logo
Two parents put a face on the impact of potential Medicaid cuts

Two parents put a face on the impact of potential Medicaid cuts

Yahoo22-05-2025

From left, parents Jessica Seawright and Brooke Wampole talk with Sen. Tammy Baldwin about their concerns over the impact of Medicaid cuts on families with children such as theirs who have disabilities. (Screenshot/Zoom)
As members of Congress continue to debate the Republican budget reconciliation bill that includes hundreds of billions of dollars in cuts to Medicaid, Jessica Seawright ponders what that could mean for her young son.
Seawright is a social worker in Southeast Wisconsin. She's also the mother of a 9-year-old boy with complex medical needs resulting from a genetic condition.
She and her husband — a college professor — have medical coverage through work, but with her son's condition, which includes cerebral palsy, their health plans could never cover the degree of care he requires.
Medicaid has made the difference, Seawright said Wednesday. It's helped through the Katie Beckett program, which enables children with disabilities to have Medicaid coverage while living at home instead of being in an institution; the Medicaid children's long-term support coverage; and Medicaid support that public schools receive to cover certain services that students with disabilities require.
Her son has been able to thrive living with her and her husband, Seawright said — but worry clouds the future.
'We look toward his adulthood, knowing that disability and aging programs that would support him staying in the community — where we, our family and our community, know he belongs — are being dismantled and defunded,' Seawright said. 'Forcing us and others like us into medical bankruptcy is not a solution.'
Seawright was one of two parents who said Wednesday that their lives and their children's lives could be profoundly upended by the Medicaid reductions that are included in the budget reconciliation proposal.
They spoke during a webinar conducted by Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisconsin), who has been an outspoken critic of the budget bill's Medicaid cuts.
'Our neighbors, our friends and our colleagues at work who rely on Medicaid and are scared, really scared,' Baldwin said. She cited estimates produced by Democrats on the Joint Economic Committee that with cuts to Medicaid as well as to the Affordable Care Act, the legislation could reduce health care for nearly 14 million Americans, including almost 230,000 Wisconsin residents.
The money saved, she added, would be used to extend and expand tax cuts enacted in 2017, during the first Trump administration. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has said the tax cuts primarily favor the wealthy and corporations.
'It's giveaways for their wealthy friends at the cost of Americans' health and lives,' Baldwin said. 'That's the deal.'
Baldwin said the choice that U.S. House Republicans made to advance the bill in committee in the early hours of Wednesday morning was a sign that 'Republicans know what they're doing is deeply unpopular.'
She dismissed claims that the objective of the bill's authors was to address waste, fraud or abuse in Medicaid and other safety net programs.
'I would be happy to come to the table to write a bill that truly gets at fraud and abuse,' Baldwin said. 'We want that out of Medicaid. We want that out of Medicare. But that is not what this bill does. This bill terminates health care for Wisconsin families.'
Besides being a mother of a child who has been helped by Medicaid's programs, Seawright has experienced Medicaid through two other lenses.
When she and her sister were growing up, their mother was relying on Medicaid for the family's health care. That helped give the family stability so that her mom could go to community college, become a medical assistant and get full-time work in health care with insurance through her employer, Seawright said.
In her own job as a social worker, she added, some of the clients she works with have Medicaid.
Both her childhood experience and her role as a mental health provider have made her critical of proposals to cut Medicaid, Seawright said — especially one to add work requirements as a condition for adults considered 'able-bodied' to enroll in Medicaid.
'Creating more barriers for people to access the care they need … individuals losing their primary care providers and their specialists, from my perspective, is just a cruel response that is steeped in distrust of those of us who are doing the work day to day,' Seawright said.
Also on the webinar was Brooke Wampole, who lives in northern Wisconsin. She and her husband have a 4-year-old son who was found to have long delays in his development.
About two years ago he was screened and qualified for services and therapies covered by Medicaid programs for children with disabilities, and over time, his clinicians helped him first to 'exist, to self-regulate, to see the world around him and not find it to be a threat,' Wampole said.
The family's regular health insurance 'could never cover the cost' those treatments required. ' Medicaid programs 'have been absolutely instrumental in our lives.'
In the last year, her son has begun speaking one-syllable words. 'My favorites or Mommy and Dada,' Wampole said, then added with a smile, 'however, he is pretty partial to talking about trapezoids. And raisins.'
The thought of losing Medicaid coverage 'is terrifying,' Wampole said — both because of the loss of services for her son, but also because of its impact on other families.
'I worry what our world looks like without Medicaid,' Wampole said. 'Other families, they could be way worse off … and cutting Medicaid could hurt them even more than my family. I don't want to be part of a system that contributes to that.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Once champions of fringe causes, now in a ‘trap of their own making'
Once champions of fringe causes, now in a ‘trap of their own making'

