Lawyers for a journalist accused of hacking Fox News blame AI for error-filled legal brief
A lawyer for Timothy Burke, the journalist indicted over leaked Fox News footage, admitted in a court filing Monday that he used ChatGPT and other AI tools to write an error-filled legal brief.
Last week, Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle said a filing by Burke's lawyers contained "significant misrepresentations and misquotations" and demanded an explanation. On Monday, the lawyers, Michael Maddux and Mark Rasch, said the errors happened because of Rasch's research and edits.
The judge cited nine examples of "non-existent quotes and miscited propositions" that appeared to come from federal appellate rulings and a Congressional committee report. She also said their brief had six errors that may have been less egregious, as well as other "miscellaneous problems."
Rasch's process "included the use of Westlaw, Westlaw's AI features, Google, Google Scholar, as well as the 'deep research' feature of the Pro version of ChatGPT version 4.5," the brief said. The lawyers said Rasch used a feature on the legal research platform Westlaw called Quick Check to vet the brief, but didn't do so again after accidentally adding unvetted sections from previous drafts.
Maddux, the lawyers added, was busy with another case.
Maddux, Rasch, and Burke didn't immediately respond to requests for comment. Neither OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, or Thomson Reuters, which makes Westlaw, responded to requests for comment.
The proliferation of AI and the high cost of legal research has led to a number of attorneys being called to the mat by judges over errors in their legal arguments, often a result of generative AI systems' tendency to "hallucinate."
Often, the mistakes are made by solo practitioners or lawyers from small firms, though big firms have also been found using AI. A Latham & Watkins attorney said the AI system Claude was to blame for giving the wrong name and authors for an article cited in an expert's report, though the content was otherwise correct. Last week, attorneys from the firms K&L Gates and Ellis George were told to pay $31,000 after their submissions were found to contain made-up citations.
Burke, a former Deadspin editor now working as a media consultant, faces charges of hacking into a streaming system used by broadcasters. The case has attracted attention from press freedom advocates, with his lawyers arguing Burke committed no crime since the URLs he visited to download clips of Fox News footage were public.
The footage, which included antisemitic remarks by the rapper Ye and behind-the-scenes comments by Tucker Carlson about sex, his "postmenopausal" viewers, and issues with the Fox Nation streaming service, was never aired on the network. When the clips appeared online in 2022 and 2023, it aroused suspicions that a Fox employee had leaked them. In 2023, however, federal investigators zeroed in on Burke, who was indicted last year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House MAHA Report may have garbled science by using AI, experts say
Some of the citations that underpin the science in the White House's sweeping 'MAHA Report' appear to have been generated using artificial intelligence, resulting in numerous garbled scientific references and invented studies, AI experts said Thursday. Of the 522 footnotes to scientific research in an initial version of the report sent to The Washington Post, at least 37 appear multiple times, according to a review of the report by The Washington Post. Other citations include the wrong author, and several studies cited by the extensive health report do not exist at all, a fact first reported by the online news outlet NOTUS on Thursday morning. Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post. Some references include 'oaicite' attached to URLs - a definitive sign that the research was collected using artificial intelligence. The presence of 'oaicite' is a marker indicating use of OpenAI, a U.S. artificial intelligence company. A common hallmark of AI chatbots, such as ChatGPT, is unusually repetitive content that does not sound human or is inaccurate -as well as the tendency to 'hallucinate' studies or answers that appear to make sense but are not real. AI technology can be used legitimately to quickly survey the research in a field. But Oren Etzioni, a professor emeritus at the University of Washington who studies AI, said he was shocked by the sloppiness in the MAHA Report. 'Frankly, that's shoddy work,' he said. 'We deserve better.' 