Bombing for "peace": The White House position on Israel-Iran war has been mired by contradictions
IN THE SPACE of less than two weeks, the US position on the Israel-Iran conflict has been marked by contradiction and confusion that resembles the Trump administration's haphazard approach to tariffs and trade policy.
Yesterday, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio both insisted that the US was not interested in overthrowing the government of Iran, but last night President Donald Trump said the opposite.
'Anything can happen in conflict. We acknowledge that,' Hegseth said.
'But the scope of this was intentionally limited. That's the message that we're sending.'
Trump then sent a very different message later the same day.
'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???' Trump said
Iran 'must now agree to end this war', Trump said after the US strikes on Saturday night, insisting that under no circumstances should it possess a nuclear weapon.
Trump's Truth Social post announcing the US bombing
The Journal - screenshot
The Journal - screenshot
There has been no evidence to show that Iran was developing nuclear weapons, but the US, European powers and Israel have all said there is. In fact, US intelligence had recently reported the same.
Advertisement
Right up until Israel launched its unilateral attack on Iran on 13 June, the Trump administration had been in talks with Iran as the two sides tried to find a replacement for the agreement reached during the Obama administration, which Trump tore up in 2018.
Even as Israeli airstrikes rained down on Tehran, Trump was still urging Iranian leaders to 'make a deal'.
US officials also denied being involved in the Israeli attack, but said Washington had been informed of them ahead of time.
Trump said last week that he would make a decision about US involvement in the conflict 'within two weeks'.
He then announced that US bombers had hit Iranian nuclear energy facilities a couple of days later, in a post on his Truth Social website.
'NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!' Trump wrote while declaring he had ordered the bombing.
Hegseth similarly said the bombing was aimed at achieving 'peace'. He also said that Iran had been 'stonewalling' the US in recent negotiations.
Despite these comments from the White House and Pentagon, the prospects of Iran coming back to the negotiating table under the current circumstances look extremely unlikely, if not impossible.
More broadly, Trump's decision to join Israel's war against Iran has also contradicted campaign promises he made to keep the US out of conflicts, particularly in the Middle East.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
25 minutes ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the economic threat from the Middle East: yet more uncertainty
The US strikes on Iran cast yet further uncertainty on the international economic outlook. As if there was not enough of this around already. Inevitably, this will have implications for Ireland, too, though to what extent is as yet impossible to judge. The most obvious way in which this will affect western economies is the price of oil. It will fluctuate now based on the news from the Middle East, in a nervous market. Any sustained rise would lead to increases in petrol and oil prices for consumers and Irish businesses before too long. To judge how serious this could become, a few factors are important. One is whether there is any impact on the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow channel between Iran and the Gulf states through which around one third of the world's seaborne oil is transported. It is unclear the extent to which Iran could block these shipments, but it could certainly cause some considerable disruption. In turn, if sustained, this could lead to a spike in crude oil prices. Goldman Sachs, the investment bank, predicted that oil prices could rise to over $100 a barrel if there was substantial disruption to oil flows through the Strait. READ MORE The second key issue will be whether Iran chooses to target the oil production facilities of US allies in the region, such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar. The resulting disruption in production could hit supply and drive up prices. It would also cause nervousness in the market. All this means further risks facing the global economy, at an already uncertain time. Sustained higher oil prices would feed through into higher inflation and lower economic growth. This will be an issue, too, for Donald Trump, who will be conscious about the price sensitivity of US consumers, particularly to prices at the pump. Following the US bombings, the world now looks on to see what Iran does next. Like the rest of the EU, the Government here, already facing the uncertainty from US tariff policy, now has another risk to put into its calculations ahead of the budget.
