IAEA refutes Indian media reports of radiation leak in Pakistan
Listen to article
As Pakistan and India trade accusations over nuclear weapons mismanagement, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has confirmed that 'no radiation leakage or incident has been detected at any nuclear site in Pakistan,' BBC Urdu reported on Thursday.
The issue came up after unverified reports emerged in Indian media, alleging that Indian airstrikes targeted Pakistan's Kerana Hills, where a stockpile of nuclear missiles is reportedly located.
Amid the media speculation, the IAEA confirmed to the British broadcaster that 'based on available data, no radiation leakage or incident has been detected at any nuclear site in Pakistan.' The Indian Air Force also denied striking any nuclear facility.
Earlier, Indian Air Marshal AK Bharti was asked at a press briefing whether reports of a strike on the Kirana Hills nuclear site were accurate. 'Thank you for informing us that there is a nuclear facility there—we didn't know,' he said sarcastically, adding, 'we did not target Kirana Hills, regardless of what is or isn't there.'
India and Pakistan traded accusations of nuclear weapons mismanagement on Thursday, days after reaching a ceasefire agreement following days of escalation.
India's Defence Minister Rajnath Singh said that the IAEA should take control of Pakistan's nuclear weapons—just days after the two nuclear-armed neighbours concluded one of their worst military escalations in nearly three decades.
'Are nuclear weapons safe in the hands of such an irresponsible and rogue nation?' Singh asked while addressing soldiers in Srinagar, the capital of Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK). 'I believe that Pakistan's nuclear weapons should be taken under the supervision of the IAEA.'
Pakistan responded firmly, calling the remarks 'provocative' and aimed at undermining the credibility of its nuclear deterrent. The Foreign Office strongly condemned the Indian Defence Minister's comments, labelling them 'irresponsible' and reflective of India's 'frustration and insecurity.'
'These remarks are not only misleading but also reflect a lack of understanding of the IAEA's mandate,' said the FO spokesperson, adding that Pakistan does not rely on nuclear blackmail to maintain deterrence—unlike India.
The statement further noted that India's remarks expose 'growing insecurity over Pakistan's robust conventional and nuclear deterrence,' while also citing past instances of nuclear material mishandling in India to question New Delhi's own safety protocols.
The Indian minister's statement comes at a sensitive time, as both countries attempt to maintain the 2021 ceasefire agreement along the Line of Control (LoC).
Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar announced that the militaries of India and Pakistan have agreed to extend last week's ceasefire until Sunday, May 18. Addressing the Senate on Thursday, he said the extension paves the way for renewed political dialogue.
Meanwhile, the Pakistani military's chief spokesperson has cautioned that any serious escalation between the two nuclear-armed neighbours could have catastrophic consequences.
'The world now recognises the extent of the nuclear threat [in the region]. Any sane player, like the USA, understands this absurdity and what the Indians are trying to do here,' DG ISPR Lt Gen Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry told Sky News in an interview on Thursday.
'If India thinks that it can carve out a space for war between India and Pakistan, it is actually a recipe for carving out mutual destruction,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Govt urged to take back harsh tax steps
Listen to article The Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) has called on the government to withdraw what it says are harsh and anti-business taxation proposals from the Finance Bill 2025 before they are passed by parliament. Speaking on behalf of the business, industrial and trade community, FPCCI President Atif Ikram Sheikh emphasised that the country needed a pro-business, investment-friendly and growth-oriented fiscal policy framework as the economy had stabilised and was poised for growth. He was of the view that the tax collection target could only be achieved if industrialists and exporters were taken on board through a comprehensive consultation process. However, the budget missed the measures required to enable the business community to fulfil the prime minister's vision of an export-led growth, according to a press statement issued on Thursday. He cautioned that sweeping discretionary powers given to taxmen would be detrimental to the business and investor confidence and would lead to harassment, corruption and maladministration. "It is a globally established fact that more a tax collector is allowed to intervene or interact directly with the taxpayer, the more it is likely to undermine the principles of fairness, transparency and impartiality primarily due to the increased role of human judgement," he remarked. He, however, appreciated the reduction in super tax, rationalisation of tax slabs for salaried individuals and simplification of the income tax return form for salaried persons and small and medium enterprises (SMEs), which had been among longstanding demands of the business community. He also welcomed the increase in defence spending to ensure the geo-economic, trade route, supply line and geostrategic security. In his remarks, FPCCI Senior Vice President Saquib Fayyaz Magoon sought the restoration of fixed tax regime for exporters in its original form for the long term to bring clarity, certainty and consistency in taxation policies. "We can only attract foreign direct investment and domestic investment if we remain competitive," he said. Magoon highlighted that instead of expanding the Export Facilitation Scheme (EFS) by including local manufacturers, as recommended by all sectors and industries, the government imposed 18% sales tax on raw material, which would raise production costs, disrupt supply chains and hurt the competitiveness of Pakistani products in global markets.
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Are Ibn Khaldun's ideas still relevant for countries like Pakistan?
