Alberta remained a Conservative stronghold in the federal election, what happened to the Liberals and NDP?
Article content
Alberta was a sea of blue with a speck or two of orange and red in the 2025 federal election with the Conservatives picking up 34 of the 37 seats in the province.
Article content
Article content
Throughout the five-week campaign, polls suggested there was a chance the federal Liberals would finally break through the long-time Conservative stronghold, but ultimately failed to do so. The final result of the federal election in Alberta ended with the Conservatives regaining two ridings held by Liberal and NDP incumbents.
Article content
Article content
Postmedia spoke to Colin Aitchison, Western Canada director at communications firm Enterprise Canada and a former UCP staffer, to discuss why the federal NDP and Liberals failed to break through in Alberta, the role of split votes and why the province remains predominantly blue.
Article content
Article content
Canadians were expecting a tight race this federal election and, in Alberta specifically, several ridings were thought to potentially flip to the Liberal party.
Article content
Aitchison said Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre and his party were able to appeal to the 'traditional' Alberta Conservative base. He said Albertans have felt disenfranchised by the federal Liberals, despite a change in leadership with Liberal Leader Mark Carney and his positive reception from many Canadians.
Article content
Article content
Over the years, some Albertans have felt federal policies are often geared towards Quebec or Ontario and feel that Liberal governments are not pro-energy or resource development — two industries that drive Alberta's economy, according to Aitchison.
Article content
Article content
'They often see election results, except for this time around, decided before they even start counting ballots in Alberta and they feel that their role in Canada's Confederation, not to use Jason Kenney language, but they feel like they haven't been getting a fair deal,' Aitchison said.
Article content
'I think that's why we see time and time again, Conservative voters really coalescing and voting conservative federally, because they feel that that is the only party that will get those policies done rightfully or wrongfully.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Sun
31 minutes ago
- Toronto Sun
Visitors on expired visas expected to leave on their own: Immigration Minister
Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Lena Metlege Diab rises during Question Period on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Thursday, June 5, 2025. Photo by Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS Visitors who have stayed in Canada well past their visa expiry dates are required to leave the country on their own, Immigration Minister Lena Diab said. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account It is not up to the Immigration Department to enforce the removal of deportees, she added. 'Anybody whose visa expired is expected to leave,' Diab said Monday night in the House of Commons, according to Blacklock's Reporter . A 2024 government briefing note indicated there may be up to half a million undocumented migrants in Canada. Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner questioned why the government allowed a large number of people into the country on temporary visas. 'Why is she persisting in letting in hundreds of thousands of people when Canada is in the middle of a health-care crisis?' said Rempel Garner. Diab replied that the Liberal government under new Prime Minister Mark Carney is 'working towards sustainable immigration by reducing our temporary resident numbers.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'That's baloney,' said Rempel Garner. 'All the statistics show they've actually increased those numbers. Meanwhile, Canadians can't get into an emergency room. Why are they persisting in bringing in hundreds of thousands of students and foreign workers on temporary visas when people can't find jobs?' According to Diab, Canada has allowed 290,000 new foreign students so far this year. However, she didn't address how many of the 1,040,985 international students in Canada in 2023 are still here after their study permits expired. 'The reality is there were way less than 290,000 housing starts last year and there's a lot more than 290,000 people waiting for family doctors right now,' Rempel Garner said. 'Why is she persisting in raising immigration levels when people can't find a doctor or a job?' Diab reiterated that the government is working on sustainable immigration levels. In April 2024, a briefing note titled Undocumented Migrants said the number of people who didn't leave after their visas expired could be as much as half a million. 'There are no accurate figures representing the number or composition of undocumented immigrants residing in Canada,' the note said. 'Estimates suggest the population could be a high as 500,000.' Read More NHL Toronto Maple Leafs NHL Columnists Toronto Blue Jays
Vancouver Sun
37 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
Who's responsible for online harms? Responsibility for troubled file floats between ministers
