Volunteers kick off Pride with free 'Vegas style' weddings for LGBT couples
Volunteers kick off Pride with free 'Vegas style' weddings for LGBT couples originally appeared on Bring Me The News.
Pride rang in early this year to the sound of wedding bells in the Twin Cities, after a group of community members banded together on Saturday to provide 15 LGBT couples with free weddings.
Former wedding photographer Kelly Wilson first issued her appeal February, seeking volunteers to help host free ceremonies for LGBT couples and bring "some joy to my community". Within a short three months, over $4,000 was raised, and the number of volunteers grew to 50 people, who helped organize and run Saturday's event.
The group, now known as Do'Gooders MN, not only volunteered their time but also provided resources, including funding for each couple's wedding cake, rings, personal photographers, and more.
"I just wanted to help others have exactly what I have, which is a wonderful legal marriage. And once you are legally wed, it can't be undone," Wilson said. "It started as kind of a joyful way to show resistance about what's going on with our community."
Having been happily married to her wife for the past 12 years, Wilson was spurred into action by President Donald Trump's return to office and the slew of orders at the federal and state level targeting the LGBT community that have since followed.
"There are multiple states that right now are moving resolutions through their system to go to the Supreme Court to ask them not to let marriage equality exist," Wilson told Bring Me The News. "The Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that same-sex marriage would be legal in all 50 states in 2015.
"That's a huge deal when it comes to health care and making choices about family planning, and making choices about whether somebody dies. Tons of rights come with a legal marriage. So I felt very compelled to help people get ahead of the curve."
Instead of a simple "mass wedding," Wilson and her Do'Gooders conducted the weddings "Vegas style" at Salem Lutheran Church, with each couple having their private 45-minute ceremony amongst invited family and friends, officiated by Ramsey County judges, such as Sara Grewing.
"When there were people in the community looking to get married, I was always happy to help out," Judge Grewing told Bring Me The News. "So, regardless of their story or background, if I can be a part of celebrating families and joy, I like to do so."
Among the happy couples able to get married on Saturday were Katie and Erica Jackson, who have been together for five years. The two celebrated not only their union but also the blending of two families, with Erica's two children being part of her bridal party.
"We actually have plans to get married in Hawaii in October, but we had some very legitimate concerns that by then it won't be legal anymore," Katie said. "We saw this opportunity and explained our situation. They very joyfully welcomed and embraced us, it's wonderful."
Erica explained just how important this event was not only to them as a family, but to the community as a whole.
"Community is the most important thing we have, and is a thing we have to support. So it is very important not just for us, but for everyone in the community," Erica added.
While the wedding event may be over, Wilson and her Do'Gooders are not planning on stopping their work anytime soon, with Wilson saying she plans on incorporating the group and becoming a nonprofit.
"We're going to continue doing good in Minnesota," Wilson said. "I wouldn't be surprised if another wedding is in our future, but right now we're just focusing on this one, and then we're all going to take June off and catch our breath."
"Not every community might be the community you feel comfortable helping, but if you can't help them, don't hurt them," Wilson added. "Let people live and support those that you can support, and get involved because when you get involved, you have community, and when you have community, you can face things."
