Council retakes possession of home of 1916 Rising leader after alleged trespassers vacate building
Dublin City Council
has retaken possession of the former home and shop of
1916 Rising
leader
Tom Clarke
on Amiens Street after a dozen alleged trespassers vacated the property, the High Court has heard.
Last November, the council issued High Court proceedings aimed at restraining 'persons unknown' from trespassing at the property after receiving reports of unauthorised occupation last May.
On Tuesday, Gavin Mooney SC, for the council, said that an undertaking had been agreed by those allegedly trespassing to vacate the house.
He said that, upon inspection, there had been 'slightly more damage' to the property than thought, but that this would not be an issue.
READ MORE
None of the 12 named alleged trespassers was in court before Mr Justice Brian Cregan, who adjourned the matter.
Mr Mooney said the 12 individuals had now given their names to the council and vacated the house.
In February, an application by the council for a court-ordered inspection of the Georgian building was adjourned amid concerns of a 'stand-off' with anyone occupying the premises.
One of the alleged trespassers told the High Court that while some in occupancy 'had no huge objection' to the inspection, others were not sure.
'We deal with things by consensus,' then-occupant Jem Cleaver told the court.
Ms Cleaver told Mr Justice Cregan that she did not want a 'stand off' between any of the occupants and any council staff entering and inspecting the seven-bedroom building.
Dublin City Council was seeking to inspect the premises, which dates from the 1790s, for damages caused either by
Storm Éowyn
or by the occupants.
Mr Justice Cregan had been told the occupants accepted that they had to vacate the heritage site by May 12th, but opposed an inspection, which they feared would violate their privacy and prejudice them on any council housing list should they give their names to officials.
The council had spent €630,000 on purchasing the run-down building in 2018 with plans to transform it into a museum and community centre.
The court previously heard works had not begun as a chosen contractor pulled out in 2023, but that the council was 'anxious' to revive its restoration plan.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
13 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Bathing restriction in place at Dollymount Strand due to ‘suspected sewage discharge'
The restriction came into effect on June 3 and is expected to remain in effect for four days. Dublin City Council has said there is a risk of deterioration of water quality due to discharge from the wastewater treatment plant and the incident was likely caused by heavy rainfall. The water will be resampled and results will be made available upon their receipt. The HSE and the Environmental Protection Agency have been notified, while swimmers have been urged to not enter the water as swimming may cause illness. Meanwhile, bathing is prohibited at Sandymount Strand to prevent exposure of swimmers to pollution. Dublin MEP, Aodhán Ó Ríordáin, called for action to be taken to reverse 'years of neglect'. 'Dublin Bay is such a fantastic natural resource enjoyed by so many but its neglect by the State has become increasingly pronounced. Particularly during the summer months, so many swimmers enjoy a dip at all hours of the day. More and more, warnings and bans are issued following sewage runoff which is just not acceptable,' he said. 'A city that can't keep its iconic bay and natural resources clean is clear evidence that protecting the environment is simply not a priority.' Mr Ó Riordáin said Labour's Dublin Bay Bill would establish an authority to 'preserve and protect the Bay - including regulating and controlling pollution in and around the bay to put an end to swim bans'. 'People from all over Dublin, as well as residents associations, swimming clubs, and environmental activists, have been crying out for a stronger vision for tackling pollution and dereliction along our coast. I'm urging Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil to stop neglecting our great city, for the love of Dublin.'
