logo
Philippines defence chief Gilberto Teodoro Jr calls out China's ‘propaganda spiel' at Shangri-La Dialogue

Philippines defence chief Gilberto Teodoro Jr calls out China's ‘propaganda spiel' at Shangri-La Dialogue

Straits Times2 days ago

SINGAPORE - A 'deficit of trust' stands in the way of Beijing's ability to resolve disputes such as overlapping claims in the South China Sea, said Philippines defence chief Gilberto Teodoro Jr on June 1.
Speaking on June 1 at a plenary session during the 22nd Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Mr Teodoro also hit back at questions from Chinese delegates after one official compared the Philippines' handling of the waterway dispute with China, with the approaches taken by Malaysia and Vietnam, asking why Manila could not 'do the same' and 'effectively manage' these differences.
The same official also asked if Manila's intention was to 'act as a proxy for external powers'.
Among the claimants of the contested waterway, Manila, which has a mutual defence treaty with Washington, has been one of the most vocal in speaking out against Beijing's moves to assert its sovereignty in the South China Sea, with tense confrontations breaking out in recent times between the two countries' vessels and coast guards.
This is in contrast to fellow Asean member states who also have territorial claims in the strategic waterway, which China claims the majority of via a 'nine-dash line' it uses to demarcate its territory.
The area within the dashes overlaps with areas that Asean members Malaysia, Vietnam, the Philippines, Brunei and Indonesia claim as their territories or exclusive economic zones. Currently, there are ongoing negotiations between Asean and Beijing to ink a Code of Conduct to manage South China Sea disputes peacefully .
Labelling the queries posed during the session as a 'propaganda spiel disguised as questions' , which drew applause from those in attendance, Mr Teodoro said: 'On dialogue with China, unfortunately, my personal opinion (is that) the fact that the way the question was asked... engenders a deficit of trust in China's words vis-a-vis action.'
He also said that while the Philippines, Malaysia and Vietnam were part of Asean , they are also sovereign countries with their own territorial integrity.
'I'm sure that if what China is doing to the Philippines is done to Malaysia or to any Asean country, you will see a different reaction. Certainly, as an Asean brother, the Philippines will stand up with that Asean brother in time of need and in support and defence of internal law and Unclos (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea),' he said.
Commenting on conducting dialogue with China , Mr Teodoro said that for such exchanges to be effective, it must be coupled with trust.
He added: 'China has a lot of trust-building to do to be an effective negotiating partner in dispute settlement.
'We have to call a spade a spade… And that's the biggest stumbling block in dispute resolution or dialogue with China, the deficit of trust.'
And while some Asean member states do have overlapping territorial claims with each other, these differences are dealt with in a cooperative and peaceful manner because of the trust between the nations.
'Asean should not allow other parties to define what Asean centrality means. And not (allow others) to use Asean's perceived action or inaction as a wedge to drive divisions among us,' Mr Teodoro said.
When asked for a response on Mr Teodoro's remarks, Senior Colonel Qi Dapeng, a National Defence University professor who was among the Chinese delegates that posed questions at the session, took issue with how the Chinese queries were being framed as propaganda slogans. He told the Straits Times at the sidelines of the forum that Mr Teodoro has failed to respond to the issue 'properly'.
In his remarks, Mr Teodoro warned that disruptions in strategic maritime corridors such as the South China Sea, the Suez Canal and the Bab el Mandeb, will have impacts across the globe.
'They are arteries of the global economy. Disruption in any of these maritime corridors triggers ripple effects across continents, impacting trade flows, military deployments and diplomatic posture,' he said.
Also speaking during the plenary session on Enhancing Security Cooperation for a Stable Asia-Pacific were Thailand's deputy prime minister and defence minister Phumtham Wechayachai and Lithuania's Minister of National Defence Dovile Sakaliene.
Mr Phumthum said that there have been efforts for Asean to unite on various fronts, including to strengthen the resilience of critical infrastructure as well as cross-regional security mechanisms.
One area of concern in particular was the protection of undersea infrastructure, which he said remains vulnerable to physical attacks, sabotage and natural disasters.
'Disruption in this domain carries far-reaching consequences for regional economies and security,' he said.
Thailand's deputy prime minister and defence minister Phumtham Wechayachai said that there have been efforts for Asean to unite on various fronts.
PHOTO: BLOOMBERG
Thailand, along with Singapore and Brunei, have proposed that the Asean Digital Masterplan 2025, which focuses on advancing digital transformation in the region, drive cooperation in this area, he added.
Answering questions about Thailand's efforts to combat the networks of illegal scam centres that have been operating along its border with Myanmar, Mr Phumthum said this involves collective efforts from all countries.
Bangkok and Beijing had earlier in 2025 launched a series of crackdowns to tackle the multi-billion-dollar scam hubs located in Myanmar, repatriating thousands of foreigners – including many Chinese nationals – who had been held captive there .
'We use our positive relations with Myanmar and talk with all concerned countries about online scammer issues, and collaborate in helping victims and trying to find a durable resolution,' he said.
Thailand has also cut cross-border supply of electricity, water and internet connectivity to areas in Myanmar linked with these scam centres, he noted.
'This has undoubtedly impacted the local people in the area, but it will help us reduce the problem of online scammers and transnational crime,' Mr Phumthum added.
Meanwhile, Ms Sakaliene highlighted Lithuania's Indo-Pacific Strategy that was launched in 2023 in response to the need to ensure security, economic cooperation and strengthen the small state's international position.
'We do have something to offer. And as one of my wonderful colleagues said here, being small does not mean being insignificant, especially where there are a lot of such small ones like us,' she said.
On May 31, United States Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said during the security conference that the future, security and prosperity of the US and its Indo-Pacific allies were linked and 'bound together'. He also encouraged Asian countries to increase their defence spending.
Ms Sakaliene said that while the United States' strategic focus on the Indo-Pacific was justified and necessary, it was not Washington's responsibility alone.
'I'm very glad to hear that so many of us here agree that we do have to work together,' she said, warning that if more 'coordinated action' by 'less diplomatically' aligned and authoritarian regimes were to take place, it would complicate global stability for decades.
She added: 'In these times of uncertainty, I believe that our ability to weave a tightly knit network of allies and partners from Europe to the Indo-Pacific, based on fair government sharing and defence of joint interest against common threats, is crucial.'
Additional reporting by Yew Lun Tian
Tan Tam Mei is assistant foreign editor at The Straits Times. She oversees coverage of South-east Asia.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump and China's Xi will likely speak this week, White House says
Trump and China's Xi will likely speak this week, White House says

