off or liquidated – possibly below their true market value – if the company was wound up, particularly if the liquidator was looking to settle its debts swiftly. 'This process could significantly reduce the overall value of Supermax and consequently, diminish the total pool of matrimonial assets available for division between the parties in the context of a divorce,' she added. Peters said Tan's conduct in attempting to wind up Supermax was indicative that there was a real and substantial risk that she would continue in her attempt to dissipate the other matrimonial assets that have been prayed for in the divorce petition and judicial separation. Accordingly, the judge inserted an order restraining the dissipation of assets on identical terms to one issued against Thai in January last year. 'In my view, the principle of fairness requires that the clause in the court order be applied consistently across both the judicial separation and divorce petitions. 'As the saying goes, what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. Fairness demands that the same rules apply equally to both parties to ensure parity in legal obligations and treatment,' she said.


Free Malaysia Today
7 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Vision 2020 plaque removed for safety reasons, says KL Tower
Visitors queuing up to enter the Kuala Lumpur Tower after its reopening. The Vision 2020 time capsule was opened on April 13. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : A plaque marking where the Vision 2020 time capsule was planted at the Kuala Lumpur Tower was removed for safety reasons, according to the skyscraper's operator. LSH Service Master Sdn Bhd said the plaque originally functioned as a cover for the special chamber where the time capsule was located, but could no longer be securely closed after the capsule was opened on April 13. 'This posed a risk of injury to visitors passing by the area. Therefore, it was removed for safety reasons, in line with the management's priority to ensure the well-being of all visitors,' said the company's CEO Khairil Faizal Othman in a statement. Khairil added that there were no longer any historical elements or artifacts stored in the chamber after the time capsule was opened by former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad. He also said the plaque had not been discarded but has been 'properly stored' by the company, though he did not elaborate on its whereabouts. Khairil also denied that the company intended to erase or alter history by removing the plaque, in response to a claim by Bersatu MP Wan Saiful Wan Jan. He said: 'All actions taken were based on safety considerations, corporate compliance, and a commitment to preserving the legacy of KL Tower.' Khairil added that the plaque featured the tower's old corporate logo and that it cannot be used for official display in line with the skyscraper's rebranding. Earlier today, Wan Saiful reportedly urged communications minister Fahmi Fadzil to explain why the plaque had been removed, saying it should have stayed put since it was meant to commemorate the time capsule planted in 1996. The Tasek Gelugor MP questioned if the government was attempting to erase history, particularly Mahathir's role in planting the time capsule.