Pierre Poilievre's record on Indigenous rights concerns advocates
Others pleased by proposed First Nations resource charge
In an election ad, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre speaks to a bust of John A. Macdonald about the importance of developing national projects like the Canadian Pacific Railway.
"What do you think, prime minister? Could you get the railway built today?" Poilievre asks the bust.
It's only the most recent way Poilievre has expressed his admiration for Canada's first prime minister — the man who got the railway built, but did it by displacing Indigenous Peoples using starvation and detention, and who also was a key proponent of the residential school system.
Métis lawyer Bruce McIvor, a partner at First Peoples Law, says it's a worrying admiration.
"Poilievre dreams of being a 21st century John A. MacDonald, and we can see that in what he's said so far," he said.
Poilievre has referenced Macdonald in multiple campaign speeches this election. Over the years, he has also made social media posts celebrating Macdonald's birthday, talked about the need for more statues of the former PM and, in 2012, dressed up in period clothing to announce the renaming of an Ottawa building after Macdonald.
In the two-and-a-half years since he became leader of the Conservative Party, Poilievre's pitch to Indigenous voters has focused on resource development and economic reconciliation but some Indigenous advocates say they are concerned about his record on issues like residential schools and Indigenous rights.
Image | Building Renamed 20120111 TOPIX
Caption: Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre poses with a bust of Sir John A. Macdonald after announcing the former Bank of Montreal building would be renamed in honour of Canada's first prime minister during a ceremony in Ottawa, Ont., Wednesday January 11, 2012. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)
Open Image in New Tab
Residential school apology
The same day in 2008 that Stephen Harper made a historic apology to former students of the residential school system, Poilievre told an Ottawa talk radio show survivors did not need more compensation but instead required a better work ethic.
"Along with this apology comes another $4 billion in compensation for those who partook in the residential schools over those years. Now, some of us are starting to ask, are we really getting value for all of this money," he said.
"My view is that we need to engender the values of hard work, independence, and self-reliance."
The next day, he was called on in Parliament to make his own apology, which he did.
Voted against UNDRIP bill
During a 2021 debate over the bill to make Canadian laws consistent with the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Poilievre said,"I am very proud to say that I oppose this bill." He said that free, prior and informed consent — a phrase that appears repeatedly in UNDRIP — "would mean a veto" for any First Nation that opposed a resource development project.
He ultimately voted against the bill.
When Poilievre addressed the Assembly of First Nations for the first time in person last summer, Judy Wilson, former chief of the Neskonlith Indian Band and former executive member of the Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs, was one of Poilievre's critics.
In addition to her concerns about his lack of support for UNDRIP, Wilson pointed out that Poilievre did not address missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls, treaty rights or climate change in his speech.
She said she remains concerned about his position on UNDRIP and free, prior and informed consent on issues affecting Indigenous Peoples, their lands and their communities.
The issue of consent and consultation arose again when Poilievre visited the Arctic in February. On the trip he announced plans to create a new military base in Nunavut if a Conservative government is elected, but Premier P.J. Akeeagok said Poilievre had failed to consult with Northerners before the announcement.
Election promises
A caption for the Facebook ad featuring Poilievre talking to the bust of Macdonald said that Conservatives would "honour the legacy of Sir John A. Macdonald & unite our country with a Canada First National Energy Corridor."
The energy corridor will be "pre-approved right away for pipelines, rail lines, power lines and other resource infrastructure," Poilievre says in the ad.
McIvor said he's worried about that.
"The government can't come forward with proposals that have been pre-determined," he said, pointing to the duty to consult Indigenous Peoples affirmed by the Supreme Court.
"So to hear the leader of the Conservatives say that they intend to greenlight projects before they've gone through consultation with Indigenous people is very concerning."
Along the same lines, Poilievre has said he would grant permits for mining projects in Ontario's Ring of Fire within six months of being elected.
Those rapid approvals, along with "pre-approving" energy corridor projects "is completely contrary to fundamental principles of constitutional law," McIvor said.
CBC Indigenous sent a list of questions to the Conservative campaign about Poilievre's record and his current policies.
A Conservative campaign spokesperson provided a statement which did not directly answer any of CBC Indigenous's questions, but said that Poilievre has prioritized speaking with Indigenous leaders and community members to inform his campaign's policies.
The energy corridor was one of two policies highlighted by the spokesperson.