Straits Times

time4 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Trump and China's Xi will likely speak this week, White House says

FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping pose for a photo ahead of their bilateral meeting during the G20 leaders summit in Osaka, Japan, June 29, 2019. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo Trump and China's Xi will likely speak this week, White House says WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping will likely speak this week, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Monday, days after Trump accused China of violating an agreement to roll back tariffs and trade restrictions. Leavitt is the third top Trump aide to forecast an imminent call between the two leaders to iron out differences on last month's tariff agreement in Geneva, among larger trade issues. It was not immediately clear when the two leaders will speak. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CBS' "Face the Nation" on Sunday that Trump and Xi would speak "very soon" to iron out trade issues including a dispute over critical minerals and China's restrictions of exports of certain minerals. Trump said on Friday he was sure that he would speak to Xi. China said in April that the two leaders had not had a conversation recently. Bessent led negotiations with China in Geneva last month that resulted in a temporary truce in the trade war between the world's two biggest economies, but progress since then has been slow, the U.S. Treasury chief told Fox News last week. The U.S.-China agreement to dial back triple-digit tariffs for 90 days prompted a massive relief rally in global stocks. But it did nothing to address the underlying reasons for Trump's tariffs on Chinese goods, mainly longstanding U.S. complaints about China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model, leaving those issues for future talks. A U.S. trade court on Wednesday ruled that Trump overstepped his authority in imposing the bulk of his tariffs on imports from China and other countries under an emergency powers act. But less than 24 hours later, a federal appeals court reinstated the tariffs, saying it was pausing the trade court ruling to consider the government's appeal. The appeals court ordered the plaintiffs to respond by June 5 and the administration to respond by June 9. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

China's grip on rare earths gives President Xi leverage in US trade duel
China's grip on rare earths gives President Xi leverage in US trade duel

