Charity ‘icon' may have used donor money for beauty treatments, judge says
Tears Foundation founder Mara Glennie transferred R2 million in donor funds to her own company, Fireworx Management Solutions.
Tears Foundation is a non-profit organisation aimed at combating gender-based violence.
Bank statements show how the money was used for Glennie's 'life of relative luxury', including restaurant and beauty salon visits.
Funding at the Tears Foundation, a non-profit organisation aimed at combating gender-based violence, has come under the spotlight in a court application implicating its founder in irregular expenditure of R2 million. (This Tears Foundation is not related to the animal rescue foundation with a similar name.)
In the application, which came before Gauteng High Court Judge Denise Fisher, Tears sought an order to compel its auditors to amend an audit report that flagged the payment by the foundation to another company, Fireworx Management Solution.
Fireworx is owned by Tears founder Mara Glennie, GroundUp reports.
But Judge Fisher has dismissed the application and directed Glennie to file an affidavit explaining why she should not be ordered to pay the court costs on a punitive scale and at the highest possible rate out of her own pocket.
The Tears Foundation was founded by Glennie, herself a survivor of violence, in 2012, along with her co–director, Michael Johnson. The two are romantic partners. According to its website it operates a 24-hour crisis hotline.
READ | ' Grossly dishonest' SA lawyer at centre of UK Christian charity looting investigation
It is donor-funded and gets donations from Standard Bank, Avbob, Capitec, Bidvest Services and Toyota South Africa, among others.
Between March and October 2024, it received more than R7 million in funding from these companies and it also received donations from the general public.
The Tears Foundation was recently given the 'Best Social Organisation of the Year' award by an organisation called Women Icon.
Fisher said before July 2023, Glennie had been employed by Tears but then began providing her services through Fireworx as a 'consultant'.
Essentially it is her alter ego
She said in May 2024, an accounts manager employed by Tears, Dirk Bornebusch, expressed concerns, writing to Glennie about how the foundation was being run financially.
He listed seven items of concern, including that Glennie was putting her personal expenses through the Tears bank account.
Judge Fisher said Glennie alleges that Bornebusch eventually notified donors of these irregularities and was attempting to 'sink Tears', because he was friends with another employee, Clair Thompson, who wanted to establish her own company and attract Tears' donors.
Glennie obtained an interdict against Bornebusch, but major donors withdrew their regular funding. The donors then required that Tears provide an independent audited financial statement before funding would resume.
This task was given to Burton van Staaden of VBS Chartered Accountants.
He flagged a R2 million payment by Tears to Fireworx and reported it to the Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors (IRBA) as a 'suspected irregularity'.
Glennie and Johnson were unhappy. They alleged the 'loan' was to be used for the purchase of a property, a safe house for abused women, the 'Joy Cottage project'.
They claimed the money was repaid to Tears, and Glennie and Johnson wanted the irregularity expunged.
READ | Limpopo and North West lead in GBV helpline calls, TEARS Foundation study reveals
Van Staaden refused to do so. He said he would go no further than state 'that the irregularity was no longer taking place'.
He also said that Bornebusch had disclosed to him that other payments had been made to Groundwave, a company owned by Johnson, for 'consulting fees'.
When Tears' urgent application came before Fisher, she raised concerns about the transaction and directed Glennie to file a further affidavit.
Glennie's lawyers tried unsuccessfully to have the matter removed from Fisher.
She then asked for a 'more complete picture' of the nature of the business of Fireworx and Groundwaves, noting that Van Staaden had raised concerns about common directorships and a potential for conflict of interest.
Glennie said Groundwave, which provides products and services in the electrical engineering industry, had provided Tears with advice on technical matters and had sold it products.
It had also provided administrative assistance, filling out grant applications, developing business plans, and conducting research.
Glennie produced bank statements reflecting that Fireworx had three accounts and Tears six accounts.
Fisher said the Fireworx account was opened in June 2023 and the R2 million 'alleged loan' was transferred as an 'investment deposit' a week later.
Regular payments were then made 'as consultancy fees' by Tears to Fireworx. These were initially R100 000 but increased to R150 000 per month.
Then, from July to October 2023, there were several 'large transactions' out of the Fireworx account, including R200 000, referenced as 'Summerhaze', which is Glennie's residence.
In September, the statements showed a credit card facility had been linked to the account. These showed 50 transactions totalling R193 000.
'The credit card was used to pay the living expenses of Glennie. The merchants' references show purchases ranging from grocery stores, clothing shops, monthly beauty salon charges, pharmacy charges, restaurant charges and payments to hardware stores and to pet shops,' Fisher said.
And the 'consultancy fees' paid by Tears to Fireworx amounted to about R1.8 million a year.