The other policy was the First Nations resource charge, which was developed by the bi-partisan First Nations Tax Commission, and would allow First Nations to opt-in to the chance to directly tax resource development projects on their lands.
Ch'íyáqtel (Tzeachten) Chief Derek (Weli'leq) Epp, who works with the First Nations Tax Commission, said the commission presented the policy to multiple parties.
"With the Conservatives endorsing this, yes, it sends an important signal that Canada is committed to Indigenous economic justice," he said.
While the Conservatives have been the only ones to adopt it outright, Epp said he's seen parts of it in Liberal policies as well.
"It's great that the Conservative government is championing this, but this isn't new," Epp said, adding that the idea has been around for well over a decade.
When Conservatives announced the proposed policy in 2023, one critic called it " a great idea for the 1990s."
Concerns about resource charge
John Desjarlais, executive director of the Indigenous Resource Network, a non-partisan organization that promotes economic development, said he is pleased by the approach of the resource charge, especially as it respects First Nations autonomy.
However, he said there are some concerns about how the policy will be applied.
"I think there's worry that [the relationship between community and industry] will be lost and they'll lose their ability to negotiate and develop the things that matter to them," said Desjarlais, who is Cree-Métis.
Since the policy was first announced, it has been unclear if it would allow nations to tax projects on their traditional territories or only on reserve lands.
Epp said the resource tax should apply to traditional territories, calling that "integral to the proposal."
Desjarlais said if it only applied to reserves, "We'd certainly be less excited or less interested because its application would be far less impactful."
While he looks forward to streamlining some of the bureaucratic processes and speeding up project timelines, Desjarlais said the policy presents concerns about the potential for governments to discharge their responsibilities on consultation.
Epp said he doesn't have any concerns about the government abdicating its obligations to First Nations.
"There still is the right to UNDRIP," he said.
Desjarlais said he is encouraged to see "less government, less paternalism, less siphoning of the resources that can come directly to communities," from the Conservative adoption of the resource tax policy.
However, he said, during a campaign it's hard to tell what is real and what is rhetoric.
"Will those promises be honoured? Generally, I think that's our concern," Desjarlais said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
$30B in new investments needed to meet Canada's critical mineral demand: report
Protesters and community members chant and wave signs, as they listen to speakers during a demonstration opposing Bill 5, outside the Ontario Legislature at Queen's Park in Toronto, Monday, June 2, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Cole Burston TORONTO — A newly released report estimates Canada will need at least $30 billion in new capital investments by 2040 if it wants to meet domestic demand for the critical minerals key to a green economy transition. But the Canadian Climate Institute's report says cutting back on environmental safeguards and Indigenous consultation to speed up those projects is likely to backfire. The report released Thursday says those cutbacks can lead to delays later on, due to community opposition or litigation. The think tank's latest report comes as the federal government, along with Ontario and British Columbia, face major pushback from First Nations and environmental groups to legislation intended to speed up mining project approvals. The report says Canadian governments should support Indigenous participation and reduce environmental risks as part of efforts to reduce regulatory delays. It says Canada has a big opportunity to capitalize on the surging domestic and global demand for critical minerals to build the batteries, solar panels and electric vehicles required to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. It estimates domestic demand alone for six key critical minerals, including lithium and copper, will reach $16 billion by 2040 if Canada keep up its climate policies, with almost half of that coming from EV manufacturers. To meet that demand, the think tank estimates Canadian mining projects will need a total of $30 billion in capital investments, and even more if the industry wants to help satiate international demand too. The report says that's also likely a lowball figure since it excludes major cost overruns that often plague mining projects. The estimated domestic need 'vastly exceeds' current investment in the sector, which averaged about $2 billion per year from 2018 to 2023, the report said. The report suggests there's a role for governments to step in to support the sector with either equity investments or financial risk-sharing agreements. But it should not come at the expense of Indigenous consultation or environmental oversight, the authors say. 'Successful projects that are being developed fast are the ones that have participation from Indigenous communities, that have adhered to the highest environmental standard,' said co-author Marisa Beck, the think tank's clean growth research director. Critics say recently passed Bill 15 in B.C. and Bill 5 in Ontario gives those provinces sweeping powers to exempt mining projects from environmental oversight and undermines constitutional obligations to consult First Nations. The provincial governments disagree and say the legislation will help speed up approvals without sacrificing First Nations rights or environmental protections. Ottawa has also faced pushback to its legislation intended to speed up infrastructure approvals. The authors of Thursday's report declined to comment on the specifics of those legislative efforts, but it did put forward several policy recommendations. Governments should also support Indigenous communities exercising their right to self-determination and economic participation, such as through funding for Indigenous-led environmental assessments, the report says. Elsewhere, the report recommends provinces strengthen mining regulations to reduce environmental risks and liabilities, such as requiring producers to make their closure plans publicly available. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 12, 2025. Jordan Omstead, The Canadian Press


