Civic education empowers students to be active in communities
'It's important to be civically engaged.' That's what an Indiana Area High School junior told our Joshua Byers at the second Democracy Bowl at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown.
Students from seven school districts went head to head in a social studies competition that tested their knowledge of congressional acts, notable court cases, founding documents, treaties and amendments.
Representatives from the Bill of Rights Institute, the National Constitution Center and Fair Districts Pennsylvania also attended.
Chris Janson, the Bill of Rights Institute's senior project lead for civic learning initiatives, said he was inspired by the students' enthusiasm.
He told the students that civics education is not just about memorizing dates and reciting historic figures. It empowers citizens to be active members of their communities.
Students also presented civics fair projects that would improve the region's image. Among them were a project from Homer-Center School District students on addressing homelessness, which took first place; Greater Johnstown High School students' ideas for revitalizing the Hornerstown neighborhood playground; and Portage Area School District students' plans for building a pickleball court and expanding CPR training.
Mark Conlon, a Pitt- Johnstown professor and event organizer, described the bowl to Byers as bet- ter than his 'wildest dreams.'
And Portage teacher Tyler Johnson said, 'I think anytime we can get kids out of the building and engage them in those important subjects is a good way to show them how to take part in their communities after (graduation).'
We agree.
Pitt-Johnstown alum and Democracy Bowl donor Douglas Weimer is credited with helping to make the event a success with his generosity.
He said, 'It was a privilege to give back.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
Marina von Neumann Whitman dies at 90; carved path for women in economics
'As a woman, she will be outnumbered on the council 2 to 1, but not in terms of brains,' the president said in the Oval Office with Dr. Whitman and her family by his side. (The council's other members at the time were Herbert Stein and Ezra Solomon.) Advertisement Dr. Whitman was an academic economist by training -- she taught at the University of Pittsburgh and later at the University of Michigan -- but she alternated her work in the classroom with extensive stints in the public and corporate sectors. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Before joining the Council of Economic Advisers, she had worked for it as a staff economist and then served on the president's board overseeing price controls. In 1979, she joined General Motors as a vice president and chief economist. She later rose to become group vice president for public relations, making her one of the highest-ranking women in corporate America at the time. 'One of the things about being an economist is that you seldom get the chance to practice your profession as well as teach,' she said in her own Oval Office comments, following Nixon's. Advertisement She was the daughter of mathematician John von Neumann, a polymath who developed game theory, made critical early advances in computer science, and played a central role in the development of the atomic bomb during World War II. He was one of several Hungarian Jewish emigres who worked on the Manhattan Project -- others included Leo Szilard and Edward Teller -- who came to be known, jokingly, as the Martians, for their intellectual brilliance and supposedly exotic personalities. In her 2012 memoir, 'The Martian's Daughter,' Dr. Whitman wrote that her father's immense intellectual accomplishments drove her to excel, especially as a woman in a male-dominated field like economics. Were it not for him, she wrote, 'I might not have pushed myself to such a level of academic achievement or set my sights on a lifelong professional commitment at a time when society made it difficult for a woman to combine a career with family obligations.' Marina von Neumann was born March 6, 1935, in New York City. Her parents, members of what she called 'the Jewish but highly assimilated haute bourgeoisie' of Budapest, had emigrated from Hungary in 1933, after her father received a professorship at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J. They divorced when Marina was 2. Her mother, Mariette (Kovesi) von Neumann, studied economics in college and later worked as the office administrator for a science consortium. After her divorce, she married James Kuper, a physicist who became a department chair at the Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island. Marina spent long stretches living with her father, whose Princeton home became a salon and way station for some of the country's leading intellectuals. Advertisement 'I was 15 before I realized this was not the normal American way of life,' she told The New York Times in 1972. The home, she added, was always filled with 'terribly interesting people and terribly interesting conversations.' She studied government at Radcliffe College, graduating at the top of her class in 1956. That same year, she married Robert F. Whitman, who was studying for his doctorate in English at Harvard. He died in 2024. Along with their son, Malcolm, a professor of developmental biology at Harvard, she leaves her half