Straits Times

time6 hours ago

  • Straits Times

China's grip on rare earths gives President Xi leverage in US trade duel

Workers at the Magnequench Company make magnetic powders and products using rare earth metals in Tianjin, China. PHOTO: SIM CHI YIN/NYTIMES BEIJING – After the US and China agreed in Geneva to lower tariffs from astronomical heights, tensions are now surging over access to chips and rare earths. And Beijing increasingly appears to have an edge. President Donald Trump on May 30 accused China of violating the agreement struck in May, and sought a call with his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping to sort things out. The main sticking point appears to be critical minerals, with US officials complaining Beijing hadn't sped up exports needed for cutting-edge electronics. The US has said the decision to reduce tariffs hinged on a Chinese agreement to lift export controls on some rare earths. 'It's going to require a discussion between the presidents of the two countries,' Deputy US Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender said on June 2 in a brief interview with Bloomberg Television. A US administration official said on June 2 it was likely the leaders would speak this week. The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Mr Faulkender added the US and China 'continue to have conversations' and Trump administration officials are urging their counterparts 'to fulfill the obligations that they made in Geneva to unlock those exports.' As China keeps constraints on metals critical to America's national security, Washington is ramping up its own tech restrictions. Over the past three weeks, the US has barred the shipping of critical jet engine parts to China, throttled Beijing's access to chip-design software and slapped fresh curbs on Huawei Technologies chips. That's sparked anger in world's second-largest economy. Chinese officials on June 2 vowed to respond and accused the US of undermining the Geneva consensus, dimming the chance of a leaders call. The dispute has the potential to endanger the fragile trade truce between Washington and Beijing. In theory, tariffs could snap back to more than 100 per cent after the 90-day negotiating period. It's uncertain if the spat over export curbs will derail relations. Mr Trump has incentive to avoid that, after the US economy shrank at the start of the year and markets panicked under the weight of huge tariffs. For years, Washington was believed to have the advantage over China in the fight for technological dominance thanks to its grip on semiconductor supply chains. Mr Xi has shown he's ready to fight back, in part by tightening controls over critical minerals in a bid to force the US into easing its restrictions. While the Trump administration has shown little sign of relenting on chip curbs, it has quickly discovered replacing China as a supplier of rare earths could take years and cause pain for key industries. The Asian nation produces almost 70 per cent of the world's metals crucial for making fighter jets, nuclear reactor control rods and other critical technology. China is gaining ground in the standoff, according to Mr Cory Combs, associate director at consultancy Trivium China who specialises in supply chains. Washington is still a decade away from securing rare earths independently from Beijing, while Chinese firms have developed capable alternatives to most US chips, he said. 'China's leverage is more durable than a lot of the US leverage at this stage,' he added. 'I'm not sure if this works out well for the US.' Supply-chain warfare As part of the agreement struck in Switzerland, China promised to remove or suspend 'non-tariff countermeasures taken against the United States' after Mr Trump announced punitive duties in April. The Chinese government did not elaborate on what that entailed. Rare-earth exporters must apply for permits from the Ministry of Commerce. That process is opaque and difficult to verify, allowing officials to turn it on and off again with little visibility from the outside world. The paperwork involved has caused hold-ups, which are only now showing signs of easing. 'We are seeing some approvals come through – certainly slower than industry would like,' said Mr Michael Hart, president of the American Chamber of Commerce in China. 'Some of the delay is related to China working through their new system.' For some US firms, the metals can't flow fast enough. Ford Motor temporarily shuttered a factory in Chicago last month because it ran short of rare earth components. At a long-running US defence aviation conference Mr Combs recently attended, rare earths were a top talking point. Attendees took the threat 'very seriously,' he said. Such concerns show why export controls have become a central pillar of China's supply-chain warfare: They can hurt US industries while causing little harm at home. Tariffs, in comparison, can be costly both for Chinese manufacturers and consumers. Giving Mr Xi even greater leverage, the impact of China's rare earths controls aren't limited to American importers. India's largest electric scooter maker, Bajaj Auto, warned last week that the country's vehicle production will take a hit as early as July if China doesn't resume shipments. 'Supplies and stocks are getting depleted as we speak,' said the firm's executive director Rakesh Sharma. Over 30 such applications have been made for shipping to Indian companies – and none have been approved so far, Mr Sharma added. Companies from another large Asian importer only started getting permits last week, according to an official from the country who asked not to be named. China's squeeze on all countries highlights another risk for Mr Trump: Strategic US sectors, such as batteries and semiconductors, depend on South Korea and Japan for components. If Beijing cuts off those US allies from rare earths, American firms could face even more pain. Japan's top trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa called rare earths 'undoubtedly a critical theme for economic security,' after emerging on May 30 from his latest round of trade negotiations with US counterparts. Next battleground Critical minerals were flagged as the next battleground in US-China ties at the height of Mr Trump's first trade war, when Mr Xi visited one of his country's biggest permanent magnet producers – a trip widely seen as an implied threat. In July 2023, Beijing followed through by slapping export curbs on gallium and germanium – minerals used to make semiconductors – after the US sought to restrict China's access to artificial intelligence chips. Recognising the danger, the US Department of Defence has pledged to develop a complete mine-to-magnet rare earth supply chain for all domestic defense needs by 2027. A lack of commercially viable natural reserves, few engineers trained in the extraction process and limited numbers of companies able to compete at the industry's thin price margins are just some of the challenges the department faces. Catching up will also depend on how deeply Washington is willing to spend. Mr Trump is already tapping foreign capital. During the president's trip in May to the Middle East, MP Materials Corp – the sole US producer of rare earths – signed a deal with Saudi Arabia's top mining firm to develop a supply chain. The US could also intensify cooperation with Australia's Lynas Rare Earths Ltd – the largest producer of separated rare earths outside of China, although that operation still sends some of its oxides to the Asian nation for refining. While capacity is building in Brazil, South Africa, Japan and Vietnam, they can't offer an immediate fix for US firms. Beijing hasn't exhausted its leverage. Restrictions so far have targeted medium- and heavy-rare earths, which are concentrated in defense applications. Weaponising light rare earths – such as neodymium and praseodymium – could deal an even bigger blow to the US economy, as they're more widespread in consumer goods. For now, Mr Xi is unlikely to pursue the most extreme options as it could invite blowback from vulnerable industries, said Neil Thomas, a fellow for Chinese politics at the Asia Society Policy Institute's Center for China Analysis. 'Beijing's controls on rare earths are a warning against further escalation,' he added. 'But if US-China tensions worsen again, then Beijing may start to inflict real pain on US defense supply chains.' BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