'The MAHA Report: Making Our Children Healthy Again,' which addressed the root causes of America's lagging health outcomes, was written by a commission of Cabinet officials and government scientific leaders. It was led by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has a history of misstating science, and written in response to an executive order from President Donald Trump. It blames exposure to environmental toxins, poor nutrition and increased screen time for a decline in Americans' life expectancy. One reference in the initial version of the report cited a study entitled 'Overprescribing of Oral Corticosteroids for Children With Asthma' to buttress the idea that children are over-medicated. But that study didn't appear to exist. There is a similar Pediatrics article from 2017 with the same first author but different co-authors. Later Thursday, that Pediatrics article was swapped in for the apparently nonexistent study in the version of the report available online. An article credited to U.S. News & World Report about children's recess and exercise time was initially cited twice to support claims of declining physical activity among U.S. children, once with only part of the link shown. It listed Mlynek, A. and Spiegel, S. as different authors. Neither referred to Kate Rix, who wrote the story. Neither Mlynek nor Spiegel appear to be actual reporters for the publication. As of Thursday evening, Rix had been swapped in as the author on one of the references in the version of the report available online. Nearly half of the 522 citations in the initial version of the report included links to articles or studies. But a Post analysis of all the report's references found that at least 21 of those links were dead. Former governor and current New York City mayoral front-runner Andrew Cuomo was caught up in controversy last month after a housing policy report he issued used ChatGPT and garbled a reference. Attorneys have faced sanctions for using nonexistent case citations created by ChatGPT in legal briefs. The garbled scientific citations betray subpar science and undermine the credibility of the report, said Georges C. Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association. 'This is not an evidence-based report, and for all practical purposes, it should be junked at this point,' he said. 'It cannot be used for any policymaking. It cannot even be used for any serious discussion, because you can't believe what's in it.' When asked about the nonexistent citations at a news briefing Thursday, press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the White House has 'complete confidence in Secretary Kennedy and his team at HHS.' 'I understand there were some formatting issues with the MAHA Report that are being addressed, and the report will be updated, but it does not negate the substance of the report, which, as you know, is one of the most transformative health reports that has ever been released by the federal government, and is backed on good science that has never been recognized by the federal government,' Leavitt said. At some point between 1 and 2:30 p.m. Eastern on Thursday, the MAHA Report file was updated on the White House site to remove mentions of 'corrected hyperlinks' and one of the 'oaicite' markers. Another 'oaicite' marker, attached to a New York Times Wirecutter story about baby formula, was still present in the document until it was removed Thursday evening. The White House continued to update the report into the night. Department of Health and Human Services spokesman Andrew Nixon said that 'minor citation and formatting errors have been corrected, but the substance of the MAHA report remains the same - a historic and transformative assessment by the federal government to understand the chronic disease epidemic afflicting our nation's children.' 'Under President Trump and Secretary Kennedy, our federal government is no longer ignoring this crisis, and it's time for the media to also focus on what matters,' Nixon said. Kennedy has long vowed to use AI to make America's health care better and more efficient, recently stating in a congressional hearing that he had even seen an AI nurse prototype 'that could revolutionize health delivery in rural areas.' Peter Lurie, president of the nonprofit Center for Science in the Public Interest, said he was not surprised by the presence of possible AI markers in the report. Lurie said he had asked his own staff to look into it after noticing that the report linked to one of his organization's fact sheets but credited the Department of Agriculture and HHS as the authors. 'The idea that they would envelop themselves in the shroud of scientific excellence while producing a report that relies heavily on AI is just shockingly hypocritical,' said Lurie, who was a top Food and Drug Administration official in the Obama administration, where he wrote such government reports. There are many pitfalls in modern AI, which is 'happy to make up citations,' said Steven Piantadosi, a professor in psychology and neuroscience at the University of California at Berkeley. 'The problem with current AI is that it's not trustworthy, so it's just based on statistical associations and dependencies,' he said. 'It has no notion of ground truth, no notion of ... a rigorous logical or statistical argument. It has no notions of evidence and how strongly to weigh one kind of evidence versus another. ' The Post previously reported that the document stretched the boundaries of science with some of its conclusions. Several sections offer misleading representations of findings in scientific papers. Related Content Harvard celebrates graduation in the shadow of its fight with Trump Columbia protester Mahmoud Khalil's detention ruled likely unconstitutional Despite ceasefire, India and Pakistan are locked in a cultural cold war