National Post
3 hours ago
- National Post
Chris Sankey: 'Free, prior, and informed consent' never amounted to a First Nations veto
Article content I had a hard time accepting UNDRIP. It is extremely convoluted and the only real effect it has had is to line the pockets of lawyers and pit elected and hereditary leaders against one another. While not all lawyers are bad people, the UNDRIP process they attempt to fix has had an adverse affect on us. There does not appear to be a single professor, lawyer or consultant who can fully explain UNDRIP, because it was not tailored to meet the needs of Indigenous peoples in Canada. I can only hope the process will improve over time. Article content It should thus be left up to Indigenous communities to lay out a process for industry and government that will satisfy them. What works for one community may not work for another. It's extremely complicated and it is not for the faint of heart. Once you understand the people, you'll understand the process and things will proceed apace. This is about executing strong relationships between our nations and country by building bridges that bring us together. Article content Article content I can tell you from experience that forging agreements between our communities is a massive undertaking. It has been my biggest challenge, but it is also the most rewarding. It's what motivates me to make change happen in our communities. It is stressful, even maddening at times, but every step forward that moves our people to a better place is a massive win. The satisfaction I get out of it is the hope that one day, my children will recognize that their dad played a small part in bringing our people together. Article content Free, prior and informed consent isn't just about making money. It's about purpose with the intent to change the lives of our people for the better. We call it 'impact investing' and 'social innovation.' Investing in people should be a community's priority. This is about inter-generational knowledge transfer. When many of us are long gone, we will need the younger generation to help manage and sustain our communities' wealth, culture, arts, language, environment, finances, social well-being, health, education and infrastructure. In order to achieve this, our communities need vibrant economies. Article content Article content We can't build capacity without projects that provide opportunities for our people to learn new skills and provide for their futures. Grants and other funds given to us isn't an economy. Those who think otherwise only hurt the people they claim to represent. We need to do better, because our younger generation is moving away from their communities to find work, or commute long distances to make a living. Large resource and infrastructure projects provide an opportunity for Indigenous people to live and work in their own communities, and lift themselves out of poverty. Article content Let's not jump to conclusions over Fraser's misinterpreted quote. We can't take offence at every comment. Doing so will only serve to hurt us. If the government and industry say they will consult Indigenous communities on major developments, then we need to open that door. If they don't follow through, then we must hold them accountable. But Indigenous communities also need to make sure they hire the right people — people who understand big business and major projects. If you don't hire the right people, your community will suffer the consequences and negotiations will fail. This duty falls on elected First Nations officials and their economic development offices. Article content Article content Article content


Toronto Star
3 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Sir John A. Macdonald statue back in view at Queen's Park after five years boarded up
TORONTO - The Sir John A. Macdonald statue outside the Ontario legislature is back in full view after spending the past five years in a box. The statue of Canada's first prime minister has been under hoarding since 2020, when it was vandalized with pink paint. The monument was one of many that were targeted across the country amid anti-racism protests and as Canadians grappled with the history of residential schools. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Macdonald is considered an architect of the country's notorious residential school system, which took Indigenous children from their families in an effort to assimilate them. Progressive Conservative and Liberal members of a non-partisan board of the legislative assembly agreed earlier this month on a motion to remove the hoarding after the statue is cleaned. Speaker Donna Skelly says she recognizes the sensitivities surrounding Macdonald and welcomes Ontarians to come and share their views peacefully. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 11, 2025. Politics Headlines Newsletter Get the latest news and unmatched insights in your inbox every evening Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. Please enter a valid email address. Sign Up Yes, I'd also like to receive customized content suggestions and promotional messages from the Star. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Politics Headlines Newsletter You're signed up! You'll start getting Politics Headlines in your inbox soon. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page.