OTTAWA — As ministers settle into their new roles, discussions are underway about who is best suited to steer the government's efforts to legislate against online harms, cabinet minister Steven Guilbeault said on Tuesday. Questions have arisen about which minister and department would be best suited to handle the complicated issue after the Liberals' proposed Online Harms Act died in Parliament when Prime Minister Mark Carney triggered a federal election in March. 'It's a good question,' said Guilbeault, who oversees the Canadian Heritage department, told reporters on his way into the Liberals' weekly cabinet meeting. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. 'We're having conversations to see what would be the most appropriate department to bring this forward.' Canadian Heritage had been the first department to develop and later introduce the Liberals' initial plan to combat the harms Canadian users experience online. That proposal, which was released in 2021, was met with widespread backlash over concerns about the requirement for social media companies to remove content within 24 hours after receiving a complaint. Experts had warned the provision was overly broad and risked infringing on free expression, given that companies could remove legal content. The Liberals then struck an advisory group and got to work on figuring out a Plan B. Responsibility for the bill also shifted from Canadian Heritage to the Justice Department. In early 2024, former justice minister Arif Vriani introduced Bill C-63, which proposed to create a new digital safety regulator that would be tasked with ensuring social media giants took steps to reduce users' access to content, such as child sex abuse images and incite extremism and violence. That bill was also met with backlash over its proposal to introduce stiffer sentences for hate-related offences and reintroduce a controversial section to the Canadian Human Rights Act to allow people to bring forward complaints of hate speech, which civil liberties advocates and Parliamentarians said risked violating free speech. Virani spent months defending the need for the tougher Criminal Code measures to be included in the online safety bill, but last December announced the government was prepared to split the bill to help get it passed. In January, former prime minister Justin Trudeau announced his resignation and that Parliament would be suspended until March. Emily Laidlaw, a Canada Research Chair in cybersecurity law at the University of Calgary, who sat on the government's expert advisory group, said it was a mistake for the government to have combined different provisions into the same legislation and that by the time it announced the legislation would be split, 'it was too late.' 'What I'm hoping is, when they reintroduce it, they have very firmly the platform regulation law,' she says. Should the Liberals want to propose changes to the Criminal Code or the Canadian Human Rights Act, that should be separate, she said. Justice Minister Sean Fraser told reporters on Tuesday that the government was going to look at different measures when it comes to protecting children online, but would have more to say in the months ahead. One new factor in how the Liberals may decide to proceed is the fact that Carney named to his cabinet the country's first minister responsible for artificial intelligence and digital innovation, a position currently held by former broadcaster Evan Solomon, who was elected in late April's general election. The Liberals in their last bill listed AI-generated sexualized 'deepfakes' as one of the harms companies would have to take steps to tackle. Asked whether online harms would fall under his mandate, Solomon told reporters on Tuesday that it was 'up for debate.' 'But probably yeah.' Laidlaw said while she does not believe the government needs to start a new round of consultations, it ought to take a second look at the scope of harms it is seeking to tackle. For example, she suggested there was room to include the issue of identity fraud. 'I actually think it should be broadened to include some of the ways that AI can be used to facilitate harm, so it might not just be the typical social media on Instagram.' Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
Calgary Herald
38 minutes ago
- Calgary Herald
Who's responsible for online harms? Responsibility for troubled file floats between ministers
OTTAWA — As ministers settle into their new roles, discussions are underway about who is best suited to steer the government's efforts to legislate against online harms, cabinet minister Steven Guilbeault said on Tuesday. Article content Questions have arisen about which minister and department would be best suited to handle the complicated issue after the Liberals' proposed Online Harms Act died in Parliament when Prime Minister Mark Carney triggered a federal election in March. Article content Article content Article content 'It's a good question,' said Guilbeault, who oversees the Canadian Heritage department, told reporters on his way into the Liberals' weekly cabinet meeting. Article content Article content 'We're having conversations to see what would be the most appropriate department to bring this forward.' Article content Canadian Heritage had been the first department to develop and later introduce the Liberals' initial plan to combat the harms Canadian users experience online. Article content That proposal, which was released in 2021, was met with widespread backlash over concerns about the requirement for social media companies to remove content within 24 hours after receiving a complaint. Article content Experts had warned the provision was overly broad and risked infringing on free expression, given that companies could remove legal content. Article content The Liberals then struck an advisory group and got to work on figuring out a Plan B. Article content Article content Responsibility for the bill also shifted from Canadian Heritage to the Justice Department. Article content In early 2024, former justice minister Arif Vriani introduced Bill C-63, which proposed to create a new digital safety regulator that would be tasked with ensuring social media giants took steps to reduce users' access to content, such as child sex abuse images and incite extremism and violence. Article content That bill was also met with backlash over its proposal to introduce stiffer sentences for hate-related offences and reintroduce a controversial section to the Canadian Human Rights Act to allow people to bring forward complaints of hate speech, which civil liberties advocates and Parliamentarians said risked violating free speech.