Irish Times
28 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Iran fires missiles at key US base in Qatar
Iran launched retaliatory attacks targeting the largest US base in the Middle East on Monday, after the US bombed three of its nuclear sites over the weekend. Qatar appeared to have advance warning about Iranian attacks targeting the US-run Al Udeid airbase, which houses about 10,000 troops. The Gulf country temporarily closed its air space, while the US and UK warned citizens to 'shelter in place until further notice'. In a statement, Qatar called the missile attacks 'a flagrant violation' of its sovereignty, saying it reserved 'the right to respond directly'. Its air defences intercepted the missiles, leading to no injuries or deaths, while the base had already been evacuated, it said. Early on Sunday morning, the US bombed three Iranian nuclear sites: Isfahan, Fordow and Natanz. READ MORE While the scale of damage is not fully clear, US president Donald Trump called the US strikes a 'Bullseye' on his Truth Social platform, saying 'Monumental Damage was done ... Obliteration is an accurate term!' He also appeared to call for regime change. 'If the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???' On Monday, Russian president Vladimir Putin hosted Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araqchi in Moscow. 'The absolutely unprovoked aggression against Iran has no basis and no justification,' Mr Putin said in televised comments. 'For our part, we are making efforts to assist the Iranian people.' [ US-Iran: Putin says Washington strikes are pushing world to a 'very dangerous line' Opens in new window ] Iran and Israel have continued trading attacks since Israel's first bombardment began on June 13th. Washington-based organisation Human Rights Activists (HRA), which has long documented happenings in Iran, says at least 950 people were killed and 3,450 injured over the first 10 days of Israel's attacks. Iranian authorities have not offered regular death tolls, though a health ministry spokesman said more than 400 people were killed by Saturday. In Israel, 24 people have been killed. Israeli strikes have targeted 'infrastructure, military and civilian facilities, residential and industrial areas in 25 provinces,' HRA said. Israel carried out its 'largest wave of raids' so far on Monday, Israeli forces said, including targeting the notorious Evin Prison in Tehran, where political prisoners are held. Aida Younesi , a Dublin-based software engineer whose father is incarcerated in Evin, said prisoners are not safe and should be freed. HRA said 640 citizens have been arrested on 'political or security-related charges' since Israel's attacks began. Iranian state television said arrests included a European national who entered the country 'disguised as a tourist'. On Monday morning, Tánaiste Simon Harris said three Irish citizens and their dependants were assisted in departing Iran overnight, while 15 Irish citizens and their dependents were evacuated from Israel the day before. A journalist in Iran, who asked not to be named for her safety, said she is worried about the scale of destruction. 'Today was the worst day since the war began,' she texted on Monday. 'Fighter jets were circling the city and we felt like they could land on us at any moment. The buildings were shaking,' she said. 'What is our future going to be? Is something like Iraq waiting for us? ... We are caught on two sides: on one side a corrupt, dictatorial government and, on the other side, warmongering Israel.' The Israeli military has warned residents of Tehran to stay away from 'weapons production centres, military bases and security institutions affiliated with the regime.' But residents said they did not know where all of those locations were. A government-implemented internet shutdown lasted days and connectivity was not fully restored by Monday. 'Diminished telecoms continue to impact the public's ability to stay informed and in touch with loved ones,' said internet monitor Netblocks. On Monday, Nato secretary general Mark Rutte told reporters that Iran must not develop a nuclear weapon and said 'allies have repeatedly urged Iran to meet its obligations under the non-proliferation treaty'. Israel, widely understood to have nuclear weapons, is one of about four countries globally which has never signed the non-proliferation treaty.
Irish Times
28 minutes ago
- Irish Times
US-Iran: Nuclear watchdog chief expects ‘significant' damage at Fordow site
US bombing probably caused 'very significant' damage to the underground areas of Iran 's Fordow uranium enrichment plant dug into a mountain, though no one can yet tell the extent, UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi said on Monday. The United States dropped the biggest conventional bombs in its arsenal on Iranian nuclear facilities on Sunday, using those bunker-busting munitions in combat for the first time to try to eliminate sites including the Fordow uranium-enrichment plant dug into a mountain. 'At this time, no one, including the IAEA, is in a position to have fully assessed the underground damage at Fordow,' Mr Grossi said in a statement to an emergency meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency's 35-nation Board of Governors. The IAEA has not been able to carry out inspections in Iran since Israel started its military strikes on nuclear facilities there on June 13th. READ MORE 'Given the explosive payload utilised and the extreme[ly] vibration-sensitive nature of centrifuges, very significant damage is expected to have occurred,' Mr Grossi added. Beyond the level of damage done to Fordow's underground enrichment halls, one of the biggest open questions is the status of its stock of enriched uranium, particularly its more than 400kg of uranium enriched to up to 60 per cent purity, a short step from the roughly 90 per cent that is weapons grade. That is enough, if enriched further, for nine nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick, though Iran says its intentions are peaceful and it does not seek atom bombs. Iran did, however, inform the IAEA on June 13th that it would take 'special measures' to protect its nuclear materials and equipment that are under so-called IAEA safeguards, the oversight provided for by the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Grossi said. 'In my response that same day, I indicated that any transfer of nuclear material from a safeguarded facility to another location in Iran must be declared to the agency,' Grossi said. 'Any special measures by Iran to protect its nuclear materials and equipment ... can be done in accordance with Iran's safeguards obligations ... This is possible.'
