logo
The brutal and unacceptable truth about lay-offs in today's working world

The brutal and unacceptable truth about lay-offs in today's working world

Irish Times3 days ago

Imagine waking up one morning and lying in bed, checking your overnight emails before you have to make a
work
call to
France
, when you see a message from your company's chief executive.
It says a lot of people are going to be laid off. The next email is worse: you are going to be one of them.
You sit up in bed, heart racing and grab your laptop to log in to the company network. Your password no longer works. It's time to make the call to France but you can't remember the name of the man you're supposed to be calling, or his number. It was all in an email you can no longer access.
You text a favourite manager, whose number is thankfully in your phone. He texts back to say he has been laid off too. He found out after trying to enter the office and discovering his badge didn't work.
READ MORE
Eventually, you get up and contemplate the dismal weeks ahead on the path your life is about to take.
[
Bust-ups and burnout: Let our experts help you deal with workplace conflict
Opens in new window
]
Vivek Gulati does not have to imagine any of this. It is almost exactly what happened to him when he became one of the 12,000 workers
Google
dismissed in early 2023 – a dismal period of tech sector lay-offs.
The 47-year-old software engineer later wrote about his experience in a Harvard Business Review article that laid bare the shock of learning you have lost your job via email.
As many as 57 per cent of US workers made redundant in the past two years received the news by email or phone. Just 30 per cent learnt face-to-face.

Survey on careers szite Zety
I tracked him down this week, after new
US
monthly data showed lay-offs jumped by nearly 200,000 in April. Separately, a survey suggested that remote, impersonal job cuts that were an unavoidable feature of pandemic lockdowns have persisted.
As many as 57 per cent of US workers made redundant in the past two years received the news by email or phone, the Zety careers site survey found. Just 30 per cent learned face-to-face.
The rest heard on a video call or the office grapevine, except for an unlucky 2 per cent who only realised they had been axed when they couldn't log into their work email or a messaging system such as Slack.
This doubtless happened before the pandemic, too. Either way, it did not surprise Gulati, who is now back at Google as a contractor rather than a full-time employee.
As a tech veteran, he has been through retrenchment before and has no time for the idea that email might be the only way to mass fire thousands of people.
Everyone terminated, he said , has a manager who could deliver the news and offer personalised assistance, which is true and important.
When he lost his job at US tech group, Broadcom, nearly a decade ago, a vice-president called to say an acquisition had made the move unavoidable but he wanted to help. He offered to introduce Gulati to another company he believed would happily hire him.
'To this day I have a lot of respect for that VP and the whole team I worked with,' says Gulati.
That is understandable, as is the impact on people who keep their jobs after mass firings but live in so much fear about the next round that they make working life more sharp-elbowed and less collaborative.
That's just one reason why it is in an employer's interest to at least make a phone call about a lay-off, though even that is not ideal. There is no way of knowing what the person to be dispensed with is doing at that moment.
Even if they are not at the bedside of a dying parent or heading in to a funeral, they could easily be somewhere lacking privacy, like the hairdresser. That's where a popular Australian TV news anchor named Sharyn Ghidella was last year when she got a call to say that, after 17 years at the network, her time was up.
It was, she said later, 'not quite the chop I was hoping for'. Her dismayed fans accused the network of cowardice and rudeness.
Sacking people is sometimes necessary. I have done it myself, though will hopefully never have to do it again.
But there is no excuse for making a brutal moment worse by delivering the news with no personalised human contact, especially at a large, well-resourced company. The sooner this needlessly cruel blot on corporate life ends, the better. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Irish Times view on the US/Iran talks: difficult compromises lie ahead
The Irish Times view on the US/Iran talks: difficult compromises lie ahead

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

The Irish Times view on the US/Iran talks: difficult compromises lie ahead

Many actors are in play and a great deal is at stake in the latest round of talks between the United States and Iran on that country's nuclear enrichment programme. Israel is threatening to attack Iranian nuclear plants if the US fails to act, European powers accuse Iran of breaching agreed inspections, while Gulf powers exert a powerful influence on President Donald Trump to avoid a dangerous war by compromises that would open up large economic opportunities for the US. These bilateral talks, and the parallel nuclear negotiations in Vienna, which could open up a new round of United Nations sanctions, hinge largely on whether Iran can continue its nuclear enrichment programme or must close it down. Iran flatly refuses to stop enrichment, a demand spearheaded by Israel and supported by a strong lobby within Trump's entourage. He has recently shifted his position towards no enrichment, but if that remains unacceptable to the Iranians he faces a fateful choice between finding a compromise and opening a path towards possible war. Trump's first overseas state visit to Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar last month exposed him to their immense wealth and newfound regional power, both of which he values. Their desire for more stable relations with Iran cuts right across Israeli leader Binyamin Netanyahu's push for military action against Iran's enrichment. That feeds into the intense debates around Trump's administration on whether such a war would derail his presidency. There is scope for diplomatic progress if the political will is there. One suggestion from the US negotiator Steve Witkoff is that Iran's enrichment for energy and other peaceful uses be tied into a wider regional programme that would create security and economic incentives all round. Iran's refusal of that option could shift if it sees UN sanctions as a real possibility and chooses to avoid that. France, Germany and the UK should channel such pressure towards finding such a path to regional security as part of their wider critique of Netanyahu's war in Gaza. READ MORE