Judge Fisher said based on the bank statements, Glennie lived a 'life of relative luxury' - and the only money in Fireworx account came from consultancy fees paid by Tears and the R2 million alleged loan from Tears.
She also noted that the 'alleged loan' was interest free. Fireworx was earning interest on it, whilst Tears was not.
Fisher said there was a clear conflict of interest, the consultancy fees seemed to be 'relatively high', and she had concerns that Glennie was attempting, in her application, to stop exposure of potential mismanagement and even misappropriation of the funds.
The transfer of the R2 million occurred at a time when Glennie started providing her services as a consultant through Fireworx.
'There is no evidence of this alleged loan. Van Staaden requested the loan agreement, but was told it was lost.
'There is no evidence of the alleged negotiations relating to the property purchase. Not even one email is put up. This is notwithstanding that the negotiations were said to be with Standard Bank. This suggests that the Joy Cottage project is nothing more than a recent fabrication,' the judge said.
She said the explanation regarding the R2 million 'was so implausible that it falls to be rejected out of hand'.
'The movement of funds back and forward into different accounts seems to me to be unbridled and inexplicable.
'The fact that the loan agreement was 'lost' and had to be refabricated is a further indication that the payment was not a loan but a misappropriation into the newly opened bank account of Fireworx.'
She said the application was a 'cynical attempt' to avoid disclosure and transparency.
Dismissing the application, Judge Fisher said that while a punitive cost order was warranted, it would be inappropriate for these costs to be paid out of donor funds and called on Glennie to show cause why she should not personally pay out of her own pocket.
She also directed the IRBA to notify any appropriate regulator, including the South African Revenue Services, of the reported irregularity.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News24
3 hours ago
- News24
Lancewood owner Libstar rallies after solid update
Lancewood cheeses are part of Libstar, along with brands like Denny, Khoisan Tea, Goldcrest, Cook 'n Bake and Cape Herb & Spice.
News24
4 hours ago
- News24
Capitec CEO isn't wrong: Unemployment data needs work
• For more financial news, go to the News24 Business front page. In June 2025, Capitec CEO Gerrie Fourie suggested that South Africa's real unemployment rate might be closer to 10% than the official 32.9% - the reaction was swift and unforgiving. Critics accused him of 'madness,' misunderstanding labour metrics, and trivialising the economic struggles of millions. But amid the furore, Fourie touched a nerve, one we can no longer afford to ignore. We need to be forthright. Any figure of the unemployment rate represents an enduring crisis that continues to erode our democratic dividend and undermine our efforts to build a more equitable and prosperous society for all South Africans. At the same time, we must all visit the fundamental assumptions guiding our understanding of the problem itself. What if the way we measure unemployment is not just analytically contested but structurally flawed? What if the very tools we rely on to understand our labour market are obscuring its most vital dynamics? This is not to say that our government, through Statistics South Africa, has been dishonest or missed the point through the years, but rather that the instruments and definitions used, while internationally accepted, may not fully capture the unique complexities and realities of South Africa's diverse economy, particularly its significant informal sector. South Africa's massive informal sector fundamentally challenges standard unemployment metrics. Millions officially classified as 'unemployed' are actively engaged in vital, though precarious, economic activities, such as street vending, waste recycling, home-based production, subsistence farming and numerous micro-services. These generate essential income and sustain communities, forming a vast parallel economy. Therefore, standard definitions, which prioritise formal employment structures like fixed hours, registered businesses, and regular wages, fail to capture this fluid, irregular, and self-directed work, misrepresenting significant economic participation as idleness. The fact that one is not seeking employment, is discouraged, or does not report any 'income' or 'wage' in the conventional sense, should not imply economic inactivity or irrelevance. Limitations Our unique economic landscape, shaped by historical exclusion and inequality, demands context-sensitive metrics. The rigid employed-unemployed binary obscures critical nuances, including underemployment, sporadic work, unpaid family labour and discouraged workers who actively survive informally. Relying on tools designed for smaller informal sectors misdiagnoses exclusion and risks policies that fail to support or integrate this vital economic segment. Admittedly, the official unemployment rate, derived from Statistics South Africa's Quarterly Labour Force Survey (QLFS), uses International Labour Organisation (ILO) standards, as rightly confirmed by our Statistician-General, Risenga Maluleke. It is important to acknowledge that although the ILO provides a standardised framework for measuring unemployment, it has limitations. A key limitation is the exclusion of 'discouraged workers,' those who have stopped actively seeking work, from the official count. This can lead to an underestimation of the true extent of unemployment, particularly among women. Additionally, the ILO definition relies on individuals actively seeking work in the past four weeks, which may not capture those who have been unemployed for extended periods and may have become less active in their job