Boston Globe

time12 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Once champions of fringe causes, now in a ‘trap of their own making'

Investigations into Epstein's 2019 death in a Manhattan prison cell found serious management errors but no evidence of criminality. Yet Trump, once a friend of the financier accused of sexually abusing dozens of teenage girls, has long suggested Epstein was silenced by shadowy clients of his sex trafficking ring. In a 2023 episode of his popular podcast, Bongino, now the bureau's No. 2 official, implored listeners, 'Please do not let that story go.' Advertisement They obliged. A Trump-allied podcaster suggested the FBI leaders were 'beholden to some unseen powers.' A former FBI agent who has been critical of the bureau posted a parody of a law firm ad with Bongino standing next to a sign that read 'Trust Me & Bro Consulting.' Tucker Carlson, a friend of Bongino's, said Trump appointees were 'making a huge mistake, promising to reveal things and then not revealing them.' Alex Jones, a founding father of the modern conspiracy movement, referred to Patel's own handling of the Epstein case as flat-out 'gaslighting.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Patel and Bongino, partisan showmen placed in positions previously held by people with greater experience, earned their bona fides in Trump's camp by promoting conspiracy theories, making promises of what they would accomplish under Trump when he returned to power based on fictional or exaggerated premises, pledging to reveal deep-state secrets, and vowing swift vengeance on their enemies. Advertisement It has now fallen on Patel, Bongino, and Attorney General Pam Bondi to make good on the promises explicit and implied — or show how hard they are trying. But they are running what amounts to a conspiracy theory fulfillment center with unstocked shelves, critics say. 'Patel, Bongino, and the other leaders are caught in a trap of their own making,' said Russell Muirhead, a politics professor at Dartmouth College who has studied the role of conspiracy theories in American politics. 'The world they helped create, a world in which conspiracy destroys facts, is now the world they have to inhabit,' he added. Trump himself campaigned on the spurious idea that immigrant criminals had invaded the United States like a foreign army, but when courts began to reject that notion in a series of deportation cases centered on those his administration claimed had criminal records, his supporters blamed the judges, not him. He has flirted so often with the QAnon conspiracy theory, which falsely holds that prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton are dangerous pedophiles, many followers still cannot fathom why Clinton and other plotters are not in prison. One former Republican congressional staff member with ties to the White House, speaking on the condition of anonymity for fear of being targeted, said that the president's courting of far-right conspiracists had stoked expectations, creating a never-ending cycle of demands. The person likened it to feeding red meat to insatiable sharks. Or zombies. Bondi learned that the hard way during her first weeks in office, when she promised new revelations about the Epstein case and faced a furious backlash when the materials she released were a dud. Anxious about any criticism that could erode her standing with Trump, she dispatched FBI agents and prosecutors from the Justice Department's national security division to scour the archives, officials familiar with the situation said. They found little but are still digging, according to Bongino. Advertisement Patel and other officials have claimed that releasing new material is difficult, and governed by the need to protect witnesses and Epstein's victims. Billionaire Elon Musk suggested another explanation in the wake of his falling-out with the president: Trump 'is in the Epstein files,' he wrote on social media Thursday, without providing evidence. 'That is why they have not been made public.' Spokespeople for the Justice Department and FBI did not return requests for comment. Patel and Bongino have limited their interactions to friendly podcasters or conservative outlets, claiming that the mainstream news media cannot be trusted to convey the truth. But those engagements also reflect an understanding that sustaining support on the right is essential for their survival, according to administration officials. 'I've been putting out the truth my entire career,' Patel told Joe Rogan, the popular podcaster who endorsed Trump, to explain his comments about the Epstein case. 'Why would I risk all of it on this guy?' But many people, including Jones, were not buying it. 'Damage control,' he growled on his show. The tension between practicing politics based on conspiracy theories and having to govern extends far beyond the FBI and the Justice Department's problems with the Epstein case. And those elevated to power by Trump know that the No. 1 rule is that he is never wrong and that their role is to absorb the criticism that cannot be aimed at him. Advertisement Days after the backlash over his Epstein comments, Bongino offered other promises — new investigations into other episodes that have gripped the president's base: the discovery of cocaine in the West Wing during the Biden administration, the leak of the draft Supreme Court opinion overturning abortion rights in 2022, and the discovery of pipe bombs near Republican and Democratic Party headquarters before the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, an unsolved crime that has already consumed significant law enforcement resources. During another appearance on Fox, Bongino said the bureau was 'closing in on some suspects' in the planting of the bombs, while claiming that 'no one seemed to show any interest in this case.' In fact, investigators had conducted around 1,000 interviews, reviewed video evidence, and chased hundreds of tips before he arrived. Trump, far from distancing himself from fringe actors in his party after retaking office, has drawn them closer. Laura Loomer, who has baselessly claimed that the Sept. 11 attacks were 'an inside job' and suggested school shootings were a ruse, has become a regular visitor to the White House with outsize influence on personnel matters. Whether by design or happenstance, Bongino, a former midlevel Secret Service agent and New York City police officer, has emerged as the bureau's principal public defender, in addition to his official role running the bureau's day-to-day operations. The strain seems to be taking its toll. 'I gave up everything for this,' he lamented in another one of his Fox appearances. 'I stare at these four walls all day in D.C., by myself.' Advertisement This article originally appeared in

