logo
Hegseth authorizes voluntary departure of military dependents from across Middle East amid rising tensions

Hegseth authorizes voluntary departure of military dependents from across Middle East amid rising tensions

Fox Newsa day ago

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has authorized the voluntary departure of U.S. military dependents from locations across the Middle East, a major move as tensions spike across the region.
A U.S. defense official told Fox News on Wednesday: "The safety and security of our service members and their families remains our highest priority and U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) is monitoring the developing tension in the Middle East. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has authorized the voluntary departure of military dependents from locations across the CENTCOM AOR."
The authorization affects U.S. bases throughout the CENTCOM area of responsibility, which includes key flashpoints like Iraq, Syria, Bahrain, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. While the Department of Defense (DOD) has not cited a specific threat, the move comes as Iran-backed militias increase activity and regional instability grows.
"CENTCOM is working in close coordination with our Department of State counterparts, as well as our Allies and partners in the region to maintain a constant state of readiness to support any number of missions around the world at any time," the official added.
US FORCES TARGET HOUTHI WEAPONS STORAGE FACILITIES IN YEMEN OVER THE WEEKEND: CENTCOMWhile voluntary departures aren't rare, they typically kick in when a security environment worsens. U.S. doctrine, such as JP 3‑68, explicitly provides for the voluntary departure of command-sponsored dependents at government expense whenever threats rise."Voluntary departure of command‑sponsored military dependents, nonessential DOD civilian employees and their families, families of essential DOD civilian employees, and DOD dependents schools' staff and faculty to an announced safe haven is encouraged and authorized at government expense, with return also at government expense," reads JP 3-68.CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APPThe Department of Defense did not immediately respond to an additional request for comment from Fox News Digital.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scoop: U.S. told Israel it won't participate in an Israeli strike on Iran
Scoop: U.S. told Israel it won't participate in an Israeli strike on Iran

Axios

timean hour ago

  • Axios

Scoop: U.S. told Israel it won't participate in an Israeli strike on Iran

The Trump administration told the Israeli government the U.S. won't be directly involved in any Israeli military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities, two U.S. sources and an Israeli source familiar with those discussions tell Axios. Why it matters: Officials in the U.S., Israel and Iran are all preparing for a scenario where U.S.-Iran nuclear talks collapse, Israel orders waves of strikes on Iran, and Iran retaliates by attacking Israel and U.S. bases in the region — possibly all within the next week or so. President Trump confirmed Thursday that Israeli strikes "might very well happen." Privately, the administration has informed Israel that would be a solo mission, not a joint operation, at least in terms of bombing and other offensive kinetic activity. The sources did not say whether the U.S. would provide assistance in terms of intelligence or logistics, such as with aerial refueling. The U.S. would almost certainly help Israel defend itself from Iranian retaliation, as it has during past Iranian attacks. Zoom in: While Israel could cause significant damage to Iran's nuclear program, an Israeli operation would be more limited than one involving U.S. participation. Israel's air force doesn't have B-2 or B-52 bombers that can carry the massive bunker buster bombs that would likely be needed to hit Iran's Fordow underground uranium enrichment facility, which is built deep inside a mountain. Israel would likely attempt to repeatedly strike the same targets over the course of multiple days in order to damage Iran's underground sites. Analysts are divided on the likelihood of success. State of play: Iran has vowed to strike U.S. targets in the region in the event of any attack on its nuclear program. The U.S. is in the process of withdrawing diplomats and military families who could be in harm's way. Driving the news: The Pentagon canceled on Thursday a planned visit to Israel this weekend by CENTCOM commander Gen. Erik Kurilla, a U.S. official said. The cancellation of the visit was another sign that the U.S. doesn't want to be seen as cooperating with an Israeli strike against Iran. The White House and the Israeli embassy in Washington declined to comment. What they're saying: Trump told reporters Thursday that he doesn't want to say an Israeli strike "is imminent," but it might happen. Trump stressed he wants to avoid conflict but said that will require concessions that Iran has been unwilling to make. He added that so long as there's a chance of a deal, he doesn't want Israel to do anything to "blow it." Between the lines: Trump's remarks urging Israel not to attack while talks are taking place wasn't coordinated with the Israeli government, according to a U.S. source familiar. Israel previously assured the White House it wouldn't move unless the talks fail, as Axios reported last week. State of play: Israeli officials say the Israel Defense Forces are on high alert and preparing to strike Iran quickly if White House envoy Steve Witkoff's diplomacy fails this weekend.