search. These standards are internationally recognised and sound in principle; however, they have limitations. Statistically invisible They were likely designed for economies where formality dominates, yet they tend to undervalue the reality of emerging markets where survivalist and informal economies are not only widespread but essential. It is necessary to emphasise that South Africa has a particularly complex labour market: sophisticated in parts yet exclusionary in others. Many South Africans are not unemployed in the literal sense; they work long hours selling food on the roadside, fixing shoes, braiding hair, or delivering packages via digital platforms. However, because their activities often lack legal status, banking records, or employer verification, they are statistically invisible. This invisibility is not benign. As Michel Foucault noted, how a state 'sees' its citizens, through censuses, surveys and indicators, is not just descriptive but political. It determines where resources flow, which sectors are prioritised, and who is included in the policy imagination. Troubling reality Across the Global South, countries with expansive informal sectors report strikingly low unemployment rates. India, with an informality rate above 90%, records unemployment rates under 5%. Mexico, Nigeria, Zimbabwe and Ethiopia—despite structural challenges—report similarly low rates. South Africa, with an informal economy estimated to comprise 40% of total employment, somehow reports the highest unemployment rate in the world. There is a profoundly troubling reality in our labour market, mirroring trends across the Global South: the relentless informalisation of the African worker. As scholars like Guy Standing illuminate, this creates a growing 'precariat' or workers stripped of stable contracts, benefits and legal protections, existing in perpetual insecurity. This is evident in models like Shoprite's Sixty60 delivery service. Reports suggest deep labour rights transgressions and potential circumvention of migration laws, potentially relying heavily on vulnerable foreign nationals and drivers operating without proper licensing. While such practices may fuel corporate profits and boost tax collections, they fundamentally erode worker dignity and flout our migration laws. Enhanced tax revenue may be problematic when achieved through the systemic exploitation and informalisation of labour. We urgently need businesses committed to ethical conduct, recognising that loyal and honest citizenship demands treating workers with dignity, not as disposable cost centres. Dogmatic fixation on formality This crisis reflects our nation's unresolved struggle: building a vibrant economy that simultaneously protects labour rights. Our history is one where economic progress was built upon the foundation of cheap, exploitable black labour. Disturbingly, many companies remain anchored in this unpalatable logic. Their substantial profits are too often subsidised by poverty wages and resistance to adhering to labour laws, perpetuating a modern form of exploitation. The Shoprite case highlights a critical flaw in our current statistical lens: even those formally recognised as 'employed' can face severe decent work deficits – insecure incomes, unsafe conditions and denied benefits - which our rigid metrics fail to capture. Formal employment status, in such contexts, offers no guarantee of dignity or security. The human cost of this informalisation extends far beyond wages into wellbeing and visibility. Informal wage workers at the foot of the formal economy, such as Sixty60 riders, face significantly heightened health and safety risks due to unregulated work environments. In South Africa, informal workers experience injury rates 2-3 times higher than their formal counterparts, alongside severe psychological stress, with women disproportionately affected. Critically, this precarity is structurally reinforced, since only 10.7% of informal enterprises hold municipal licenses, thereby denying workers access to basic infrastructure and legal recourse. Unlike the often entrepreneurial, family-driven informality seen in parts of West Africa or South Asia, South Africa's informal sector reflects not prosperity, but our dogmatic fixation on formality. Suppressing informality does not create formality; instead, it traps workers in a vulnerable, invisible underclass. Right tools, wrong terrain The Sixty60 paradox, characterised by soaring profits and tax contributions alongside alleged deep-seated worker indignity, exposes the dangerous fallacy of equating state revenue with societal well-being or ethical progress. True dignity requires labour security and voice, neither of which is inherent in precarious gig work. To turn moral clarity into action, we will work with other government entities, including Statistics South Africa and the National Treasury, to address our concerns. We will also ramp up our labour inspection efforts to improve enforcement and compliance. Our view is that this disconnect is not purely economic but methodological. We could be using the right tools for the wrong terrain. Again, we must stress that this is not about pushing the black majority further into an abyss; we acknowledge vast swathes of surplus labour that continue to characterise the South African labour market. However, our immediate concern is solely whether the statistical measures accurately reflect the nature of economic activity, particularly informal survivalist efforts, within this complex reality. As the Department of Employment and Labour, we are addressing this definitional challenge. In our internal policy discussions, we are advancing a more nuanced classification of employment, distinguishing between formal unemployment (individuals actively seeking or available for formal sector work) and economic participation (those actively engaged in the informal economy or