North Korea moves warship from botched launch to dockyard for repairs
North Korea has moved the warship that partially capsized during a botched launch last month to a repair factory, new satellite images show.
The 5,000-tonne vessel, North Korea 's second known destroyer, was damaged during the launch ceremony on 21 May, causing enraged leader Kim Jong Un, who was in attendance, to call it a 'criminal act'.
Pyongyang has since confirmed the failed launch, describing it as a 'serious accident'.
Satellite images from this week show the vessel has been moved to the graving dock at Rajin dockyard, also known as Rajin Ship Repair Factory, in the country's northeast, the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a think tank based in the US, said.
'Subsequently, the 8 June image shows the destroyer positioned within the dock, the caissons back in position and the water likely being pumped out so the vessel can rest on blocks,' it said. 'Critical parts of the destroyer such as the vertical launch missile systems, forward gun turret mount, mast, and superstructure, are partially covered with netting to limit overhead visibility.'
The warship's hull will be examined over the next week to 10 days to determine the next steps for restoration, North Korean experts told state media.
The Rajin shipyard, located near the Russian border, has produced several of North Korea's larger warships for decades, the think tank said.
"Once any critical repairs or restoration work are completed, the vessel will likely be transferred to the shipyard's fitting out dock, where its weapons and other systems will be installed and subsequently commissioned," it said.
In the aftermath of the failed launch, Pyongyang detained several officials involved and Mr Kim ordered the ship restored before a ruling party meeting this month.
The ruler also blamed military officials, scientists and shipyard operators for what he described as a 'serious accident and criminal act caused by absolute carelessness, irresponsibility and unscientific empiricism'.
According to researchers in the US and South Korean military, the warship was seen lying on its side in the water after the botched launch but was pulled upright a few days later.
The damaged vessel was likely in the same class as North Korea's first destroyer, which was unveiled on 25 April and hailed by Mr Kim as a significant asset for advancing the navy's operational range and nuclear strike capabilities.
State media said the ship was designed to handle various weapons systems, including anti-air and anti-ship weapons as well as nuclear-capable ballistic and cruise missiles.
Mr Kim supervised test-firings of missiles from the destroyer afterwards and state media said it was expected to enter active duty early next year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Marines prepare for Los Angeles deployment as protests spread across US
LOS ANGELES, June 12 (Reuters) - California will face off with Washington in court on Thursday over President Donald Trump's deployment of U.S. troops in Los Angeles after demonstrators again took to the streets in major cities to protest Trump's immigration crackdown. Some 700 U.S. Marines will be on the streets of Los Angeles by Thursday or Friday, the military said, to support up to 4,000 National Guard troops in protecting federal property and federal agents, including on immigration raids. Trump's decision to dispatch troops to Los Angeles over the objections of California Governor Gavin Newsom has sparked a national debate about the use of the military on U.S. soil and further polarized the country. Street protests have broken out in multiple cities besides Los Angeles including New York, Chicago, Washington and San Antonio, Texas. A federal judge in San Francisco will hear arguments Thursday as part of California's lawsuit against Trump. The state is requesting a temporary restraining order to block the troops' participation in law enforcement activities. California ultimately wants a court ruling that returns its National Guard to the state's control and declares that Trump's action was illegal. The L.A. protests broke out last Friday in response to a series of immigration raids. Trump in turn called in the National Guard on Saturday, then summoned the Marines on Monday. "If I didn't act quickly on that, Los Angeles would be burning to the ground right now," said Trump at an event at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. State and local leaders dispute that, saying Trump has only escalated tensions with an unnecessary deployment of federal troops, while Democrats nationally have condemned his action as authoritarian. Trump is carrying out a campaign promise to deport immigrants, employing forceful tactics consistent with the norm-breaking political style that got him elected twice. Los Angeles on Wednesday endured a sixth day of protests that have been largely peaceful but occasionally punctuated by violence, mostly contained to a few blocks. In downtown L.A., shortly before the second night of a curfew over a one square mile (2.5 square km) area on Wednesday night, police said demonstrators at one location threw commercial-grade fireworks and rocks at officers. Another group of nearly 1,000 demonstrators was peacefully marching through downtown when police suddenly opened fire with less lethal munitions in front of City Hall. Marlene Lopez, 39, a Los Angeles native, was demonstrating as flash bangs exploded just a few meters away. "I am out here because of the fact that our human rights are being violated every day. If we give up, it's over. We have to stand our ground here in L.A. so that the nation will follow us," Lopez said. An undetermined number of arrests were made, in addition to some 400 over the previous days. New York police said an unknown number of people had been taken into custody on Wednesday after saying on Tuesday that 86 had been taken into custody, of which 34 were arrested and charged, while the others received a criminal court summons. The protests are set to expand on Saturday, when several activist groups have planned more than 1,800 anti-Trump demonstrations across the country. That day, tanks and other armored vehicles will rumble down the streets of Washington, D.C., in a military parade marking the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary and coinciding with Trump's 79th birthday. U.S. Marines will join National Guard troops on the streets of Los Angeles within 48 hours, officials said on Wednesday, and would be authorized to detain anyone who interferes with immigration officers on raids or protesters who confront federal agents. A battalion of 700 Marines had concluded training specific to the L.A. mission, including de-escalation and crowd control, the U.S. Northern Command said in a statement. The Marines would join the National Guard under the authority of a federal law known as Title 10, not to conduct civilian policing but to protect federal officers and property, the military said. "Title 10 forces may temporarily detain an individual in specific circumstances such as to stop an assault, to prevent harm to others, or to prevent interference with federal personnel performing their duties," the Northern Command said. U.S. Army Major General Scott Sherman, who commands the task force of Marines and Guardsmen, told reporters the Marines will not load their rifles with live ammunition, but they will carry live rounds.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Kim Jong-un: Friendship with Putin is now ‘forged in blood'
North Korea's relationship with Russia is now 'forged in blood', Kim Jong-un said on Thursday in a message to Vladimir Putin. The dictator vowed to 'always stand' with Moscow, while snubbing any outreach from the United States, in comments reported by state media. The message was addressed to the Russian president to commemorate Russia Day, which marks the country's declaration of sovereignty in 1990, just over a year before the collapse of the Soviet Union. Kim said it is an 'unshakeable will' of both his and his country to carry on relations with Russia, which 'have been sealed and verified in the face of all sorts of trials and challenges of history, to a heyday of comprehensive prosperity'. He also acknowledged that the friendship between the two countries 'has been further cemented thanks to the militant comradeship the service personnel of the two countries have forged at the cost of their blood' in reference to the war in Ukraine. In late April, Kim and Putin confirmed that North Korea had sent approximately 15,000 troops to fight alongside Russian forces, along with 100 ballistic missiles and millions of munitions. Both leaders put out statements at the time affirming the strong relations between the two countries, which only seem to be growing by the day, with both countries largely isolated by western sanctions. In his latest address, Kim said the ties between Russia and North Korea have 'developed into an excellent model of indestructible, genuine relationship between comrades-in-arms and alliance'. In exchange for the soldiers, Russia supplied North Korea with sophisticated defence equipment, including short-range air-defence systems and jamming equipment. Experts suspect that Moscow is also offering Pyongyang support for its nuclear and drone programmes. Kim also commented on the war in his message, telling Putin that Russia will 'surely emerge victorious'. 'Never been as strong' Experts have said that relations between the two regimes have 'never been as strong'. While he offered one of the more emphatic congratulations, Kim wasn't the only leader to send a celebratory message to Moscow today. Despite a frostier tone from president Donald Trump towards Putin in recent weeks, his Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a statement on Thursday morning also congratulating the Russian people. He said: 'The United States remains committed to supporting the Russian people as they continue to build on their aspirations for a brighter future.' Mr Rubio also reaffirmed the US' 'desire for constructive engagement with the Russian Federation to bring about a durable peace between Russia and Ukraine'. The Trump administration has also recently been making overtures to the North Korean regime, though so far they seem to have been unsuccessful. Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, told reporters on Wednesday that 'the president remains receptive to correspondence with Kim Jong-un' and that Mr Trump would like to build on the 'progress' that he made during his first term. In 2018, Mr Trump met with Kim in Singapore, in the first ever meeting between a sitting US president and leader of North Korea, but this time the efforts seem to be one-sided. According to local outlet NK News, Mr Trump has once again written a letter for Kim that his aides have been trying to hand-deliver to North Korean diplomats at the United Nations in New York to no avail. The president said in 2018 that the two leaders 'fell in love' by exchanging letters. In April, Trump claimed the US was in 'communication' with North Korea and said his administration would 'probably do something at some point.' However, for now it looks like the isolated regime has its fill with its close ties to Russia.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Troops and marines deeply troubled by LA deployment: ‘Morale is not great'
California national guards troops and marines deployed to Los Angeles to help restore order after days of protest against the Trump administration have told friends and family members they are deeply unhappy about the assignment and worry their only meaningful role will be as pawns in a political battle they do not want to join. Three different advocacy organisations representing military families said they had heard from dozens of affected service members who expressed discomfort about being drawn into a domestic policing operation outside their normal field of operations. The groups said they have heard no countervailing opinions. 'The sentiment across the board right now is that deploying military force against our own communities isn't the kind of national security we signed up for,' said Sarah Streyder of the Secure Families Initiative, which represents the interests of military spouses, children and veterans. 'Families are scared not just for their loved ones' safety, although that's a big concern, but also for what their service is being used to justify.' Chris Purdy of the Chamberlain Network, whose stated mission is to 'mobilize and empower veterans to protect democracy', said he had heard similar things from half a dozen national guard members. 