Speaker Johnson teases follow-ups to the ‘one big, beautiful bill'
Speaker Johnson teases follow-ups to the ‘one big, beautiful bill'

The Hill

time28 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Speaker Johnson teases follow-ups to the ‘one big, beautiful bill'

The 'one big, beautiful bill' may not be so singular, after all. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is teasing follow-up legislation to the megabill of President Trump's tax cut and spending priorities that Republicans can push though using the same special budget reconciliation process that requires only GOP votes. That tool can be used once per fiscal year, with the current fiscal year ending on Sept. 30. So after Republicans are done with the 'big, beautiful bill,' the GOP trifecta has, in theory, two more shots to muscle through party-line legislation before the next Congress comes into power after the midterms. Johnson floated plans for a second reconciliation bill while rebutting concerns from deficit hawks on the budget impact of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act — which includes an extension of tax cuts and boosts to border and defense funding, with costs offset in part by new requirements on low-income assistance programs like Medicaid and food aid. 'Everyone here wants to reduce spending,' Johnson said Friday morning on CNBC. 'But you have to do that in a sequence of events. We have a plan, OK? This is the first of a multistep process.' 'We're going to have another reconciliation bill that follows this one, possibly a third one before this Congress is up, because you can have a reconciliation bill for each budget year, each fiscal year. So that's ahead of us,' Johnson continued, also pointing to separate plans to claw back money based on recommendations from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 'We're also doing rescissions packages. We got the first one delivered this week from the White House, and that will codify many of the DOGE cuts.' The promise of another reconciliation bill is somewhat surprising given the crux of the debate that dominated the early weeks of the year: Should Republicans divide up their agenda into two bills, passing the first quickly to give Trump an early win on boosting funding for border enforcement and deportations? Or would putting all of Trump's priorities into one bill — which would contain both bitter pills and sweeteners for different factions of the razor-thin majority — be a better political strategy? Trump eventually said he preferred 'one big, beautiful bill,' a moniker that became the legislation's official title in the House last month. It's not clear what would be in a second piece of legislation. Multiple House Republicans who spoke with The Hill were unaware of plans for more reconciliation bills and were not sure what could be included in them. 'I think we need to see what's left on the table after the first one,' Rep. Michael Cloud (R-Texas) said. And to muster through multiple reconciliation bills is a delicate prospect. If members know more reconciliation bills are coming, that complicates the argument that everything in the current package — even policies some factions dislike that others love — need to stay in one megabill. The Speaker declined to elaborate on what might be in such a package when asked in a press conference last week. 'I'm not going to tell you that,' Johnson said. 'Let's get the first one done.' 'Look, I say this is the beginning of a process, and what you're going to see is a continuing of us identifying waste, fraud, abuse in government, which is our pledge of common sense, restoring common sense and fiscal sanity. So we have lots of ideas of things that might be in that package.' Republicans had started planning for the current legislative behemoth months before the 2024 election so they would be prepared to quickly execute on their policy wish list if they won the majority. 'This isn't something we just drew up overnight. So, we'll go through that same laborious process,' Johnson said. But some members have ideas of what else they'd like to see. Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) said that he'd hope a second bill would do more to tackle rolling back green energy tax credits and make further spending cuts. Ultimately, though, it will be Trump's call, Norman said: 'I know when the president gets involved, it adds a lot of value.' And Rep. August Pfluger (R-Texas) speculated that passing the 'big, beautiful bill' would inspire members to keep going with another bill. 'People like the feeling of winning,' Pfluger said.

