
Bondi stabbing: How killer Joel Cauchi slipped through the cracks
For many, Saturdays are something to look forward to - relaxed times, enjoyed with family and friends. But Elizabeth Young "dreads" them. It's a weekly reminder of her daughter Jade's violent murder at Westfield Bondi Junction."On a lovely autumn afternoon, to learn your daughter is dead, stabbed in broad daylight, killed amidst fellow unsuspecting shoppers... [when she] was living, breathing, just an hour ago... it's the stuff of nightmares, of a parallel universe," Elizabeth told an inquiry into the mass killing this week."The moment [the attacker] casually plunged that knife into Jade, our ordinary lives were shattered."Her pain was echoed by families of the other victims who gave emotional testimonies on the final day of a five-week coronial inquest into the fatal stabbings on 13 April last year.The inquiry sought to understand how a 40-year-old Queensland man with a long history of mental illness was able to walk into the popular Sydney shopping centre on a busy Saturday afternoon and kill six people, injuring 10 others including a nine-month-old baby.The court heard hours of evidence from dozens of witnesses - doctors, survivors, victims' families, police - in a bid to find out how, or if, Australia can prevent a such a tragedy happening again."It seems to me that my daughter and five others were killed by the cumulative failures of numbers of people within a whole series of fallible systems," Elizabeth told New South Wales (NSW) Coroners Court.
Shopping centre stabbings shock nation
It was a mild, sparkling afternoon - the first day of school holidays – when Joel Cauchi walked into the sprawling shopping centre, just minutes from Australia's most famous beach.Just before 15:33 local time (GMT), Cauchi took a 30cm knife from his backpack and stabbed to death his first victim, 25-year-old Dawn Singleton.
Within three minutes, he had fatally attacked five others – Yixuan Cheng, 27; Jade Young, 47, Ashlee Good, 38; Faraz Tahir, 30; and Pikria Darchia, 55. Cauchi also injured 10 others including Good's infant daughter.At 15:38, five minutes after his rampage started, Cauchi was shot dead by police officer Amy Scott, who had been on duty nearby and arrived at the centre about a minute earlier.As news outlets reported on the killings, Cauchi's parents recognised their son on TV and called the police to alert them about his decades-long struggle with serious mental health problems.Jade Young's family was also confronted by images of her on TV, describing to the inquest the horror of seeing video which showed her "lifeless body being worked on". Similarly, Julie Singleton, whose daughter Dawn was killed while standing in a line at a bakery, heard her daughter named as a victim on the radio before her body had even been formally identified and other relatives informed.The scenes at Bondi sent shockwaves across the nation, where mass murder is rare, and prompted a rush of anger and fear from women in particular. All except two of the 16 victims were female, including five of the six people who died.
Missed opportunities for intervention
A key focus of the inquest was to scrutinise the multiple interactions Cauchi had with police and mental health professionals in the months and years leading up to the attacks.The inquest heard that Cauchi was once a bright young man with a promising life ahead of him. His family say he was a gifted student, and had attended a private school on scholarship before topping his class at university.At the age of 17, in 2001, Cauchi was diagnosed with schizophrenia and soon started taking medication for his condition.After a decade of managing it in the public health system, Cauchi started regular sessions with psychiatrist Dr Andrea Boros-Lavack in his hometown of Toowoomba in 2012.In 2015 he complained about the medication side effects, so Dr Boros-Lavack started to gradually reduce his dosage of clozapine – used for treatment-resistant schizophrenia – after seeking a second opinion from another psychiatrist, the inquest heard.She weaned him off clozapine entirely in 2018 and Cauchi also stopped taking medication to treat his obsessive-compulsive disorder the year after, she said.In 2019, for the first time in about 15 years, Cauchi was no longer on antipsychotic medications. No second opinion on completely stopping either drug was sought by Dr Boros-Lavack, she admitted under questioning.The inquest heard from medical professionals who said that in most cases, patients coming off antipsychotic medications transition to another one, rather than ceasing treatment altogether.Within months, Cauchi's mum contacted his psychiatrist with concerns about her son's mental state after finding notes showing he believed he was "under satanic control". Around the same time, Cauchi developed what Dr Boros-Lavack told the inquest was "a compulsive interest in porn". She wrote a prescription but told the inquest it was up to Cauchi to decide if he would start taking the medication again.In 2020, Cauchi left his family home, moved to Brisbane and stopped seeing Dr Boros-Lavack.At this time, after almost two decades of treatment, Cauchi had no regular psychiatrist, was not on any medications to treat his schizophrenia and had no family living nearby.The inquest heard he began seeking a gun licence, contacting three Brisbane doctors for a medical certificate to support his application. They either didn't request access to his medical file or weren't given his whole history by Dr Boros-Lavack, who said if they needed more information they could have asked her for it. The third doctor gave Cauchi the clearance he was after, but he never applied for a gun, the court was told.