The writer is an academic and researcher. He is also the author of Development, Poverty, and Power in Pakistan, available from Routledge Listen to article The dangerous skirmish with our hostile larger neighbour has sparked a rare moment of national solidarity within Pakistan — a welcome feeling given the immense political polarisation we have been experiencing in recent years. However, major ethnic, regional and socio-economic rifts remain a dominant feature within Pakistani society, and it would be wishful thinking to assume that these serious problems will melt away just because we scored an apparent short-term win over India. Carving out a new nation from colonial India, using the two-nation theory which aimed to unite diverse ethnic groups using a common religious identity, was an impressive feat. Yet, the way this rationale was operationalised through a hurried partition plan resulted in a truncated nation separated by nearly 1000 miles. A sizeable number of Muslims remained in India fearing displacement and believing that the transnational nature of their faith did not necessitate residing in a separate nation. Those who migrated to the eastern wing of Pakistan also soon discovered that a shared religious identity was not an excuse to continue tolerating hegemony by more powerful ethnic groups. The traumatic separation of Bengalis from the rest of Pakistan did not result in other ethnic groups overcoming their differences either. Not only the Balochs or Pathans, but also the Sindhis and Saraikis have their own reasons for feeling disgruntled in the sort of Pakistan we have managed to create over these past several decades. Ethnic disgruntlement is not the only problem corroding a common sense of national identity. Sectarianism and the extremist violence resulting from it remain another source of perpetual consternation. One cannot oversimplify the root causes of such ruptures and blame the Punjabis as the cause of all discord. The proxy contestation between the Soviets and the US, alongside rivalries within the Muslim world, has certainly exacerbated religious tensions in Pakistan. Suspected Indian support to militants and insurgents has added fuel to the fire. However, while these external factors exacerbated societal rifts, they cannot be blamed for creating them out of thin air. The way our post-colonial establishment has relied on top-down, patronage-based and unrepresentative models of governance must shoulder much of the blame for the glaring social tensions evident in our midst today. Perhaps it is time for our leaders and decision-makers to revisit some of the ideas put forth by thinkers closer to our own cultural roots. For instance, the work of a 14th century seminal Muslim sociologist, Ibn Khaldun, still offers relevant insights for addressing the growing polarisation in our contemporary society. Ibn Khaldun's concept of asabiyyah, or social cohesion, is particularly worthy of greater attention. Asabiyyah helps unite people and can foster solidarity through shared values which, in turn, remains essential for effective governance and the overall stability of any state. The essence of Ibn Khaldun's ideas proposes a humanist and participatory approach to governance, wherein the well-being of a given society is a paramount goal. He aptly noted how inequality leads to social fragmentation and instability, and warned about the dangers of relying solely on military strength. Ibn Khaldun certainly offers a more compelling basis for national building than the warped ideologies put forth by populist and divisive leaders who suppress dissenting voices to build hierarchical systems allowing accumulation by the few at the cost of marginalising the many. Even if the traditional characteristics identified by Ibn Khaldun to enable cohesion may be less relevant in our increasingly complex world of fluid identities, the notion of asabiyyah can be reinterpreted to prioritise universal values such as freedom, social justice and respect for differences. If our leaders can honestly embrace such ideas, we may move closer to actualising the notion of Pakistan, which is supposed to be an acronym representing all the regions that comprise this nation.
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Trump offers to mediate Kashmir dispute, says 'I can solve anything'
US President Donald Trump gestures, as he departs for Pennsylvania, on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, DC, U.S., May 30, 2025. Photo: Reuters Listen to article US President Donald Trump on Thursday again claimed credit for easing recent India-Pakistan tensions, saying he prevented a potential nuclear war by using trade pressure and direct diplomacy. "I stopped a war between India and Pakistan, and I stopped it with trade," Trump told reporters after a bill signing event. "Pakistan, now, it was their turn to hit, and eventually they're going to go nuclear." Trump said he made personal calls to both Indian and Pakistani leaders at the height of tensions. "I called each leader, I respect them greatly. I talked about trade. I said, but you're not trading with us if you're going to go to war, if you're going to start throwing nuclear weapons around." "They understood it exactly. They stopped," he added. He praised his is role in preventing casualties, saying: "I stopped that war with phone calls and trade." "And India is here right now negotiating a trade deal, and Pakistan is coming, I think, next week," he added. In response to a question, Trump said, 'We're going to get them together. I told them, India and Pakistan … they have a longtime rivalry over Kashmir. I told them 'I can solve anything.' 'I will be your arbitrator. I will be your arbitrator. I can solve anything.' India and Pakistan saw one of the worst hostilities last month, sparked by an April 22 attack in Indian-administered Kashmir, where unidentified gunmen killed 26 people, mostly Indian tourists, at the Pahalgam tourist site. New Delhi said the attack had "cross-border links," but Islamabad denied the claims and offered a neutral probe. It led to an exchange of blame and denials, eventually escalating to retaliatory air strikes and drone attacks. Tensions eased after Trump announced a May 10 ceasefire, which remains in effect.