This story was originally reported by Bring Me The News on Jun 5, 2025, where it first appeared.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
43 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump says he thinks the government has a 'very easy case' against Kilmar Abrego Garcia
President Donald Trump on Saturday said that it wasn't his decision to bring Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador, back to the U.S. to face federal charges, saying the "Department of Justice decided to do it that way, and that's fine." "That wasn't my decision," Trump said of Abrego Garcia's return in a phone call with NBC News on Saturday. "It should be a very easy case" for federal prosecutors, the president added. Trump added that he did not speak with Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele about Abrego Garcia's return, even though the two men spoke about Abrego Garcia during an April meeting in the Oval Office. His remarks came after Abrego Garcia arrived back in the U.S. on Friday and was charged in an indictment alleging he transported people who were not legally in the country. The indictment came amid a protracted legal battle over whether to bring him back from El Salvador that escalated all the way up to the Supreme Court. Abrego Garcia's family and lawyers have called him a family man, while Trump and his administration have alleged that he is a member of the gang MS-13. The case drew national attention amid the Trump administration's broader push for mass deportations. After Abrego Garcia's deportation, lawyers for the Trump administration said he was deported in an "administrative error," as Abrego Garcia had previous legal protection from deportation to El Salvador. Still, the Trump administration did not attempt to bring Abrego Garcia back, even as the Supreme Court ruled that it had to "facilitate" his return to the U.S. Democrats, including Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., had for weeks said that Abrego Garcia was denied due process when he was detained and deported, arguing that he should have been allowed to defend himself from deportation before he was sent to El Salvador. Trump on Saturday called Van Hollen, who went to visit Abrego Garcia in jail in El Salvador in April, a "loser" for defending the man's right to due process. "He's a loser. The guy's a loser. They're going to lose because of that same thing. That's not what people want to hear," the president said about Van Hollen. "He's trying to defend a man who's got a horrible record of abuse, abuse of women in particular. No, he's a total loser, this guy." On Friday, Attorney General Pam Bondi alleged that Abrego Garcia "was a smuggler of humans and children and women. He made over 100 trips, the grand jury found, smuggling people throughout our country." In a statement Friday, Abrego Garcia's lawyer called Bondi's move "an abuse of power, not justice." —
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court allows DOGE staffers to access Social Security data
June 7 (UPI) -- The U.S. Supreme Court is allowing members of the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency to access personal Social Security Administration data. On Friday, the Court's six conservatives granted an emergency application filed by the Trump administration to lift an injunction issued by a federal judge in Maryland. Opposing the injunction were the three liberal justices: Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. There are 69 million retirees, disabled workers, dependents and survivors who receive Social Security benefits, representing 28.75% of the U.S. population. In a separate two-page order issued Friday, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration for now to shield DOGE from freedom of information requests seeking thousands of pages of material. This vote also was 6-3 with no written dissenting opinions. In the two-page unsigned order on access, the court said: "We conclude that, under the present circumstances, SSA may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work." The conservatives are Chief Justice John Roberts, and Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. Three of them were nominated by President Donald Trump during his first term. U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander, appointed by President Barack Obama, had ruled that DOGE staffers had no need to access the specific data. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Virginia, declined to block Hollander's decision. The lawsuit was filed by progressive group Democracy Forward on behalf of two unions, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, and the American Federation of Teachers, as well as the Alliance for Retired Americans. They alleged broader access to personal information would violate a federal law, the Privacy Act and the Administrative Procedure Act. "This is a sad day for our democracy and a scary day for millions of people," the groups said in a statement. "This ruling will enable President Trump and DOGE's affiliates to steal Americans' private and personal data. Elon Musk may have left Washington, D.C., but his impact continues to harm millions of people. We will continue to use every legal tool at our disposal to keep unelected bureaucrats from misusing the public's most sensitive data as this case moves forward." Social Security Works posted on X: "No one in history -- no commissioner, no president, no one -- has ever had the access that these DOGE minions have." White House spokesperson Liz Huston after the ruling told NBC News that "the Supreme Court allowing the Trump Administration to carry out commonsense efforts to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse and modernize government information systems is a huge victory for the rule of law." Brown Jackson wrote a nine-page dissenting opinion that the "Government fails to substantiate its stay request by showing that it or the public will suffer