Meanwhile Cauchi was increasingly coming into contact with police. After moving to Brisbane, he was pulled over three times for driving erratically. In 2021, officers were called to Cauchi's unit in Brisbane after residents heard a man screaming and banging sounds.In 2022, Cauchi was reported to police after calling a girl's school to ask if he could come and watch the students swim and play sports. Officers tried to call Cauchi but weren't able to reach him.In January 2023, Cauchi had moved back in with his parents in Toowoomba and called police to complain that his father had stolen his collection of "pigging knives". At this time, his mother raised concerns with the officers, saying he should be back on medication.Authorities can't detain people for mental health reasons unless they are a risk to themselves and as the officers had assessed Cauchi did not meet that description, they left, the court heard.After the call-out, one of the attending police officers sent an email to an internal police mental health coordinator, requesting they follow up on Cauchi. However, the email was overlooked due to understaffing, the inquest was told.Months later, police in Sydney found Cauchi sleeping rough near a road after being called by a concerned passerby.By 2024 Cauchi's mental health had deteriorated, he was homeless, and isolated from his family.
Three minutes that changed everything
The inquest looked closely at Cauchi's mental health treatment in Queensland, with a panel of five psychiatrists tasked with reviewing it.They found that Dr Boros-Lavack had missed opportunities to put him back on anti-psychotic medication, one member of the panel saying she had "not taken seriously enough" the concerns from Cauchi's mother in late-2019.The panel also gave evidence at the inquest that Cauchi was "floridly psychotic" - in the active part of a psychotic episode – when he walked into the shopping centre.When questioned by the lawyer assisting the coroner, Dr Boros-Lavack stressed: "I did not fail in my care of Joel."She had earlier told the inquest she believed Cauchi was not psychotic during the attack and that medication would not have prevented the tragedy.Dr Boros-Lavack said the attacks may have been "due to his sexual frustration, pornography and hatred towards women".But the next day, she withdrew that evidence, saying it was simply "conjecture" and she was not in a position to assess Cauchi's mental state, having not treated him since 2019.However the inquest is investigating whether Cauchi targeted specific individuals or groups.For Peter Young, the brother of Jade, the answer seemed clear. "Fuelled by his frustration with not finding a 'nice' girl to marry", his "rapid hunt found 16 victims, 14 of which were women," he told the inquest.The NSW Police Commissioner in the days after the attack said it was "obvious" to detectives that the offender had focussed on women.However, during the inquest, the homicide squad's Andrew Paul Marks said he did not believe there was evidence that Cauchi had specifically targeted women.The inquiry also heard about a number of failings or near misses in the way security, police, paramedics and the media responded to the attack.It was told that recruitment and training pressures for the security provider meant that the centre's control room operator was not "competent". At the exact moment when Cauchi stabbed his first victim, the room was unattended as she was on a toilet break.