DNC chair on leaked call says Hogg ‘essentially destroyed' shot at success
DNC chair on leaked call says Hogg ‘essentially destroyed' shot at success

The Hill

time28 minutes ago

  • The Hill

DNC chair on leaked call says Hogg ‘essentially destroyed' shot at success

Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Ken Martin said in a recent party meeting that Vice Chair David Hogg has 'essentially destroyed' his chances of leading the DNC successfully, according to leaked audio obtained by Politico. Martin seemed to get choked up as he addressed Hogg, who rose to national prominence as a gun control activist and has pledged to primary Democrats he sees as ineffective in pushing back against President Trump and the GOP. 'No one knows who the hell I am, right? I'm trying to get my sea legs underneath of me and actually develop any amount of credibility so I can go out there and raise the money and do the job I need to, to put ourselves in a position to win,' Martin told other DNC leaders on the call. 'And again, I don't think you intended this, but you essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to. It's really frustrating,' Martin said. Politico reported that the conversation took place on a Zoom meeting of DNC officers on May 15, a few days after the DNC recommended new elections on procedural grounds for seats held by Hogg and one other vice chair. Members will decide on Monday whether to hold new elections. In the recording, Martin told Hogg that he respected the progressive activist, but said the intraparty drama has led him to question whether it's worth continuing in the post. 'I'll say, look, it has plenty of warts, and we're all trying to change those, for sure, but the longer we continue this fight, the harder it is for us to actually do what we all want to do, which is make a difference in this country again,' Martin said in the meeting. 'So I deeply respect you, David. I, too, was looking forward to working with you, but this has created a situation, and I'll be very honest with you, for the first time in my 100 days on this job… the other night, I said to myself, for the first time, I don't know if I want to do this anymore.' The Hill has reached out to the DNC for comment. In a statement to Politico, provided by a spokesperson, Martin said, 'I'm not going anywhere.' 'I took this job to fight Republicans, not Democrats,' he added. 'As I said when I was elected, our fight is not within the Democratic Party, our fight is and has to be solely focused on Donald Trump and the disastrous Republican agenda. That's the work that I will continue to do every day.' Symone Sanders Townsend, an MSNBC host and former Democratic adviser, came to Martin's defense in a post on X on Sunday. 'Ken Martin had a vulnerable moment w/his vice chairs & other leaders on a call. Someone recorded it + shared it. Seems to me THAT anonymous person has no business anywhere near the DNC,' she wrote. 'As a former DNC member, it's quite clear there are too many people currently in roles for the wrong reasons. From the outside looking in, I don't think Ken Martin is one of them.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store