Elon Musk says he ‘regrets' some posts he made about Donald Trump
Elon Musk says he ‘regrets' some posts he made about Donald Trump

Irish Times

time14 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Elon Musk says he ‘regrets' some posts he made about Donald Trump

Billionaire Elon Musk has said he regrets some of the posts he made last week about US president Donald Trump , in a message on his social media platform X . 'I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far,' Mr Musk wrote. The two men began exchanging insults last week on social media, with the Tesla and SpaceX chief executive describing the US president's sweeping tax and spending bill as a 'disgusting abomination.' Mr Musk called for Mr Trump to be impeached, suggested his trade tariffs would cause a US recession, threatened to decommission SpaceX capsules used to transport Nasa astronauts and insinuated the president was associated with the late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. READ MORE Mr Musk's post comes days after Mr Trump said his relationship with the world's richest man was over. I regret some of my posts about President — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025

US and China agree to framework deal to restore trade war truce
US and China agree to framework deal to restore trade war truce

Irish Times

time15 hours ago

  • Irish Times

US and China agree to framework deal to restore trade war truce

The US and China have agreed to a framework that restores a truce in their trade war after two days of marathon negotiations in London. The breakthrough late on Tuesday followed an agreement in Geneva last month aimed at easing trade tensions between the world's two economic superpowers, which had faltered over differences regarding Chinese rare earth exports and US export controls. The US team, which included commerce secretary Howard Lutnick and US trade representative Jamieson Greer, will return to Washington to present the deal to US President Donald Trump , Mr Lutnick said. He did not provide any details about the framework. Li Chenggang, China's vice-minister of commerce, described the talks as 'rational, in-depth and candid', and said the sides had agreed to implement the consensus reached in Geneva and in a phone call between Trump and Chinese president Xi Jinping last week, according to state news agency Xinhua. READ MORE He expressed hope that the progress made in London 'will be conducive to strengthening trust between China and the United States'. China's CSI 300 index of Shanghai- and Shenzhen-listed stocks rose 0.8 per cent on Wednesday, while Hong Kong's Hang Seng benchmark was up about 1 per cent. [ How a man described as 'dumber than a sack of bricks' came to dominate global trade policy Opens in new window ] Both countries agreed in Geneva last month to slash their respective tariffs by 115 percentage points and provided a 90-day window to resolve the trade war. But the ceasefire came under pressure after Washington accused Beijing of reneging on an agreement to speed up the export of rare earths, while China criticised new US export controls. The US team, which also included treasury secretary Scott Bessent, had held two days of talks with the Chinese delegation, led by He Lifeng, a vice-premier responsible for the economy. Earlier on Tuesday, Lutnick said the talks could stretch into a third day. How to manage your pension in these volatile times Listen | 37:00 Mr Bessent left London before the talks ended to return to Washington ahead of a previously scheduled plan to testify before Congress on Wednesday. The talks were held in the historic Lancaster House mansion in central London, a short walk from Buckingham Palace, which was provided by the British government as a neutral ground for the talks. The negotiations were launched to ensure Chinese exports of rare earths to the US and American technology export controls on China did not derail broader talks between the sides. Ahead of the first round of talks in Geneva, Mr Bessent had warned that the high level of mutual tariffs had amounted to an effective embargo on bilateral trade. [ US tariffs will result in shock to global growth but not recession, World Bank says Opens in new window ] Chinese exports to the US fell more steeply in May on a year earlier than at any point since the pandemic in 2020. The US had said China was not honouring its pledge in Geneva to ease restrictions on rare earths exports, which are critical to the defence, car and tech industries, and was dragging its feet over approving licences for shipments, affecting manufacturing supply chains in the US and Europe. Beijing has accused the US of 'seriously violating' the Geneva agreement after it announced new restrictions on sales of chip design software to Chinese companies. It has also objected to the US issuing new warnings on global use of Huawei chips, and cancelling visas for Chinese students. On Monday, a senior White House official indicated that Trump could ease restrictions on selling chips to China if Beijing agreed to speed up the export of rare earths. That would amount to a significant policy shift from former president Joe Biden's administration, which implemented what it called a 'small yard, high fence' approach to restrict Beijing's ability to obtain US technology that could be used to help its military. Separately, a US federal appeals court on Tuesday allowed some of Trump's broadest tariffs to remain in place while it reviews a lower-court ruling that had blocked his 'liberation day' levies on US trading partners. The ruling extended an earlier, temporary reprieve, and will allow Trump to enact the measures as well as separate levies targeting Mexico, Canada and China. The president has however already paused the wider 'reciprocal' tariffs for 90 days. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store