
India in the crosshairs
There have been two wars on our two borders in a span of two months. But only one is ours. Best to focus on that one.
Those among us who say that Israeli and American aggression against Iran is condemnable in the strongest words, are right. There can be absolutely nothing right or justified in two nuclear powers ganging up against a non-nuclear country (no proof yet that Iran has weaponized enriched uranium) and launching unprovoked attacks against military and civilian targets. Pakistan has done right to express solidarity with Iran.
We have also taken the correct initiative at the UN by sponsoring a resolution urging an immediate halt to aggression against Iran.
But there are limits to what we can do. Or should do. These limits should be defined by our priorities. Not by our emotions.
All policy must therefore coalesce around these priorities with clarity and cold logic. This logic dictates that our real, clear and present danger emanates from India, and India alone. All other threats are either indirect, or implied, or both.
It makes perfect sense then to carry out our diplomatic and kinetic calculation in reference to the threat from India. The fog of war on our eastern border appears to have made this fact more difficult than it needs to be. Suddenly, it is all about Iran and Israel and the US, when in reality it should really be about India, India and India.
Nothing illustrates this more than our approach towards the United States, and more specifically, towards its president. In the last six weeks he has midwifed a ceasefire between Pakistan and India (to our advantage), hyphenated Islamabad and New Delhi (to our advantage), repeatedly mentioned Kashmir thereby internationalizing it to the maximum (to our advantage), praised the leadership of both countries numerous times (to our advantage), and invited Pakistan's army chief for a lunch at the White House (to our huge advantage).
At the same time, he has supported Israel's genocide in Gaza, persecuted immigrants in the US, slapped travel bans on countries that are mostly Muslim-majority, waged a tariff war against the world, insulted foreign leaders in the Oval office, and has now outrightly attacked Iran. It ain't a pretty scorecard by any measure.
How should we read the scorecard from our vantage point? When we praise Trump but also support Iran, most people believe this is a contradiction that reflects poorly on our decision-making. This may not be entirely true. The fact is that we do not need to conduct our policy in binaries. If the United States has acted immorally in Gaza and duplicitously in Iran, it is not for the first time it has done so.
And certainly not for the last time. But if the US president is providing us an advantage over India, this is definitely for the first time since at least the Bush-Musharraf bromance from two decades ago.
It is, in fact, after decades that Pakistan finds itself in a foreign policy sweet spot. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's disastrous decision to launch attacks on Pakistan in May, and our subsequent victory in the four-day conflict has catapulted Pakistan to an elevated diplomatic level beyond all calculations. This provides us with a great opportunity to strengthen ourselves militarily, project our narrative diplomatically and leverage this sweet spot to improve our economic situation.
It is a good time to be prudent and practical. It is a bad time to be reckless and rash.
This means matters on our western border should not distract us from the urgency needed at the eastern border. Emotional outbursts at the role of the US president in the Middle East are good for venting but should have no place on the policymaking table.
Pakistan is doing everything right by supporting Iran and condemning Israel, and it is doing nothing wrong with consolidating the relationship with President Trump. And no, this will not happen at the expense of our bond with China. That's fair to assume. Pakistan has given India a bloody nose with the support of China, and the next round with New Delhi is only a matter of time. We should aim to ensure that the next time is the last time.
This will require an effort that needs maximum support – or at the least, appreciative understanding – from global powers. The Indus Water Treaty red light is flashing.
As are many other danger lights from across the LoC and the international border. To wage successful offensive defence against India – the kind that deters and degrades India's will and capacity to strike at Pakistan – we need conceptual, doctrinal, material and military planning and preparedness far beyond our present level.
