Southern Baptist public policy arm survives challenge to its conservative credentials
DALLAS (AP) — Southern Baptist representatives on Wednesday fended off two efforts to move the staunchly conservative body even more sharply to the right, giving a vote of confidence to its public-policy agency and defeating a proposed constitutional ban on churches with women pastors.
The votes came just before the adjournment of the two-day annual meeting of the Southern Baptist Convention, the nation's largest Protestant denomination.
Church 'messengers' voted 3,744-2,819 to retain their public policy agency, rejecting calls for its abolition from those who allege the entity is tainted by liberal affiliations on immigration issues and who want it to be even more conservative than it already is.
The bid to enshrine a ban on churches with women pastors in the SBC constitution received a 3,421-2,191 vote, but that 61% majority fell short of the two-thirds support needed to initiate a constitutional ban.
The measures reflect debate only on the degree of conservatism in the SBC. It comes just a day after messengers overwhelmingly endorsed a call to overturn the Supreme Court's Obergefell v. Hodges decision legalizing same-sex marriage, and any other court and legislative actions with similar results. And it comes in a denomination that officially opposes women pastors, and where the debate is over whether that applies to women in subordinate pastoral roles.
The action affirming the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission amounted to a vote of confidence in the public advocacy voice of the nation's largest evangelical body, coming at a time when Christian conservatives have unprecedented influence in Washington.
Willy Rice, senior pastor of Calvary Baptist Church in Clearwater, Florida, said he filed the motion to abolish the ERLC with the aim of making it heed member criticisms. Had the measure passed, he argued, it would have given the agency time to enact changes by next year's annual meeting, when its fate would have come up for a final vote.
'But make no mistake, this motion is a wake-up call,' he said.
But Richard Land, a former longtime president of the commission, said it would be 'tragic' to silence Baptists' voice in Washington.
'We have more opportunity right now to influence public policy in our nation's capital than we have had in my lifetime,' Land said. 'We have a president who is more sympathetic. … We have more congressmen and senators who are sympathetic to what we as Southern Baptists are trying to do, and to turn back the barbarians at the gate in our culture.'
President Donald Trump has created at least three religion-focused entities with a strong evangelical Christian influence, reflecting the overwhelming support he's received from that demographic.
Brent Leatherwood, president of the ERLC, presented a slideshow in defense of the organization. It included a photo of him with House Speaker Mike Johnson, a fellow Southern Baptist. A day before the vote, an ERLC event championed a Tennessee ban on certain medical treatments for transgender minors that faces a Supreme Court challenge.
Abolishing the organization 'means the public square would be abandoned by the SBC, losing a powerful voice for the truth of the Gospel and in effect, rewarding secular efforts to push religion out,' Leatherwood said.
What does the ERLC do?
While not a lobbying organization, the ERLC has advocated against abortion and transgender rights. It has promoted a strongly pro-Israel stance, a longtime evangelical priority. The commission has also provided ultrasound machines for organizations that seek to dissuade women from having abortions.
Leatherwood credited the ERLC with advocating for the repeal of Roe v. Wade, which was realized in a 2022 Supreme Court decision ending the nationwide right to an abortion. That was followed by abortion bans in several states. Leatherwood also touted ERLC advocacy for a pending congressional move to defund Planned Parenthood.
But some criticism focused on the ERLC's opposition to criminal penalties for women who seek abortions.
'Time after time, they've opposed righteous pro-life legislation that seeks equal justice for the unborn, arguing that those who choose abortion should face no legal consequences,' Ethan Jago, pastor of Five Bridges Church in Panama City, Florida, said in calling for the vote to abolish the commission.
Rice contended that 'outside progressive advocacy organizations have financially supported' the commission. But Leatherwood said more than 98% of commission funding comes from the SBC, with the remaining coming Baptist state conventions and individuals.
While the ERLC has been criticized for its advocacy on immigration reform, the commission says it has promoted only stances in keeping with official SBC resolutions calling for both the rule of law and respect for human dignity.