Security guard Faraz Tahir, the sole male victim of the stabbings, was working his first day on the job when he was killing trying to stop Cauchi, raising questions over the powers and protection given to personnel like him.His brother, Muzafar, told the inquest how Faraz died "with honour as a hero" and also acknowledged that Cauchi's parents had lost their son: "We know that this tragedy is not their fault."The contractor responsible for security at the shopping centre has since updated its training and policies, as well as introducing stab-proof vests for guards.Several families criticised media coverage in the wake of the attack, telling the inquiry they hoped the industry would reflect on how they should report sensitive stories so as not to further traumatise those affected.
Lessons to be learnt
After weeks of evidence, the inquest was adjourned on Thursday with NSW state coroner Teresa O'Sullivan expected to deliver her recommendations by the end of the year.At the start of the inquest, O'Sullivan said the hearings weren't about who was to blame for the attacks, but rather to "identify potential opportunities for reform or improvement to enable such events to be avoided in the future"."I want the families to know their loved ones will not be lost in this process."
Elizabeth Young, though, told the court, for her, "nothing good" will come from the inquest."At 74, I have lost my way in life," she said, describing the crippling impact of the killings.But she said the action the country needed to take was already obvious to her."My daughter was murdered by an unmedicated, chronic schizophrenic... who had in his possession knives designed for killing."[This is] another cry out to an Australia that doesn't seem to want to acknowledge that what happened... is essentially the catastrophic consequence of years of neglect of, and within, our mental health systems."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
C*A*U*G*H*T, review: tiring hostage comedy tries to hit too many targets
Shall we start with the title? C*A*U*G*H*T (ITVX) begs for attention through the medium of capitals and asterisks. Imagine if everyone made their show look like a finicky password. S/T\R/I!C\T/L\Y. ?QUESTION? ?TIME?. B@K£ ŒUF. It would get irritating in a heartbeat. C*A*U*G*H*T doesn't require typography to achieve that outcome. Originally scheduled to air in October 2023, but postponed in the wake of the October 7 attack, this is that trickiest of balancing acts: a no-holds-barred comedy about soldiers being taken hostage by the terrorist rebels of a small unrecognised nation. There are d--k pics and SMGs, cold-blooded slaughter and a man sucking out a bullet amusingly lodged in his wounded pal's anus. On the drawing board, the script no doubt throbbed and swaggered with hilarity. Most of the action is set on a tropical island of Behati-Prinsloo where four Aussie soldiers have been dropped on a black ops mission to wipe the phone of the island's princess. They are soon captured by indeterminately Asian freedom fighters and pleading for their lives. 'Killing Australian could be a public relations disaster for us,' reasons a rebel. 'Everybody loves Australians. Nobody knows why.' A geopolitical incident is soon the talk of the international airwaves. The joke is that the soldiers, seemingly in danger, really collaborate with their captors by making a fake hostage video. Then the US gets involved, rendering this a most strange Australian-American hybrid. Almost every male Aussie here – soldier, politician, broadcaster – is some form of idiot. The female characters are all feistier and, of necessity in this patriarchy of plonkers, cannier. The US is mainly represented by Sean Penn playing Sean Penn as a narcissistic bully who gets caught up in the hostages' story. It's an arms race of self-parody. In all this random oddness, there's even a blink-and-you'll-miss-it cameo for Susan Sarandon. Penn does deliver one extremely funny punchline about Madonna, to whom, once upon a time, he was married. But you have to slog through to the end of the fifth episode for this reward. And it jostles for attention in a dense thicket of chuck-in-anything, broad-brushstroke satire on masculinity, ethnicity, diplomacy, celebrity, news media, action movies, plus a whole anthology of Aussie in-jokes about a murderous dingo and a murdered koala, 'The Shark', 'The Thorpedo' and the defensible merits of early Mel Gibson. As for the plot, it hops along in six half-hour increments. Interest in the four hostages, as they once again barter to save their skins, wanes long before their fate is revealed. As the scriptwriters might put it, it's all ****.