To achieve this, we will need laser focus on the Indian threat and sharpened policy prescriptions that deflect all distractions and zoom in on all relations that strengthen our ability to solve the Indian problem once and for all.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Attacks on Iran: If we don't speak, next they will come to Pakistan: Bilawal
ISLAMABAD: Regarding the military attacks of Israel and America on Iran, Pakistan People's Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that first they came to Lebanon, then to Yemen, and now to Iran, if we don't speak up, they will come to us, and there will be no one to speak up. Speaking on the floor of the National Assembly on Monday, he said that that we strongly condemn the attacks on Iran's nuclear sites. 'Israel attacked Iran based on lies. We condemn it. Iran's sovereignty was violated. Iran's military leadership was targeted not on the battlefield but in their homes. Iranian scientists were targeted. The biggest violation is the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities.' He said that the United States (US) attacked Iran's nuclear sites. US carried out strikes at Iranian nuclear sites. Had there been a spread of radiations due to the attack, it would have impacted the entire region, especially Pakistan. The people of America do not support this war. The PPP chairman said that earlier this was said about Iraq and now it has been said about Iran that they have weapons of mass destruction. 'First, they came to Lebanon, then to Yemen and now to Iran. If we do not speak up now, then when they come to us, there will be no one to speak up. The Israeli regime must be stopped,' he said. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Israel and Iran agree on ceasefire to end 12-day war, Trump says
WASHINGTON/DOHA/ISTANBUL: US President Donald Trump announced on Monday a complete ceasefire between Israel and Iran, potentially ending the 12-day war that saw millions flee Tehran and prompted fears of further escalation in the war-torn region. But there was no confirmation from Israel and the Israeli military said two volleys of missiles were launched from Iran towards Israel in the early hours of Tuesday. Witnesses later heard explosions near Tel Aviv and Beersheba in central Israel. Israel media said a building had been struck and three people were killed in the missile strike on Beersheba. Israel, joined by the United States on the weekend, has carried out attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities, after alleging Tehran was getting close to obtaining a nuclear weapon. 'On the assumption that everything works as it should, which it will, I would like to congratulate both Countries, Israel and Iran, on having the Stamina, Courage, and Intelligence to end, what should be called, 'THE 12 DAY WAR',' Trump wrote on his Truth Social site. While an Iranian official earlier confirmed that Tehran had agreed to a ceasefire, the country's foreign minister said there would be no cessation of hostilities unless Israel stopped its attacks. Abbas Araqchi said early on Tuesday that if Israel stopped its 'illegal aggression' against the Iranian people no later than 4 a.m. Tehran time (0030 GMT) on Tuesday, Iran had no intention of continuing its response afterwards. There have been no reported Israeli attacks on Iran since that time. 'The final decision on the cessation of our military operations will be made later,' Araqchi added in a post on X. A senior White House official said Trump had brokered the deal in a call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel had agreed so long as Iran did not launch further attacks. Trump appeared to suggest that Israel and Iran would have some time to complete any missions that are underway, at which point the ceasefire would begin in a staged process. Iran denies ever having a nuclear weapons program but Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has said that if it wanted to, world leaders 'wouldn't be able to stop us'. Trump says Iran gave US notice before attack on Qatar military base Israel, which is not a party to the international Non-Proliferation Treaty, is the only country in the Middle East believed to have nuclear weapons. Israel does not deny or confirm that. Qatar's Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani secured Tehran's agreement during a call with Iranian officials, an official briefed on the negotiations told Reuters on Tuesday. U.S. Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff were in direct and indirect contact with the Iranians, a White House official said. Neither Iran's U.N. mission nor the Israeli embassy in Washington responded to separate requests for comment from Reuters. Hours earlier, three Israeli officials had signaled Israel was looking to wrap up its campaign in Iran soon and had passed the message on to the United States. Netanyahu had told government ministers whose discussions ended early on Tuesday not to speak publicly, Israel's Channel 12 television reported. Markets reacted favorably to the news. S&P 500 futures rose 0.4% late on Monday, suggesting traders expect the U.S. stock market to open with gains on Tuesday. U.S. crude futures fell in early Asian trading hours on Tuesday to their lowest level in more than a week after Trump said a ceasefire had been agreed, relieving worries of supply disruption in the region. Endto the fighting? There did not appear to be calm yet in the region. The Israeli military issued two evacuation warnings in less than two hours to residents of areas in the Iranian capital Tehran, one late on Monday and one early on Tuesday. Israeli Army radio reported early on Tuesday that alarms were activated in the southern Golan Heights area due to fears of hostile aircraft intrusion. Earlier on Monday, Trump said he would encourage Israel to proceed towards peace after dismissing Iran's attack on an American air base that caused no injuries and thanking Tehran for the early notice of the strikes. He said Iran fired 14 missiles at the U.S. air base, calling it 'a very weak response, which we expected, and have very effectively countered.' Iran's handling of the attack recalled earlier clashes with the United States and Israel, with Tehran seeking a balance between saving face with a military response but without provoking a cycle of escalation it can't afford. Tehran appears to have achieved that goal. Iran's attack came after U.S. bombers dropped 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs on Iranian underground nuclear facilities at the weekend, joining Israel's air war. Much of Tehran's population of 10 million has fled after days of bombing. The Trump administration maintains that its aim was solely to destroy Iran's nuclear program, not to open a wider war. 'Iran was very close to having a nuclear weapon,' Vice President JD Vance said in an interview on Fox News' 'Special Report with Bret Baier.' 'Now Iran is incapable of building a nuclear weapon with the equipment they have because we destroyed it,' Vance said. Trump has cited intelligence reports that Iran was close to building a nuclear weaopon, without elaborating. However, U.S. intelligence agencies said earlier this year they assessed that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon and a source with access to U.S. intelligence reports told Reuters last week that that assessment hadn't changed. But in a social media post on Sunday, Trump spoke of toppling the hardline clerical rulers who have been Washington's principal foes in the Middle East since Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution. Israel, however, had made clear that its strikes on Evin prison - a notorious jail for housing political prisoners - and other targets in Tehran were intended to hit the Iranian ruling apparatus broadly, and its ability to sustain power.


Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Gold at near 2-week low after Trump announces Israel-Iran ceasefire
Gold prices fell to a near two-week low on Tuesday as risk appetite improved after U.S. President Donald Trump said Iran and Israel had agreed to a ceasefire, denting demand for safe-haven assets. Spot gold was down 0.5% to $3,351.47 an ounce, as of 0257 GMT, after hitting its lowest level since June 11 earlier in the session. U.S. gold futures slipped 0.9% to $3,365.30. 'It seems like there's a good bit of geopolitical risk that's exiting the market here near term after, of course, we have signs of de-escalation between the U.S. and Iran,' said Ilya Spivak, head of global macro at Tastylive. Trump announced a complete ceasefire between Israel and Iran, potentially ending the 12-day conflict that saw millions flee Tehran and prompted fears of further escalation in the war-torn region. There was no immediate comment from Israel. While an Iranian official earlier confirmed that Tehran had agreed to a ceasefire, the country's foreign minister said there would be no cessation of hostilities unless Israel stopped its attacks. Global shares rallied, while oil prices slipped to a one-week low after Trump announced the Iran-Israel ceasefire. Meanwhile, U.S. Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman said on Monday that the time to cut interest rates is approaching amid potential risks to the job market. Gold price per tola falls Rs300 in Pakistan Investors await testimony by Fed Chair Jerome Powell before the House Financial Services Committee later on Tuesday. Powell has been cautious about signalling near-term easing. 'The bias for gold prices is higher, but we might see a correction in near-term and an uptick in the dollar if Powell convinces markets that they're not going to cut more than twice this year,' Spivak said. Gold tends to thrive in a low-interest-rate environment. Elsewhere, spot silver eased 0.1% to $36.10 per ounce, platinum fell 0.2% to $1,292.39, while palladium slipped 0.4% to $1,073.05.