
Jonathan Turley: Supreme Court could soon give Trump 'enormous' victory in battle with left-wing judges
A looming Supreme Court decision on nationwide injunctions could have "enormous" impacts on the Trump administration, George Washington University law professor and Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley said Tuesday.
The high court is poised to decide on the practice that can currently halt executive branch policies affecting the entire country.
Conservatives have argued that injunctions have been strategically sought in left-wing jurisdictions as a strategy to frustrate the Trump administration's agenda on immigration enforcement and deportations.
"It's going to be an enormous decision potentially," Turley shared with "Fox & Friends," noting that a decision may come on Thursday.
"For the administration in the immigration areas, as well as other areas, the court could very well say, 'Enough. We're not going to have individual judges freezing the entire United States government on critical programs like this."
Turley said that many of the injunctions are brought in "favorable" jurisdictions in front of "favorable" judges who issue the injunctions to stop the president's policies in their tracks.
He cited U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy, a Boston-based federal judge who presided over a class-action lawsuit from illegal migrants who are challenging deportations to third countries – countries that are not their country of origin – including South Sudan, El Salvador and others that the administration has reportedly eyed in its ongoing wave of deportations.
Murphy previously ordered the Trump administration to keep in U.S. custody all illegal migrants slated for deportation to a country not "explicitly" named in their removal orders.
This week, the court granted the Trump administration's request to stay the lower court's injunction blocking them from deporting individuals to third countries.
Turley broke down the ruling on Tuesday.
"The lower court judge said that, 'You're sending these people to countries that you've advised Americans to leave because of the violence.' But ICE is saying, 'Look, there's a reason why their home countries don't want them. Countries are not clamoring to get more felons to augment their home population, and that's not our fault. It's your fault. You committed crimes here, and you are deportable, and we're not a travel agency, so if your home country doesn't want you, then we're going to find the next best option.'
"With this order, they're allowed to do that," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
25 minutes ago
- Fox News
Former FBI special agent says she's ‘never seen' a defendant want to remain in prison
All times eastern FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: Senate convenes over President Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'


CBS News
31 minutes ago
- CBS News
Rally held to support "No Masks for ICE Act" introduced by New York lawmaker
Bill by N.Y. lawmaker would require ICE agents be unmasked during enforcement actions Bill by N.Y. lawmaker would require ICE agents be unmasked during enforcement actions Bill by N.Y. lawmaker would require ICE agents be unmasked during enforcement actions A New York lawmaker is calling for transparency from United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, starting with having its agents remove their masks. In a statement from ICE, a spokesperson says the masks are optional but that "ICE law enforcement and their families are being targeted and are facing a 500% increase in assaults ... due to the demonization of ICE by hostile groups and irresponsible elected officials." "Politicians and activists must turn the temperature down and tone down their rhetoric," the spokesperson added. Bill would require ICE agents be unmasked during enforcement actions Immigration advocates and political leaders used 26 Federal Plaza in Manhattan, which houses the city's ICE field office, as a backdrop Saturday. Immigrants, and even Comptroller Brad Lander, have been detained there by ICE agents with masks on. "No excuses, no cover-ups. When law enforcement hides who they are, there is no accountability," Rep. Nydia Velazquez said. That's the message behind her "No Masks for ICE Act" introduced earlier this month, requiring that ICE agents be unmasked during enforcement actions unless it's for a serious health issue, which has to be explained in writing. "And require them to wear clothing that clearly shows they work for ICE," she said. NEW YORK, NEW YORK - JUNE 20: Federal agents patrol the halls of immigration court at the Jacob K. Javitz Federal Building on June 20, 2025 in New York masks creates risk of copycat criminals, advocates say Supporters of the bill also allude to copycat incidents, where masked individuals have committed crimes allegedly pretending to be ICE agents. "If they're just wearing masks, you may think you're being kidnapped, and if you're armed, you may shoot them. So this bill will promote the safety of federal agents," Rep. Jerry Nadler said. Ricardo Aca, with immigrant advocacy group Make The Road, says banning the face coverings could relieve tensions he's seeing among the immigrant populations he advocates for. "A lot of folks don't know if they're being kidnapped or they're being detained because ICE is not even telling them or giving them the dignity and respect that they deserve," he said. Supporters say democracy cannot exist in darkness, or behind a mask.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lawsuit and protest intensify over 'Alligator Alcatraz' in Everglades
A legal and environmental firestorm is growing around Florida's controversial migrant detention center — dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz' — under construction at the remote Dade‑Collier airstrip in the Everglades. On June 27, two conservation groups, Friends of the Everglades and the Center for Biological Diversity, filed a federal lawsuit seeking to halt construction. They argue the state bypassed required environmental reviews under both the National Environmental Policy Act and the Endangered Species Act, putting wetlands and fragile ecosystems at risk. The suit specifically cites threats to wetlands, endangered species, and culturally important tribal lands. Environmentalists rallied on June 28, with dozens gathering near the site in a protest organized by tribal elder Betty Osceola. Many held signs emphasizing the 'sacred' nature of the land and decried rushed decisions that ignored public input. According to AP News, the center is designed to house up to 5,000 migrants in temporary structures and will rely on nearby swampland, as well as local wildlife like alligators and pythons, as natural barriers. It is expected to become operational by early July and cost around $450 million per year, funded via FEMA's shelter and services program. Florida officials, including Governor Ron DeSantis and AG James Uthmeier, defend the project as an efficient processing site, while critics, including Miami‑Dade Mayor Daniella Levine Cava, demand environmental impact assessments. With lawsuits filed and protests ongoing, the debate captures the clash between accelerated immigration enforcement and preservation of sensitive tribal and ecological lands within a UNESCO‑linked wetland. The post Lawsuit and protest intensify over 'Alligator Alcatraz' in Everglades appeared first on