UN votes overwhelmingly to demand Gaza ceasefire, hostage release and aid access
UN votes overwhelmingly to demand Gaza ceasefire, hostage release and aid access

Hamilton Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

UN votes overwhelmingly to demand Gaza ceasefire, hostage release and aid access

UNITED NATIONS (AP) — U.N. member nations voted overwhelmingly Thursday to demand an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the release of all hostages held by Hamas, and unrestricted access for the delivery of desperately needed food to 2 million Palestinians. The vote in the 193-member General Assembly was 149-12 with 19 abstentions. It was adopted with a burst of applause. The resolution, drafted by Spain, 'strongly condemns any use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare.' Speaking before the vote, Israel's U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon vehemently opposed the resolution. He denied that Israel was using starvation as a weapon of war, calling the accusation 'blood libel,' and insisted that aid is being delivered. Experts and human rights workers say hunger is widespread in Gaza and some 2 million Palestinians are at risk of famine if Israel does not fully lift its blockade and halt its military campaign, which it renewed in March after ending a ceasefire with Hamas . At the start of Thursday's meeting, Spain's U.N. Ambassador Héctor José Gómez Hernández urged members to vote in favor of the resolution in light of 'the catastrophic humanitarian situation in Gaza.' The Palestinian U.N. ambassador, Riyad Mansour, also pleaded with U.N. members to vote in favor. 'The actions you take today to stop the killing, displacement and the famine will determine how many more Palestinian children die a horrible death,' he said. Last week, the U.N. Security Council failed to pass a resolution demanding a ceasefire in Gaza and calling on Israel to lift all restrictions on the delivery of aid. The United States vetoed the resolution because it was not linked to the release of the hostages, while all 14 other members of the council voted in favor. There are no vetoes in the 193-member General Assembly. But unlike in the Security Council, assembly resolutions are not legally binding, though they are seen as a barometer of world opinion. After a 10-week blockade that barred all aid to Gaza, Israel is allowing the United Nations to deliver a trickle of food assistance and is backing a newly created U.S. aid group, which has opened several sites in the center and south of the territory to deliver food parcels. But the aid system rolled out last month by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has been troubled by near-daily shootings as crowds make their way to aid sites, while the longstanding U.N.-run system has struggled to deliver food because of Israeli restrictions and a breakdown of law and order. Like the failed Security Council resolution, the resolution passed on Thursday does not condemn Hamas' deadly attack in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which ignited the war, or say the militant group must disarm and withdraw from Gaza. Both are U.S. demands. Acting U.S. Ambassador Dorothy Shea told the assembly before the vote that the resolution 'sends an unacceptable message to Hamas and other Iran-backed terrorist proxies, and that message is, you will be rewarded for taking hostages, diverting aid and launching attacks from civilian areas.' The resolution references a March 28 legally binding order by the top United Nations court for Israel to open more land crossings into Gaza for food, water, fuel and other supplies. The International Court of Justice issued the order in a case brought by South Africa accusing Israel of acts of genocide in its war in Gaza, charges Israel strongly denies. The resolution stresses that Israel, as an occupying power, has an obligation under international law to ensure that humanitarian aid reaches those in need. It reiterates the assembly's commitment to a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with the Gaza Strip as part of a Palestinian state. The assembly is holding a high-level meeting next week to push for a two-state solution, which Israel has rejected. The resolution supports mediation efforts by Egypt, Qatar and the United States aimed at implementing a January ceasefire agreement. The Hamas-led militants killed around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took 251 hostages. About 55 hostages are still being held. Israel's military campaign has killed over 55,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. It says women and children make up most of the dead, but doesn't distinguish between civilians and combatants. Israel says it has killed more than 20,000 militants, without providing evidence. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store