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
I turned to OnlyFans after reality TV fame and made £1.1m – but quit stripping off after finding GOD
A REALITY TV star has revealed she's scrapped her OnlyFans career after finding her faith. The E4 personality became "born again in my faith" back in 2024, prompting a huge shift-change in her mindset. 6 6 6 Married At First Sight alum Hayley Vernon, 32, previously told how she had switched careers to a high-class £600-an-hour escort after finding show fame. The former finance broker, who starred in the Australia season in 2020, had also made a staggering £1.1m selling raunchy content on adult website OnlyFans. The brunette previously told how she would always choose her racy job over her jealous boyfriends, as she found her clients "more interesting." The Melbourne beauty is now flogging her old lingerie - which she says she has no need for - as she instead follows God's plan. She detailed the underwear and their sizes as she put: "I used to think that lingerie and dressing a certain way would make me feel empowered. It didn't, it did the opposite. "But I have so many baskets of expensive lingerie that I'm no longer going to need or use." Hayley then clarified: "They are obviously all clean." GOD'S PLAN It came after the TV star's U-turn on her whole life. She previously told her Instagram followers: "I know that God has bigger plans for me than what I'm doing." In a video then posted to social media, Hayley captured herself being baptised in a lake. MAFS star shocks fans as she reveals she's had secret nose job after bitter split on show In her lengthy caption accompanying the scenes she wrote: "'For I know the plans I have for you' declares the LORD, 'plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.' Jeremiah 29:11." She then added: "Yesterday I was born again in my faith making a public declaration to the outside world based on the inward transformation I have experienced through finding Christ. "My relationship with my faith has changed every aspect of my life. "IYKYN and if you don't when I say EVERY aspect I hand on heart can confirm not one negative has come through finding Christianity, quiet the contrary every corner has levelled up and what wasn't serving me has fallen to the wayside. Mafs couples that have stood the test of time Loved-up Tayah Victoria and Adam Aveling of series six fame had the first Mafs baby. The pair couldn't keep their hands off each other on the programme and quickly found their feet in the outside world, moving into Adam's Doncaster home. Just 18 months after meeting, the couple welcomed their daughter Beau. Season five couple Michelle Walder and Owen Jenkins also managed to make their marriage work away from the cameras and had their first child in December. Teacher Michelle, 29, has no regrets about taking part in the experiment. She told us: 'I just feel very lucky and thankful that it has worked out - and excited for everything to come.' Michelle and Owen were both sick of dating apps when they applied in 2019. Owen recalled: 'I had been out for some drinks with a friend after work. "While he was out for a cigarette I was scrolling on Instagram waiting for him to come back in. 'The MAFS advert was the last thing I saw, and I joked, 'Wouldn't it be funny if I signed up?' 'A few beers later when I was back at home I sent in the application, and the rest is history.' Another couple to make Mafs UK history is Zoe Clifton and Jenna Robinson. Despite a slight rocky start, where they clashed over Jenna's vegan lifestyle, the show's first same sex pairing are still going strong. They even have a successful podcast together called Life With a Pod. Jenna shed light on being involved in the show earlier this year when she told us: "We're not legally married, and I never felt like we were. I definitely feel the process makes you take the relationship a lot more seriously and having the help of the experts… if you can survive that process it sets a firm foundation for a long-lasting relationship." "There isn't enough space or even words to explain the transformative goodness of God. "Every inch of my life has changed for the better, finding my faith has given me a firmer foundation to live my life on. "It's absolutely by far been the best thing that has happened to me. I would have called you crazy if 6 months ago you would have said I'd be here. "But truth be told there has not been one negative only positive areas of improvement- has letting go and being challenged been easy- nope- have I come out better for it? Absolutely." In her new podcast, she told of ditching OF for good and admitted to the MAFS Funny podcast: "The line becomes quite blurred. "You start acting so much and becoming this character that isn't you, that you actually forget to be you. "Then when it comes to interacting in everyday life and normal conversations you actually start getting riddled with anxiety and fear. "Because you're so used to standing on something that is so far removed from who God has called you to be and who you were made to be. "That you just don't have a firm foundation any more." MAFS SCANDAL Hayley brought the drama when she appeared on series seven of the Aussie reality dating show. Truck driver Dave Cannon and Hayley looked as though they were going to get their happy ending. But things got very bizarre when footage emerged of David scrubbing the toilet with Hayley's toothbrush, after it emerged she had kissed co-star Michael Goonan. Hayley was left disgusted and went on to get her revenge by writing stay at the last commitment ceremony. The experts stepped in and made the executive call that the couple should leave. 6 6 6


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Can I gift my £330,000 second home to my adult kids without paying tax?