irreparable harm absent this Court's intervention. In essence, the 'urgency' underlying the government's stay application is the mere fact that it cannot be bothered to wait for the litigation process to play out before proceeding as it wishes." She concluded her dissent by writing: "The Court opts instead to relieve the Government of the standard obligations, jettisoning careful judicial decisionmaking and creates grave privacy risks for millions of Americans in the process." Kathleen Romig, who worked as a senior adviser at the agency during the Biden administration, told CNN that Americans should be concerned about how DOGE has handled highly sensitive data so far. She said the personal data runs "from cradle to grave." "While the appeals court considers whether DOGE is violating the law, its operatives will have 'God-level' access to Social Security numbers, earnings records, bank routing numbers, mental and reproductive health records and much more," Romig, who now is director of Social Security and disability policy at the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. When Trump became president again on Jan. 20, he signed an executive order establishing DOGE with the goal of "modernizing Federal technology and software to maximize governmental efficiency and productivity." Nearly a dozen DOGE members have been installed at the agency, according to court filings. In all, there are about 90 DOGE workers. DOGE, which was run by billionaire Elon Musk until he left the White House one week ago, wants to modernize systems and detect waste and fraud at the agency. "These teams have a business need to access the data at their assigned agency and subject the government's records to much-needed scrutiny," Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote in the court motion. The data includes Social Security numbers, date and place of birth, gender, addresses, marital and parental status, parents' names, lifetime earnings, bank account information, immigration and work authorization status, health conditions for disability benefits and use of Medicare. SSA also has data-sharing agreements with the IRS and the Department of Health and Human Services. The plaintiffs wrote: "The agency is obligated by the Privacy Act and its own regulations, practices, and procedures to keep that information secure -- and not to share it beyond the circle of those who truly need it." Social Security Administration Commissioner Frank Bisignano, who was sworn in to the post on May 7, said in a statement: that"The Supreme Court's ruling is a major victory for American taxpayers. The Social Security Administration will continue driving forward modernization efforts, streamlining government systems, and ensuring improved service and outcomes for our beneficiaries." On May 23, Roberts temporarily put lower court decisions on hold while the Supreme Court considered what next steps to take. Musk called Social Security "the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time" during an interview with Joe Rogan on Feb. 28. The Social Security system, which started in 1935, transfers current workers' payroll tax payments to people who are already retired. The payroll tax is a mandatory tax paid by employees and employers. The total current tax rate is 12.4%. There is a separate 2.9% tax for Medicare.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Kilmar Abrego Garcia's return ‘wasn't my decision,' Trump says
President Donald Trump said Saturday that the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia — the Salvadoran man who was illegally deported in March — was not his decision. 'That wasn't my decision,' Trump said in an interview with NBC News. 'The Department of Justice decided to do it that way.' Abrego Garcia was flown back to the United States on Friday to face federal human trafficking charges in Tennessee, after prosecutors unveiled the indictment this week. It comes months after the Trump administration admitted it had mistakenly deported him — which the Supreme Court declared was illegal, ordering the government to 'facilitate' his return — leading to an intense political and legal firestorm throughout the country over the ethics of the administration's mass deportation policy. 'It should be a very easy case' for federal prosecutors, the president told NBC News. Trump said that he did not talk to Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele about Abrego Garcia's return. Despite the high court's order, Trump officials have for months resisted bringing Abrego Garcia back to the U.S., arguing it was out of their hands as he was in Salvadoran custody. 'There is no scenario where Abrego Garcia will be in the United States again,' Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem told lawmakers last month. The Trump administration repeatedly labeled Abrego Garcia as a violent gang member, which his family and lawyers have flatly denied and a federal judge labeled as 'a vague, uncorroborated allegation.' Lawyers for the administration called his deportation 'an administrative error,' but did not immediately facilitate his return, despite the Supreme Court instructing them to. Intense backlash followed, including Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) traveling to El Salvador to meet with him and demand his return. Republicans, in turn, bashed Van Hollen and Democrats for defending him. Abrego Garcia's lawyers have urged the public to treat the allegations with suspicion. 'They'll stop at nothing at all — even some of the most preposterous charges imaginable — just to avoid admitting that they made a mistake, which is what everyone knows happened,' Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, one of his lawyers, told reporters Friday. 'He's not going to be convicted of these crimes,' the lawyer added. 'There's no way a jury is going to see the evidence and agree that this sheet metal worker is the leader of an international MS-13 smuggling conspiracy.'