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Boy (16) ‘at real risk of death' after targeting by drug dealers brought to secure care
A 16-year-old boy in State care 'at real risk of death' as he is targeted by drug dealers to whom he owes money was ordered to be picked by gardaí on Thursday and brought to a secure-care unit. In an unusual step, Tusla applied to the High Court for an interim secure care order on an ex-parte basis – where only one side is represented – to ensure neither the boy nor his father knew before the boy could be picked up. Judge John Jordan heard the teenager, who has a difficult family history and has been in care since 2023, was not staying in his current placement. 'He is essentially residing with father ... His behaviour has deteriorated in the last couple of months,' counsel for Tusla said. READ MORE 'There is a real threat to this child's life. He has become involved in drug-dealing, has amassed a drug debt and on [a date in March] two other teenagers present in his house ... when they left somebody shot at them.' One was injured, but gardaí advised the 16-year-old 'was the target for the attack' and 'there was an intent to kill'. The boy 'struggles to regulate his emotions', had abused care staff and was 'totally disengaged from education'. The judge was satisfied the boy's 'chaotic lifestyle', vulnerability and the 'real risk to his life' reached the threshold for an interim secure care order. A child or young person who is deemed to be at such a risk to themselves, or others, as to need therapeutic residential care may be detained in secure care by the High Court. Another boy, aged 13, who had barricaded himself in his room for months living on fizzy drinks and junk food, had gained four kilos since 'finally' entering secure care in April. A secure care order had been made in December. Supporting Tusla's application to extend the order for a further three months, David Leahy SC for the guardian ad litem – an independent person appointed by the court to be the voice of the child – said the boy had 'very significant attachment difficulties'. 'Given the circumstance in which he grew up how could that not be so?' he said. The boy's mother was dead and his father only recently made contact with him. The judge met the boy in recent months, in secure care. 'He is only 13 years old but in fact would pass for a boy of seven or eight. He is a tiny, diminutive young boy who clearly has suffered huge neglect despite the best efforts of [foster carers] to address that.' The foster placement broke down and the boy was in a special emergency arrangement in the community. 'In recent years he has had no safe relationships,' the judge said. 'He has sought out peers, generally older teenagers who were engaging in criminal activity ... [making himself] vulnerable and placing himself at risk.' His secure-care order was extended. A three-month extension to secure care was granted in the case of a 14-year-old boy admitted in February. The boy had 'made good progress' and was 'happier and more regulated'. However, he 'does not understand the consequences of his behaviour' and was resisting therapeutic interventions. 'This is a boy with significant problems as a result of the dysfunctional household into which he was born and severe trauma he suffered as a child,' said the judge. There had been 'issues of drugs and alcohol, child sexual exploitation on top of the neglect'. A fresh secure-care order was granted in respect of a 17-year-old boy who has been 'fire-setting' in his secure-care placement. He will turn 18 in November, the court heard, and is 'very concerned' about having to leave the unit. 'It was clear from speaking to him [special care] was having a hugely beneficial effect.'
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Suspended solicitor's appeal over professional misconduct finding to be heard in July
A date has been fixed next month for an appeal by suspended solicitor Declan O'Callaghan over findings of professional misconduct in connection with his handling of a land deal in Co Mayo. On Friday, the president of the High Court, Mr Justice David Barniville, set a provisional hearing date of July 23rd for the appeal. Barrister Michael Mullooly, for Mr O'Callaghan, said he expected it to run for two days and Mr O'Callaghan would be among his side's witnesses. Barrister Ruadhán Ó Ciaráin, for Nirvanna, the concrete products manufacturer that brought the complaint against Mr O'Callaghan over the 2007 land deal to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, said it is expected to call two witnesses at most. READ MORE Last month, Mr Justice Barniville rejected a challenge by Mr O'Callaghan over the procedures adopted by the tribunal in reaching its findings last year of professional misconduct over the 2007 deal. On Friday, he made an order requiring Mr O'Callaghan to pay Nirvanna's costs in opposing that application. The rejection of Mr O'Callaghan's judicial review-type challenge cleared the way for the hearing of his full appeal. If he loses that appeal, the High Court will then consider whether or not to grant an application by the Law Society to strike him off. The society has agreed with the tribunal recommendation that Mr O'Callaghan be struck off, but the final decision on whether or not to grant a strike-off order must be made by the High Court president. The three-member tribunal last summer found Mr O'Callaghan guilty of four counts of professional misconduct over his handling of the 2007 land deal involving Nirvanna, a company of Co Mayo businessman Tom Fleming. [ Declan O'Callaghan: No end in sight as saga of suspended solicitor continues Opens in new window ] Now aged 80, Mr Fleming claimed Nirvanna never received €250,000 for selling the land to a now-deceased businessman. Mr O'Callaghan denied the sum was owed, and disputed the transaction was for 'sale' of the lands. The tribunal upheld the Nirvanna complaint, finding professional misconduct on grounds Mr O'Callaghan breached his duty of care to the company, provided inadequate professional services, and purported to act for vendor and purchaser in a transaction where there was 'a clear conflict of interest'. In recommending strike-off, it had regard to two findings of professional misconduct previously made by it in 1990 and 2019 against Mr O'Callaghan. He has been suspended as a solicitor since 2018 arising from a separate Law Society investigation into matters at his now-defunct practice Kilrane O'Callaghan & Co, which was based in Ballaghaderreen, Co Roscommon. The suspension was imposed pending a tribunal hearing of the society's application for an inquiry into matters arising from its investigation. Concerns raised in an independent solicitor's report for that investigation included that Mr O'Callaghan withdrew substantial fees from the estate of a bereaved child.