brother, George H. Kuper, and two grandchildren. Her daughter, Laura M. Whitman, an assistant professor of medicine at Yale University, died in 2023 at 59. Marina Whitman initially thought of becoming a journalist. But her first job after college, with the Educational Testing Service, ignited an interest in economics. She wanted to attend Princeton, but at the time, its acclaimed economics department did not accept female graduate students. Instead, she studied at Columbia University. After receiving her doctorate in 1966, she became a professor at Pittsburgh, where her husband taught English. They took leaves of absence in 1972, when she joined the Council of Economic Advisers, and moved to Washington with some intention of remaining there long term. But she resigned after just a year, disillusioned by the Watergate scandal that was beginning to unfold around Nixon. Dr. Whitman spent 13 years at General Motors. After she left in 1992, she taught at the University of Michigan's business and public policy schools. A lifelong Republican, she did not put herself forward as a feminist. But she did her part to prop open the doors she had gone through, for other women to follow. Advertisement 'There is a very small group of highly visible women who have now been offered a lot of boards,' Dr. Whitman told the Times in 1984. 'What has not developed as much as I hoped is going beyond that to a second wave. When I turn down offers, I sometimes have tried to suggest other women, but people do not react well to names they haven't heard before.' This article originally appeared in
CBS News
27-05-2025
- CBS News
Shapiro visits Pitt research facility to push his budget's investment in innovation
Gov. Josh Shapiro continues to make the push for parts of his budget. He stopped by facilities at the University of Pittsburgh on Tuesday to make his pitch for investments in life sciences. Shapiro visited Pitt's The Assembly facility, which is an old auto factory that turned into a research building focused on knowledge and discoveries related to cancer biology. The governor's budget calls for $50 million to spur this type of innovation, with a one-time $30 million payment to grow life sciences and $20 million coming annually. "We know that this is a profitable sector of the economy. It's a place that not only employs a whole lot of folks, over 100,000, wages tend to be pretty high," Shapiro said. The challenge he faces is a divided legislature. Based on party lines, Shapiro has the votes in the House for his budget but not the Senate. He said this issue goes beyond party lines and would be to the benefit of the commonwealth. Currently, the budget is sitting in the House waiting for a vote. "Everyone is going to have to compromise. I'm gonna have to compromise. The Senate led by Republicans are gonna have to compromise. The House led by Democrats are gonna have to compromise," Shapiro said. According to Shapiro, the Pittsburgh area is losing out on the money that comes from the research in the region. He said Pittsburgh needs to make ways for universities to complete clinical trials quicker, get a fast track to commercialize their work and then keep the talent that's being created. "Instead of then allowing that research and development that's been done here to be taken elsewhere for commercialization, we've got to create the ecosystem where it's being commercialized right here," Shapiro said. The governor's comments were echoed by local leaders who say this type of investment is needed to continue success and growth.
Yahoo
27-05-2025
- Yahoo
Opinion - In-office work mandates are bad for the environment
Office buildings across the country are filling up again as the air outside grows thicker with climate-warming gases. Federal agencies, state governments and many corporations now require employees to commute five days a week, reversing the remote-work flexibility adopted in 2020. Mounting research shows that those mandates carry a heavy environmental cost. A new satellite analysis by Mark Ma at the University of Pittsburgh, Betty Xing at Baylor University and Ling Zhang at Rowan University tracks carbon dioxide and nitrogen dioxide over the 10 most and 10 least flexible U.S. metropolitan areas. Using both NASA and European satellite instruments, the authors measured concentrations within a 20-mile radius of each downtown from 2017 to 2023. The flexible metros — places where remote and hybrid schedules remain common — kept carbon emission levels roughly flat between 2019 and 2022, whereas the least flexible metros endured a marked uptick. Nitrogen dioxide, a traffic pollutant, plunged everywhere when lockdowns began but rebounded far faster in rigid, office-centric cities. Those findings highlight the commuting tailpipe as a decisive source of urban greenhouse gases. Independent laboratory research aligns with the satellite record. A 2023 study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences calculated that moving from full-time office work to full-time work from home slashes an employee's work-related carbon footprint by as much as 58 percent. Employees who stay home two to four days a week still cut emissions 11 to 29 percent, whereas a token 'one day remote' policy trims only 2 percent because extra errands and higher home energy use cancel most of the advantage. Modeling by Cornell University and Microsoft echoes those numbers: fully remote staff register a 54 percent smaller footprint than in-office peers, and hybrid schedules deliver double-digit savings when adopted for at least two days per week. The researchers emphasize that while residential energy efficiency, household size and office design shape the final tally, transportation remains the dominant lever. In turn, a 2024 Applied Energy article comparing 'work from home' and 'work in office' scenarios found that remote arrangements cut daily per-person greenhouse-gas output by 29 percent. Traditional life at home — weekends and evenings — produced 13 percent more emissions than active telework, underscoring how commuting, not laptops, drives the difference. Critics of remote work often cite potential rebound effects. Indeed, a 2023 review in Energy and Buildings reported that heavy teleworkers can increase household energy demand by 16 to 117 percent, sometimes erasing transportation savings if homes rely on inefficient heating and cooling. Yet the same review notes that simple upgrades — heat-pump mini-splits, programmable thermostats, LED lighting — restore the net benefit. Policymakers who pair flexible schedules with residential efficiency incentives can capture the upside without the rebound. Evidence from the transportation sector adds another layer. University of Florida economists estimate that a 10 percent rise in remote workers slices national transportation-sector carbon dioxide by roughly 200 million tons per year — about the annual emissions of 43 million cars — while shrinking transit fare revenue 27 percent. The result calls for a reimagined funding model for buses and subways, not a retreat from telework. A systematic review by Hook, Sovacool, Sorrell and Court examined 39 empirical papers and concluded that 26 recorded net energy savings from telework, often up to 20 percent, largely through reduced vehicle travel. The most conservative analyses revealed smaller, but still positive, gains once added leisure trips and home energy were counted. Taken together, these studies dismantle the assertion that full-time return-to-office orders are climate neutral. The federal government's own sustainability plan pledges to cut agency emissions 65 percent by 2030. Yet more than 400,000 federal employees faced requirements to appear in person, the vast majority full-time, due to the new presidential administration's policies. States such as Texas, Ohio and Tennessee have matched that strictness, while giants like Amazon, JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs adopted five-day mandates. Each decree forces millions of additional car trips at a moment when the transportation sector already contributes 28 percent of U.S. greenhouse gases. Remote work is no panacea. It strains public transit budgets, shifts some emissions from city centers to suburbs, and can blur work-life boundaries. Still, the climate math remains clear: widespread telework and well-designed hybrid schedules dramatically curb the largest single source of American emissions: daily driving. Electric vehicles will eventually replace gasoline engines, but fleets turn over slowly; the average U.S. car now stays on the road more than 12 years. Working patterns, by contrast, can change overnight. Congress and the White House should treat flexible schedules as a verified decarbonization tool. Rather than blanket return-to-office edicts, federal agencies could set performance-based targets: for example, trim operational emissions 30 percent below 2019 by 2027 and allow each department to reach that mark through a mix of space consolidation, renewable procurement and telework. States and municipalities could follow suit, tying office occupancy guidelines to regional air-quality goals. Corporations that trumpet net-zero ambitions should publish commuting-related emissions alongside power and supply-chain data, then let employees choose the work pattern that meets both productivity and climate metrics. A few practical steps reinforce the environmental upside. Implementing timed energy audits and upgrade rebates for home offices guards against rebound effects. Converting unused cubicles into shared hoteling stations lets firms shrink leased square footage, cutting HVAC and lighting loads. Redirecting a sliver of those savings toward transit agencies stabilizes service for riders who must travel. Together, these moves build a virtuous cycle: fewer cars on highways, cleaner urban air, and leaner real estate overhead. Short of such reforms, mandatory in-office policies undercut the nation's climate commitments. Telework is already proven, popular and cost-effective. Ignoring its benefits hands an avoidable victory to rising carbon levels. The bottom line is simple. Requiring five days at a desk is no longer just a question of management style; it is an environmental decision whose consequences swirl above city skylines and linger in the atmosphere for centuries. Science delivers the verdict: flexible work shrinks carbon footprints. Policymakers and business executives now face their own test — whether to heed that verdict or watch tailpipe exhaust erase hard-won climate progress. Gleb Tsipursky, Ph.D., serves as the CEO of the hybrid work consultancy Disaster Avoidance Experts and authored the best-seller 'Returning to the Office and Leading Hybrid and Remote Teams.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