I live in Australia (and am a tax resident here) and I own a leasehold flat in Suffolk that I use when visiting the UK. I no longer wish to own the property due to the doubling of the council tax on unoccupied properties. Also, the water is muddied with regard to possible liability for UK inheritance tax. There is no inheritance tax here in Australia. I would like to gift it to my two adult children since I don't need the funds here and they will eventually inherit the property anyway. If I transfer title to them, do they have to pay stamp duty, and if so, at what rate? It is on sale at present for £330,000 Due to the government's war on landlords and buy to let (neither of which applies to me since it is not let out), it will probably not sell at that price. If stamp duty is levied on the gift, would it be possible to agree a notional sale price of £250,000 in order to fall into the lowest tax bracket, or can it even be exempt from stamp duty since there will be no money changing hands? They will then become second home owners, so does the transaction incur additional stamp duty? P.A, via email SCROLL DOWN TO ASK YOUR FINANCIAL PLANNING QUESTION Harvey Dorset, of This is Money, replies: For many Britons living abroad, its nice to continue to have a base to come back to when you visit. This would be especially the case for you, as your trips from Australia are likely to be for longer periods given the distance between the two countries. Unfortunately, you tax changes that came into effect last month in Suffolk mean that you are now required to pay twice the standard council tax rate on your property, as it is only 'occupied periodically.' East Suffolk Council states: 'At a Full Council meeting held in February 2024 it was approved that from 1 April 2025 a 100 per cent Second Home Premium charge will be applied to properties that are furnished and do not have anyone living in them as their main home. This means that 200 per cent Council Tax is payable.' Understandably, you have decided it is not worth you keeping the property under the current ownership circumstances. Instead, you want to give the flat to your children, which would pass on some wealth and help with potential inheritance tax liabilities. As you say, there is no inheritance tax in Australia but there is in the UK, meaning your situation is harder to work out. Meanwhile, as discussed below, there are other taxes that you may need to watch out for. This is Money spoke to two financial advisers to find out what you need to do in order to pass your flat to your children while keeping tax to a minimum. David Denton, head of technical at Quilter Cheviot, replies: First, from an inheritance tax point of view, your instincts are right to consider future exposure. While Australia abolished inheritance tax in the late 1970s, UK IHT still applies to most UK-based assets – including property – regardless of the tax residency or domicile of the owner. So, although you're an Australian tax resident, your UK flat remains within the scope of UK IHT. That said, with the nil-rate band currently set at £325,000 and your flat valued at around £330,000, the potential liability could be relatively minor, although the nil rate band is frozen until at least 5 April 2030. Now to the more immediate question of gifting the property to your children. Provided there is no outstanding mortgage on the flat, a transfer of ownership as a genuine gift would not trigger Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) on the part of your children. SDLT is only payable if there is 'consideration' – for example, if the recipient assumes liability for a mortgage, or pays for the property. However, even if the transfer is exempt from SDLT because there is no consideration, your children may still face the 3 per cent additional homes surcharge in the future. This wouldn't apply at the point of receiving the gifted flat, but if they later went on to buy another UK property without selling the Suffolk flat, the new home would count as an 'additional property' and attract the higher SDLT rate. Lastly, you also need to consider capital gains tax (CGT). As a non-resident, you remain liable for UK CGT on the disposal of UK property, even when gifting it. The gain would be calculated as the difference between the property's market value at the point of transfer and its value when you acquired it. Certain costs associated with the transaction may be deducted, and it's likely that the annual exempt amount of £3,000 would be available, whilst depending on the level of gain, the tax rate could be up to 24 per cent. Where people often come unstuck is trying to manipulate the value of the property for tax purposes. HMRC normally expects that any transfer – whether by sale or gift – is assessed based on open market value. That means a professional valuation may be required. Artificially lowering the price could lead to tax complications and potentially penalties. In short, your children won't pay SDLT upon receiving a gift without a mortgage, but there are still IHT and CGT considerations. It's worth seeking tailored advice and a professional valuation to ensure all angles are covered properly. Check your inheritance tax position carefully Oliver Loughead, wealth manager at RBC Brewin Dolphin, replies: Transferring ownership of UK property to children is a significant decision that carries various legal, financial, and tax implications, particularly for individuals who are not resident in the United Kingdom. Regarding inheritance tax (IHT) treatment of the property, for a non-UK resident, IHT will normally be due on UK assets only (subject to new long-term UK residency rules) that exceed the available nil rate band (NRB), which is currently £325,000 per person. If you have a spouse or civil partner, it might be possible to make use of both of your available NRBs, so £650,000. Under UK law, a gift of property is typically treated as a potentially exempt transfer (PET). This means that if the donor survives for seven years following the date of the gift, the value of the gift may fall outside the scope of IHT. However, if the donor dies within that period, the value of the gift may still be brought into account for IHT purposes. In such cases, taper relief may apply, potentially reducing the amount of tax due depending on the time elapsed between the gift and the donor's death. If you have previously lived in the UK, you should check if you qualify as a long-term UK resident, as your worldwide assets may fall into scope for UK IHT. You are deemed a long-term UK tax resident if you have been resident for either the previous 10 consecutive years or a total of 10 years or more within the previous 20 years. Help with financial advice and planning Financial planning can help you grow your wealth, sort your pension, or make sure your finances are as tax efficient as possible. A key driver for many people is investing for or in retirement and inheritance tax planning. If you are looking for help sorting your finances and want to work out whether you need advice, planning, or coaching, the following links can help you understand more: >Do you need financial planning or financial advice - and is it worth it? > Financial advice: What to ask and how much it might cost > Are you retirement ready? Take our quiz and get financial planning help > Inheritance tax planning - what you need to know to protect your wealth Regarding concerns around stamp duty land tax, SDLT generally does not apply to gifts of property unless the recipient assumes a mortgage on the property. In cases where the transfer involves taking over an existing mortgage, SDLT may be charged based on the value of the outstanding loan. Therefore, the structure of the gift - especially whether the property is encumbered - must be carefully evaluated. Capital gains tax (CGT) should also be considered. Since April 2015, non-residents have been liable for CGT on disposals of UK residential property. A gift of property is treated as if the donor has disposed of it at market value, even if no money changes hands. This means that any increase in the property's value from its acquisition (or from April 2015 if it was owned before that date) to the date of the gift may be subject to CGT. Non-resident individuals must report and pay any CGT due within 60 days of completing the gift. The legal process for transferring UK property to children is complex. A UK-based solicitor should be instructed to handle the conveyancing and ensure all necessary documentation is completed, including a deed of gift or transfer deed. An often-overlooked aspect of gifting property is the potential loss of control. Once the property is legally transferred, the donor no longer holds rights over it unless specific conditions are attached, such as transferring it through a trust. Establishing a trust can be a useful mechanism to maintain some level of influence over the property while still achieving estate planning objectives. However, trusts introduce their own tax implications and legal complexity, so professional advice is essential before proceeding. In conclusion, while gifting UK property to children can be a valuable tool for estate planning and wealth distribution, non-UK residents must carefully assess the legal and tax consequences. Thorough planning, supported by expert advice from UK solicitors and cross-border tax professionals, is essential to ensure that such a transfer achieves the desired outcome without triggering unintended liabilities.