Women in pastoral roles debated
The proposal on women pastors was a rerun of recent years' meetings. A similar proposal received two-thirds of votes in 2023, but fell just short of the necessary supermajority in 2024.
Wednesday's vote sought to restart the process.
The denomination's official statement of belief, the Baptist Faith and Message, reserves the role of pastor to men.
Southern Baptist churches are self-governing. But the convention can kick them out if deemed not in 'friendly cooperation,' based in part on how closely they adhere to the Baptist Faith and Message on issues such as women pastors.
But there remain disagreements over whether the faith statement applies only to women as a senior pastor or similar role, or whether it applies to ministry assistants with the title of pastor.
In recent years, the convention began purging churches that either had women as lead pastors or asserted that they could serve that role. That included one of its largest congregations, California's Saddleback Church.
But when an SBC committee this year retained a South Carolina megachurch with a woman on its pastoral staff, some argued this proved the need for a constitutional amendment. The church later quit the denomination of its own accord.
Other ERLC-related controversies
Criticism has long dogged the ERLC. After Leatherwood last year commended former President Joe Biden — who is deeply unpopular among religious conservatives — for withdrawing his reelection bid, the then-chairman of the commission announced his firing. However, the commission retracted that announcement and the chairman resigned when it became clear that its board's executive committee hadn't agreed to that. Instead, the board gave Leatherwood a strong vote of confidence along with a warning against stirring unnecessary controversy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
13 hours ago
- Newsweek
Over 10K Sign Christian Petition Rebuking 'Immoral and Cruel' Trump Budget
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. As of Friday afternoon, more than 10,000 people have signed a Christian petition condemning President Donald Trump's "big beautiful bill" as an "immoral and cruel" bill. The petition was published May 30 by Faithful America—which on its website calls itself "the largest online community of Christians" whose members "are sick of sitting by quietly while Jesus' message of good news is hijacked by the religious right to serve a hateful political agenda"—blasts Trump's massive financial proposal as anti-Christian. "Trump's proposed budget turns Biblical values upside down. It rewards the wealthiest Americans with tax cuts while brutalizing the most vulnerable with massive cuts to critical social programs," the petition reads. "If it passes, millions of Americans will suffer as a result." Why It Matters While the budget proposal has received its fair share of criticism from Democrats and some Republicans over its impact on social safety net programs and the federal government's deficit, Christians have largely supported Trump during the presidential election. According to the Associated Press, roughly eight in 10 white evangelicals supported him in 2020 and 2024. President Donald Trump delivers remarks before signing a series of bills related to California's vehicle emissions standards during an event in the East Room of the White House on June 12 in Washington, D.C. President Donald Trump delivers remarks before signing a series of bills related to California's vehicle emissions standards during an event in the East Room of the White House on June 12 in Washington, To Know In its petition, Faithful America calls out the Trump-backed House budget proposal: "It is immoral and cruel to deprive people of health care, access to affordable food, and educational opportunities to satisfy a few individuals who have more money than they could spend in a lifetime. Tens of millions of Americans will suffer if this budget advances. This budget is a direct violation of Jesus' teachings to love and care for the poor." Trump's "big beautiful bill" includes permanence for the individual income and estate tax cuts enacted in his first term. It also features new exemptions for tipped income, overtime pay and interest on certain auto loans, designed to target working-class voters. The bill would increase the standard deduction and includes a temporary $500 boost to the child tax credit for tax years 2025 through 2028. But the spending plan also outlines nearly $700 billion in cuts to Medicaid, including new eligibility requirements for able-bodied adults without dependents—a requirement for 80 hours per month of work, education or service. Recipients would also face biannual eligibility verification. Democrats have criticized the proposal, warning of possible increases in premiums and reductions in health care and food assistance for millions. "This budget is the antithesis of Jesus' teachings. It harms millions of Americans while benefiting only the wealthiest