Forbes
28 minutes ago
- Forbes
Will AI Replace Cybersecurity? Not Quite—But It's Rewriting The Rules
The Real Battle Is Now AI vs. AI Put yourself in the mind of a master cybercriminal. Fun, right? Stay with me. I promise this role play exercise will pay off. Just a few years ago, your illicit schemes were small time. You were content to steal unwitting individuals' personal data, including credit card and social security numbers to buy merchandise on the Dark Web. Your petty exploits paid off—modestly but steadily. But it was a volume game. You had to keep finding more unsuspecting marks to exploit and more creative ways to turn a profit. Then came AI. You quickly learned all about ChatGPT and other forms of generative artificial intelligence. As you did, you thought: why not use this tech to level up—crime-wise? Armed with new tools you evolved from a petty thief. You developed a budding criminal empire capable of exploiting not just singular victims, but enterprise corporations with billion-dollar balance sheets. After all, that's where the real dough is, right? Welcome to the new age of cyberwarfare—courtesy of AI. 'The stakes have never been higher,' says Ed Vasko, COO of High Wire Networks, a leading global provider of managed cybersecurity services. A seasoned veteran with 33 years' experience, we sat down to discuss the elephant in the room. 'The cyber war has shifted. It no longer wages between hackers and IT departments. It's now AI versus AI.' Vasko is not alone in this assessment. Speaking at DefenseScoop's Google Defense Forum Pentagon last year, military insider Jude Sunderbruch of the Defense Department's Cyber Crime Center warned attendees of future 'AI versus AI conflicts' spreading all the way to the international stage. ''I think we're really just at the start,' Sunderbruch said, later adding that the U.S. and its allies will have to get creative and learn how to best use existing AI systems to gain a leg up on competing intelligence giants like China,' according to Defense One. The implications go beyond boardrooms and command centers. To appreciate what may be coming, Vasko paints a chilling scenario for the not-so-distant future. Time for more role playing. Now imagine you're the head of a major retailer. For the last few years you've relied on AI supply chain forecasting. Similar to how fintech increasingly depends on AI—not humans—to handle the complexities of trading, artificial intelligence is core to your business' operations. Without it, you're flying blind. This reality makes things all the more disturbing when the AI supporting your organization begins behaving erratically, wreaking havoc. Orders stop arriving. Inventory goes out of stock. Even your pricing models collapse. These internal problems don't stay contained for long. They proliferate externally—in dire ways. Once loyal customers defect. Revenues drop up. And your stock price plummets. But that's not all… According to Vasko, cyber criminals behind this type of villainy may be thought of as AI buccaneers—digital pirates often paid to instigate corporate espionage and theft. 'Unlike the antiquated variety from centuries past, AI buccaneers know the power of perception—that it's possible to tank a rival company's stock price by spreading lies to disrupt public sentiment.' To this end, the hits keep on coming for your major retailer company. A video surfaces of your CFO making disturbing comments in a shareholder meeting. The remarks are so inflammatory they go viral, driving your already plummeting stock even lower. But here's the thing. That CFO video is actually a deepfake. It was produced by Google's Veo 3, similar to extant bogus news anchor content already proliferating the Internet. True or not, the damage is done. Within hours, your unscrupulous corporate rivals bask in ignoble victory. Short selling your plunging stock, they make out like bandits—along with their AI buccaneer accomplices, benefitting from your demise. As Vasko explains, 'Cyber criminals can even now use AI co-pilots to coordinate attacks on corporations, industries, even governments. They're faster, smarter, and more dangerous than anything we've seen before.' More on that below. AI co-pilots are but one part of a growing criminal toolkit, capable of automating surveillance, coordinating attacks, and orchestrating malfeasance at scale. What's now possible almost defies belief. Example: AI can analyze thousands of profiles across social media, company directories, and public databases to identify weak links for exploitation. 