'Morale is not great, is the quote I keep hearing,' he said. The marines and the California national guard did not respond to invitations to comment. Trump has taken the unusual step of ordering 4,000 national guard members to Los Angeles without the consent of California's governor, Gavin Newsom, saying that the city risked being 'obliterated' by violent protesters without them. Earlier this week, he also activated 700 marines from the Twentynine Palms base two hours' drive to the east, describing Los Angeles as a 'trash heap' that was in danger of burning to the ground. In reality, the anti-Trump protests – called first in response to aggressive federal roundups of undocumented immigrants, then in anger at the national guard deployment – have been largely peaceful and restricted to just a few blocks around downtown federal buildings. The Los Angeles police has made hundreds of arrests in response to acts of violence and vandalism around the protests, and the city's mayor, Karen Bass, has instituted a night-time curfew – all with minimal input from the federal authorities. At the largest demonstration since Trump first intervened, last Sunday, the national guard was hemmed into a staging area by Los Angeles police cruisers and played almost no role in crowd control. Since then, its service members have been deployed to guard buildings and federal law enforcement convoys conducting immigration sweeps. The marines, who arrived on Wednesday, are expected to play a similar function, with no powers of arrest. Newsom has described the deployment as 'a provocation, not just an escalation' and accused the White House of mistreating the service members it was activating. A widely circulated photograph, later confirmed as authentic by the Pentagon, showed national guard members sleeping on a concrete loading dock floor without bedding, and the San Francisco Chronicle reported that the troops arrived with no lodging, insufficient portable toilets and no funds for food or water. A pair of YouGov polls published on Tuesday show public disapproval of both the national guard and marines deployments, as well as disapproval of Trump's immigrant deportation policies. A Washington Post poll published on Wednesday came up with similar findings, but with slightly narrower margins. Active service members are prohibited by law from speaking publicly about their work. But Streyder, of the Secure Families Initiative, said she had heard dozens of complaints indirectly through their families. She had also seen a written comment passed along to her organization from a national guard member who described the assignment as 'shitty' – particularly compared with early secondments to help with wildfire relief or, during the Covid pandemic, vaccination outreach. 'Both of those experiences were uncomplicatedly positive, a contribution back to the community,' Streyder described the message as saying. 'This is quite the opposite.' According to Janessa Goldbeck, a Marine Corps veteran who runs the Vet Voice Foundation, the feeling was similar among some of the troops being sent from Twentynine Palms. 'Among all that I spoke with, the feeling was that the marines are being used as political pawns, and it strains the perception that marines are apolitical,' Goldbeck said. 'Some were concerned that the Marines were being set up for failure. The overall perception was that the situation was nowhere at the level where marines were necessary.' Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion The advocates said it was important to draw a distinction between the personal political preferences of service members, many if not most of whom voted for Trump last November, and the higher principle that military personnel should not get involved in politics or politically motivated missions that blur lines of responsibility with civilian agencies. 'We tend to be uniquely apolitical, as an institution and with each other,' Streyder said. 'The military is a tool that should be used as a last resort, not a first response… It does not feel that the tool is being calibrated accurately to the situation.' The discontent may not be limited to California. In Texas, where the governor, Greg Abbott, called out the national guard on Wednesday in San Antonio, Austin and other cities expecting anti-Trump protests, guardsmen have a history of feeling poorly treated in the workplace if not outright misused, Purdy of the Chamberlain Network said. After Abbott requisitioned the guard in 2021 to help police the Mexican border – a controversial policy codenamed Operation Lone Star – there were bitter complaints among guard members about the length and nature of an assignment that largely duplicated the work of the federal Border Patrol. Several guardsmen took their own lives. The LA operations are also sparking safety concerns because of complications inherent in pairing military and domestic police officers, advocates say, since they are trained very differently and use different vocabulary to handle emergency situations. In one infamous episode during the 1992 Los Angeles riots – the last time the military were called out to restore order in southern California – a police officer on patrol turned to his marines counterparts and said 'cover me', meaning be ready with your weapon to make sure I stay safe. To the marines, though, 'cover me' meant open fire immediately, which they did, unloading more than 200 M16 rounds into a house where the police had a tip about a possible domestic abuser. By sheer luck, nobody was hurt. CJ Chivers, a New York Times reporter who was with the marines in Los Angeles in 1992 and witnessed the tail-end of this near-calamity, wrote years later of his mixed feelings about the assignment: 'The Marines' presence in greater Los Angeles… felt unnecessary,' he said. 'I'd like to say we understood the context of the role we were given … But domestic crowd control had never been our specialty.' Streyder and the other advocates concurred. 'Domestic law enforcement and the military are entirely separate functions, manned by separate people who have been given separate training, who come from different cultures,' Streyder said. 'As military families, we rely implicitly on that separation being honored and remaining clear.'