in our country," the Rev. Dr. Shannon Fleck, executive director of Faithful America, told Newsweek. "Trump and his followers' rhetoric is not in alignment with the majority of Americans, and it's incumbent on all American Christians who love our neighbors and want a nation made of love and opportunity for all to speak out loudly in opposition to the damaging and harmful proposal." The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the bill would increase the U.S. federal debt by $2.4 trillion from 2025 to 2034, while reducing taxes by $3.75 trillion over the same period. The analysis was released as the bill moved from the House to the Senate for further debate. While some Republicans have voiced concern over debt implications, Trump's allies have argued that the official estimates do not fully account for economic growth they claim will result from the tax cuts. The House of Representatives narrowly passed the bill of more than 1,000 pages by a vote of 215–214, following prolonged negotiations and deep divisions within Republican ranks. All House Democrats and two Republican representatives voted against it. "As Christians, we know that budgets are moral documents," Faithful America wrote on its website. "And the budget reconciliation bill currently making its way through Congress says dire things about what the Trump regime values -- and who it is willing to leave behind." In March, the group also launched a petition against Trump's efforts to dismantle the Department of Education, saying the action corrupted the Christian faith. "It's clear Christian nationalists want to take full advantage of [Trump's efforts]. But forcing Christianity on others doesn't spread our faith, it corrupts it," the prior petition said. Still, three months into Trump's second term, white evangelical protestants were some of his staunchest supporters, according to Pew Research Center think tank, which suggested 72 percent approved of Trump's handling of the presidency. What People Are Saying Fleck also told Newsweek: "There is nothing beautiful about Trump's budget proposal. It's really a big betrayal and yet another example of the Project 2025 agenda: cutting funding that aids vulnerable communities and pitting them against one another while using that money to provide tax cuts for Trump and his billionaire friends to line their own pockets." Alex Beene, financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "One subject continuously discussed in the proposed budget is cuts to important programs that provided services to tens of millions of Americans, many of which voted for the current administration. New requirements could have a dramatic effect on the number of those who qualify, and the loss of healthcare coverage could be devastating, particularly to states which lean heavily on the federal funding these programs provide." What Happens Next The bill is now under debate in the Senate, where Republicans hold a slim majority. Several in the GOP have signaled opposition or uncertainty, citing provisions related to the debt ceiling and deficit spending. Modifications are expected before any final vote. "It's no surprise some religious groups are making moves to attempt to stop the bill's progression and get Congress to reassess some of the proposed cuts," Beene said.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's DHS posts tip line propaganda amplified by white supremacists
In an effort to recruit Americans to use a tip line to aid its authoritarian crackdown on immigrants, the Department of Homeland Security this week promoted propaganda that white supremacist social media accounts claim to have generated. As Donald Trump and his administration pursue their anti-immigrant raids in California, DHS' X account shared an image Wednesday that featured an illustration of Uncle Sam alongside text encouraging Americans to 'report all foreign invaders to ICE.' DHS' post was also retweeted by White House deputy chief of staff Steven Miller, who has previously promoted white supremacist views, including circulating articles from white nationalist websites to a reporter at Breitbart prior to Miller's first role in the White House. Nashville-based investigative reporter Phil Williams, who's well-known for his reporting on extremism, identified a post on X from Christian nationalist influencer C. Jay Engel, who claimed the image originated from his account. Williams went on to link to his past reporting on Engel, whose white nationalist beliefs include a vision of America that, in Engel's words, 'affirms the domination and pre-eminence of European derived peoples, their institutions and their way of life.' In another post, flagged by journalist David Bernstein, Engel says he got the image from X account 'mrrobertwp,' which boasts a social media feed rife with racist propaganda, such as suggesting the Civil Rights Act is unconstitutional and reposting statements like 'racism is cool and normal.' Independent journalist Tim Burke also noted that the