self-employed outside regulated sectors). This is not an attempt to mask the crisis or rewrite history. Instead, it is a genuine bid for clarity, so that policymakers, economists and communities alike can operate from a shared and realistic understanding of South Africa's complex labour market dynamics. Resilience is not success Yet, our data underscore a profound crisis: official unemployment stands at 32.9%, rising to 43.1% under the expanded definition (which includes discouraged job seekers). Youth unemployment (15–24 years) is staggering at 62.4%, while graduate unemployment stands at 11.7%, revealing deep-seated structural challenges, even for the educated. Furthermore, there are currently 3.8 million young people classified as NEET (Not in Employment, Education or Training). These figures demand urgent, comprehensive reform and a labour market framework that recognises the diverse forms and complex realities of all economic activity, both formal and informal. Behind each statistic lies a human story of effort, ambition, exclusion and resilience. It is essential to stress that this resilience should not be mistaken for success; the informal sector is not thriving, but merely surviving under conditions of precarity and exclusion. Research from the UCT-Harvard Growth Lab identifies South Africa's informality rate as 'abnormally low' relative to peer economies, not due to prosperity, but rather to state-imposed constraints, including hostile zoning laws, bureaucratic red tape and over-policing. Crucially, unlike entrepreneurial, family-driven informality in West Africa or South Asia, South Africa's informal economy is predominantly employee-based, precarious and excluded from support systems. This vulnerability is strikingly illustrated by the fact that only 10.7% of informal enterprises held a valid municipal licence in 2023. These figures demand urgent, comprehensive reform and a labour market framework that recognises the diverse forms, complex realities and systemic barriers facing all economic activity, both formal and informal. We need to distinguish between informal and illegible. Just because someone is not counted does not mean they are not making a contribution. New tools needed If we want a policy that reflects the realities on the ground, we need new tools. A hybrid data ecosystem, combining the QLFS with alternative indicators such as mobile money flows, anonymised bank transaction data and digital platform work patterns, can provide a more complete and human-centred picture of labour in South Africa. Crucially, unlocking this invisible economy requires collaboration. Private sector players, including Capitec, which processes billions of township-based transactions annually, may hold part of the key to decoding our invisible economy. However, this must be done with ethical safeguards, public oversight and institutional collaboration, not in corporate isolation. Gerrie Fourie may have overstated his case, but he also illuminated a critical truth: our unemployment narrative is not just technical; it is moral. A country that fails to see the economic contributions of its people, no matter how unorthodox, fails to recognise and thus harness its potential. We are at a crossroads. Either we continue to wage policy wars based on partial metrics, or we build a statistical framework that honours the full complexity of labour in South Africa. One pathway leads to ongoing crises, while the other results in inclusive renewal. Let us choose to see. Let us choose to count. Let us choose to act. Nomakhosazana Meth is Minister of Employment and Labour.
News24
4 hours ago
- News24
Eastern Cape transport dept crew robbed while repairing flood-damaged road
A provincial transport department crew was robbed while repairing a flood-damaged road in Cala, Eastern Cape. Gunmen stole the crew's bakkie. The robbery comes days after humanitarian aid workers were intimidated while assisting people affected by flooding in the province. A group of armed men robbed provincial transport department construction workers who were sent to repair a flood-damaged road in Cala in the Chris Hani district in the Eastern Cape. 'The incident occurred in Cala late [on Wednesday] as the workers were out to attend to a rural bridge damaged by the recent floods in a village in Cala,' Transport MEC Xolile Nqatha said. 'A bakkie driven by a group of balaclava-clad men armed with rifles approached them while working at a nearby quarry,' Nqatha added. He added that the men tied up the workers, demanded keys to their bakkie, and removed several tyres from their tipper truck. 'They loaded them onto the stolen bakkie, and both bakkies sped off, leaving the [crew] stranded but unharmed,' Nqatha added. The incident comes only days after Gift of the Givers Foundation aid workers were intimidated while providing essential aid to flood victims in Mthatha on Saturday. According to the OR Tambo District Municipality, the workers were threatened by people who demanded that they stop supporting hundreds of displaced residents affected by recent flooding in the province. Police are now escorting Gift of the Givers teams when delivering essential aid to affected people. The Mthatha area was the hardest-hit part of the province with 68 of the total death toll of 92. Two bodies were found on Wednesday night, including that of a teenage girl, Premier Oscar Mabuyane said in a statement. It was discovered along the Mthatha River. Mabuyane added: 'The provincial government continues to work tirelessly to provide urgent humanitarian assistance to 4 308 individuals who have been left homeless across the province, and processes are under way to ensure the provision of temporary residential units. Significant progress has also been made in the restoration of critical infrastructure,' he said. The premier said an intensive response and recovery effort was under way.