How Trump's trade war is upending the global economy, World News
How Trump's trade war is upending the global economy, World News

AsiaOne

time15 hours ago

  • AsiaOne

How Trump's trade war is upending the global economy, World News

US President Donald Trump's tariff decisions since he took office on Jan 20 have shocked financial markets and sent a wave of uncertainty through the global economy. Here is a timeline of the major developments: Feb 1 - Trump imposes 25 per cent tariffs on Mexican and most Canadian imports and 10 per cent on goods from China, demanding they curb the flow of fentanyl and illegal immigrants into the United States. Feb 3 - Trump suspends his threat of tariffs on Mexico and Canada, agreeing to a 30-day pause in return for concessions on border and crime enforcement. The US does not reach such a deal with China. Feb 7 - Trump delays tariffs on de minimis, or low-cost, packages from China until the Commerce Department can confirm that procedures and systems are in place to process them and collect tariff revenue. Feb 10 - Trump raises tariffs on steel and aluminium to a flat 25 per cent "without exceptions or exemptions". March 3 - Trump says 25 per cent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada will take effect from March 4 and doubles fentanyl-related tariffs on all Chinese imports to 20 per cent. March 5 - The president agrees to delay tariffs for one month on some vehicles built in Canada and Mexico after a call with the CEOs of General Motors and Ford and the chair of Stellantis. March 6 - Trump exempts goods from Canada and Mexico under a North American trade pact for a month from the 25 per cent tariffs. March 26 - Trump unveils a 25 per cent tariff on imported cars and light trucks. April 2 - Trump announces global tariffs with a baseline of 10 per cent across all imports and significantly higher duties on some of the US' biggest trading partners. April 9 - Trump pauses for 90 days most of his country-specific tariffs that kicked in less than 24 hours earlier following an upheaval in financial markets that erased trillions of dollars from bourses around the world. The 10 per cent blanket duty on almost all US imports stays in place. Trump says he will raise the tariff on Chinese imports to 125 per cent from the 104 per cent level that took effect a day earlier. This pushes the extra duties on Chinese goods to 145 per cent, including the fentanyl-related tariffs imposed earlier. April 13 - The US administration grants exclusions from steep tariffs on smartphones, computers and some other electronics imported largely from China. April 22 - The Trump administration launches national security probes under Section 232 of the Trade Act of 1962 into imports of both pharmaceuticals and semiconductors as part of a bid to impose tariffs on both sectors. May 4 - Trump imposes a 100 per cent tariff on all movies produced outside the US May 9 - Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announce a limited bilateral trade agreement that leaves in place 10 per cent tariffs on British exports, modestly expands agricultural access for both countries and lowers prohibitive US duties on British car exports. May 12 - The US and China agree to temporarily slash reciprocal tariffs. Under the 90-day truce, the US will cut the extra tariffs it imposed on Chinese imports to 30 per cent from 145 per cent, while China's duties on US imports will be slashed to 10 per cent from 125 per cent. May 13 - The US cuts the low value "de minimis" tariff on China shipments, reducing duties for items valued at up to $800 to 54 per cent from 120 per cent. May 23 - Trump says he is recommending a straight 50 per cent tariff on goods from the European Union starting on June 1. He also warned Apple it would face 25 per cent tariff if phones it sold in the US were manufactured outside of the country. May 25 - Trump backpedals on his threat to slap 50 per cent tariffs on imports from the EU, agreeing to extend the deadline for talks between the US and the block until July 9. May 28 - A US trade court blocked Trump's tariffs from going into effect in a sweeping ruling that the president overstepped his authority by imposing across-the-board duties on imports from US trade partners. The Trump administration said it would appeal the ruling. May 29 - A federal appeals court temporarily reinstates the most sweeping of Trump's tariffs, saying it was pausing the lower court's ruling to consider the government's appeal, and ordered the plaintiffs in the cases to respond by June 5 and the administration by June 9. May 30 - At a rally in Pennsylvania, Trump says he plans to increase tariffs on imported steel and aluminium to 50 per cent from 25 per cent. [[nid:718546]]

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store