pair apparently sourced the image from a World War II–era war bonds poster. The Department of Homeland Security didn't immediately return MSNBC's request for comment on the image. In reality, there is no 'foreign invasion' underway in the United States, nor is there any evidence one is imminent, despite the Trump administration's best efforts to convince Americans otherwise. But the propaganda aligns with some of the bigoted imagery Trump and his administration have deployed to target immigrants — and with Trump's history of promoting racist propaganda that hearkens back to xenophobic imagery popularized by the Ku Klux Klan in the early 20th century. This incident is like a Russian nesting doll of racist propaganda that shows how social media can enlarge the audience for extremism. This situation also provides fresh evidence to support claims that white nationalist ideology is helping to fuel the Trump administration's anti-immigrant agenda. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Southern Baptists' call for the US Supreme Court to overturn its same-sex marriage decision is part of a long history of opposing women's and LGBTQ+ people's rights
The Southern Baptist Convention has lost 3.6 million members over the past two decades and faces an ongoing sexual abuse crisis. At its June 2025 annual meeting, however, neither of those issues took up as much time as controversial social issues, including the denomination's stance on same-sex marriage. The group called for the overturning of Obergefell v. Hodges – the Supreme Court decision that legalized same-sex marriage – and the creation of laws that 'affirm marriage between one man and one woman.' Messengers – Southern Baptists' word for delegates from local churches – also asked for laws that would 'reflect the moral order revealed in Scripture and nature.' They also decried declining fertility rates, commercial surrogacy, Planned Parenthood, 'willful childlessness,' the normalization of 'transgender ideology,' and gender-affirming medical care. This detailed list targeting women's and LGBTQ+ rights was justified by an appeal to a God-ordained created order, as defined by Southern Baptists' interpretation of the Bible. In this created order, sex and gender are synonymous and are irrevocably defined by biology. The heterosexual nuclear family is the foundational institution of this order, with the father dominant over his wife and children – and children are a necessity if husbands and wives are to be faithful to God's design for the family. The resolution, On Restoring Moral Clarity through God's Design for Gender, Marriage, and the Family, passed easily in a denomination that was taken over from more moderate Southern Baptists by fundamentalists in the early 1990s, largely in response to women's progress in society and in the denomination. Southern Baptists were always conservative on issues of gender and sexuality. As I was entering a Southern Baptist seminary in the early 1980s, the denomination seemed poised to embrace social progress. I watched the takeover firsthand as a student and then as a professor of women and gender studies who studies Southern Baptists. This new resolution is the latest in a long history of Southern Baptist opposition to the progress of women and LGBTQ+ people. Throughout the late 1960s and early 1970s, many Southern Baptists began to embrace the women's movement. Women started to attend Southern Baptist seminaries in record numbers, many claiming a call to serve as pastors. While Southern Baptist acceptance of LGBTQ+ people lagged far behind its nascent embrace of women's rights, progress did seem possible. Then in 1979, a group of Southern Baptist fundamentalists organized to wrest control of the denomination from the moderates who had led it for decades. Any hope for progress on changes regarding LGBTQ+ rights in the denomination quickly died. Across the next two decades, advances made by women, such as being ordained and serving as senior pastors, eroded and disappeared. The SBC had passed anti-gay resolutions in the 1970s defining homosexuality as 'deviant' and a 'sin.' But under the new fundamentalist rule, the SBC became even more vehemently anti-gay and anti-trans. In 1988, the SBC called homosexuality a 'perversion of divine standards,' 'a violation of nature and natural affections,' 'not a normal lifestyle,' and 'an abomination in the eyes of God.' In 1991, they decried government funding for the National Lesbian and Gay Health Conference as a violation of 'the proper role and responsibility of government' because of its encouragement of 'sexual immorality.' Predictably, across the years, the convention spoke out against every effort to advance LGBTQ+ rights. This included supporting the Boy Scouts' ban of gay scouts, opposing military service by LGBTQ+ people, boycotting Disney for its support of LGBTQ+ people, calling on businesses to deny LGBTQ+ people domestic partner benefits and employment nondiscrimination to protect LGBTQ+ people, and supporting the Defense of Marriage Act that limited marriage to a woman and a man. The gender and sexuality topic, however, that has received the most attention from the convention has been marriage equality. Since 1980, the SBC has passed 22 resolutions that touch on same-sex marriage. The SBC passed its first resolution against same-sex marriage in 1996 after the Hawaii Supreme Court indicated the possibility it could rule in favor of same-sex marriage. The court never decided the issue because Hawaii's Legislature passed a bill defining marriage as between a man and a woman. In 1998, the convention amended its faith statement, the Baptist Faith and Message, to define marriage as 'the uniting of one man and one woman in covenant commitment.' The denomination passed its next resolution in 2003 in response to the Vermont General Assembly's establishment of civil unions. The resolution opposed any efforts to validate same-sex marriages or partnerships, whether legislative, judicial or religious. In 2004, after the Massachusetts Supreme Court allowed same-sex marriages in that state, the convention called for a constitutional amendment to define marriage as between a man and a woman. It reiterated this call in 2006. When the California Supreme Court struck down the state's ban on same-sex marriage, the SBC passed another resolution in 2008 warning of the dire consequences of allowing lesbians and gay men to marry, as people from other states would marry in California and return home to challenge their states' marriage bans. In 2011, the convention offered its support for the Defense of Marriage Act, followed in 2012 by a denunciation of the use of civil rights language to argue for marriage equality. The resolution argues that homosexuality 'does not qualify as a class meriting special protections, like race and gender.' When Obergefell was before the Supreme Court, the SBC called on the court to deny marriage equality. After Obergefell was decided in favor of same-sex marriage, the convention asked for Congress to pass the First Amendment Defense Act, which would have prohibited the federal government from discriminating against people based on their opposition to same-sex marriage. That same resolution also offers its support to state attorneys general challenging transgender rights. This was not the first time the SBC had spoken about transgender issues. As early as 2007, the denomination expressed its opposition to allowing transgender people to constitute a protected class in hate crimes legislation. In 2014, the convention stated its belief that gender is fixed and binary and subsequently that trans people should not be allowed gender-affirming care and that government officials should not validate transgender identity. In 2016, the denomination opposed access for transgender people to bathrooms matching their gender identities. In 2021, the convention invoked women's rights – in a denomination famous for its resistance to women's equality – as a reason to undermine trans rights. In its resolution opposing the proposed Equality Act, which would have added sexual orientation and gender identity as protected classifications, the SBC argued, 'The Equality Act would undermine decades of hard-fought civil rights protections for women and girls by threatening competition in sports and disregarding the privacy concerns women rightly have about sharing sleeping quarters and intimate facilities with members of the opposite sex.' This most recent resolution from June 2025 returns to the themes of fixed and binary gender, a divinely sanctioned hierarchical ordering of gender, and marriage as an institution limited to one woman and one man. While claiming these beliefs are 'universal truths,' the resolution argues that Obergefell is a 'legal fiction' because it denies the biological reality of male and female. Going further, this resolution claims that U.S. law on gender and sexuality should be based on the Bible. The duty of lawmakers, it states, is to 'pass laws that reflect the truth of creation and natural law – about marriage, sex, human life, and family – and to oppose any law that denies or undermines what God has made plain through nature and Scripture.' By taking no action on sexual abuse while focusing its efforts on issues of gender and sexuality, the convention affirmed its decades-long conservative trajectory. It also underlined its willingness to encourage lawmakers to impose these standards on the rest of the nation. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Susan M. Shaw, Oregon State University Read more: Data on sexual orientation and gender is critical to public health – without it, health crises continue unnoticed Southern Baptist Convention votes to expel two churches with female pastors – a religion scholar explains how far back these battles go How women in the Southern Baptist Convention have fought for decades to be ordained Susan M. Shaw does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