'Once inside, these same AI tools can poison an organization's internal data lakes—sabotaging predictive systems and decision-making engines from the inside out,' explains Vasko. This means bad actors needn't limit themselves to stealing personal data. They can expand their scope of attack, going so far as to manipulate market outcomes. Per the above cautionary tale, they can influence how a company performs, how it's perceived, and ultimately, what happens to it long-term. Hundreds of years ago, back when pirates plundered by sea, countries ravaged by buccaneers authorized so-called privateers to fight off the bad guys. Unfortunately, the U.S. government doesn't allow proactive 'hacking back' in the form of AI privateers. Not even in self-defense. This is why High Wire Networks and other cybersecurity firms avoid going on the offensive. Instead, they turn to AI-augmented defense platforms to preemptively determine and intercept threats, shifting reactive security into a proactive shield. In other words, they're fighting AI with AI. 'Hyperautomation' is the term Vasko uses to describe the fusion of machine learning and automated decision-making throughout a security stack. In the old model, a cyber victim might be notified of a data breach. 'Dear so and so,' an email might read. 'We regret to inform you that your credit card was compromised.' That's not so helpful, is it? Hyperautomation, on the other hand, reacts proactively. Here's how it could work with the above individual scenario. Alerted of a breach, AI could stop it, issue a new credit card, and continually monitor a victim's credit card and exposure. Many cybersecurity firms employ similar tech at the organizational level. As Cyber Magazine reports, Varonis leverages artificial intelligence to act autonomously as a counterweight to AI-enabled mischief. The company's 'AI Shield' offers real-time ongoing protection for large organizations. 'By integrating real-time risk analysis, automated risk remediation, behavior-based threat detection, and 24/7 alert response, Varonis' AI Shield empowers enterprises to safely use AI technologies while safeguarding sensitive data.' Looking forward, the more things change, the more they stay the same. Once upon a time, swashbuckling pirates patrolled the high seas, pilfering valuables from individuals, companies, and governments alike. Nowadays, that threat has migrated from the physical theatre to cyberspace as criminals wield code to rob and steal at will. To survive, much less thrive, tomorrow's organizations would do well to wrest back the power of AI. Without it? We're surely sunk.
40 minutes ago
Trump claims China 'totally violated' trade agreement with US
U.S. stocks fell slightly in early trading after the comments from Trump. By President Donald Trump on Friday morning accused China of violating a recent trade agreement with the United States. The sharp criticism appeared to cast doubt over the staying power of the accord, setting up the possibility of a rekindled trade war between the world's two largest economies. "China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US," Trump said in a social media post Friday morning. "So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!" Trump did not identify the action taken by China that had violated the agreement. The remarks came hours after U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent voiced pessimism about U.S.-China trade talks in an interview with Fox News on Thursday night. "I would say that they are a bit stalled," Bessent said when asked about the status of the trade talks. "I believe that we will be having more talks with them in the next few weeks, and I believe we may at some point have a call between the president and Party Chair Xi [Jinping]." U.S. stocks fell slightly in early trading on Friday morning after the comments from Trump and Bessent. A trade agreement between the U.S. and China earlier this month slashed tit-for-tat tariffs imposed by the two countries, triggering a surge in the stock market and softening recession forecasts on Wall Street. The U.S. agreed to cut tariffs on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%, while China committed to reduce tariffs on U.S. products from 125% to 10%. The lowered tariffs are set to remain in place for 90 days while the two sides negotiate a wider trade deal. The remaining 30% tariffs imposed on Chinese goods faced a major setback this week, however, when a panel of federal judges struck down the legal justification for the levies. The ruling from the U.S. Court of International Trade late Wednesday invalidated the China tariffs, along with a host of other levies on dozens of countries unveiled in a Rose Garden ceremony that Trump had dubbed "Liberation Day." A federal appeals court moved to temporarily reinstate the tariffs on Thursday, leaving the ultimate fate of the policy uncertain.
